Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!
The goal of this overview is to provide a detailed comparison of two popular camera models from Entry-Level DSLR category, introduced by Sony. We are going to take a closer look at the technical and physical characteristics, features, and performance. The models we are going to assess and compare in this review are SLT-A68 and SLT-A65. The first common feature of Sony SLT-A68 and Sony SLT-A65 that is worth mentioning is sensor. Both cameras feature CMOS sensors with a resolution of 24.0 MP.
Now, before we can move on to our comparison, let's take a moment to look at the key characteristics of Sony SLT-A68 and Sony SLT-A65.
Sony SLT-A68 Key Features:
Sony SLT-A65 Key Features:
Being a newer model, Sony SLT-A68 substituted Sony A65.
|Flash Range||12 vs 10||2 better flash range|
|Number Of Focus Points||79 vs 15||64 more focus points|
|Number Of Cross Focus Points||15 vs 3||12 more cross focus points|
|Weight||610 g vs 622 g||12 g lighter|
|Dxo Color Depth||24.1 vs 23.4||Better color depth|
|Dxo Dynamic Range||13.5 vs 12.6||Better dynamic range|
|Gps||Built-in vs No||Has GPS|
|Continuous Shooting||10 fps vs 8 fps||2 fps faster|
|Screen Size||3″ vs 2.7″||0.3" larger screen|
|Screen Type||Fully Articulated vs Tilting||Flexible shooting positions|
|Screen Resolution||921k dots vs 461k dots||49.9% higher resolution screen|
|Battery Life||560 shots vs 510 shots||50 more frames with a single charge|
|Dxo Low Light Iso||717 vs 701||Better High ISO performance|
|Viewfinder Resolution||2,359k dots vs 1,440k dots||39% higher resolution|
|Viewfinder Magnification||0.73 vs 0.57||0.16 better magnification|
|Screen Type||Tilting | Fully Articulated||Help viewing and changing settings easily|
|Viewfinder||Electronic | Electronic||Better framing and control|
|Raw Support||Yes | Yes||Better image quality|
|Sensor Resolution||24.0 MP | 24.0 MP||Bigger prints and more details|
|AutoFocus Face Detection||Yes | Yes||Very handy for portraits|
|Microphone Port||Yes | Yes||High quality audio recording option|
|Bracketing||Yes | Yes||Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR|
|Continuous Shooting||8.0 fps | 10.0 fps||Nice continuous shooting|
|Built-In Flash||Yes | Yes||External flash available|
|Image Stabilization||Yes | Yes||Built-in stabilization|
|Flash Sync Port||Yes | Yes||Port for Flash Sync|
|Battery Life||510 shots | 560 shots||Big number of frames with a single charge|
|Touch Screen||No | No||No touch screen|
|Screen Resolution||461k dots | 921k dots||Small screen resolution|
|Headphone Port||No | No||No headphone port|
|Timelapse Recording||No | No||No timelapse recording|
|Environmental Sealing||No | No||No environmental sealing|
Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Sony SLT-A68 and Sony SLT-A65 from the front view.
Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.
After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.
Speaking of weight, Sony SLT-A68 is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 12g less than the Sony SLT-A65. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.
Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.
Are Sony SLT-A68 and Sony SLT-A65 any different in terms of sensor type?
In terms of sensor type and resolution, these models are identical. Both Sony SLT-A68 and Sony SLT-A65 come equipped with the same CMOS that has a resolution of 24.0 MP. Thus, if you are wondering, which option to choose, this is not a factor you should be looking at.
Take a look below to find the comparison of Sony SLT-A68 and Sony SLT-A65 by the size of their sensors.
Sony SLT-A68 and Sony SLT-A65 are identical by this indicator, as each feature a sensor of the same size. Thus, both cameras will provide the same level of control in terms of the depth of field if you use them with the same focal length and aperture.
If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.
This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Sony SLT-A68 and Sony SLT-A65 in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.
|Photography Type||Sony SLT-A68||Sony SLT-A65|
Disadvantages:No Significant Disadvantages
Disadvantages:No Significant Disadvantages
Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Sony SLT-A68 or Sony SLT-A65, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.
What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Sony SLT-A68 and Sony SLT-A65 here is what we can say in conclusion:
According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Sony SLT-A65 deserves a higher Total Score than the Sony SLT-A68. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.
For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:
|Sony SLT-A68||Sony SLT-A65|
|Announced||Nov 06, 2015||Nov 15, 2011|
|Body Type||Compact SLR||Compact SLR|
|Sensor Dimensions||23.5 x 15.6 mm||23.5 x 15.6 mm|
|Sensor Area||366.60 mm2||366.60 mm2|
|Sensor Resolution||24.0 MP||24.0 MP|
|Max Image Resolution||6000 x 4000||6000 x 4000|
|Max Native ISO||25,600||12,800|
|Max Boosted ISO||n/a||25,600|
|Min Native ISO||100||100|
|Lens Mount||Sony/Minolta Alpha||Sony/Minolta Alpha|
|Number of Lenses||141||141|
|Focal Length Multiplier||1.5x||1.5x|
|Macro Focus Range|
|AF Multi Area|
|AF Live View|
|AF Face Detection|
|AF Contrast Detection|
|AF Phase Detection|
|Number of Focus Points||79||15|
|Number of Cross Focus Points||15||3|
|Screen Type||Tilting||Fully Articulated|
|Screen Resolution||461k dots||921k dots|
|ViewFinder Resolution||1,440k dots||2,359k dots|
|Min Shutter Speed||30 s||30 s|
|Max Shutter Speed||1/4000 s||1/4000 s|
|Continuous Shooting||8.0 fps||10.0 fps|
|Manual Exposure Mode|
|Custom White Balance|
|Flash Modes||Flash off, Auto, Fill-flash, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction, Rear sync, Wireless, High Speed sync||Auto, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless|
|DxO Sensor Scores|
|DxO Sensor Score||79||74|
|DxO Color Depth||24.1||23.4|
|DxO Dynamic Range||13.5||12.6|
|DxO Low Light ISO||701||717|
|Video Resolutions||1920 x 1080 (60i, 30p, 24p), 1440 x 1080, 640 x 480||1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps)|
|Max Video Resolution||1920 x 1080||1920 x 1080|
|Video Formats||MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S||MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264|
|USB||USB 2.0||USB 2.0|
|Weight||610 g||622 g|
|Physical Dimensions||143 x 104 x 81 mm||132 x 97 x 81 mm|
|Battery Life||510 shots||560 shots|
|Battery Type||Battery Pack||Battery Pack|
|Storage Type||SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo||SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo|