Sony Alpha a6400 vs Fujifilm X-T3
Sony Alpha a6400 vs Fujifilm X-T3: a Complete Review and Comparison
Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!
In this review, we are going to provide a detailed evaluation and comparison of two different camera models that fall into the same category - Semi-Pro Mirrorless. Although these cameras are from the same category, they were introduced by different brands - Sony and Fujifilm. Models we are reviewing in this article have different types of sensors, Thus, Sony Alpha a6400 is equipped with a 24.0 MP CMOS sensor. Fujifilm X-T3, on the contrary, features BSI-CMOS sensor with a resolution of 26.0 MP.
To get started, let’s take a look at some of the key features of Sony Alpha a6400 and Fujifilm X-T3 and, after this, we can go on to our detailed comparison of these models.
Sony Alpha a6400 Key Features:
- 24.0 MP APS-C CMOS sensor
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Expands to 102800)
- Image Stabilization: No
- 3″ Tilting Screen
- ViewFinder: Yes
- 11.0 fps Continuous Shooting
- Video: 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM
- Built-in Wireless: Yes
- Dimensions: 120 x 67 x 60 mm
- Weight: 403 g
- Environmental Sealing: Yes
- Built-in GPS: No
Fujifilm X-T3 Key Features:
- 26.0 MP APS-C BSI-CMOS sensor
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Expands to 80 - 51200)
- Image Stabilization: No
- 3.2″ Tilting Screen
- ViewFinder: Yes
- 20.0 fps Continuous Shooting
- Video: 4096x2160 (60p/50p/30p/25p/24p/23.98p)
- Built-in Wireless: Yes
- Dimensions: 133 x 93 x 59 mm
- Weight: 539 g
- Environmental Sealing: Yes
- Built-in GPS: No
- Replaced Fujifilm X-T2. Compare
Why is Sony Alpha a6400 a better choice than Fujifilm X-T3
| NFC | Yes vs No | Easy wireless connectivity with compatible devices |
| Built-In Flash | Yes vs No | All the lenses are stabilized |
| Flash Range | 6 vs No | 6 better flash range |
| Battery Life | 410 shots vs 390 shots | 20 more frames with a single charge |
| Weight | 403 g vs 539 g | 136 g lighter |
What are the key reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T3 over Sony Alpha a6400
| Storage Slots | 2 vs 1 | Extra storage slot |
| Sensor Resolution | 26.0 MP vs 24.0 MP | 7.7% more pixels |
| Continuous Shooting | 20 fps vs 11 fps | 9 fps faster |
| Max Shutter Speed | 1/8000 vs 1/4000 | Faster shutter speed |
| Screen Size | 3.2″ vs 3″ | 0.2" larger screen |
| Screen Resolution | 1,040k dots vs 922k dots | 11.3% higher resolution screen |
| Max Video Resolution | 4096 x 2160 vs 3840 x 2160 | Higher Resolution Video |
| Headphone Port | Yes vs No | Has headphone port |
| Viewfinder Resolution | 3,690k dots vs 2,359k dots | 36.1% higher resolution |
| Viewfinder Magnification | 0.75 vs 0.7 | 0.05 better magnification |
Key PROs of Sony Alpha a6400 and Fujifilm X-T3
| Touch Screen | Yes | Yes | Easy control of camera functions |
| Screen Size | 3″ | 3.2″ | Large display |
| Screen Type | Tilting | Tilting | Help viewing and changing settings easily |
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic | Better framing and control |
| Raw Support | Yes | Yes | Better image quality |
| Sensor Resolution | 24.0 MP | 26.0 MP | Bigger prints and more details |
| AutoFocus Face Detection | Yes | Yes | Very handy for portraits |
| Microphone Port | Yes | Yes | High quality audio recording option |
| Timelapse Recording | Yes | Yes | Creative shooting |
| Bracketing | Yes | Yes | Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR |
| Continuous Shooting | 11.0 fps | 20.0 fps | Nice continuous shooting |
| Flash Sync Port | Yes | Yes | Port for Flash Sync |
| Environmental Sealing | Yes | Yes | Shoot at tough conditions |
Key CONs of Sony Alpha a6400 and Fujifilm X-T3
| Image Stabilization | No | No | No image stabilization |
Sony Alpha a6400 vs Fujifilm X-T3: Comparing Two Models By Physical Characteristics
Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Sony Alpha a6400 and Fujifilm X-T3 from the front view.
Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.
After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.
Speaking of weight, Sony Alpha a6400 is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 136g less than the Fujifilm X-T3. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.
Comparing Sony Alpha a6400 and Fujifilm X-T3 by the type of Sensor and Resolution
Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.
Are Sony Alpha a6400 and Fujifilm X-T3 any different in terms of sensor type?
In fact, that's exactly what makes these two models really different. Thus, it is a good point to consider if your are choosing between these two cameras. Sony Alpha a6400 features a 24.0 MP APS-C sized CMOS sensor and boasts of a Bionz X processor . Fujifilm X-T3, in its turn, comes with a 26.0 MP APS-C sized BSI-CMOS sensor , which makes it significantly different from the first model.
Take a look below to find the comparison of Sony Alpha a6400 and Fujifilm X-T3 by the size of their sensors.
Sony Alpha a6400 and Fujifilm X-T3 are identical by this indicator, as each feature a sensor of the same size. Thus, both cameras will provide the same level of control in terms of the depth of field if you use them with the same focal length and aperture.
For Which Fields Of Photography Are Sony Alpha a6400 and Fujifilm X-T3 Suitable?
If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.
This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Sony Alpha a6400 and Fujifilm X-T3 in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.
| Photography Type | Sony Alpha a6400 | Fujifilm X-T3 |
|---|---|---|
| Portrait Photography |
|
|
| Street Photography |
|
|
| Sports Photography |
|
|
| Daily Photography |
|
|
| Landscape Photography |
|
|
Sony Alpha a6400 for Portrait Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
- High resolution sensor (24 MP)
- Face Detection Focusing
Disadvantages:
- No Image Stabilization
Fujifilm X-T3 for Portrait Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
- High resolution sensor (26 MP)
- Fast Max Shutter Speed (1/8000s)
- Face Detection Focusing
Disadvantages:
- No Image Stabilization
Sony Alpha a6400 for Street Photography
Advantages:
- Built-in View Finder
- Live View
- Large APS-C(23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
Disadvantages:
- Big size (120 x 67 x 60 mm)
- No Image Stabilization
Fujifilm X-T3 for Street Photography
Advantages:
- Built-in View Finder
- Live View
- Large APS-C(23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
Disadvantages:
- Big size (133 x 93 x 59 mm)
- No Image Stabilization
Sony Alpha a6400 for Sports Photography
Advantages:
- Fast Continuous Shooting (11.0 fps)
- Environmental Sealing
- Big Number of autofocus Points (425)
Disadvantages:
- Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
- Small battery life (410 shots)
Fujifilm X-T3 for Sports Photography
Advantages:
- Fast Continuous Shooting (20.0 fps)
- Environmental Sealing
- Fast Max Shutter Speed (1/8000s)
- Big Number of autofocus Points (425)
Disadvantages:
- Bad Max Native ISO (12800)
- Small battery life (390 shots)
Sony Alpha a6400 for Daily Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
- Built-in Flash
- Built-in View Finder
- Live View
- Wireless Connectivity
- Video is available
Disadvantages:
- Big weight (403 g)
- Big size (120 x 67 x 60 mm)
Fujifilm X-T3 for Daily Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
- Built-in View Finder
- Live View
- Wireless Connectivity
- Video is available
Disadvantages:
- Big weight (539 g)
- Big size (133 x 93 x 59 mm)
- No Built-in Flash
Sony Alpha a6400 for Landscape Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
- High resolution sensor (24 MP)
- Good Dynamic Range (13.6)
- Environmental Sealing
- Live View
- RAW Support
Disadvantages:
No Significant DisadvantagesFujifilm X-T3 for Landscape Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
- High resolution sensor (26 MP)
- Environmental Sealing
- Live View
- RAW Support
Disadvantages:
- Bad Max Native ISO (12800)
Comparison of Sony Alpha a6400 vs Fujifilm X-T3: Final Verdict
Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Sony Alpha a6400 or Fujifilm X-T3, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.
What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Sony Alpha a6400 and Fujifilm X-T3 here is what we can say in conclusion:
According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Sony Alpha a6400 deserves a higher Total Score than the Fujifilm X-T3. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.
Sony Alpha a6400 vs Fujifilm X-T3 Table Of Technical Specs
For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:
| Sony Alpha a6400 | Fujifilm X-T3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Brand | Sony | Fujifilm |
| Model | Alpha a6400 | X-T3 |
| Announced | Jan 15, 2019 | Sep 06, 2018 |
| Body Type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor | ||
| Sensor Type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor Size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor Dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6 mm | 23.5 x 15.6 mm |
| Sensor Area | 366.60 mm2 | 366.60 mm2 |
| Sensor Resolution | 24.0 MP | 26.0 MP |
| Max Image Resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 6240 x 4160 |
| Max Native ISO | 32,000 | 12,800 |
| Max Boosted ISO | 102,800 | 51,200 |
| Min Native ISO | 100 | 160 |
| RAW Support |  |
|
| Lens | ||
| Manual Focus | |
|
| Lens Mount | Sony E | Fujifilm X |
| Number of Lenses | 102 | 43 |
| Focal Length Multiplier | 1.5x | 1.5x |
| Macro Focus Range | ||
| AutoFocus | ||
| AF Touch | |
|
| AF Continuous | |
|
| AF Single | |
|
| AF Tracking | |
|
| AF Selective | |
|
| AF Center | |
|
| AF Multi Area | |
|
| AF Live View | |
|
| AF Face Detection | |
|
| AF Contrast Detection | |
|
| AF Phase Detection | |
|
| Number of Focus Points | 425 | 425 |
| Number of Cross Focus Points | n/a | n/a |
| Screen | ||
| Screen Type | Tilting | Tilting |
| Screen Size | 3″ | 3.2″ |
| Screen Resolution | 922k dots | 1,040k dots |
| Live View | |
|
| Touch Screen | |
|
| ViewFinder | ||
| ViewFinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| ViewFinder Resolution | 2,359k dots | 3,690k dots |
| ViewFinder Coverage | 100% | 100% |
| ViewFinder Magnification | 0.7 | 0.75 |
| Photography Features | ||
| Min Shutter Speed | 30 s | 30 s |
| Max Shutter Speed | 1/4000 s | 1/8000 s |
| Continuous Shooting | 11.0 fps | 20.0 fps |
| Shutter Priority | |
|
| Aperture Priority | |
|
| Manual Exposure Mode | |
|
| Exposure Compensation | |
|
| Custom White Balance | |
|
| Image Stabilization |  |
|
| Built-in Flash | |
|
| Flash Range | 6 | 0 |
| Flash Modes | auto, slow sync, rear sync, redeye reduction, wireless, hi-speed sync | no built-in flash |
| External Flash | |
|
| AE Bracketing | |
|
| WB Bracketing | |
|
| Exposure Modes | ||
| Multi-Segment | |
|
| Average | |
|
| Spot | |
|
| Partial | |
|
| AF-Area | |
|
| Center Weighted | |
|
| Video Features | ||
| Video Resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM | 4096x2160 (60p/50p/30p/25p/24p/23.98p) |
| Max Video Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 4096 x 2160 |
| Video Formats | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 |
| Microphone Port | |
|
| Headphone Port | |
|
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless Connectivity | |
|
| HDMI | |
|
| USB | USB 2.0 | USB 3.0 |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental Sealing | |
|
| Water Proof | |
|
| Dust Proof | |
|
| Shock Proof | |
|
| Crush Proof | |
|
| Freeze Proof | |
|
| Weight | 403 g | 539 g |
| Physical Dimensions | 120 x 67 x 60 mm | 133 x 93 x 59 mm |
| Battery Life | 410 shots | 390 shots |
| Battery Type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery Model | NP-FW50 | n/a |
| Other Features | ||
| Self Timer | |
|
| Timelapse Recording | |
|
| GPS | ||
| Storage Type | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick DUO (UHS-I compliant) | n/a |
| Storage Slots | 1 | 2 |
Most popular cameras
Four Thirds
APS-C
APS-C
1"
APS-C
