Sony Alpha a6400 vs Fujifilm X-T20
Sony Alpha a6400 vs Fujifilm X-T20: a Complete Review and Comparison
Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!
In this review, we are going to make a detailed comparison of two cameras that fall into different categories. While the first model we are looking at, Sony Alpha a6400 belongs to a Semi-Pro Mirrorless category, the other model, Sony Alpha a6400 is a Entry-Level Mirrorless camera. Both models feature different types of sensors. Thus, Sony Alpha a6400 comes with CMOS sensor that has a resolution of 24.0 MP resolution, while our second compared model Fujifilm X-T20 features a 24.0 MP CMOS X-TRANS III sensor.
To get started, let’s take a look at some of the key features of Sony Alpha a6400 and Fujifilm X-T20 and, after this, we can go on to our detailed comparison of these models.
Sony Alpha a6400 Key Features:
- 24.0 MP APS-C CMOS sensor
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Expands to 102800)
- Image Stabilization: No
- 3″ Tilting Screen
- ViewFinder: Yes
- 11.0 fps Continuous Shooting
- Video: 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM
- Built-in Wireless: Yes
- Dimensions: 120 x 67 x 60 mm
- Weight: 403 g
- Environmental Sealing: Yes
- Built-in GPS: No
Fujifilm X-T20 Key Features:
- 24.0 MP APS-C CMOS X-TRANS III sensor
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Expands to 100 - 51200)
- Image Stabilization: No
- 3.2″ Tilting Screen
- ViewFinder: Yes
- 14.0 fps Continuous Shooting
- Video: 3840 x 2160 (29.97p, 25p, 24p, 23.98p), 1920 x 1080 (59.94p, 50p, 29.97p, 25p, 24p, 23.98p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p)
- Built-in Wireless: Yes
- Dimensions: 118 x 83 x 41 mm
- Weight: 383 g
- Environmental Sealing: No
- Built-in GPS: Yes
- Replaced Fujifilm X-T10. Compare
Why is Sony Alpha a6400 a better choice than Fujifilm X-T20
| NFC | Yes vs No | Easy wireless connectivity with compatible devices |
| Bluetooth | Yes vs No | Connect your camera to other devices via Bluetooth |
| Flash Range | 6 vs 5 | 1 better flash range |
| Number Of Focus Points | 425 vs 325 | 100 more focus points |
| Screen Resolution | 922k dots vs 920k dots | 0.2% higher resolution screen |
| Battery Life | 410 shots vs 350 shots | 60 more frames with a single charge |
| Environmental Sealing | Yes vs No | Shoot at tough conditions |
| Viewfinder Magnification | 0.7 vs 0.62 | 0.08 better magnification |
What are the key reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T20 over Sony Alpha a6400
| Sensor Area | 368.16 mm2 vs 366.6 mm2 | 0.4% larger pixel area |
| Continuous Shooting | 14 fps vs 11 fps | 3 fps faster |
| Screen Size | 3.2″ vs 3″ | 0.2" larger screen |
| Weight | 383 g vs 403 g | 20 g lighter |
| Viewfinder Resolution | 2,360k dots vs 2,359k dots | 0% higher resolution |
Key PROs of Sony Alpha a6400 and Fujifilm X-T20
| Touch Screen | Yes | Yes | Easy control of camera functions |
| Screen Size | 3″ | 3.2″ | Large display |
| Screen Type | Tilting | Tilting | Help viewing and changing settings easily |
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic | Better framing and control |
| Raw Support | Yes | Yes | Better image quality |
| Sensor Resolution | 24.0 MP | 24.0 MP | Bigger prints and more details |
| AutoFocus Face Detection | Yes | Yes | Very handy for portraits |
| Microphone Port | Yes | Yes | High quality audio recording option |
| Timelapse Recording | Yes | Yes | Creative shooting |
| Bracketing | Yes | Yes | Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR |
| Continuous Shooting | 11.0 fps | 14.0 fps | Nice continuous shooting |
| Built-In Flash | Yes | Yes | External flash available |
| Flash Sync Port | Yes | Yes | Port for Flash Sync |
Key CONs of Sony Alpha a6400 and Fujifilm X-T20
| Screen Resolution | 922k dots | 920k dots | Small screen resolution |
| Headphone Port | No | No | No headphone port |
| Image Stabilization | No | No | No image stabilization |
Sony Alpha a6400 vs Fujifilm X-T20: Comparing Two Models By Physical Characteristics
Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Sony Alpha a6400 and Fujifilm X-T20 from the front view.
Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.
After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.
Speaking of weight, Fujifilm X-T20 is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 20g less than the Sony Alpha a6400. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.
Comparing Sony Alpha a6400 and Fujifilm X-T20 by the type of Sensor and Resolution
Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.
Are Sony Alpha a6400 and Fujifilm X-T20 any different in terms of sensor type?
Take a look below to find the comparison of Sony Alpha a6400 and Fujifilm X-T20 by the size of their sensors.
Sony Alpha a6400 and Fujifilm X-T20 are identical by this indicator, as each feature a sensor of the same size. Thus, both cameras will provide the same level of control in terms of the depth of field if you use them with the same focal length and aperture.
For Which Fields Of Photography Are Sony Alpha a6400 and Fujifilm X-T20 Suitable?
If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.
This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Sony Alpha a6400 and Fujifilm X-T20 in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.
| Photography Type | Sony Alpha a6400 | Fujifilm X-T20 |
|---|---|---|
| Portrait Photography |
|
|
| Street Photography |
|
|
| Sports Photography |
|
|
| Daily Photography |
|
|
| Landscape Photography |
|
|
Sony Alpha a6400 for Portrait Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
- High resolution sensor (24 MP)
- Face Detection Focusing
Disadvantages:
- No Image Stabilization
Fujifilm X-T20 for Portrait Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.6 x 15.6 mm) sensor
- High resolution sensor (24 MP)
- Face Detection Focusing
Disadvantages:
- No Image Stabilization
Sony Alpha a6400 for Street Photography
Advantages:
- Built-in View Finder
- Live View
- Large APS-C(23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
Disadvantages:
- Big size (120 x 67 x 60 mm)
- No Image Stabilization
Fujifilm X-T20 for Street Photography
Advantages:
- Built-in View Finder
- Live View
- Large APS-C(23.6 x 15.6 mm) sensor
Disadvantages:
- Big size (118 x 83 x 41 mm)
- No Image Stabilization
Sony Alpha a6400 for Sports Photography
Advantages:
- Fast Continuous Shooting (11.0 fps)
- Environmental Sealing
- Big Number of autofocus Points (425)
Disadvantages:
- Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
- Small battery life (410 shots)
Fujifilm X-T20 for Sports Photography
Advantages:
- Fast Continuous Shooting (14.0 fps)
- Big Number of autofocus Points (325)
Disadvantages:
- No Environmental Sealing
- Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
- Bad Max Native ISO (12800)
- Small battery life (350 shots)
Sony Alpha a6400 for Daily Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
- Built-in Flash
- Built-in View Finder
- Live View
- Wireless Connectivity
- Video is available
Disadvantages:
- Big weight (403 g)
- Big size (120 x 67 x 60 mm)
Fujifilm X-T20 for Daily Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.6 x 15.6 mm) sensor
- Built-in Flash
- Built-in View Finder
- Live View
- Wireless Connectivity
- Video is available
Disadvantages:
- Big size (118 x 83 x 41 mm)
Sony Alpha a6400 for Landscape Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
- High resolution sensor (24 MP)
- Good Dynamic Range (13.6)
- Environmental Sealing
- Live View
- RAW Support
Disadvantages:
No Significant DisadvantagesFujifilm X-T20 for Landscape Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.6 x 15.6 mm) sensor
- High resolution sensor (24 MP)
- Live View
- RAW Support
Disadvantages:
- No Environmental Sealing
- Bad Max Native ISO (12800)
Comparison of Sony Alpha a6400 vs Fujifilm X-T20: Final Verdict
Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Sony Alpha a6400 or Fujifilm X-T20, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.
What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Sony Alpha a6400 and Fujifilm X-T20 here is what we can say in conclusion:
According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Sony Alpha a6400 deserves a higher Total Score than the Fujifilm X-T20. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.
Sony Alpha a6400 vs Fujifilm X-T20 Table Of Technical Specs
For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:
| Sony Alpha a6400 | Fujifilm X-T20 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Brand | Sony | Fujifilm |
| Model | Alpha a6400 | X-T20 |
| Announced | Jan 15, 2019 | Jan 18, 2017 |
| Body Type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor | ||
| Sensor Type | CMOS | CMOS X-TRANS III |
| Sensor Size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor Dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6 mm | 23.6 x 15.6 mm |
| Sensor Area | 366.60 mm2 | 368.16 mm2 |
| Sensor Resolution | 24.0 MP | 24.0 MP |
| Max Image Resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Max Native ISO | 32,000 | 12,800 |
| Max Boosted ISO | 102,800 | 51,200 |
| Min Native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW Support |  |
|
| Lens | ||
| Manual Focus | |
|
| Lens Mount | Sony E | Fujifilm X |
| Number of Lenses | 102 | 43 |
| Focal Length Multiplier | 1.5x | 1.5x |
| Macro Focus Range | ||
| AutoFocus | ||
| AF Touch | |
|
| AF Continuous | |
|
| AF Single | |
|
| AF Tracking | |
|
| AF Selective | |
|
| AF Center | |
|
| AF Multi Area | |
|
| AF Live View | |
|
| AF Face Detection | |
|
| AF Contrast Detection | |
|
| AF Phase Detection | |
|
| Number of Focus Points | 425 | 325 |
| Number of Cross Focus Points | n/a | n/a |
| Screen | ||
| Screen Type | Tilting | Tilting |
| Screen Size | 3″ | 3.2″ |
| Screen Resolution | 922k dots | 920k dots |
| Live View | |
|
| Touch Screen | |
|
| ViewFinder | ||
| ViewFinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| ViewFinder Resolution | 2,359k dots | 2,360k dots |
| ViewFinder Coverage | 100% | 100% |
| ViewFinder Magnification | 0.7 | 0.62 |
| Photography Features | ||
| Min Shutter Speed | 30 s | 30 s |
| Max Shutter Speed | 1/4000 s | 1/4000 s |
| Continuous Shooting | 11.0 fps | 14.0 fps |
| Shutter Priority | |
|
| Aperture Priority | |
|
| Manual Exposure Mode | |
|
| Exposure Compensation | |
|
| Custom White Balance | |
|
| Image Stabilization |  |
|
| Built-in Flash | |
|
| Flash Range | 6 | 5 |
| Flash Modes | auto, slow sync, rear sync, redeye reduction, wireless, hi-speed sync | Auto, forced flash, slow synchro, flash off, rear-curtain synchro, commander |
| External Flash | |
|
| AE Bracketing | |
|
| WB Bracketing | |
|
| Exposure Modes | ||
| Multi-Segment | |
|
| Average | |
|
| Spot | |
|
| Partial | |
|
| AF-Area | |
|
| Center Weighted | |
|
| Video Features | ||
| Video Resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 (29.97p, 25p, 24p, 23.98p), 1920 x 1080 (59.94p, 50p, 29.97p, 25p, 24p, 23.98p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) |
| Max Video Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 |
| Video Formats | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone Port | |
|
| Headphone Port | |
|
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless Connectivity | |
|
| HDMI | |
|
| USB | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental Sealing | |
|
| Water Proof | |
|
| Dust Proof | |
|
| Shock Proof | |
|
| Crush Proof | |
|
| Freeze Proof | |
|
| Weight | 403 g | 383 g |
| Physical Dimensions | 120 x 67 x 60 mm | 118 x 83 x 41 mm |
| Battery Life | 410 shots | 350 shots |
| Battery Type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery Model | NP-FW50 | n/a |
| Other Features | ||
| Self Timer | |
|
| Timelapse Recording | |
|
| GPS | Optional | |
| Storage Type | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick DUO (UHS-I compliant) | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible) |
| Storage Slots | 1 | 1 |
Most popular cameras
Four Thirds
APS-C
APS-C
1"
APS-C
