In this review, we are going to make a detailed comparison of two cameras that fall into different categories. While the first model we are looking at, Sony Alpha a6400 belongs to a Semi-Pro Mirrorless category, the other model, Sony Alpha a6400 is a Semi-Pro DSLR camera. Sony Alpha a6400 is equipped with a 24.0 MP CMOS sensor, while Canon EOS 6D comes with a 20.0 MP CMOS sensor.
Both cameras we are going to look at in our overview fall into two different categories - MirrorLess and DSLR. Keeping in mind all the distinctive features of each category, it will be hard to make a detailed comparison of these two models. However, we will do our best to make this review as unbiased and detailed as possible.
To get started, let’s take a look at some of the key features of Sony Alpha a6400 and Canon EOS 6D and, after this, we can go on to our detailed comparison of these models.
Sony Alpha a6400 Key Features:
Canon EOS 6D Key Features:
|NFC||Yes vs No||Easy wireless connectivity with compatible devices|
|Bluetooth||Yes vs No||Connect your camera to other devices via Bluetooth|
|Sensor Resolution||24.0 MP vs 20.0 MP||16.7% more pixels|
|Continuous Shooting||11 fps vs 4.5 fps||6.5 fps faster|
|Built-In Flash||Yes vs No||All the lenses are stabilized|
|Flash Range||6 vs No||6 better flash range|
|Number Of Focus Points||425 vs 11||414 more focus points|
|Touch Screen||Yes vs No||Easy control of camera functions|
|Weight||403 g vs 770 g||367 g lighter|
|Max Video Resolution||3840 x 2160 vs 1920 x 1080||Higher Resolution Video|
|Dxo Color Depth||24 vs 23.8||Better color depth|
|Dxo Dynamic Range||13.6 vs 12.1||Better dynamic range|
|Gps||Built-in vs No||Has GPS|
|Sensor Area||864 mm2 vs 366.6 mm2||57.6% larger pixel area|
|Screen Resolution||1,040k dots vs 922k dots||11.3% higher resolution screen|
|Battery Life||1090 shots vs 410 shots||680 more frames with a single charge|
|Dxo Low Light Iso||2340 vs 1431||Better High ISO performance|
|Viewfinder Magnification||0.71 vs 0.7||0.01 better magnification|
|Screen Size||3″ | 3″||Large display|
|Viewfinder||Electronic | Optical (pentaprism)||Better framing and control|
|Raw Support||Yes | Yes||Better image quality|
|AutoFocus Face Detection||Yes | Yes||Very handy for portraits|
|Microphone Port||Yes | Yes||High quality audio recording option|
|Timelapse Recording||Yes | Yes||Creative shooting|
|Bracketing||Yes | Yes||Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR|
|Flash Sync Port||Yes | Yes||Port for Flash Sync|
|Environmental Sealing||Yes | Yes||Shoot at tough conditions|
|Headphone Port||No | No||No headphone port|
|Image Stabilization||No | No||No image stabilization|
Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Sony Alpha a6400 and Canon EOS 6D from the front view.
Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.
Speaking of weight, Sony Alpha a6400 is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 367g less than the Canon EOS 6D. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.
Are Sony Alpha a6400 and Canon EOS 6D any different in terms of sensor type?
In fact, that's exactly what makes these two models really different. Thus, it is a good point to consider if your are choosing between these two cameras. Sony Alpha a6400 features a 24.0 MP APS-C sized CMOS sensor and boasts of a Bionz X processor . Canon EOS 6D, in its turn, comes with a 20.0 MP Full frame sized CMOS sensor , which makes it significantly different from the first model.
Take a look below to find the comparison of Sony Alpha a6400 and Canon EOS 6D by the size of their sensors.
One more distinctive feature of compared models is the sensor size. Canon EOS 6D is equipped with a sensor that is 0.4x larger than the one featured in Sony Alpha a6400. Compared to the cameras with smaller sensor area, the ones with larger sensors ensure more control on the blurry background and depth of field if you shoot in the same aperture and focal length. Thus, the first model has a significant advantage here.
This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Sony Alpha a6400 and Canon EOS 6D in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.
|Photography Type||Sony Alpha a6400||Canon EOS 6D|
Disadvantages:No Significant Disadvantages
Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Sony Alpha a6400 or Canon EOS 6D, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.
What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Sony Alpha a6400 and Canon EOS 6D here is what we can say in conclusion:
According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Sony Alpha a6400 deserves a higher Total Score than the Canon EOS 6D. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.
|Sony Alpha a6400||Canon EOS 6D|
|Model||Alpha a6400||EOS 6D|
|Announced||Jan 15, 2019||Feb 12, 2013|
|Body Type||Rangefinder-style mirrorless||Mid-size SLR|
|Sensor Size||APS-C||Full frame|
|Sensor Dimensions||23.5 x 15.6 mm||36 x 24 mm|
|Sensor Area||366.60 mm2||864.00 mm2|
|Sensor Resolution||24.0 MP||20.0 MP|
|Max Image Resolution||6000 x 4000||5472 x 3648|
|Max Native ISO||32,000||25,600|
|Max Boosted ISO||102,800||102,400|
|Min Native ISO||100||100|
|Lens Mount||Sony E||Canon EF|
|Number of Lenses||102||256|
|Focal Length Multiplier||1.5x||1x|
|Macro Focus Range|
|AF Multi Area|
|AF Live View|
|AF Face Detection|
|AF Contrast Detection|
|AF Phase Detection|
|Number of Focus Points||425||11|
|Number of Cross Focus Points||n/a||1|
|Screen Type||Tilting||Fixed Type|
|Screen Resolution||922k dots||1,040k dots|
|ViewFinder Resolution||2,359k dots||0k dots|
|Min Shutter Speed||30 s||30 s|
|Max Shutter Speed||1/4000 s||1/4000 s|
|Continuous Shooting||11.0 fps||4.5 fps|
|Manual Exposure Mode|
|Custom White Balance|
|Flash Modes||auto, slow sync, rear sync, redeye reduction, wireless, hi-speed sync||no built-in flash|
|DxO Sensor Scores|
|DxO Sensor Score||83||82|
|DxO Color Depth||24.0||23.8|
|DxO Dynamic Range||13.6||12.1|
|DxO Low Light ISO||1431||2340|
|Video Resolutions||3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM||1920 x 1080 (29.97, 25, 23.976 fps), 1280 x 720 (59.94, 50 fps), 640 x 480 (25, 30 fps)|
|Max Video Resolution||3840 x 2160||1920 x 1080|
|Video Formats||MPEG-4, H.264||H.264|
|USB||USB 2.0||USB 2.0|
|Weight||403 g||770 g|
|Physical Dimensions||120 x 67 x 60 mm||145 x 111 x 71 mm|
|Battery Life||410 shots||1090 shots|
|Battery Type||Battery Pack||Battery Pack|
|Storage Type||SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick DUO (UHS-I compliant)||SD/SDHC/SDXC|