Sony Alpha a6300 vs Ricoh GR III

  • APS-C
  • 24 megapixels
  • Sony E (NEX)
  • 53
    Overall
  • 25
    Imaging
  • 57
    Features
  • 80
    Size
  • 0
    Price
  • APS-C
  • 24 megapixels
  • Fixed lens
  • 47
    Overall
  • 14
    Imaging
  • 48
    Features
  • 85
    Size
  • 0
    Price

Sony Alpha a6300 vs Ricoh GR III: a Complete Review and Comparison

Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!

In this review, we are going to make a detailed comparison of two cameras that fall into different categories. While the first model we are looking at, Sony Alpha a6300 belongs to a Semi-Pro Mirrorless category, the other model, Sony Alpha a6300 is a Large Sensor Compact camera. One of the key common traits of both cameras we are looking at is sensor. Both Sony Alpha a6300 and Ricoh GR III, are equipped with the same 24.0 MP CMOS sensors.

Both cameras we are going to look at in our overview fall into two different categories - MirrorLess and Compact. Keeping in mind all the distinctive features of each category, it will be hard to make a detailed comparison of these two models. However, we will do our best to make this review as unbiased and detailed as possible.

To get started, let’s take a look at some of the key features of Sony Alpha a6300 and Ricoh GR III and, after this, we can go on to our detailed comparison of these models.

Sony Alpha a6300 Key Features:

  • 24.0 MP APS-C CMOS sensor
  • ISO 100 - 25600 (Expands to 51200)
  • Image Stabilization: No
  • 3″ Tilting Screen
  • ViewFinder: Yes
  • 11.0 fps Continuous Shooting
  • Video: 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p)
  • Built-in Wireless: Yes
  • Dimensions: 120 x 67 x 49 mm
  • Weight: 404 g
  • Environmental Sealing: Yes
  • Built-in GPS: No
  • Replaced Sony A6000.
  • Replaced by Sony A6500.

Ricoh GR III Key Features:

  • 24.0 MP APS-C CMOS sensor
  • Image Stabilization: Yes
  • 3″ Fixed Type Screen
  • ViewFinder: Yes
  • fps Continuous Shooting
  • Video: 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
  • Built-in Wireless: Yes
  • Dimensions: 109 x 62 x 33 mm
  • Weight: 257 g
  • Environmental Sealing: No
  • Built-in GPS: No

Sony Alpha a6300 was substituted by Sony A6500.

Sony Alpha a6300 substituted Sony A6000.

Why is Sony Alpha a6300 a better choice than Ricoh GR III

NFC Yes vs No Easy wireless connectivity with compatible devices
Timelapse Recording No vs No Creative shooting
Continuous Shooting 11 fps vs No fps 11 fps faster
Built-In Flash Yes vs No All the lenses are stabilized
Flash Range 6 vs No 6 better flash range
Environmental Sealing Yes vs No Shoot at tough conditions
Max Video Resolution 3840 x 2160 vs 1920 x 1080 Higher Resolution Video
Microphone Port Yes vs No High quality audio recording option
Viewfinder Magnification 0.7 vs No 0.7 better magnification

What are the key reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over Sony Alpha a6300

Image Stabilization Yes vs No All lenses are stabilized
Screen Resolution 1,037k dots vs 922k dots 11.1% higher resolution screen
Touch Screen Yes vs No Easy control of camera functions
Weight 257 g vs 404 g 147 g lighter

Key PROs of Sony Alpha a6300 and Ricoh GR III

Screen Size 3″ | 3″ Large display
Viewfinder Electronic | Optical (optional) Better framing and control
Raw Support Yes | Yes Better image quality
Sensor Resolution 24.0 MP | 24.0 MP Bigger prints and more details
AutoFocus Face Detection Yes | Yes Very handy for portraits
Bracketing Yes | Yes Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR

Key CONs of Sony Alpha a6300 and Ricoh GR III

Headphone Port No | No No headphone port
Timelapse Recording Yes | No No timelapse recording

Sony Alpha a6300 vs Ricoh GR III: Comparing Two Models By Physical Characteristics

Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Sony Alpha a6300 and Ricoh GR III from the front view.

Sony Alpha a6300
Ricoh GR III
HTML
BB

Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.

Sony Alpha a6300
Ricoh GR III
HTML
BB

After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.

Speaking of weight, Ricoh GR III is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 147g less than the Sony Alpha a6300. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.

Comparing Sony Alpha a6300 and Ricoh GR III by the type of Sensor and Resolution

Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.

Are Sony Alpha a6300 and Ricoh GR III any different in terms of sensor type?

In terms of sensor type and resolution, these models are identical. Both Sony Alpha a6300 and Ricoh GR III come equipped with the same CMOS that has a resolution of 24.0 MP. Thus, if you are wondering, which option to choose, this is not a factor you should be looking at.

Take a look below to find the comparison of Sony Alpha a6300 and Ricoh GR III by the size of their sensors.

Sony Alpha a6300
Ricoh GR III
HTML
BB

Sony Alpha a6300 and Ricoh GR III are identical by this indicator, as each feature a sensor of the same size. Thus, both cameras will provide the same level of control in terms of the depth of field if you use them with the same focal length and aperture.

For Which Fields Of Photography Are Sony Alpha a6300 and Ricoh GR III Suitable?

If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.

This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Sony Alpha a6300 and Ricoh GR III in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.

Photography Type Sony Alpha a6300 Ricoh GR III
Portrait Photography
88%
93%
Street Photography
81%
98%
Sports Photography
98%
48%
Daily Photography
49%
2%
Landscape Photography
97%
81%

Sony Alpha a6300 for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
  • High resolution sensor (24 MP)
  • Face Detection Focusing

Disadvantages:

  • No Image Stabilization

Ricoh GR III for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
  • High resolution sensor (24 MP)
  • Image Stabilization
  • Face Detection Focusing

Disadvantages:

No Significant Disadvantages

Sony Alpha a6300 for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Large APS-C(23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor

Disadvantages:

  • Big size (120 x 67 x 49 mm)
  • No Image Stabilization

Ricoh GR III for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Small size (109 x 62 x 33 mm)
  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Image Stabilization
  • Large APS-C(23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor

Disadvantages:

No Significant Disadvantages

Sony Alpha a6300 for Sports Photography

Advantages:

  • Fast Continuous Shooting (11.0 fps)
  • Environmental Sealing
  • Big Number of autofocus Points (425)

Disadvantages:

  • Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
  • Small battery life (400 shots)

Ricoh GR III for Sports Photography

Advantages:

No Significant Advantages

Disadvantages:

  • Slow Continuous Shooting ( fps)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
  • Bad Max Native ISO (0)
  • Small size (109 x 62 x 33 mm)

Sony Alpha a6300 for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
  • Built-in Flash
  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Wireless Connectivity
  • Video is available

Disadvantages:

  • Big weight (404 g)
  • Big size (120 x 67 x 49 mm)

Ricoh GR III for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
  • Small weight (257 g)
  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Wireless Connectivity
  • Video is available

Disadvantages:

  • No Built-in Flash

Sony Alpha a6300 for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
  • High resolution sensor (24 MP)
  • Good Dynamic Range (13.7)
  • Environmental Sealing
  • Live View
  • RAW Support

Disadvantages:

No Significant Disadvantages

Ricoh GR III for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
  • High resolution sensor (24 MP)
  • Live View
  • RAW Support

Disadvantages:

  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Bad Max Native ISO (0)

Comparison of Sony Alpha a6300 vs Ricoh GR III: Final Verdict

Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Sony Alpha a6300 or Ricoh GR III, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.

What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Sony Alpha a6300 and Ricoh GR III here is what we can say in conclusion:

According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Sony Alpha a6300 deserves a higher Total Score than the Ricoh GR III. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.

Sony Alpha a6300 vs Ricoh GR III Table Of Technical Specs

For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:

Sony Alpha a6300 Ricoh GR III
General
Brand Sony Ricoh
Model Alpha a6300 GR III
Announced Feb 03, 2016 Sep 25, 2018
Body Type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Large sensor compact
Sensor
Sensor Type CMOS CMOS
Sensor Size APS-C APS-C
Sensor Dimensions 23.5 x 15.6 mm 23.5 x 15.6 mm
Sensor Area 366.60 mm2 366.60 mm2
Sensor Resolution 24.0 MP 24.0 MP
Max Image Resolution 6000 x 4000 6000 x 4000
Max Native ISO 25,600 0
Max Boosted ISO 51,200 n/a
Min Native ISO 100 0
RAW Support Yes Yes
Lens
Manual Focus Yes Yes
Lens Mount Sony E (NEX) Fixed lens
Number of Lenses 83 n/a
Focal Length Multiplier 1.5x n/a
Macro Focus Range 6
AutoFocus
AF Touch No Yes
AF Continuous Yes Yes
AF Single Yes Yes
AF Tracking Yes Yes
AF Selective Yes Yes
AF Center Yes Yes
AF Multi Area Yes Yes
AF Live View Yes Yes
AF Face Detection Yes Yes
AF Contrast Detection Yes Yes
AF Phase Detection Yes Yes
Number of Focus Points 425 n/a
Number of Cross Focus Points n/a n/a
Screen
Screen Type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen Size 3″ 3″
Screen Resolution 922k dots 1,037k dots
Live View Yes Yes
Touch Screen No Yes
ViewFinder
ViewFinder Electronic Optical (optional)
ViewFinder Resolution 2,359k dots 0k dots
ViewFinder Coverage 100% %
ViewFinder Magnification 0.7
Photography Features
Min Shutter Speed 30 s 30 s
Max Shutter Speed 1/4000 s 1/4000 s
Continuous Shooting 11.0 fps fps
Shutter Priority Yes Yes
Aperture Priority Yes Yes
Manual Exposure Mode Yes Yes
Exposure Compensation Yes Yes
Custom White Balance Yes Yes
Image Stabilization No Yes
Built-in Flash Yes No
Flash Range 6 0
Flash Modes Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye
External Flash Yes Yes
AE Bracketing Yes Yes
WB Bracketing Yes No
Exposure Modes
Multi-Segment Yes Yes
Average No Yes
Spot Yes Yes
Partial No No
AF-Area No No
Center Weighted No No
Video Features
Video Resolutions 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p) 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Max Video Resolution 3840 x 2160 1920 x 1080
Video Formats MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone Port Yes No
Headphone Port No No
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity Yes Yes
HDMI Yes No
USB USB 2.0 USB 1
Physical
Environmental Sealing Yes No
Water Proof No No
Dust Proof No No
Shock Proof No No
Crush Proof No No
Freeze Proof No No
Weight 404 g 257 g
Physical Dimensions 120 x 67 x 49 mm 109 x 62 x 33 mm
Battery Life 400 shots n/a
Battery Type Battery Pack n/a
Battery Model NP-FW50 n/a
Other Features
Self Timer Yes Yes
Timelapse Recording Yes No
GPS
Storage Type SD/SDHC/SDXC Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported)
Storage Slots 1 1

Most popular cameras

Fujifilm X-T3 26.0 MP BSI-CMOS
APS-C
Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 20.0 MP CMOS
Four Thirds
Nikon D610 24.0 MP CMOS
Full frame
Sony Alpha A7S 12.0 MP CMOS
Full frame
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV 30.0 MP CMOS
Full frame