Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!
The goal of this overview is to provide a detailed comparison of two popular camera models from Semi-Pro DSLR category, introduced by Sigma. We are going to take a closer look at the technical and physical characteristics, features, and performance. The models we are going to assess and compare in this review are SD9 and SD10. The first common feature of Sigma SD9 and Sigma SD10 that is worth mentioning is sensor. Both cameras feature CMOS (Foveon X3) sensors with a resolution of 3.0 MP.
Now, before we can move on to our comparison, let's take a moment to look at the key characteristics of Sigma SD9 and Sigma SD10.
Sigma SD9 Key Features:
Sigma SD10 Key Features:
Since Sigma SD9 has been around for some time, it was substituted by Sigma SD10.
|Viewfinder||Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (pentaprism)||Better framing and control|
|Raw Support||Yes | Yes||Better image quality|
|Flash Sync Port||Yes | Yes||Port for Flash Sync|
|Touch Screen||No | No||No touch screen|
|Screen Size||1.8″ | 1.8″||Not suitable for flash photography|
|Screen Resolution||130k dots | 130k dots||Small screen resolution|
|Screen Type||Fixed Type | Fixed Type||No flexible viewing angles|
|Sensor Resolution||3.0 MP | 3.0 MP||Small sensor resolution|
|AutoFocus Face Detection||No | No||No Face Detection|
|Timelapse Recording||No | No||No timelapse recording|
|Bracketing||No | No||No AE bracketing|
|Continuous Shooting||fps | fps||Low continuous shooting|
|Built-In Flash||No | No||No built-in flash|
|Image Stabilization||No | No||No image stabilization|
|Environmental Sealing||No | No||No environmental sealing|
Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Sigma SD9 and Sigma SD10 from the front view.
Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.
After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.
Speaking of weight, Sigma SD10 is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 0g less than the Sigma SD9. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.
Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.
Are Sigma SD9 and Sigma SD10 any different in terms of sensor type?
In terms of sensor type and resolution, these models are identical. Both Sigma SD9 and Sigma SD10 come equipped with the same CMOS (Foveon X3) that has a resolution of 3.0 MP. Thus, if you are wondering, which option to choose, this is not a factor you should be looking at.
Take a look below to find the comparison of Sigma SD9 and Sigma SD10 by the size of their sensors.
Sigma SD9 and Sigma SD10 are identical by this indicator, as each feature a sensor of the same size. Thus, both cameras will provide the same level of control in terms of the depth of field if you use them with the same focal length and aperture.
If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.
This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Sigma SD9 and Sigma SD10 in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.
|Photography Type||Sigma SD9||Sigma SD10|
Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Sigma SD9 or Sigma SD10, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.
What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Sigma SD9 and Sigma SD10 here is what we can say in conclusion:
According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Sigma SD10 deserves a higher Total Score than the Sigma SD9. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.
For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:
|Sigma SD9||Sigma SD10|
|Announced||Nov 26, 2002||Mar 19, 2004|
|Body Type||Mid-size SLR||Mid-size SLR|
|Sensor Type||CMOS (Foveon X3)||CMOS (Foveon X3)|
|Sensor Dimensions||20.7 x 13.8 mm||20.7 x 13.8 mm|
|Sensor Area||285.66 mm2||285.66 mm2|
|Sensor Resolution||3.0 MP||3.0 MP|
|Max Image Resolution||2268 x 1512||2268 x 1512|
|Max Native ISO||400||800|
|Max Boosted ISO||n/a||1,600|
|Min Native ISO||100||100|
|Lens Mount||Sigma SA Bayonet||Sigma SA Bayonet|
|Number of Lenses||72||72|
|Focal Length Multiplier||x||x|
|Macro Focus Range|
|AF Multi Area|
|AF Live View|
|AF Face Detection|
|AF Contrast Detection|
|AF Phase Detection|
|Number of Focus Points||n/a||n/a|
|Number of Cross Focus Points||n/a||n/a|
|Screen Type||Fixed Type||Fixed Type|
|Screen Resolution||130k dots||130k dots|
|ViewFinder||Optical (pentaprism)||Optical (pentaprism)|
|ViewFinder Resolution||0k dots||0k dots|
|Min Shutter Speed||30 s||30 s|
|Max Shutter Speed||1/6000 s||1/6000 s|
|Manual Exposure Mode|
|Custom White Balance|
|Max Video Resolution|
|USB||USB 1.0||USB 1.0|
|Weight||950 g||950 g|
|Physical Dimensions||152 x 120 x 79 mm||152 x 120 x 79 mm|
|Storage Type||Compact Flash Type I or II||Compact Flash Type I or II|