Samsung NX200 vs Samsung NX3000
- APS-C
- 20 megapixels
- Samsung NX
-
49
Overall -
19
Imaging -
33
Features -
82
Size -
100
Price
Samsung NX200 vs Samsung NX3000: a Complete Review and Comparison
Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!
The goal of this overview is to provide a detailed comparison of two popular camera models from Entry-Level Mirrorless category, introduced by Samsung. We are going to take a closer look at the technical and physical characteristics, features, and performance. The models we are going to assess and compare in this review are NX200 and NX3000. The first common feature of Samsung NX200 and Samsung NX3000 that is worth mentioning is sensor. Both cameras feature CMOS sensors with a resolution of 20.0 MP.
Now, before we can move on to our comparison, let's take a moment to look at the key characteristics of Samsung NX200 and Samsung NX3000.
Samsung NX200 Key Features:
- 20.0 MP APS-C CMOS sensor
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Image Stabilization: No
- 3″ Fixed Type Screen
- ViewFinder: Yes
- 7.0 fps Continuous Shooting
- Video: 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
- Built-in Wireless: No
- Dimensions: 117 x 63 x 36 mm
- Weight: 223 g
- Environmental Sealing: No
- Built-in GPS: Yes
- Replaced Samsung NX100. Compare
- Replaced by Samsung NX210. Compare
Samsung NX3000 Key Features:
- 20.0 MP APS-C CMOS sensor
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Image Stabilization: No
- 3″ Tilting Screen
- ViewFinder: No
- 5.0 fps Continuous Shooting
- Video: 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240
- Built-in Wireless: Yes
- Dimensions: 117 x 66 x 39 mm
- Weight: 230 g
- Environmental Sealing: No
- Built-in GPS: No
- Replaced Samsung NX2000. Compare
Since Samsung NX200 has been around for some time, it was substituted by
Samsung NX210.
Be sure to check out some of our other comparisons that may also interest you:
Samsung NX200 vs. NX210
Samsung NX210 vs. Samsung NX3000
Being a newer model, Samsung NX200 substituted
Samsung NX100.
Be sure to check out some of our other comparisons that may also interest you:
Samsung NX200 vs. NX100
Samsung NX100 vs. Samsung NX3000
Why is Samsung NX200 a better choice than Samsung NX3000
| Continuous Shooting | 7 fps vs 5 fps | 2 fps faster |
| Screen Resolution | 614k dots vs 461k dots | 24.9% higher resolution screen |
| Weight | 223 g vs 230 g | 7 g lighter |
What are the key reasons to pick Samsung NX3000 over Samsung NX200
| Wireless Connectivity | Built-In vs No | Better connectivity |
| Number Of Focus Points | 35 vs 15 | 20 more focus points |
| Battery Life | 370 shots vs 330 shots | 40 more frames with a single charge |
Key PROs of Samsung NX200 and Samsung NX3000
| Screen Size | 3″ | 3″ | Large display |
| Raw Support | Yes | Yes | Better image quality |
| AutoFocus Face Detection | Yes | Yes | Very handy for portraits |
| Bracketing | Yes | Yes | Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR |
| Flash Sync Port | Yes | Yes | Port for Flash Sync |
Key CONs of Samsung NX200 and Samsung NX3000
| Touch Screen | No | No | No touch screen |
| Screen Resolution | 614k dots | 461k dots | Small screen resolution |
| Sensor Resolution | 20.0 MP | 20.0 MP | Small sensor resolution |
| Microphone Port | No | No | No microphone port |
| Headphone Port | No | No | No headphone port |
| Timelapse Recording | No | No | No timelapse recording |
| Continuous Shooting | 7.0 fps | 5.0 fps | Low continuous shooting |
| Built-In Flash | No | No | No built-in flash |
| Image Stabilization | No | No | No image stabilization |
| Environmental Sealing | No | No | No environmental sealing |
Samsung NX200 vs Samsung NX3000: Comparing Two Models By Physical Characteristics
Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Samsung NX200 and Samsung NX3000 from the front view.
Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.
After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.
Speaking of weight, Samsung NX200 is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 7g less than the Samsung NX3000. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.
Comparing Samsung NX200 and Samsung NX3000 by the type of Sensor and Resolution
Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.
Are Samsung NX200 and Samsung NX3000 any different in terms of sensor type?
In terms of sensor type and resolution, these models are identical. Both Samsung NX200 and Samsung NX3000 come equipped with the same CMOS that has a resolution of 20.0 MP. Thus, if you are wondering, which option to choose, this is not a factor you should be looking at.
Take a look below to find the comparison of Samsung NX200 and Samsung NX3000 by the size of their sensors.
Samsung NX200 and Samsung NX3000 are identical by this indicator, as each feature a sensor of the same size. Thus, both cameras will provide the same level of control in terms of the depth of field if you use them with the same focal length and aperture.
For Which Fields Of Photography Are Samsung NX200 and Samsung NX3000 Suitable?
If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.
This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Samsung NX200 and Samsung NX3000 in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.
| Photography Type | Samsung NX200 | Samsung NX3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Portrait Photography |
|
|
| Street Photography |
|
|
| Sports Photography |
|
|
| Daily Photography |
|
|
| Landscape Photography |
|
|
Samsung NX200 for Portrait Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm) sensor
- Face Detection Focusing
Disadvantages:
- No Image Stabilization
Samsung NX3000 for Portrait Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm) sensor
- Face Detection Focusing
Disadvantages:
- No Image Stabilization
Samsung NX200 for Street Photography
Advantages:
- Built-in View Finder
- Live View
- Large APS-C(23.5 x 15.7 mm) sensor
Disadvantages:
- Big size (117 x 63 x 36 mm)
- No Image Stabilization
Samsung NX3000 for Street Photography
Advantages:
- Live View
- Large APS-C(23.5 x 15.7 mm) sensor
Disadvantages:
- Big size (117 x 66 x 39 mm)
- No Built-in View Finder
- No Image Stabilization
Samsung NX200 for Sports Photography
Advantages:
No Significant Advantages
Disadvantages:
- Slow Continuous Shooting (7.0 fps)
- No Environmental Sealing
- Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
- Smal Number of autofocus Points (15)
- Bad Low Light ISO (618)
- Small battery life (330 shots)
Samsung NX3000 for Sports Photography
Advantages:
- No View Finder
Disadvantages:
- Slow Continuous Shooting (5.0 fps)
- No Environmental Sealing
- Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
- Smal Number of autofocus Points (35)
- Small Number of CrossFocus Points (1)
- Small battery life (370 shots)
Samsung NX200 for Daily Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm) sensor
- Small weight (223 g)
- Built-in View Finder
- Live View
- Video is available
Disadvantages:
- No Built-in Flash
Samsung NX3000 for Daily Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm) sensor
- Small weight (230 g)
- Live View
- Wireless Connectivity
- Video is available
Disadvantages:
- No Built-in Flash
- No Built-in View Finder
Samsung NX200 for Landscape Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm) sensor
- Good Dynamic Range (12.6)
- Live View
- RAW Support
Disadvantages:
- Low resolution sensor (20 MP)
- No Environmental Sealing
- Bad Low Light ISO (618)
Samsung NX3000 for Landscape Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm) sensor
- Live View
- RAW Support
Disadvantages:
- Low resolution sensor (20 MP)
- No Environmental Sealing
Comparison of Samsung NX200 vs Samsung NX3000: Final Verdict
Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Samsung NX200 or Samsung NX3000, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.
What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Samsung NX200 and Samsung NX3000 here is what we can say in conclusion:
According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Samsung NX200 deserves a higher Total Score than the Samsung NX3000. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.
Samsung NX200 vs Samsung NX3000 Table Of Technical Specs
For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:
| Samsung NX200 | Samsung NX3000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model | NX200 | NX3000 |
| Announced | Feb 28, 2012 | May 26, 2014 |
| Body Type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor | ||
| Sensor Type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor Size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor Dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7 mm | 23.5 x 15.7 mm |
| Sensor Area | 368.95 mm2 | 368.95 mm2 |
| Sensor Resolution | 20.0 MP | 20.0 MP |
| Max Image Resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Max Native ISO | 12,800 | 25,600 |
| Max Boosted ISO | n/a | n/a |
| Min Native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW Support |  |
|
| Lens | ||
| Manual Focus | |
|
| Lens Mount | Samsung NX | Samsung NX |
| Number of Lenses | 32 | 32 |
| Focal Length Multiplier | 1.5x | 1.5x |
| Macro Focus Range | ||
| AutoFocus | ||
| AF Touch |  |
|
| AF Continuous | |
|
| AF Single | |
|
| AF Tracking | |
|
| AF Selective | |
|
| AF Center | |
|
| AF Multi Area | |
|
| AF Live View | |
|
| AF Face Detection | |
|
| AF Contrast Detection | |
|
| AF Phase Detection | |
|
| Number of Focus Points | 15 | 35 |
| Number of Cross Focus Points | n/a | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen Type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen Size | 3″ | 3″ |
| Screen Resolution | 614k dots | 461k dots |
| Live View | |
|
| Touch Screen | |
|
| ViewFinder | ||
| ViewFinder | Electronic (optional) | |
| ViewFinder Resolution | 0k dots | 0k dots |
| ViewFinder Coverage | % | % |
| ViewFinder Magnification | ||
| Photography Features | ||
| Min Shutter Speed | 30 s | 30 s |
| Max Shutter Speed | 1/4000 s | 1/4000 s |
| Continuous Shooting | 7.0 fps | 5.0 fps |
| Shutter Priority | |
|
| Aperture Priority | |
|
| Manual Exposure Mode | |
|
| Exposure Compensation | |
|
| Custom White Balance | |
|
| Image Stabilization | |
|
| Built-in Flash | |
|
| Flash Range | 0 | 0 |
| Flash Modes | Auto, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual | no built-in flash |
| External Flash | |
|
| AE Bracketing | |
|
| WB Bracketing | |
|
| Exposure Modes | ||
| Multi-Segment | |
|
| Average | |
|
| Spot | |
|
| Partial | |
|
| AF-Area | |
|
| Center Weighted | |
|
| Video Features | ||
| Video Resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
| Max Video Resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 |
| Video Formats | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone Port | |
|
| Headphone Port | |
|
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless Connectivity | |
|
| HDMI | |
|
| USB | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental Sealing | |
|
| Water Proof | |
|
| Dust Proof | |
|
| Shock Proof | |
|
| Crush Proof | |
|
| Freeze Proof | |
|
| Weight | 223 g | 230 g |
| Physical Dimensions | 117 x 63 x 36 mm | 117 x 66 x 39 mm |
| Battery Life | 330 shots | 370 shots |
| Battery Type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery Model | BC1030 | B740 |
| Other Features | ||
| Self Timer | |
|
| Timelapse Recording | |
|
| GPS | Optional | |
| Storage Type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
| Storage Slots | 1 | 1 |
Most popular cameras
Four Thirds
Full frame
APS-C
Four Thirds
Four Thirds
