Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS

  • 1/2.3"
  • 16 megapixels
  • Fixed lens
  • 44
    Overall
  • 11
    Imaging
  • 50
    Features
  • 84
    Size
  • 0
    Price
  • 1/2.3"
  • 16 megapixels
  • Fixed lens
  • 44
    Overall
  • 11
    Imaging
  • 50
    Features
  • 83
    Size
  • 100
    Price

Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS: a Complete Review and Comparison

Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!

The goal of this overview is to provide a detailed comparison of two popular camera models from Waterproof category, introduced by Ricoh. We are going to take a closer look at the technical and physical characteristics, features, and performance. The models we are going to assess and compare in this review are WG-5 GPS and WG-4 GPS. The first common feature of Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Ricoh WG-4 GPS that is worth mentioning is sensor. Both cameras feature BSI-CMOS sensors with a resolution of 16.0 MP.

Now, before we can move on to our comparison, let's take a moment to look at the key characteristics of Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Ricoh WG-4 GPS.

Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Features:

  • 16.0 MP 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS sensor
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Image Stabilization: Yes
  • 3″ Fixed Type Screen
  • ViewFinder: No
  • 14.0 fps Continuous Shooting
  • Video: 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p)
  • Built-in Wireless: No
  • Dimensions: 125 x 65 x 32 mm
  • Weight: 236 g
  • Environmental Sealing: Yes
  • Built-in GPS: Yes
  • Replaced Ricoh WG-4 GPS. Compare

Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Features:

  • 16.0 MP 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS sensor
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Image Stabilization: Yes
  • 3″ Fixed Type Screen
  • ViewFinder: No
  • 2.0 fps Continuous Shooting
  • Video: 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p)
  • Built-in Wireless: No
  • Dimensions: 124 x 64 x 33 mm
  • Weight: 235 g
  • Environmental Sealing: Yes
  • Built-in GPS: Yes
  • Replaced by Ricoh WG-5 GPS. Compare

Being a newer model, Ricoh WG-5 GPS substituted Ricoh WG-4 GPS.

Why is Ricoh WG-5 GPS a better choice than Ricoh WG-4 GPS

Continuous Shooting 14 fps vs 2 fps 12 fps faster
Flash Range 10.4 vs 10 0.4 better flash range

What are the key reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over Ricoh WG-5 GPS

Weight 235 g vs 236 g 1 g lighter

Key PROs of Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Ricoh WG-4 GPS

Screen Size 3″ | 3″ Large display
AutoFocus Face Detection Yes | Yes Very handy for portraits
Timelapse Recording Yes | Yes Creative shooting
Bracketing Yes | Yes Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR
Built-In Flash Yes | Yes External flash available
Image Stabilization Yes | Yes Built-in stabilization
Environmental Sealing Yes | Yes Shoot at tough conditions

Key CONs of Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Ricoh WG-4 GPS

Touch Screen No | No No touch screen
Screen Resolution 460k dots | 460k dots Small screen resolution
Screen Type Fixed Type | Fixed Type No flexible viewing angles
Viewfinder No | No No ViewFinder
Raw Support No | No Doesn's support RAW format
Sensor Resolution 16.0 MP | 16.0 MP Small sensor resolution
Microphone Port No | No No microphone port
Headphone Port No | No No headphone port
External Flash Shoe No | No No Flash Shoe
Battery Life 240 shots | 240 shots Low battery life

Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS: Comparing Two Models By Physical Characteristics

Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Ricoh WG-4 GPS from the front view.

Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Ricoh WG-4 GPS
HTML
BB

Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.

Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Ricoh WG-4 GPS
HTML
BB

After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.

Speaking of weight, Ricoh WG-4 GPS is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 1g less than the Ricoh WG-5 GPS. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.

Battery values for Waterproof cameras:
Ricoh WG-5 GPS — 240 shots
Ricoh WG-4 GPS — 240 shots
Min: 150 shots
Average: 274 shots
Max: 380 shots
Thickness values for Waterproof cameras:
Ricoh WG-5 GPS — 32 mm
Ricoh WG-4 GPS — 33 mm
Min: 19 mm
Average: 28 mm
Max: 89 mm
Weight values for Waterproof cameras:
Ricoh WG-5 GPS — 236 g
Ricoh WG-4 GPS — 235 g
Min: 110 g
Average: 196 g
Max: 307 g

Comparing Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Ricoh WG-4 GPS by the type of Sensor and Resolution

Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.

Are Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Ricoh WG-4 GPS any different in terms of sensor type?

In terms of sensor type and resolution, these models are identical. Both Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Ricoh WG-4 GPS come equipped with the same BSI-CMOS that has a resolution of 16.0 MP. Thus, if you are wondering, which option to choose, this is not a factor you should be looking at.

Take a look below to find the comparison of Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Ricoh WG-4 GPS by the size of their sensors.

Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Ricoh WG-4 GPS
HTML
BB

Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Ricoh WG-4 GPS are identical by this indicator, as each feature a sensor of the same size. Thus, both cameras will provide the same level of control in terms of the depth of field if you use them with the same focal length and aperture.

For Which Fields Of Photography Are Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Suitable?

If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.

This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Ricoh WG-4 GPS in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.

Photography Type Ricoh WG-5 GPS Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Portrait Photography
48%
51%
Street Photography
18%
20%
Sports Photography
83%
68%
Daily Photography
62%
65%
Landscape Photography
60%
61%

Ricoh WG-5 GPS for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

  • Image Stabilization
  • Face Detection Focusing

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor

Ricoh WG-4 GPS for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

  • Image Stabilization
  • Face Detection Focusing

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor

Ricoh WG-5 GPS for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Live View
  • Image Stabilization

Disadvantages:

  • Big size (125 x 65 x 32 mm)
  • No Built-in View Finder
  • Small 1/2.3"(6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
  • Small Number of autofocus Points (9)

Ricoh WG-4 GPS for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Live View
  • Image Stabilization

Disadvantages:

  • Big size (124 x 64 x 33 mm)
  • No Built-in View Finder
  • Small 1/2.3"(6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
  • Small Number of autofocus Points (9)

Ricoh WG-5 GPS for Sports Photography

Advantages:

  • Fast Continuous Shooting (14.0 fps)
  • Environmental Sealing
  • No View Finder

Disadvantages:

  • Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
  • Smal Number of autofocus Points (9)
  • Bad Max Native ISO (6400)
  • Small battery life (240 shots)

Ricoh WG-4 GPS for Sports Photography

Advantages:

  • Environmental Sealing
  • No View Finder

Disadvantages:

  • Slow Continuous Shooting (2.0 fps)
  • Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
  • Smal Number of autofocus Points (9)
  • Bad Max Native ISO (6400)
  • Small battery life (240 shots)

Ricoh WG-5 GPS for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Small weight (236 g)
  • Built-in Flash
  • Live View
  • Video is available

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
  • No Built-in View Finder

Ricoh WG-4 GPS for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Small weight (235 g)
  • Built-in Flash
  • Live View
  • Video is available

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
  • No Built-in View Finder

Ricoh WG-5 GPS for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Environmental Sealing
  • Live View

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
  • Low resolution sensor (16 MP)
  • No RAW Support
  • Bad Max Native ISO (6400)

Ricoh WG-4 GPS for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Environmental Sealing
  • Live View

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
  • Low resolution sensor (16 MP)
  • No RAW Support
  • Bad Max Native ISO (6400)

Comparison of Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS: Final Verdict

Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Ricoh WG-5 GPS or Ricoh WG-4 GPS, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.

What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Ricoh WG-5 GPS and Ricoh WG-4 GPS here is what we can say in conclusion:

According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Ricoh WG-4 GPS deserves a higher Total Score than the Ricoh WG-5 GPS. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.

Ricoh WG-5 GPS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Table Of Technical Specs

For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:

Ricoh WG-5 GPS Ricoh WG-4 GPS
General
Brand Ricoh Ricoh
Model WG-5 GPS WG-4 GPS
Announced Feb 10, 2015 Feb 05, 2014
Body Type Compact Compact
Sensor
Sensor Type BSI-CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor Size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor Dimensions 6.17 x 4.55 mm 6.17 x 4.55 mm
Sensor Area 28.07 mm2 28.07 mm2
Sensor Resolution 16.0 MP 16.0 MP
Max Image Resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Max Native ISO 6,400 6,400
Max Boosted ISO n/a n/a
Min Native ISO 125 125
RAW Support No No
Lens
Manual Focus Yes Yes
Lens Mount Fixed lens Fixed lens
Number of Lenses n/a n/a
Focal Length Multiplier n/a n/a
Macro Focus Range 1 1
AutoFocus
AF Touch No No
AF Continuous Yes Yes
AF Single Yes Yes
AF Tracking Yes Yes
AF Selective No No
AF Center Yes Yes
AF Multi Area Yes Yes
AF Live View Yes Yes
AF Face Detection Yes Yes
AF Contrast Detection Yes Yes
AF Phase Detection No No
Number of Focus Points 9 9
Number of Cross Focus Points n/a n/a
Screen
Screen Type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen Size 3″ 3″
Screen Resolution 460k dots 460k dots
Live View Yes Yes
Touch Screen No No
ViewFinder
ViewFinder
ViewFinder Resolution 0k dots 0k dots
ViewFinder Coverage % %
ViewFinder Magnification
Photography Features
Min Shutter Speed 4 s 4 s
Max Shutter Speed 1/4000 s 1/4000 s
Continuous Shooting 14.0 fps 2.0 fps
Shutter Priority Yes Yes
Aperture Priority No No
Manual Exposure Mode No No
Exposure Compensation No No
Custom White Balance Yes Yes
Image Stabilization Yes Yes
Built-in Flash Yes Yes
Flash Range 10.4 10
Flash Modes Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye
External Flash No No
AE Bracketing Yes Yes
WB Bracketing Yes Yes
Exposure Modes
Multi-Segment Yes Yes
Average No No
Spot Yes Yes
Partial No No
AF-Area No No
Center Weighted Yes Yes
Video Features
Video Resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p)
Max Video Resolution 1920 x 1080 1920 x 1080
Video Formats MPEG-4, H.264 H.264
Microphone Port No No
Headphone Port No No
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity No No
HDMI Yes Yes
USB USB 2.0 USB 2.0
Physical
Environmental Sealing Yes Yes
Water Proof Yes Yes
Dust Proof No No
Shock Proof Yes Yes
Crush Proof Yes Yes
Freeze Proof Yes Yes
Weight 236 g 235 g
Physical Dimensions 125 x 65 x 32 mm 124 x 64 x 33 mm
Battery Life 240 shots 240 shots
Battery Type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery Model D-LI92 D-LI92
Other Features
Self Timer Yes Yes
Timelapse Recording Yes Yes
GPS Built-in Built-in
Storage Type SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Storage Slots 1 1

Most popular cameras

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II 20.0 MP CMOS
Four Thirds
Pentax K-1 Mark II 36.0 MP CMOS
Full frame
Sony Alpha A7 II 24.0 MP CMOS
Full frame
Sony Alpha A7S II 12.0 MP CMOS
Full frame
Sony Alpha A7R III 42.0 MP BSI-CMOS
Full frame