Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GR Digital III

  • APS-C
  • 16 megapixels
  • Fixed lens
  • 51
    Overall
  • 21
    Imaging
  • 27
    Features
  • 84
    Size
  • 0
    Price
  • 1/1.7"
  • 10 megapixels
  • Fixed lens
  • 41
    Overall
  • 5
    Imaging
  • 24
    Features
  • 88
    Size
  • 0
    Price

Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GR Digital III: a Complete Review and Comparison

Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!

In this overview, we are going to take a look at two different camera models that fall into different categories: the first model we are about to review, Ricoh GR is a camera from Large Sensor Compact category. It features CMOS sensor with a resolution of 16.0 MP. The second model we are looking at, Ricoh GR Digital III, falls into a Small Sensor Compact category and it is equipped with CCD sensor that has a resolution of 10.0 MP.

Now, before we can move on to our comparison, let's take a moment to look at the key characteristics of Ricoh GR and Ricoh GR Digital III.

Ricoh GR Key Features:

  • 16.0 MP APS-C CMOS sensor
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Image Stabilization: No
  • 3″ Fixed Type Screen
  • ViewFinder: Yes
  • 4.0 fps Continuous Shooting
  • Video: 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps)
  • Built-in Wireless: Yes
  • Dimensions: 117 x 61 x 35 mm
  • Weight: 245 g
  • Environmental Sealing: No
  • Built-in GPS: No
  • Replaced by Ricoh GR II. Compare

Ricoh GR Digital III Key Features:

  • 10.0 MP 1/1.7" CCD sensor
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Image Stabilization: No
  • 3″ Fixed Type Screen
  • ViewFinder: Yes
  • fps Continuous Shooting
  • Video: 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
  • Built-in Wireless: No
  • Dimensions: 109 x 59 x 26 mm
  • Weight: 208 g
  • Environmental Sealing: No
  • Built-in GPS: No
  • Replaced Ricoh GR Digital II.
  • Replaced by Ricoh GR Digital IV. Compare

Since Ricoh GR has been around for some time, it was substituted by Ricoh GR II. Be sure to check out some of our other comparisons that may also interest you:
Ricoh GR vs. GR II
Ricoh GR II vs. Ricoh GR Digital III

Why is Ricoh GR a better choice than Ricoh GR Digital III

Wireless Connectivity Eye-Fi Connected vs No Better connectivity
Sensor Resolution 16.0 MP vs 10.0 MP 37.5% more pixels
Sensor Area 372.09 mm2 vs 41.52 mm2 88.8% larger pixel area
Continuous Shooting 4 fps vs No fps 4 fps faster
Flash Range 5.4 vs 3 2.4 better flash range
Max Shutter Speed 1/4000 vs 1/2000 Faster shutter speed
Screen Resolution 1,230k dots vs 920k dots 25.2% higher resolution screen
Max Video Resolution 1920 x 1080 vs 640 x 480 Higher Resolution Video

What are the key reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over Ricoh GR

Weight 208 g vs 245 g 37 g lighter

Key PROs of Ricoh GR and Ricoh GR Digital III

Screen Size 3″ | 3″ Large display
Viewfinder Optical (optional) | Optical (optional) Better framing and control
Raw Support Yes | Yes Better image quality
Timelapse Recording Yes | Yes Creative shooting
External Flash Shoe Yes | Yes Flash Shoe available
Built-In Flash Yes | Yes External flash available

Key CONs of Ricoh GR and Ricoh GR Digital III

Touch Screen No | No No touch screen
Screen Type Fixed Type | Fixed Type No flexible viewing angles
Sensor Resolution 16.0 MP | 10.0 MP Small sensor resolution
AutoFocus Face Detection No | No No Face Detection
Microphone Port No | No No microphone port
Headphone Port No | No No headphone port
Continuous Shooting 4.0 fps | fps Low continuous shooting
Image Stabilization No | No No image stabilization
Environmental Sealing No | No No environmental sealing

Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GR Digital III: Comparing Two Models By Physical Characteristics

Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Ricoh GR and Ricoh GR Digital III from the front view.

Ricoh GR
Ricoh GR Digital III
HTML
BB

Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.

Ricoh GR
Ricoh GR Digital III
HTML
BB

After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.

Speaking of weight, Ricoh GR Digital III is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 37g less than the Ricoh GR. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.

Comparing Ricoh GR and Ricoh GR Digital III by the type of Sensor and Resolution

Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.

Are Ricoh GR and Ricoh GR Digital III any different in terms of sensor type?

In fact, that's exactly what makes these two models really different. Thus, it is a good point to consider if your are choosing between these two cameras. Ricoh GR features a 16.0 MP APS-C sized CMOS sensor . Ricoh GR Digital III, in its turn, comes with a 10.0 MP 1/1.7" sized CCD sensor and GR engine III processor , which makes it significantly different from the first model.

Take a look below to find the comparison of Ricoh GR and Ricoh GR Digital III by the size of their sensors.

Ricoh GR
Ricoh GR Digital III
HTML
BB

One more distinctive feature of compared models is the sensor size. Ricoh GR has a sensor area 0.1x bigger compared to Ricoh GR Digital III. What does it mean? This basically means that if you these cameras them with the same aperture and focal length, the first model will give you more control in terms of the blurry background and depth of field.

For Which Fields Of Photography Are Ricoh GR and Ricoh GR Digital III Suitable?

If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.

This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Ricoh GR and Ricoh GR Digital III in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.

Photography Type Ricoh GR Ricoh GR Digital III
Portrait Photography
64%
9%
Street Photography
85%
63%
Sports Photography
52%
47%
Daily Photography
0%
1%
Landscape Photography
92%
59%

Ricoh GR for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.7 x 15.7 mm) sensor

Disadvantages:

  • No Image Stabilization

Ricoh GR Digital III for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

No Significant Advantages

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm) sensor
  • No Image Stabilization

Ricoh GR for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Small size (117 x 61 x 35 mm)
  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Large APS-C(23.7 x 15.7 mm) sensor

Disadvantages:

  • No Image Stabilization

Ricoh GR Digital III for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Small size (109 x 59 x 26 mm)
  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View

Disadvantages:

  • No Image Stabilization
  • Small 1/1.7"(7.44 x 5.58 mm) sensor

Ricoh GR for Sports Photography

Advantages:

No Significant Advantages

Disadvantages:

  • Slow Continuous Shooting (4.0 fps)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
  • Small Number of CrossFocus Points (0)
  • Bad Low Light ISO (972)
  • Small battery life (290 shots)
  • Small size (117 x 61 x 35 mm)

Ricoh GR Digital III for Sports Photography

Advantages:

No Significant Advantages

Disadvantages:

  • Slow Continuous Shooting ( fps)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/2000s)
  • Bad Max Native ISO (1600)
  • Small size (109 x 59 x 26 mm)

Ricoh GR for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.7 x 15.7 mm) sensor
  • Small weight (245 g)
  • Built-in Flash
  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Wireless Connectivity
  • Video is available

Disadvantages:

No Significant Disadvantages

Ricoh GR Digital III for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Small weight (208 g)
  • Small size (109 x 59 x 26 mm)
  • Built-in Flash
  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Video is available

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm) sensor

Ricoh GR for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.7 x 15.7 mm) sensor
  • Good Dynamic Range (13.5)
  • Live View
  • RAW Support

Disadvantages:

  • Low resolution sensor (16 MP)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Bad Low Light ISO (972)

Ricoh GR Digital III for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Live View
  • RAW Support

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm) sensor
  • Low resolution sensor (10 MP)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Bad Max Native ISO (1600)

Comparison of Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GR Digital III: Final Verdict

Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Ricoh GR or Ricoh GR Digital III, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.

What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Ricoh GR and Ricoh GR Digital III here is what we can say in conclusion:

According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Ricoh GR deserves a higher Total Score than the Ricoh GR Digital III. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.

Ricoh GR vs Ricoh GR Digital III Table Of Technical Specs

For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:

Ricoh GR Ricoh GR Digital III
General
Brand Ricoh Ricoh
Model GR GR Digital III
Announced Apr 17, 2013 Jul 27, 2009
Body Type Large sensor compact Compact
Sensor
Sensor Type CMOS CCD
Sensor Size APS-C 1/1.7"
Sensor Dimensions 23.7 x 15.7 mm 7.44 x 5.58 mm
Sensor Area 372.09 mm2 41.52 mm2
Sensor Resolution 16.0 MP 10.0 MP
Max Image Resolution 4928 x 3264 3648 x 2736
Max Native ISO 25,600 1,600
Max Boosted ISO n/a n/a
Min Native ISO 100 64
RAW Support Yes Yes
Lens
Manual Focus Yes Yes
Lens Mount Fixed lens Fixed lens
Number of Lenses n/a n/a
Focal Length Multiplier n/a n/a
Macro Focus Range 1
AutoFocus
AF Touch No No
AF Continuous Yes No
AF Single Yes Yes
AF Tracking No No
AF Selective Yes No
AF Center No No
AF Multi Area Yes Yes
AF Live View Yes Yes
AF Face Detection No No
AF Contrast Detection Yes Yes
AF Phase Detection No No
Number of Focus Points n/a n/a
Number of Cross Focus Points 0 n/a
Screen
Screen Type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen Size 3″ 3″
Screen Resolution 1,230k dots 920k dots
Live View Yes Yes
Touch Screen No No
ViewFinder
ViewFinder Optical (optional) Optical (optional)
ViewFinder Resolution 0k dots 0k dots
ViewFinder Coverage % %
ViewFinder Magnification
Photography Features
Min Shutter Speed 300 s 1 s
Max Shutter Speed 1/4000 s 1/2000 s
Continuous Shooting 4.0 fps fps
Shutter Priority Yes Yes
Aperture Priority Yes Yes
Manual Exposure Mode Yes Yes
Exposure Compensation Yes Yes
Custom White Balance Yes Yes
Image Stabilization No No
Built-in Flash Yes Yes
Flash Range 5.4 3
Flash Modes Auto, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External Flash Yes Yes
AE Bracketing Yes No
WB Bracketing Yes No
Exposure Modes
Multi-Segment Yes Yes
Average No No
Spot Yes Yes
Partial No No
AF-Area No No
Center Weighted Yes Yes
Video Features
Video Resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max Video Resolution 1920 x 1080 640 x 480
Video Formats MPEG-4 n/a
Microphone Port No No
Headphone Port No No
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity Yes No
HDMI Yes No
USB USB 2.0 USB 2.0
Physical
Environmental Sealing No No
Water Proof No No
Dust Proof No No
Shock Proof No No
Crush Proof No No
Freeze Proof No No
Weight 245 g 208 g
Physical Dimensions 117 x 61 x 35 mm 109 x 59 x 26 mm
Battery Life 290 shots n/a
Battery Type Battery Pack n/a
Battery Model DB65 n/a
Other Features
Self Timer Yes Yes
Timelapse Recording Yes Yes
GPS
Storage Type SD, SDHC, SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage Slots 1 1

Most popular cameras

Sony Alpha A7 II 24.0 MP CMOS
Full frame
Sony Alpha A7S II 12.0 MP CMOS
Full frame
Canon EOS-1D X Mark II 20.0 MP CMOS
Full frame
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV 30.0 MP CMOS
Full frame
Pentax K-1 Mark II 36.0 MP CMOS
Full frame