Ricoh GR vs Fujifilm X-A10

  • APS-C
  • 16 megapixels
  • Fixed lens
  • 51
    Overall
  • 21
    Imaging
  • 27
    Features
  • 84
    Size
  • 0
    Price
  • APS-C
  • 16 megapixels
  • Fujifilm X
  • 45
    Overall
  • 13
    Imaging
  • 40
    Features
  • 82
    Size
  • 0
    Price

Ricoh GR vs Fujifilm X-A10: a Complete Review and Comparison

Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!

In this review, we are going to make a detailed comparison of two cameras that fall into different categories. While the first model we are looking at, Ricoh GR belongs to a Large Sensor Compact category, the other model, Ricoh GR is a Entry-Level Mirrorless camera. One of the key common traits of both cameras we are looking at is sensor. Both Ricoh GR and Fujifilm X-A10, are equipped with the same 16.0 MP CMOS sensors.

Both cameras we are going to look at in our overview fall into two different categories - Compact and MirrorLess. Keeping in mind all the distinctive features of each category, it will be hard to make a detailed comparison of these two models. However, we will do our best to make this review as unbiased and detailed as possible.

To get started, let’s take a look at some of the key features of Ricoh GR and Fujifilm X-A10 and, after this, we can go on to our detailed comparison of these models.

Ricoh GR Key Features:

  • 16.0 MP APS-C CMOS sensor
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Image Stabilization: No
  • 3″ Fixed Type Screen
  • ViewFinder: Yes
  • 4.0 fps Continuous Shooting
  • Video: 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps)
  • Built-in Wireless: Yes
  • Dimensions: 117 x 61 x 35 mm
  • Weight: 245 g
  • Environmental Sealing: No
  • Built-in GPS: No
  • Replaced by Ricoh GR II. Compare

Fujifilm X-A10 Key Features:

  • 16.0 MP APS-C CMOS sensor
  • ISO 200 - 6400 (Expands to 100 - 25600)
  • Image Stabilization: No
  • 3″ Tilting Screen
  • ViewFinder: No
  • 6.0 fps Continuous Shooting
  • Video: 1920 x 1080 (30p. 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p,24p)
  • Built-in Wireless: Yes
  • Dimensions: 117 x 67 x 40 mm
  • Weight: 331 g
  • Environmental Sealing: No
  • Built-in GPS: No

Ricoh GR was substituted by Ricoh GR II. Be sure to check out some of our other overviews that may also interest you:
Ricoh GR vs. GR II
Ricoh GR II vs. Fujifilm X-A10

Why is Ricoh GR a better choice than Fujifilm X-A10

Sensor Area 372.09 mm2 vs 368.16 mm2 1.1% larger pixel area
Flash Range 5.4 vs 5 0.4 better flash range
External Flash Yes vs No Connect off-camera flash
Screen Resolution 1,230k dots vs 1,040k dots 15.4% higher resolution screen
Weight 245 g vs 331 g 86 g lighter
Max Video Resolution 1920 x 1080 vs 0 x 1080 Higher Resolution Video

What are the key reasons to pick Fujifilm X-A10 over Ricoh GR

Continuous Shooting 6 fps vs 4 fps 2 fps faster
AutoFocus Face Detection Yes vs No Very handy for portraits
Battery Life 410 shots vs 290 shots 120 more frames with a single charge

Key PROs of Ricoh GR and Fujifilm X-A10

Screen Size 3″ | 3″ Large display
Screen Resolution 1,230k dots | 1,040k dots High resolution screen
Raw Support Yes | Yes Better image quality
Timelapse Recording Yes | Yes Creative shooting
Bracketing Yes | Yes Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR
Built-In Flash Yes | Yes External flash available

Key CONs of Ricoh GR and Fujifilm X-A10

Touch Screen No | No No touch screen
Sensor Resolution 16.0 MP | 16.0 MP Small sensor resolution
Microphone Port No | No No microphone port
Headphone Port No | No No headphone port
Continuous Shooting 4.0 fps | 6.0 fps Low continuous shooting
Image Stabilization No | No No image stabilization
Environmental Sealing No | No No environmental sealing

Ricoh GR vs Fujifilm X-A10: Comparing Two Models By Physical Characteristics

Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Ricoh GR and Fujifilm X-A10 from the front view.

Ricoh GR
Fujifilm X-A10
HTML
BB

Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.

Ricoh GR
Fujifilm X-A10
HTML
BB

After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.

Speaking of weight, Ricoh GR is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 86g less than the Fujifilm X-A10. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.

Comparing Ricoh GR and Fujifilm X-A10 by the type of Sensor and Resolution

Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.

Are Ricoh GR and Fujifilm X-A10 any different in terms of sensor type?

In terms of sensor type and resolution, these models are identical. Both Ricoh GR and Fujifilm X-A10 come equipped with the same CMOS that has a resolution of 16.0 MP. Thus, if you are wondering, which option to choose, this is not a factor you should be looking at.

Take a look below to find the comparison of Ricoh GR and Fujifilm X-A10 by the size of their sensors.

Ricoh GR
Fujifilm X-A10
HTML
BB

Ricoh GR and Fujifilm X-A10 are identical by this indicator, as each feature a sensor of the same size. Thus, both cameras will provide the same level of control in terms of the depth of field if you use them with the same focal length and aperture.

For Which Fields Of Photography Are Ricoh GR and Fujifilm X-A10 Suitable?

If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.

This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Ricoh GR and Fujifilm X-A10 in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.

Photography Type Ricoh GR Fujifilm X-A10
Portrait Photography
64%
69%
Street Photography
85%
52%
Sports Photography
52%
39%
Daily Photography
0%
17%
Landscape Photography
92%
76%

Ricoh GR for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.7 x 15.7 mm) sensor

Disadvantages:

  • No Image Stabilization

Fujifilm X-A10 for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.6 x 15.6 mm) sensor
  • Face Detection Focusing

Disadvantages:

  • No Image Stabilization

Ricoh GR for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Small size (117 x 61 x 35 mm)
  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Large APS-C(23.7 x 15.7 mm) sensor

Disadvantages:

  • No Image Stabilization

Fujifilm X-A10 for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Live View
  • Large APS-C(23.6 x 15.6 mm) sensor

Disadvantages:

  • Big size (117 x 67 x 40 mm)
  • No Built-in View Finder
  • No Image Stabilization

Ricoh GR for Sports Photography

Advantages:

No Significant Advantages

Disadvantages:

  • Slow Continuous Shooting (4.0 fps)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
  • Small Number of CrossFocus Points (0)
  • Bad Low Light ISO (972)
  • Small battery life (290 shots)
  • Small size (117 x 61 x 35 mm)

Fujifilm X-A10 for Sports Photography

Advantages:

  • No View Finder

Disadvantages:

  • Slow Continuous Shooting (6.0 fps)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
  • Smal Number of autofocus Points (49)
  • Bad Max Native ISO (6400)
  • Small battery life (410 shots)

Ricoh GR for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.7 x 15.7 mm) sensor
  • Small weight (245 g)
  • Built-in Flash
  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Wireless Connectivity
  • Video is available

Disadvantages:

No Significant Disadvantages

Fujifilm X-A10 for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.6 x 15.6 mm) sensor
  • Built-in Flash
  • Live View
  • Wireless Connectivity
  • Video is available

Disadvantages:

  • No Built-in View Finder

Ricoh GR for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.7 x 15.7 mm) sensor
  • Good Dynamic Range (13.5)
  • Live View
  • RAW Support

Disadvantages:

  • Low resolution sensor (16 MP)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Bad Low Light ISO (972)

Fujifilm X-A10 for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.6 x 15.6 mm) sensor
  • Live View
  • RAW Support

Disadvantages:

  • Low resolution sensor (16 MP)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Bad Max Native ISO (6400)

Comparison of Ricoh GR vs Fujifilm X-A10: Final Verdict

Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Ricoh GR or Fujifilm X-A10, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.

What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Ricoh GR and Fujifilm X-A10 here is what we can say in conclusion:

According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Ricoh GR deserves a higher Total Score than the Fujifilm X-A10. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.

Ricoh GR vs Fujifilm X-A10 Table Of Technical Specs

For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:

Ricoh GR Fujifilm X-A10
General
Brand Ricoh Fujifilm
Model GR X-A10
Announced Apr 17, 2013 Dec 01, 2016
Body Type Large sensor compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor
Sensor Type CMOS CMOS
Sensor Size APS-C APS-C
Sensor Dimensions 23.7 x 15.7 mm 23.6 x 15.6 mm
Sensor Area 372.09 mm2 368.16 mm2
Sensor Resolution 16.0 MP 16.0 MP
Max Image Resolution 4928 x 3264 4896 x 3264
Max Native ISO 25,600 6,400
Max Boosted ISO n/a 25,600
Min Native ISO 100 200
RAW Support Yes Yes
Lens
Manual Focus Yes Yes
Lens Mount Fixed lens Fujifilm X
Number of Lenses n/a 43
Focal Length Multiplier n/a 1.5x
Macro Focus Range
AutoFocus
AF Touch No No
AF Continuous Yes Yes
AF Single Yes Yes
AF Tracking No Yes
AF Selective Yes Yes
AF Center No Yes
AF Multi Area Yes Yes
AF Live View Yes Yes
AF Face Detection No Yes
AF Contrast Detection Yes Yes
AF Phase Detection No No
Number of Focus Points n/a 49
Number of Cross Focus Points 0 n/a
Screen
Screen Type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen Size 3″ 3″
Screen Resolution 1,230k dots 1,040k dots
Live View Yes Yes
Touch Screen No No
ViewFinder
ViewFinder Optical (optional)
ViewFinder Resolution 0k dots 0k dots
ViewFinder Coverage % %
ViewFinder Magnification
Photography Features
Min Shutter Speed 300 s 30 s
Max Shutter Speed 1/4000 s 1/4000 s
Continuous Shooting 4.0 fps 6.0 fps
Shutter Priority Yes Yes
Aperture Priority Yes Yes
Manual Exposure Mode Yes Yes
Exposure Compensation Yes Yes
Custom White Balance Yes Yes
Image Stabilization No No
Built-in Flash Yes Yes
Flash Range 5.4 5
Flash Modes Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro, rear-curtain synchro, commander
External Flash Yes No
AE Bracketing Yes Yes
WB Bracketing Yes Yes
Exposure Modes
Multi-Segment Yes Yes
Average No Yes
Spot Yes Yes
Partial No No
AF-Area No No
Center Weighted Yes No
Video Features
Video Resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p. 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p,24p)
Max Video Resolution 1920 x 1080 0 x 1080
Video Formats MPEG-4 H.264
Microphone Port No No
Headphone Port No No
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity Yes Yes
HDMI Yes Yes
USB USB 2.0 USB 2.0
Physical
Environmental Sealing No No
Water Proof No No
Dust Proof No No
Shock Proof No No
Crush Proof No No
Freeze Proof No No
Weight 245 g 331 g
Physical Dimensions 117 x 61 x 35 mm 117 x 67 x 40 mm
Battery Life 290 shots 410 shots
Battery Type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery Model DB65 NP-W126S
Other Features
Self Timer Yes Yes
Timelapse Recording Yes Yes
GPS
Storage Type SD, SDHC, SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Storage Slots 1 1

Most popular cameras

Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 20.0 MP CMOS
Four Thirds
Canon EOS-1D X Mark II 20.0 MP CMOS
Full frame
Sony Alpha A7S 12.0 MP CMOS
Full frame
Fujifilm X-T3 26.0 MP BSI-CMOS
APS-C
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV 30.0 MP CMOS
Full frame