Ricoh GR III vs Ricoh GR Digital III

  • APS-C
  • 24 megapixels
  • Fixed lens
  • 47
    Overall
  • 14
    Imaging
  • 48
    Features
  • 85
    Size
  • 0
    Price
  • 1/1.7"
  • 10 megapixels
  • Fixed lens
  • 41
    Overall
  • 5
    Imaging
  • 24
    Features
  • 88
    Size
  • 0
    Price

Ricoh GR III vs Ricoh GR Digital III: a Complete Review and Comparison

Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!

In this overview, we are going to take a look at two different camera models that fall into different categories: the first model we are about to review, Ricoh GR III is a camera from Large Sensor Compact category. It features CMOS sensor with a resolution of 24.0 MP. The second model we are looking at, Ricoh GR Digital III, falls into a Small Sensor Compact category and it is equipped with CCD sensor that has a resolution of 10.0 MP.

Now, before we can move on to our comparison, let's take a moment to look at the key characteristics of Ricoh GR III and Ricoh GR Digital III.

Ricoh GR III Key Features:

  • 24.0 MP APS-C CMOS sensor
  • Image Stabilization: Yes
  • 3″ Fixed Type Screen
  • ViewFinder: Yes
  • fps Continuous Shooting
  • Video: 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
  • Built-in Wireless: Yes
  • Dimensions: 109 x 62 x 33 mm
  • Weight: 257 g
  • Environmental Sealing: No
  • Built-in GPS: No

Ricoh GR Digital III Key Features:

  • 10.0 MP 1/1.7" CCD sensor
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Image Stabilization: No
  • 3″ Fixed Type Screen
  • ViewFinder: Yes
  • fps Continuous Shooting
  • Video: 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
  • Built-in Wireless: No
  • Dimensions: 109 x 59 x 26 mm
  • Weight: 208 g
  • Environmental Sealing: No
  • Built-in GPS: No
  • Replaced Ricoh GR Digital II.
  • Replaced by Ricoh GR Digital IV. Compare

Why is Ricoh GR III a better choice than Ricoh GR Digital III

Wireless Connectivity Built-In vs No Better connectivity
Sensor Resolution 24.0 MP vs 10.0 MP 58.3% more pixels
Sensor Area 366.6 mm2 vs 41.52 mm2 88.7% larger pixel area
Image Stabilization Yes vs No All lenses are stabilized
Max Shutter Speed 1/4000 vs 1/2000 Faster shutter speed
AutoFocus Face Detection Yes vs No Very handy for portraits
Screen Resolution 1,037k dots vs 920k dots 11.3% higher resolution screen
Touch Screen Yes vs No Easy control of camera functions
Max Video Resolution 1920 x 1080 vs 640 x 480 Higher Resolution Video

What are the key reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over Ricoh GR III

Timelapse Recording Yes vs No Creative shooting
Built-In Flash Yes vs No All the lenses are stabilized
Flash Range 3 vs No 3 better flash range
Weight 208 g vs 257 g 49 g lighter

Key PROs of Ricoh GR III and Ricoh GR Digital III

Screen Size 3″ | 3″ Large display
Viewfinder Optical (optional) | Optical (optional) Better framing and control
Raw Support Yes | Yes Better image quality

Key CONs of Ricoh GR III and Ricoh GR Digital III

Screen Type Fixed Type | Fixed Type No flexible viewing angles
Microphone Port No | No No microphone port
Headphone Port No | No No headphone port
Continuous Shooting fps | fps Low continuous shooting
Environmental Sealing No | No No environmental sealing

Ricoh GR III vs Ricoh GR Digital III: Comparing Two Models By Physical Characteristics

Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Ricoh GR III and Ricoh GR Digital III from the front view.

Ricoh GR III
Ricoh GR Digital III
HTML
BB

Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.

Ricoh GR III
Ricoh GR Digital III
HTML
BB

After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.

Speaking of weight, Ricoh GR Digital III is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 49g less than the Ricoh GR III. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.

Comparing Ricoh GR III and Ricoh GR Digital III by the type of Sensor and Resolution

Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.

Are Ricoh GR III and Ricoh GR Digital III any different in terms of sensor type?

In fact, that's exactly what makes these two models really different. Thus, it is a good point to consider if your are choosing between these two cameras. Ricoh GR III features a 24.0 MP APS-C sized CMOS sensor . Ricoh GR Digital III, in its turn, comes with a 10.0 MP 1/1.7" sized CCD sensor and GR engine III processor , which makes it significantly different from the first model.

Take a look below to find the comparison of Ricoh GR III and Ricoh GR Digital III by the size of their sensors.

Ricoh GR III
Ricoh GR Digital III
HTML
BB

One more distinctive feature of compared models is the sensor size. Ricoh GR III has a sensor area 0.1x bigger compared to Ricoh GR Digital III. What does it mean? This basically means that if you these cameras them with the same aperture and focal length, the first model will give you more control in terms of the blurry background and depth of field.

For Which Fields Of Photography Are Ricoh GR III and Ricoh GR Digital III Suitable?

If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.

This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Ricoh GR III and Ricoh GR Digital III in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.

Photography Type Ricoh GR III Ricoh GR Digital III
Portrait Photography
93%
9%
Street Photography
98%
63%
Sports Photography
48%
47%
Daily Photography
2%
1%
Landscape Photography
81%
59%

Ricoh GR III for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
  • High resolution sensor (24 MP)
  • Image Stabilization
  • Face Detection Focusing

Disadvantages:

No Significant Disadvantages

Ricoh GR Digital III for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

No Significant Advantages

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm) sensor
  • No Image Stabilization

Ricoh GR III for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Small size (109 x 62 x 33 mm)
  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Image Stabilization
  • Large APS-C(23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor

Disadvantages:

No Significant Disadvantages

Ricoh GR Digital III for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Small size (109 x 59 x 26 mm)
  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View

Disadvantages:

  • No Image Stabilization
  • Small 1/1.7"(7.44 x 5.58 mm) sensor

Ricoh GR III for Sports Photography

Advantages:

No Significant Advantages

Disadvantages:

  • Slow Continuous Shooting ( fps)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
  • Bad Max Native ISO (0)
  • Small size (109 x 62 x 33 mm)

Ricoh GR Digital III for Sports Photography

Advantages:

No Significant Advantages

Disadvantages:

  • Slow Continuous Shooting ( fps)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/2000s)
  • Bad Max Native ISO (1600)
  • Small size (109 x 59 x 26 mm)

Ricoh GR III for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
  • Small weight (257 g)
  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Wireless Connectivity
  • Video is available

Disadvantages:

  • No Built-in Flash

Ricoh GR Digital III for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Small weight (208 g)
  • Small size (109 x 59 x 26 mm)
  • Built-in Flash
  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Video is available

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm) sensor

Ricoh GR III for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
  • High resolution sensor (24 MP)
  • Live View
  • RAW Support

Disadvantages:

  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Bad Max Native ISO (0)

Ricoh GR Digital III for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Live View
  • RAW Support

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm) sensor
  • Low resolution sensor (10 MP)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Bad Max Native ISO (1600)

Comparison of Ricoh GR III vs Ricoh GR Digital III: Final Verdict

Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Ricoh GR III or Ricoh GR Digital III, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.

What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Ricoh GR III and Ricoh GR Digital III here is what we can say in conclusion:

According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Ricoh GR III deserves a higher Total Score than the Ricoh GR Digital III. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.

Ricoh GR III vs Ricoh GR Digital III Table Of Technical Specs

For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:

Ricoh GR III Ricoh GR Digital III
General
Brand Ricoh Ricoh
Model GR III GR Digital III
Announced Sep 25, 2018 Jul 27, 2009
Body Type Large sensor compact Compact
Sensor
Sensor Type CMOS CCD
Sensor Size APS-C 1/1.7"
Sensor Dimensions 23.5 x 15.6 mm 7.44 x 5.58 mm
Sensor Area 366.60 mm2 41.52 mm2
Sensor Resolution 24.0 MP 10.0 MP
Max Image Resolution 6000 x 4000 3648 x 2736
Max Native ISO 0 1,600
Max Boosted ISO n/a n/a
Min Native ISO 0 64
RAW Support Yes Yes
Lens
Manual Focus Yes Yes
Lens Mount Fixed lens Fixed lens
Number of Lenses n/a n/a
Focal Length Multiplier n/a n/a
Macro Focus Range 6 1
AutoFocus
AF Touch Yes No
AF Continuous Yes No
AF Single Yes Yes
AF Tracking Yes No
AF Selective Yes No
AF Center Yes No
AF Multi Area Yes Yes
AF Live View Yes Yes
AF Face Detection Yes No
AF Contrast Detection Yes Yes
AF Phase Detection Yes No
Number of Focus Points n/a n/a
Number of Cross Focus Points n/a n/a
Screen
Screen Type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen Size 3″ 3″
Screen Resolution 1,037k dots 920k dots
Live View Yes Yes
Touch Screen Yes No
ViewFinder
ViewFinder Optical (optional) Optical (optional)
ViewFinder Resolution 0k dots 0k dots
ViewFinder Coverage % %
ViewFinder Magnification
Photography Features
Min Shutter Speed 30 s 1 s
Max Shutter Speed 1/4000 s 1/2000 s
Continuous Shooting fps fps
Shutter Priority Yes Yes
Aperture Priority Yes Yes
Manual Exposure Mode Yes Yes
Exposure Compensation Yes Yes
Custom White Balance Yes Yes
Image Stabilization Yes No
Built-in Flash No Yes
Flash Range 0 3
Flash Modes Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye Auto, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External Flash Yes Yes
AE Bracketing Yes No
WB Bracketing No No
Exposure Modes
Multi-Segment Yes Yes
Average Yes No
Spot Yes Yes
Partial No No
AF-Area No No
Center Weighted No Yes
Video Features
Video Resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max Video Resolution 1920 x 1080 640 x 480
Video Formats MPEG-4, H.264 n/a
Microphone Port No No
Headphone Port No No
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity Yes No
HDMI No No
USB USB 1 USB 2.0
Physical
Environmental Sealing No No
Water Proof No No
Dust Proof No No
Shock Proof No No
Crush Proof No No
Freeze Proof No No
Weight 257 g 208 g
Physical Dimensions 109 x 62 x 33 mm 109 x 59 x 26 mm
Battery Life n/a n/a
Battery Type n/a n/a
Battery Model n/a n/a
Other Features
Self Timer Yes Yes
Timelapse Recording No Yes
GPS
Storage Type Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage Slots 1 1

Most popular cameras

Sony Alpha A7 II 24.0 MP CMOS
Full frame
Sony Alpha A7S II 12.0 MP CMOS
Full frame
Canon EOS-1D X Mark II 20.0 MP CMOS
Full frame
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV 30.0 MP CMOS
Full frame
Pentax K-1 Mark II 36.0 MP CMOS
Full frame