Ricoh GR III vs Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

  • APS-C
  • 24 megapixels
  • Fixed lens
  • 47
    Overall
  • 14
    Imaging
  • 48
    Features
  • 85
    Size
  • 0
    Price
  • 1"
  • 20 megapixels
  • Fixed lens
  • 48
    Overall
  • 16
    Imaging
  • 61
    Features
  • 83
    Size
  • 0
    Price

Ricoh GR III vs Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II: a Complete Review and Comparison

Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!

In this review, we are going to provide a detailed evaluation and comparison of two different camera models that fall into the same category - Large Sensor Compact. Although these cameras are from the same category, they were introduced by different brands - Ricoh and Canon. Models we are reviewing in this article have different types of sensors, Thus, Ricoh GR III is equipped with a 24.0 MP CMOS sensor. Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II, on the contrary, features BSI-CMOS sensor with a resolution of 20.0 MP.

To get started, let’s take a look at some of the key features of Ricoh GR III and Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II and, after this, we can go on to our detailed comparison of these models.

Ricoh GR III Key Features:

  • 24.0 MP APS-C CMOS sensor
  • Image Stabilization: Yes
  • 3″ Fixed Type Screen
  • ViewFinder: Yes
  • fps Continuous Shooting
  • Video: 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
  • Built-in Wireless: Yes
  • Dimensions: 109 x 62 x 33 mm
  • Weight: 257 g
  • Environmental Sealing: No
  • Built-in GPS: No

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II Key Features:

  • 20.0 MP 1" BSI-CMOS sensor
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Expands to 25600)
  • Image Stabilization: Yes
  • 3″ Tilting Screen
  • ViewFinder: No
  • 8.0 fps Continuous Shooting
  • Video: 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
  • Built-in Wireless: Yes
  • Dimensions: 106 x 61 x 42 mm
  • Weight: 319 g
  • Environmental Sealing: No
  • Built-in GPS: No
  • Replaced Canon G7 X.

Why is Ricoh GR III a better choice than Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Sensor Resolution 24.0 MP vs 20.0 MP 16.7% more pixels
Sensor Area 366.6 mm2 vs 116.16 mm2 68.3% larger pixel area
External Flash Yes vs No Connect off-camera flash
Max Shutter Speed 1/4000 vs 1/2000 Faster shutter speed
Weight 257 g vs 319 g 62 g lighter

What are the key reasons to pick Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II over Ricoh GR III

NFC Yes vs No Easy wireless connectivity with compatible devices
Timelapse Recording Yes vs No Creative shooting
Continuous Shooting 8 fps vs No fps 8 fps faster
Built-In Flash Yes vs No All the lenses are stabilized
Flash Range 7 vs No 7 better flash range
Screen Resolution 1,040k dots vs 1,037k dots 0.3% higher resolution screen

Key PROs of Ricoh GR III and Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Touch Screen Yes | Yes Easy control of camera functions
Screen Size 3″ | 3″ Large display
Screen Resolution 1,037k dots | 1,040k dots High resolution screen
Raw Support Yes | Yes Better image quality
AutoFocus Face Detection Yes | Yes Very handy for portraits
Bracketing Yes | Yes Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR
Image Stabilization Yes | Yes Built-in stabilization

Key CONs of Ricoh GR III and Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II

Microphone Port No | No No microphone port
Headphone Port No | No No headphone port
Environmental Sealing No | No No environmental sealing

Ricoh GR III vs Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II: Comparing Two Models By Physical Characteristics

Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Ricoh GR III and Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II from the front view.

Ricoh GR III
Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II
HTML
BB

Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.

Ricoh GR III
Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II
HTML
BB

After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.

Speaking of weight, Ricoh GR III is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 62g less than the Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.

Thickness values for Large Sensor Compact cameras:
Ricoh GR III — 33 mm
Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II — 42 mm
Min: 31 mm
Average: 54 mm
Max: 122 mm
Weight values for Large Sensor Compact cameras:
Ricoh GR III — 257 g
Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II — 319 g
Min: 206 g
Average: 393 g
Max: 1040 g

Comparing Ricoh GR III and Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II by the type of Sensor and Resolution

Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.

Are Ricoh GR III and Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II any different in terms of sensor type?

In fact, that's exactly what makes these two models really different. Thus, it is a good point to consider if your are choosing between these two cameras. Ricoh GR III features a 24.0 MP APS-C sized CMOS sensor . Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II, in its turn, comes with a 20.0 MP 1" sized BSI-CMOS sensor , which makes it significantly different from the first model.

Take a look below to find the comparison of Ricoh GR III and Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II by the size of their sensors.

Ricoh GR III
Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II
HTML
BB

One more distinctive feature of compared models is the sensor size. Ricoh GR III has a sensor area 0.3x bigger compared to Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II. What does it mean? This basically means that if you these cameras them with the same aperture and focal length, the first model will give you more control in terms of the blurry background and depth of field.

For Which Fields Of Photography Are Ricoh GR III and Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II Suitable?

If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.

This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Ricoh GR III and Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.

Photography Type Ricoh GR III Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II
Portrait Photography
93%
80%
Street Photography
98%
31%
Sports Photography
48%
39%
Daily Photography
2%
66%
Landscape Photography
81%
68%

Ricoh GR III for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
  • High resolution sensor (24 MP)
  • Image Stabilization
  • Face Detection Focusing

Disadvantages:

No Significant Disadvantages

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

  • Canon is famous with its skintones
  • Image Stabilization
  • Face Detection Focusing

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1" (13.2 x 8.8 mm) sensor

Ricoh GR III for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Small size (109 x 62 x 33 mm)
  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Image Stabilization
  • Large APS-C(23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor

Disadvantages:

No Significant Disadvantages

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Live View
  • Image Stabilization

Disadvantages:

  • Big size (106 x 61 x 42 mm)
  • No Built-in View Finder
  • Small 1"(13.2 x 8.8 mm) sensor

Ricoh GR III for Sports Photography

Advantages:

No Significant Advantages

Disadvantages:

  • Slow Continuous Shooting ( fps)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
  • Bad Max Native ISO (0)
  • Small size (109 x 62 x 33 mm)

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II for Sports Photography

Advantages:

  • No View Finder

Disadvantages:

  • Slow Continuous Shooting (8.0 fps)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/2000s)
  • Smal Number of autofocus Points (31)
  • Bad Max Native ISO (12800)
  • Small battery life (265 shots)

Ricoh GR III for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
  • Small weight (257 g)
  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Wireless Connectivity
  • Video is available

Disadvantages:

  • No Built-in Flash

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Built-in Flash
  • Live View
  • Wireless Connectivity
  • Video is available

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1" (13.2 x 8.8 mm) sensor
  • No Built-in View Finder

Ricoh GR III for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
  • High resolution sensor (24 MP)
  • Live View
  • RAW Support

Disadvantages:

  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Bad Max Native ISO (0)

Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Live View
  • RAW Support

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1" (13.2 x 8.8 mm) sensor
  • Low resolution sensor (20 MP)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Bad Max Native ISO (12800)

Comparison of Ricoh GR III vs Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II: Final Verdict

Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Ricoh GR III or Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.

What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Ricoh GR III and Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II here is what we can say in conclusion:

According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II deserves a higher Total Score than the Ricoh GR III. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.

Ricoh GR III vs Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II Table Of Technical Specs

For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:

Ricoh GR III Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark II
General
Brand Ricoh Canon
Model GR III PowerShot G7 X Mark II
Announced Sep 25, 2018 Feb 18, 2016
Body Type Large sensor compact Large sensor compact
Sensor
Sensor Type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor Size APS-C 1"
Sensor Dimensions 23.5 x 15.6 mm 13.2 x 8.8 mm
Sensor Area 366.60 mm2 116.16 mm2
Sensor Resolution 24.0 MP 20.0 MP
Max Image Resolution 6000 x 4000 5472 x 3648
Max Native ISO 0 12,800
Max Boosted ISO n/a 25,600
Min Native ISO 0 125
RAW Support Yes Yes
Lens
Manual Focus Yes Yes
Lens Mount Fixed lens Fixed lens
Number of Lenses n/a n/a
Focal Length Multiplier n/a n/a
Macro Focus Range 6 5
AutoFocus
AF Touch Yes Yes
AF Continuous Yes Yes
AF Single Yes Yes
AF Tracking Yes Yes
AF Selective Yes Yes
AF Center Yes Yes
AF Multi Area Yes Yes
AF Live View Yes Yes
AF Face Detection Yes Yes
AF Contrast Detection Yes Yes
AF Phase Detection Yes No
Number of Focus Points n/a 31
Number of Cross Focus Points n/a n/a
Screen
Screen Type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen Size 3″ 3″
Screen Resolution 1,037k dots 1,040k dots
Live View Yes Yes
Touch Screen Yes Yes
ViewFinder
ViewFinder Optical (optional)
ViewFinder Resolution 0k dots 0k dots
ViewFinder Coverage % %
ViewFinder Magnification
Photography Features
Min Shutter Speed 30 s 15 s
Max Shutter Speed 1/4000 s 1/2000 s
Continuous Shooting fps 8.0 fps
Shutter Priority Yes Yes
Aperture Priority Yes Yes
Manual Exposure Mode Yes Yes
Exposure Compensation Yes Yes
Custom White Balance Yes Yes
Image Stabilization Yes Yes
Built-in Flash No Yes
Flash Range 0 7
Flash Modes Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye Auto, slow synchro
External Flash Yes No
AE Bracketing Yes Yes
WB Bracketing No No
Exposure Modes
Multi-Segment Yes Yes
Average Yes No
Spot Yes Yes
Partial No No
AF-Area No No
Center Weighted No No
Video Features
Video Resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Max Video Resolution 1920 x 1080 1920 x 1080
Video Formats MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone Port No No
Headphone Port No No
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity Yes Yes
HDMI No Yes
USB USB 1 USB 2.0
Physical
Environmental Sealing No No
Water Proof No No
Dust Proof No No
Shock Proof No No
Crush Proof No No
Freeze Proof No No
Weight 257 g 319 g
Physical Dimensions 109 x 62 x 33 mm 106 x 61 x 42 mm
Battery Life n/a 265 shots
Battery Type n/a Battery Pack
Battery Model n/a NB-13L
Other Features
Self Timer Yes Yes
Timelapse Recording No Yes
GPS
Storage Type Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I compatible)
Storage Slots 1 1

Most popular cameras

Fujifilm X-T1 IR 16.0 MP CMOS X-TRANS II
APS-C
Fujifilm X-T1 16.0 MP CMOS X-TRANS II
APS-C
Samsung NX20 20.0 MP CMOS
APS-C
Canon EOS M3 24.0 MP CMOS
APS-C
Panasonic Lumix DC-GH5S 10.0 MP CMOS
Four Thirds