Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh GR

  • APS-C
  • 16 megapixels
  • Fixed lens
  • 51
    Overall
  • 21
    Imaging
  • 32
    Features
  • 84
    Size
  • 0
    Price
  • APS-C
  • 16 megapixels
  • Fixed lens
  • 51
    Overall
  • 21
    Imaging
  • 27
    Features
  • 84
    Size
  • 0
    Price

Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh GR: a Complete Review and Comparison

Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!

The goal of this overview is to provide a detailed comparison of two popular camera models from Large Sensor Compact category, introduced by Ricoh. We are going to take a closer look at the technical and physical characteristics, features, and performance. The models we are going to assess and compare in this review are GR II and GR. The first common feature of Ricoh GR II and Ricoh GR that is worth mentioning is sensor. Both cameras feature CMOS sensors with a resolution of 16.0 MP.

Now, before we can move on to our comparison, let's take a moment to look at the key characteristics of Ricoh GR II and Ricoh GR.

Ricoh GR II Key Features:

  • 16.0 MP APS-C CMOS sensor
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Image Stabilization: No
  • 3″ Fixed Type Screen
  • ViewFinder: Yes
  • 4.0 fps Continuous Shooting
  • Video: 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p)
  • Built-in Wireless: Yes
  • Dimensions: 117 x 63 x 35 mm
  • Weight: 251 g
  • Environmental Sealing: No
  • Built-in GPS: No
  • Replaced Ricoh GR. Compare
  • Replaced by Ricoh GR III. Compare

Ricoh GR Key Features:

  • 16.0 MP APS-C CMOS sensor
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Image Stabilization: No
  • 3″ Fixed Type Screen
  • ViewFinder: Yes
  • 4.0 fps Continuous Shooting
  • Video: 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps)
  • Built-in Wireless: Yes
  • Dimensions: 117 x 61 x 35 mm
  • Weight: 245 g
  • Environmental Sealing: No
  • Built-in GPS: No
  • Replaced by Ricoh GR II. Compare

Since Ricoh GR II has been around for some time, it was substituted by Ricoh GR III. Be sure to check out some of our other comparisons that may also interest you:
Ricoh GR II vs. GR III
Ricoh GR III vs. Ricoh GR

Being a newer model, Ricoh GR II substituted Ricoh GR.

Why is Ricoh GR II a better choice than Ricoh GR

NFC Yes vs No Easy wireless connectivity with compatible devices
AutoFocus Face Detection Yes vs No Very handy for portraits
Battery Life 320 shots vs 290 shots 30 more frames with a single charge
Dxo Dynamic Range 13.7 vs 13.5 Better dynamic range
Dxo Low Light Iso 1078 vs 972 Better High ISO performance

What are the key reasons to pick Ricoh GR over Ricoh GR II

Timelapse Recording Yes vs No Creative shooting
Flash Range 5.4 vs 3 2.4 better flash range
Weight 245 g vs 251 g 6 g lighter

Key PROs of Ricoh GR II and Ricoh GR

Screen Size 3″ | 3″ Large display
Screen Resolution 1,230k dots | 1,230k dots High resolution screen
Viewfinder Optical (optional) | Optical (optional) Better framing and control
Raw Support Yes | Yes Better image quality
Bracketing Yes | Yes Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR
Built-In Flash Yes | Yes External flash available

Key CONs of Ricoh GR II and Ricoh GR

Touch Screen No | No No touch screen
Screen Type Fixed Type | Fixed Type No flexible viewing angles
Sensor Resolution 16.0 MP | 16.0 MP Small sensor resolution
Microphone Port No | No No microphone port
Headphone Port No | No No headphone port
Continuous Shooting 4.0 fps | 4.0 fps Low continuous shooting
Image Stabilization No | No No image stabilization
Environmental Sealing No | No No environmental sealing

Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh GR: Comparing Two Models By Physical Characteristics

Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Ricoh GR II and Ricoh GR from the front view.

Ricoh GR II
Ricoh GR
HTML
BB

Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.

Ricoh GR II
Ricoh GR
HTML
BB

After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.

Speaking of weight, Ricoh GR is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 6g less than the Ricoh GR II. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.

Battery values for Large Sensor Compact cameras:
Ricoh GR II — 320 shots
Ricoh GR — 290 shots
Min: 200 shots
Average: 301 shots
Max: 450 shots
Thickness values for Large Sensor Compact cameras:
Ricoh GR II — 35 mm
Ricoh GR — 35 mm
Min: 31 mm
Average: 54 mm
Max: 122 mm
Weight values for Large Sensor Compact cameras:
Ricoh GR II — 251 g
Ricoh GR — 245 g
Min: 206 g
Average: 393 g
Max: 1040 g

Comparing Ricoh GR II and Ricoh GR by the type of Sensor and Resolution

Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.

Are Ricoh GR II and Ricoh GR any different in terms of sensor type?

In terms of sensor type and resolution, these models are identical. Both Ricoh GR II and Ricoh GR come equipped with the same CMOS that has a resolution of 16.0 MP. Thus, if you are wondering, which option to choose, this is not a factor you should be looking at.

Take a look below to find the comparison of Ricoh GR II and Ricoh GR by the size of their sensors.

Ricoh GR II
Ricoh GR
HTML
BB

Ricoh GR II and Ricoh GR are identical by this indicator, as each feature a sensor of the same size. Thus, both cameras will provide the same level of control in terms of the depth of field if you use them with the same focal length and aperture.

For Which Fields Of Photography Are Ricoh GR II and Ricoh GR Suitable?

If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.

This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Ricoh GR II and Ricoh GR in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.

Photography Type Ricoh GR II Ricoh GR
Portrait Photography
71%
64%
Street Photography
68%
85%
Sports Photography
64%
52%
Daily Photography
0%
0%
Landscape Photography
92%
92%

Ricoh GR II for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.7 x 15.7 mm) sensor
  • Face Detection Focusing

Disadvantages:

  • No Image Stabilization

Ricoh GR for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.7 x 15.7 mm) sensor

Disadvantages:

  • No Image Stabilization

Ricoh GR II for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Large APS-C(23.7 x 15.7 mm) sensor

Disadvantages:

  • Big size (117 x 63 x 35 mm)
  • No Image Stabilization
  • Small Number of autofocus Points (9)

Ricoh GR for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Small size (117 x 61 x 35 mm)
  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Large APS-C(23.7 x 15.7 mm) sensor

Disadvantages:

  • No Image Stabilization

Ricoh GR II for Sports Photography

Advantages:

No Significant Advantages

Disadvantages:

  • Slow Continuous Shooting (4.0 fps)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
  • Smal Number of autofocus Points (9)
  • Bad Low Light ISO (1078)
  • Small battery life (320 shots)

Ricoh GR for Sports Photography

Advantages:

No Significant Advantages

Disadvantages:

  • Slow Continuous Shooting (4.0 fps)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
  • Small Number of CrossFocus Points (0)
  • Bad Low Light ISO (972)
  • Small battery life (290 shots)
  • Small size (117 x 61 x 35 mm)

Ricoh GR II for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.7 x 15.7 mm) sensor
  • Small weight (251 g)
  • Built-in Flash
  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Wireless Connectivity
  • Video is available

Disadvantages:

No Significant Disadvantages

Ricoh GR for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.7 x 15.7 mm) sensor
  • Small weight (245 g)
  • Built-in Flash
  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Wireless Connectivity
  • Video is available

Disadvantages:

No Significant Disadvantages

Ricoh GR II for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.7 x 15.7 mm) sensor
  • Good Dynamic Range (13.7)
  • Live View
  • RAW Support

Disadvantages:

  • Low resolution sensor (16 MP)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Bad Low Light ISO (1078)

Ricoh GR for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.7 x 15.7 mm) sensor
  • Good Dynamic Range (13.5)
  • Live View
  • RAW Support

Disadvantages:

  • Low resolution sensor (16 MP)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Bad Low Light ISO (972)

Comparison of Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh GR: Final Verdict

Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Ricoh GR II or Ricoh GR, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.

What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Ricoh GR II and Ricoh GR here is what we can say in conclusion:

According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Ricoh GR deserves a higher Total Score than the Ricoh GR II. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.

Ricoh GR II vs Ricoh GR Table Of Technical Specs

For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:

Ricoh GR II Ricoh GR
General
Brand Ricoh Ricoh
Model GR II GR
Announced Jun 17, 2015 Apr 17, 2013
Body Type Large sensor compact Large sensor compact
Sensor
Sensor Type CMOS CMOS
Sensor Size APS-C APS-C
Sensor Dimensions 23.7 x 15.7 mm 23.7 x 15.7 mm
Sensor Area 372.09 mm2 372.09 mm2
Sensor Resolution 16.0 MP 16.0 MP
Max Image Resolution 4928 x 3264 4928 x 3264
Max Native ISO 25,600 25,600
Max Boosted ISO n/a n/a
Min Native ISO 100 100
RAW Support Yes Yes
Lens
Manual Focus Yes Yes
Lens Mount Fixed lens Fixed lens
Number of Lenses n/a n/a
Focal Length Multiplier n/a n/a
Macro Focus Range 10
AutoFocus
AF Touch No No
AF Continuous Yes Yes
AF Single Yes Yes
AF Tracking Yes No
AF Selective Yes Yes
AF Center Yes No
AF Multi Area Yes Yes
AF Live View Yes Yes
AF Face Detection Yes No
AF Contrast Detection Yes Yes
AF Phase Detection No No
Number of Focus Points 9 n/a
Number of Cross Focus Points n/a 0
Screen
Screen Type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen Size 3″ 3″
Screen Resolution 1,230k dots 1,230k dots
Live View Yes Yes
Touch Screen No No
ViewFinder
ViewFinder Optical (optional) Optical (optional)
ViewFinder Resolution 0k dots 0k dots
ViewFinder Coverage % %
ViewFinder Magnification
Photography Features
Min Shutter Speed 300 s 300 s
Max Shutter Speed 1/4000 s 1/4000 s
Continuous Shooting 4.0 fps 4.0 fps
Shutter Priority Yes Yes
Aperture Priority Yes Yes
Manual Exposure Mode Yes Yes
Exposure Compensation Yes Yes
Custom White Balance Yes Yes
Image Stabilization No No
Built-in Flash Yes Yes
Flash Range 3 5.4
Flash Modes Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless
External Flash Yes Yes
AE Bracketing Yes Yes
WB Bracketing Yes Yes
Exposure Modes
Multi-Segment Yes Yes
Average No No
Spot Yes Yes
Partial No No
AF-Area No No
Center Weighted No Yes
DxO Sensor Scores
DxO Sensor Score 80 78
DxO Color Depth 23.6 23.6
DxO Dynamic Range 13.7 13.5
DxO Low Light ISO 1078 972
Video Features
Video Resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps)
Max Video Resolution 1920 x 1080 1920 x 1080
Video Formats MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4
Microphone Port No No
Headphone Port No No
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity Yes Yes
HDMI Yes Yes
USB USB 2.0 USB 2.0
Physical
Environmental Sealing No No
Water Proof No No
Dust Proof No No
Shock Proof No No
Crush Proof No No
Freeze Proof No No
Weight 251 g 245 g
Physical Dimensions 117 x 63 x 35 mm 117 x 61 x 35 mm
Battery Life 320 shots 290 shots
Battery Type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery Model DB-65 DB65
Other Features
Self Timer Yes Yes
Timelapse Recording No Yes
GPS
Storage Type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD, SDHC, SDXC
Storage Slots 1 1

Most popular cameras

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II 20.0 MP CMOS
Four Thirds
Pentax K-1 Mark II 36.0 MP CMOS
Full frame
Sony Alpha A7 II 24.0 MP CMOS
Full frame
Sony Alpha A7S II 12.0 MP CMOS
Full frame
Sony Alpha A7R III 42.0 MP BSI-CMOS
Full frame