Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Ricoh GR Digital III

  • 1/1.7"
  • 10 megapixels
  • Fixed lens
  • 43
    Overall
  • 9
    Imaging
  • 31
    Features
  • 85
    Size
  • 100
    Price
  • 1/1.7"
  • 10 megapixels
  • Fixed lens
  • 41
    Overall
  • 5
    Imaging
  • 24
    Features
  • 88
    Size
  • 0
    Price

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Ricoh GR Digital III: a Complete Review and Comparison

Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!

The goal of this overview is to provide a detailed comparison of two popular camera models from Small Sensor Compact category, introduced by Ricoh. We are going to take a closer look at the technical and physical characteristics, features, and performance. The models we are going to assess and compare in this review are GR Digital IV and GR Digital III. The first common feature of Ricoh GR Digital IV and Ricoh GR Digital III that is worth mentioning is sensor. Both cameras feature CCD sensors with a resolution of 10.0 MP.

Now, before we can move on to our comparison, let's take a moment to look at the key characteristics of Ricoh GR Digital IV and Ricoh GR Digital III.

Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Features:

  • 10.0 MP 1/1.7" CCD sensor
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Image Stabilization: Yes
  • 3″ Fixed Type Screen
  • ViewFinder: Yes
  • fps Continuous Shooting
  • Video: 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
  • Built-in Wireless: No
  • Dimensions: 109 x 59 x 33 mm
  • Weight: 190 g
  • Environmental Sealing: No
  • Built-in GPS: No
  • Replaced Ricoh GR Digital III. Compare
  • Replaced by Ricoh GR. Compare

Ricoh GR Digital III Key Features:

  • 10.0 MP 1/1.7" CCD sensor
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Image Stabilization: No
  • 3″ Fixed Type Screen
  • ViewFinder: Yes
  • fps Continuous Shooting
  • Video: 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
  • Built-in Wireless: No
  • Dimensions: 109 x 59 x 26 mm
  • Weight: 208 g
  • Environmental Sealing: No
  • Built-in GPS: No
  • Replaced Ricoh GR Digital II.
  • Replaced by Ricoh GR Digital IV. Compare

Since Ricoh GR Digital IV has been around for some time, it was substituted by Ricoh GR. Be sure to check out some of our other comparisons that may also interest you:
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs. GR
Ricoh GR vs. Ricoh GR Digital III

Being a newer model, Ricoh GR Digital IV substituted Ricoh GR Digital III.

Why is Ricoh GR Digital IV a better choice than Ricoh GR Digital III

Image Stabilization Yes vs No All lenses are stabilized
Screen Resolution 1,230k dots vs 920k dots 25.2% higher resolution screen
Weight 190 g vs 208 g 18 g lighter

Key PROs of Ricoh GR Digital IV and Ricoh GR Digital III

Screen Size 3″ | 3″ Large display
Viewfinder Optical (optional) | Optical (optional) Better framing and control
Raw Support Yes | Yes Better image quality
Timelapse Recording Yes | Yes Creative shooting
External Flash Shoe Yes | Yes Flash Shoe available
Built-In Flash Yes | Yes External flash available

Key CONs of Ricoh GR Digital IV and Ricoh GR Digital III

Touch Screen No | No No touch screen
Screen Type Fixed Type | Fixed Type No flexible viewing angles
Sensor Resolution 10.0 MP | 10.0 MP Small sensor resolution
AutoFocus Face Detection No | No No Face Detection
Microphone Port No | No No microphone port
Headphone Port No | No No headphone port
Bracketing No | No No AE bracketing
Continuous Shooting fps | fps Low continuous shooting
Environmental Sealing No | No No environmental sealing

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Ricoh GR Digital III: Comparing Two Models By Physical Characteristics

Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Ricoh GR Digital IV and Ricoh GR Digital III from the front view.

Ricoh GR Digital IV
Ricoh GR Digital III
HTML
BB

Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.

Ricoh GR Digital IV
Ricoh GR Digital III
HTML
BB

After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.

Speaking of weight, Ricoh GR Digital IV is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 18g less than the Ricoh GR Digital III. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.

Thickness values for Small Sensor Compact cameras:
Ricoh GR Digital IV — 33 mm
Ricoh GR Digital III — 26 mm
Min: 10 mm
Average: 26 mm
Max: 60 mm
Weight values for Small Sensor Compact cameras:
Ricoh GR Digital IV — 190 g
Ricoh GR Digital III — 208 g
Min: 103 g
Average: 175 g
Max: 423 g

Comparing Ricoh GR Digital IV and Ricoh GR Digital III by the type of Sensor and Resolution

Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.

Are Ricoh GR Digital IV and Ricoh GR Digital III any different in terms of sensor type?

In terms of sensor type and resolution, these models are identical. Both Ricoh GR Digital IV and Ricoh GR Digital III come equipped with the same CCD that has a resolution of 10.0 MP. Thus, if you are wondering, which option to choose, this is not a factor you should be looking at.

Take a look below to find the comparison of Ricoh GR Digital IV and Ricoh GR Digital III by the size of their sensors.

Ricoh GR Digital IV
Ricoh GR Digital III
HTML
BB

Ricoh GR Digital IV and Ricoh GR Digital III are identical by this indicator, as each feature a sensor of the same size. Thus, both cameras will provide the same level of control in terms of the depth of field if you use them with the same focal length and aperture.

For Which Fields Of Photography Are Ricoh GR Digital IV and Ricoh GR Digital III Suitable?

If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.

This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Ricoh GR Digital IV and Ricoh GR Digital III in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.

Photography Type Ricoh GR Digital IV Ricoh GR Digital III
Portrait Photography
23%
9%
Street Photography
79%
63%
Sports Photography
62%
47%
Daily Photography
32%
1%
Landscape Photography
58%
59%

Ricoh GR Digital IV for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

  • Image Stabilization

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm) sensor

Ricoh GR Digital III for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

No Significant Advantages

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm) sensor
  • No Image Stabilization

Ricoh GR Digital IV for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Small size (109 x 59 x 33 mm)
  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Image Stabilization

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/1.7"(7.44 x 5.58 mm) sensor

Ricoh GR Digital III for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Small size (109 x 59 x 26 mm)
  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View

Disadvantages:

  • No Image Stabilization
  • Small 1/1.7"(7.44 x 5.58 mm) sensor

Ricoh GR Digital IV for Sports Photography

Advantages:

No Significant Advantages

Disadvantages:

  • Slow Continuous Shooting ( fps)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/2000s)
  • Bad Max Native ISO (3200)
  • Small battery life (390 shots)
  • Small size (109 x 59 x 33 mm)

Ricoh GR Digital III for Sports Photography

Advantages:

No Significant Advantages

Disadvantages:

  • Slow Continuous Shooting ( fps)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/2000s)
  • Bad Max Native ISO (1600)
  • Small size (109 x 59 x 26 mm)

Ricoh GR Digital IV for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Small weight (190 g)
  • Built-in Flash
  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Video is available

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm) sensor

Ricoh GR Digital III for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Small weight (208 g)
  • Small size (109 x 59 x 26 mm)
  • Built-in Flash
  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Video is available

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm) sensor

Ricoh GR Digital IV for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Live View
  • RAW Support

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm) sensor
  • Low resolution sensor (10 MP)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Bad Max Native ISO (3200)

Ricoh GR Digital III for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Live View
  • RAW Support

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm) sensor
  • Low resolution sensor (10 MP)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Bad Max Native ISO (1600)

Comparison of Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Ricoh GR Digital III: Final Verdict

Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Ricoh GR Digital IV or Ricoh GR Digital III, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.

What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Ricoh GR Digital IV and Ricoh GR Digital III here is what we can say in conclusion:

According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Ricoh GR Digital IV deserves a higher Total Score than the Ricoh GR Digital III. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.

Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Ricoh GR Digital III Table Of Technical Specs

For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:

Ricoh GR Digital IV Ricoh GR Digital III
General
Brand Ricoh Ricoh
Model GR Digital IV GR Digital III
Announced Sep 15, 2011 Jul 27, 2009
Body Type Compact Compact
Sensor
Sensor Type CCD CCD
Sensor Size 1/1.7" 1/1.7"
Sensor Dimensions 7.44 x 5.58 mm 7.44 x 5.58 mm
Sensor Area 41.52 mm2 41.52 mm2
Sensor Resolution 10.0 MP 10.0 MP
Max Image Resolution 3648 x 2736 3648 x 2736
Max Native ISO 3,200 1,600
Max Boosted ISO n/a n/a
Min Native ISO 80 64
RAW Support Yes Yes
Lens
Manual Focus Yes Yes
Lens Mount Fixed lens Fixed lens
Number of Lenses n/a n/a
Focal Length Multiplier n/a n/a
Macro Focus Range 1 1
AutoFocus
AF Touch No No
AF Continuous No No
AF Single Yes Yes
AF Tracking No No
AF Selective No No
AF Center No No
AF Multi Area Yes Yes
AF Live View Yes Yes
AF Face Detection No No
AF Contrast Detection Yes Yes
AF Phase Detection No No
Number of Focus Points n/a n/a
Number of Cross Focus Points n/a n/a
Screen
Screen Type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen Size 3″ 3″
Screen Resolution 1,230k dots 920k dots
Live View Yes Yes
Touch Screen No No
ViewFinder
ViewFinder Optical (optional) Optical (optional)
ViewFinder Resolution 0k dots 0k dots
ViewFinder Coverage % %
ViewFinder Magnification
Photography Features
Min Shutter Speed 1 s 1 s
Max Shutter Speed 1/2000 s 1/2000 s
Continuous Shooting fps fps
Shutter Priority Yes Yes
Aperture Priority Yes Yes
Manual Exposure Mode Yes Yes
Exposure Compensation Yes Yes
Custom White Balance Yes Yes
Image Stabilization Yes No
Built-in Flash Yes Yes
Flash Range 3 3
Flash Modes Auto, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External Flash Yes Yes
AE Bracketing No No
WB Bracketing No No
Exposure Modes
Multi-Segment Yes Yes
Average No No
Spot Yes Yes
Partial No No
AF-Area No No
Center Weighted Yes Yes
Video Features
Video Resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max Video Resolution 640 x 480 640 x 480
Video Formats Motion JPEG n/a
Microphone Port No No
Headphone Port No No
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity No No
HDMI Yes No
USB USB 2.0 USB 2.0
Physical
Environmental Sealing No No
Water Proof No No
Dust Proof No No
Shock Proof No No
Crush Proof No No
Freeze Proof No No
Weight 190 g 208 g
Physical Dimensions 109 x 59 x 33 mm 109 x 59 x 26 mm
Battery Life 390 shots n/a
Battery Type Battery Pack n/a
Battery Model DB65 n/a
Other Features
Self Timer Yes Yes
Timelapse Recording Yes Yes
GPS
Storage Type SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage Slots 1 1

Most popular cameras

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II 20.0 MP CMOS
Four Thirds
Pentax K-1 Mark II 36.0 MP CMOS
Full frame
Sony Alpha A7 II 24.0 MP CMOS
Full frame
Sony Alpha A7S II 12.0 MP CMOS
Full frame
Sony Alpha A7R III 42.0 MP BSI-CMOS
Full frame