Olympus VR-320 vs Olympus VR-330

  • 1/2.3"
  • 14 megapixels
  • Fixed lens
  • 41
    Overall
  • 5
    Imaging
  • 24
    Features
  • 88
    Size
  • 0
    Price
  • 1/2.3"
  • 14 megapixels
  • Fixed lens
  • 41
    Overall
  • 5
    Imaging
  • 24
    Features
  • 88
    Size
  • 100
    Price

Olympus VR-320 vs Olympus VR-330: a Complete Review and Comparison

Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!

The goal of this overview is to provide a detailed comparison of two popular camera models from Small Sensor Superzoom category, introduced by Olympus. We are going to take a closer look at the technical and physical characteristics, features, and performance. The models we are going to assess and compare in this review are VR-320 and VR-330. The first common feature of Olympus VR-320 and Olympus VR-330 that is worth mentioning is sensor. Both cameras feature CCD sensors with a resolution of 14.0 MP.

Now, before we can move on to our comparison, let's take a moment to look at the key characteristics of Olympus VR-320 and Olympus VR-330.

Olympus VR-320 Key Features:

  • 14.0 MP 1/2.3" CCD sensor
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Image Stabilization: Yes
  • 3″ Fixed Type Screen
  • ViewFinder: No
  • fps Continuous Shooting
  • Video: 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
  • Built-in Wireless: No
  • Dimensions: 101 x 58 x 29 mm
  • Weight: 158 g
  • Environmental Sealing: No
  • Built-in GPS: No
  • Replaced by Olympus VR-330. Compare

Olympus VR-330 Key Features:

  • 14.0 MP 1/2.3" CCD sensor
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Image Stabilization: Yes
  • 3″ Fixed Type Screen
  • ViewFinder: No
  • fps Continuous Shooting
  • Video: 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
  • Built-in Wireless: No
  • Dimensions: 101 x 58 x 29 mm
  • Weight: 158 g
  • Environmental Sealing: No
  • Built-in GPS: No
  • Replaced Olympus VR-320. Compare

Since Olympus VR-320 has been around for some time, it was substituted by Olympus VR-330.

What are the key reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over Olympus VR-320

Screen Resolution 460k dots vs 230k dots 50% higher resolution screen

Key PROs of Olympus VR-320 and Olympus VR-330

Screen Size 3″ | 3″ Large display
AutoFocus Face Detection Yes | Yes Very handy for portraits
Built-In Flash Yes | Yes External flash available
Image Stabilization Yes | Yes Built-in stabilization

Key CONs of Olympus VR-320 and Olympus VR-330

Touch Screen No | No No touch screen
Screen Resolution 230k dots | 460k dots Small screen resolution
Screen Type Fixed Type | Fixed Type No flexible viewing angles
Viewfinder No | No No ViewFinder
Raw Support No | No Doesn's support RAW format
Sensor Resolution 14.0 MP | 14.0 MP Small sensor resolution
Microphone Port No | No No microphone port
Headphone Port No | No No headphone port
Timelapse Recording No | No No timelapse recording
External Flash Shoe No | No No Flash Shoe
Bracketing No | No No AE bracketing
Continuous Shooting fps | fps Low continuous shooting
Environmental Sealing No | No No environmental sealing

Olympus VR-320 vs Olympus VR-330: Comparing Two Models By Physical Characteristics

Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Olympus VR-320 and Olympus VR-330 from the front view.

Olympus VR-320
Olympus VR-330
HTML
BB

Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.

Olympus VR-320
Olympus VR-330
HTML
BB

After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.

Speaking of weight, Olympus VR-330 is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 0g less than the Olympus VR-320. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.

Thickness values for Small Sensor Superzoom cameras:
Olympus VR-320 — 29 mm
Olympus VR-330 — 29 mm
Min: 19 mm
Average: 66 mm
Max: 181 mm
Weight values for Small Sensor Superzoom cameras:
Olympus VR-320 — 158 g
Olympus VR-330 — 158 g
Min: 136 g
Average: 387 g
Max: 1415 g

Comparing Olympus VR-320 and Olympus VR-330 by the type of Sensor and Resolution

Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.

Are Olympus VR-320 and Olympus VR-330 any different in terms of sensor type?

In terms of sensor type and resolution, these models are identical. Both Olympus VR-320 and Olympus VR-330 come equipped with the same CCD that has a resolution of 14.0 MP. Thus, if you are wondering, which option to choose, this is not a factor you should be looking at.

Take a look below to find the comparison of Olympus VR-320 and Olympus VR-330 by the size of their sensors.

Olympus VR-320
Olympus VR-330
HTML
BB

Olympus VR-320 and Olympus VR-330 are identical by this indicator, as each feature a sensor of the same size. Thus, both cameras will provide the same level of control in terms of the depth of field if you use them with the same focal length and aperture.

For Which Fields Of Photography Are Olympus VR-320 and Olympus VR-330 Suitable?

If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.

This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Olympus VR-320 and Olympus VR-330 in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.

Photography Type Olympus VR-320 Olympus VR-330
Portrait Photography
56%
55%
Street Photography
39%
41%
Sports Photography
13%
12%
Daily Photography
26%
24%
Landscape Photography
36%
33%

Olympus VR-320 for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

  • Image Stabilization
  • Face Detection Focusing

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor

Olympus VR-330 for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

  • Image Stabilization
  • Face Detection Focusing

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor

Olympus VR-320 for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Small size (101 x 58 x 29 mm)
  • Live View
  • Image Stabilization

Disadvantages:

  • No Built-in View Finder
  • Small 1/2.3"(6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor

Olympus VR-330 for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Small size (101 x 58 x 29 mm)
  • Live View
  • Image Stabilization

Disadvantages:

  • No Built-in View Finder
  • Small 1/2.3"(6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor

Olympus VR-320 for Sports Photography

Advantages:

  • No View Finder

Disadvantages:

  • Slow Continuous Shooting ( fps)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/2000s)
  • Bad Max Native ISO (1600)
  • Small size (101 x 58 x 29 mm)

Olympus VR-330 for Sports Photography

Advantages:

  • No View Finder

Disadvantages:

  • Slow Continuous Shooting ( fps)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/2000s)
  • Bad Max Native ISO (1600)
  • Small size (101 x 58 x 29 mm)

Olympus VR-320 for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Small weight (158 g)
  • Small size (101 x 58 x 29 mm)
  • Built-in Flash
  • Live View
  • Video is available

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
  • No Built-in View Finder

Olympus VR-330 for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Small weight (158 g)
  • Small size (101 x 58 x 29 mm)
  • Built-in Flash
  • Live View
  • Video is available

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
  • No Built-in View Finder

Olympus VR-320 for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Live View

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
  • Low resolution sensor (14 MP)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • No RAW Support
  • Bad Max Native ISO (1600)

Olympus VR-330 for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Live View

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
  • Low resolution sensor (14 MP)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • No RAW Support
  • Bad Max Native ISO (1600)

Comparison of Olympus VR-320 vs Olympus VR-330: Final Verdict

Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Olympus VR-320 or Olympus VR-330, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.

What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Olympus VR-320 and Olympus VR-330 here is what we can say in conclusion:

According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Olympus VR-330 deserves a higher Total Score than the Olympus VR-320. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.

Olympus VR-320 vs Olympus VR-330 Table Of Technical Specs

For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:

Olympus VR-320 Olympus VR-330
General
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model VR-320 VR-330
Announced Jul 19, 2011 Feb 08, 2011
Body Type Compact Compact
Sensor
Sensor Type CCD CCD
Sensor Size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor Dimensions 6.17 x 4.55 mm 6.17 x 4.55 mm
Sensor Area 28.07 mm2 28.07 mm2
Sensor Resolution 14.0 MP 14.0 MP
Max Image Resolution 4288 x 3216 4288 x 3216
Max Native ISO 1,600 1,600
Max Boosted ISO n/a n/a
Min Native ISO 80 80
RAW Support No No
Lens
Manual Focus No No
Lens Mount Fixed lens Fixed lens
Number of Lenses n/a n/a
Focal Length Multiplier n/a n/a
Macro Focus Range 1 1
AutoFocus
AF Touch No No
AF Continuous No No
AF Single Yes Yes
AF Tracking Yes Yes
AF Selective No No
AF Center No No
AF Multi Area Yes Yes
AF Live View Yes Yes
AF Face Detection Yes Yes
AF Contrast Detection Yes Yes
AF Phase Detection No No
Number of Focus Points n/a n/a
Number of Cross Focus Points n/a n/a
Screen
Screen Type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen Size 3″ 3″
Screen Resolution 230k dots 460k dots
Live View Yes Yes
Touch Screen No No
ViewFinder
ViewFinder
ViewFinder Resolution 0k dots 0k dots
ViewFinder Coverage % %
ViewFinder Magnification
Photography Features
Min Shutter Speed 4 s 4 s
Max Shutter Speed 1/2000 s 1/2000 s
Continuous Shooting fps fps
Shutter Priority No No
Aperture Priority No No
Manual Exposure Mode No No
Exposure Compensation No No
Custom White Balance No No
Image Stabilization Yes Yes
Built-in Flash Yes Yes
Flash Range 4.7 4.7
Flash Modes Auto, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External Flash No No
AE Bracketing No No
WB Bracketing Yes Yes
Exposure Modes
Multi-Segment Yes Yes
Average No No
Spot Yes Yes
Partial No No
AF-Area Yes Yes
Center Weighted No No
Video Features
Video Resolutions 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max Video Resolution 1280 x 720 1280 x 720
Video Formats Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone Port No No
Headphone Port No No
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity No No
HDMI No Yes
USB USB 2.0 USB 2.0
Physical
Environmental Sealing No No
Water Proof No No
Dust Proof No No
Shock Proof No No
Crush Proof No No
Freeze Proof No No
Weight 158 g 158 g
Physical Dimensions 101 x 58 x 29 mm 101 x 58 x 29 mm
Battery Life n/a n/a
Battery Type n/a n/a
Battery Model LI-42B LI-42B
Other Features
Self Timer Yes Yes
Timelapse Recording No No
GPS
Storage Type SD/SDHC SD/SDHC
Storage Slots 1 1

Most popular cameras

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II 20.0 MP CMOS
Four Thirds
Pentax K-1 Mark II 36.0 MP CMOS
Full frame
Sony Alpha A7 II 24.0 MP CMOS
Full frame
Sony Alpha A7S II 12.0 MP CMOS
Full frame
Sony Alpha A7R III 42.0 MP BSI-CMOS
Full frame