Olympus Stylus SH-3 vs Olympus Stylus SH-2

  • 1/2.3"
  • 16 megapixels
  • Fixed lens
  • 45
    Overall
  • 13
    Imaging
  • 49
    Features
  • 83
    Size
  • 0
    Price
  • 1/2.3"
  • 16 megapixels
  • Fixed lens
  • 45
    Overall
  • 13
    Imaging
  • 49
    Features
  • 83
    Size
  • 100
    Price

Olympus Stylus SH-3 vs Olympus Stylus SH-2: a Complete Review and Comparison

Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!

The goal of this overview is to provide a detailed comparison of two popular camera models from Small Sensor Superzoom category, introduced by Olympus. We are going to take a closer look at the technical and physical characteristics, features, and performance. The models we are going to assess and compare in this review are Stylus SH-3 and Stylus SH-2. The first common feature of Olympus Stylus SH-3 and Olympus Stylus SH-2 that is worth mentioning is sensor. Both cameras feature BSI-CMOS sensors with a resolution of 16.0 MP.

Now, before we can move on to our comparison, let's take a moment to look at the key characteristics of Olympus Stylus SH-3 and Olympus Stylus SH-2.

Olympus Stylus SH-3 Key Features:

  • 16.0 MP 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS sensor
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Image Stabilization: Yes
  • 3″ Fixed Type Screen
  • ViewFinder: No
  • 11.5 fps Continuous Shooting
  • Video: 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
  • Built-in Wireless: Yes
  • Dimensions: 109 x 63 x 42 mm
  • Weight: 271 g
  • Environmental Sealing: No
  • Built-in GPS: No
  • Replaced Olympus SH-2.

Olympus Stylus SH-2 Key Features:

  • 16.0 MP 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS sensor
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Image Stabilization: Yes
  • 3″ Fixed Type Screen
  • ViewFinder: No
  • 11.5 fps Continuous Shooting
  • Video: 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
  • Built-in Wireless: Yes
  • Dimensions: 109 x 63 x 42 mm
  • Weight: 271 g
  • Environmental Sealing: No
  • Built-in GPS: No
  • Replaced Olympus SH-1.
  • Replaced by Olympus SH-3.

Being a newer model, Olympus Stylus SH-3 substituted Olympus SH-2.

Why is Olympus Stylus SH-3 a better choice than Olympus Stylus SH-2

Max Video Resolution 3840 x 2160 vs 1920 x 1080 Higher Resolution Video

Key PROs of Olympus Stylus SH-3 and Olympus Stylus SH-2

Touch Screen Yes | Yes Easy control of camera functions
Screen Size 3″ | 3″ Large display
Raw Support Yes | Yes Better image quality
AutoFocus Face Detection Yes | Yes Very handy for portraits
Timelapse Recording Yes | Yes Creative shooting
Continuous Shooting 11.5 fps | 11.5 fps Nice continuous shooting
Built-In Flash Yes | Yes External flash available
Image Stabilization Yes | Yes Built-in stabilization

Key CONs of Olympus Stylus SH-3 and Olympus Stylus SH-2

Screen Resolution 460k dots | 460k dots Small screen resolution
Screen Type Fixed Type | Fixed Type No flexible viewing angles
Viewfinder No | No No ViewFinder
Sensor Resolution 16.0 MP | 16.0 MP Small sensor resolution
Microphone Port No | No No microphone port
Headphone Port No | No No headphone port
External Flash Shoe No | No No Flash Shoe
Bracketing No | No No AE bracketing
Environmental Sealing No | No No environmental sealing

Olympus Stylus SH-3 vs Olympus Stylus SH-2: Comparing Two Models By Physical Characteristics

Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Olympus Stylus SH-3 and Olympus Stylus SH-2 from the front view.

Olympus Stylus SH-3
Olympus Stylus SH-2
HTML
BB

Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.

Olympus Stylus SH-3
Olympus Stylus SH-2
HTML
BB

After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.

Speaking of weight, Olympus Stylus SH-2 is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 0g less than the Olympus Stylus SH-3. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.

Battery values for Small Sensor Superzoom cameras:
Olympus Stylus SH-3 — 380 shots
Olympus Stylus SH-2 — 380 shots
Min: 120 shots
Average: 316 shots
Max: 600 shots
Thickness values for Small Sensor Superzoom cameras:
Olympus Stylus SH-3 — 42 mm
Olympus Stylus SH-2 — 42 mm
Min: 19 mm
Average: 66 mm
Max: 181 mm
Weight values for Small Sensor Superzoom cameras:
Olympus Stylus SH-3 — 271 g
Olympus Stylus SH-2 — 271 g
Min: 136 g
Average: 387 g
Max: 1415 g

Comparing Olympus Stylus SH-3 and Olympus Stylus SH-2 by the type of Sensor and Resolution

Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.

Are Olympus Stylus SH-3 and Olympus Stylus SH-2 any different in terms of sensor type?

In terms of sensor type and resolution, these models are identical. Both Olympus Stylus SH-3 and Olympus Stylus SH-2 come equipped with the same BSI-CMOS that has a resolution of 16.0 MP. Thus, if you are wondering, which option to choose, this is not a factor you should be looking at.

Take a look below to find the comparison of Olympus Stylus SH-3 and Olympus Stylus SH-2 by the size of their sensors.

Olympus Stylus SH-3
Olympus Stylus SH-2
HTML
BB

Olympus Stylus SH-3 and Olympus Stylus SH-2 are identical by this indicator, as each feature a sensor of the same size. Thus, both cameras will provide the same level of control in terms of the depth of field if you use them with the same focal length and aperture.

For Which Fields Of Photography Are Olympus Stylus SH-3 and Olympus Stylus SH-2 Suitable?

If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.

This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Olympus Stylus SH-3 and Olympus Stylus SH-2 in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.

Photography Type Olympus Stylus SH-3 Olympus Stylus SH-2
Portrait Photography
45%
44%
Street Photography
37%
36%
Sports Photography
74%
74%
Daily Photography
41%
50%
Landscape Photography
64%
65%

Olympus Stylus SH-3 for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

  • Image Stabilization
  • Face Detection Focusing

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor

Olympus Stylus SH-2 for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

  • Image Stabilization
  • Face Detection Focusing

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor

Olympus Stylus SH-3 for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Live View
  • Image Stabilization

Disadvantages:

  • Big size (109 x 63 x 42 mm)
  • No Built-in View Finder
  • Small 1/2.3"(6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor

Olympus Stylus SH-2 for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Live View
  • Image Stabilization

Disadvantages:

  • Big size (109 x 63 x 42 mm)
  • No Built-in View Finder
  • Small 1/2.3"(6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor

Olympus Stylus SH-3 for Sports Photography

Advantages:

  • Fast Continuous Shooting (11.5 fps)
  • No View Finder

Disadvantages:

  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/2000s)
  • Bad Max Native ISO (6400)
  • Small battery life (380 shots)

Olympus Stylus SH-2 for Sports Photography

Advantages:

  • Fast Continuous Shooting (11.5 fps)
  • No View Finder

Disadvantages:

  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/2000s)
  • Bad Max Native ISO (6400)
  • Small battery life (380 shots)

Olympus Stylus SH-3 for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Small weight (271 g)
  • Built-in Flash
  • Live View
  • Wireless Connectivity
  • Video is available

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
  • No Built-in View Finder

Olympus Stylus SH-2 for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Small weight (271 g)
  • Built-in Flash
  • Live View
  • Wireless Connectivity
  • Video is available

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
  • No Built-in View Finder

Olympus Stylus SH-3 for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Live View
  • RAW Support

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
  • Low resolution sensor (16 MP)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Bad Max Native ISO (6400)

Olympus Stylus SH-2 for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Live View
  • RAW Support

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
  • Low resolution sensor (16 MP)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Bad Max Native ISO (6400)

Comparison of Olympus Stylus SH-3 vs Olympus Stylus SH-2: Final Verdict

Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Olympus Stylus SH-3 or Olympus Stylus SH-2, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.

What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Olympus Stylus SH-3 and Olympus Stylus SH-2 here is what we can say in conclusion:

According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Olympus Stylus SH-2 deserves a higher Total Score than the Olympus Stylus SH-3. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.

Olympus Stylus SH-3 vs Olympus Stylus SH-2 Table Of Technical Specs

For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:

Olympus Stylus SH-3 Olympus Stylus SH-2
General
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model Stylus SH-3 Stylus SH-2
Announced Feb 08, 2016 Mar 11, 2015
Body Type Compact Compact
Sensor
Sensor Type BSI-CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor Size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor Dimensions 6.17 x 4.55 mm 6.17 x 4.55 mm
Sensor Area 28.07 mm2 28.07 mm2
Sensor Resolution 16.0 MP 16.0 MP
Max Image Resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Max Native ISO 6,400 6,400
Max Boosted ISO n/a n/a
Min Native ISO 125 125
RAW Support Yes Yes
Lens
Manual Focus No No
Lens Mount Fixed lens Fixed lens
Number of Lenses n/a n/a
Focal Length Multiplier n/a n/a
Macro Focus Range 3 3
AutoFocus
AF Touch Yes Yes
AF Continuous Yes Yes
AF Single Yes Yes
AF Tracking Yes Yes
AF Selective Yes Yes
AF Center Yes Yes
AF Multi Area Yes Yes
AF Live View Yes Yes
AF Face Detection Yes Yes
AF Contrast Detection Yes Yes
AF Phase Detection No No
Number of Focus Points n/a n/a
Number of Cross Focus Points n/a n/a
Screen
Screen Type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen Size 3″ 3″
Screen Resolution 460k dots 460k dots
Live View Yes Yes
Touch Screen Yes Yes
ViewFinder
ViewFinder
ViewFinder Resolution 0k dots 0k dots
ViewFinder Coverage % %
ViewFinder Magnification
Photography Features
Min Shutter Speed 30 s 30 s
Max Shutter Speed 1/2000 s 1/2000 s
Continuous Shooting 11.5 fps 11.5 fps
Shutter Priority No No
Aperture Priority No No
Manual Exposure Mode Yes Yes
Exposure Compensation Yes Yes
Custom White Balance Yes Yes
Image Stabilization Yes Yes
Built-in Flash Yes Yes
Flash Range 8.3 8.3
Flash Modes Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in
External Flash No No
AE Bracketing No No
WB Bracketing No No
Exposure Modes
Multi-Segment Yes Yes
Average No No
Spot Yes Yes
Partial No No
AF-Area No No
Center Weighted No No
Video Features
Video Resolutions 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max Video Resolution 3840 x 2160 1920 x 1080
Video Formats H.264 H.264
Microphone Port No No
Headphone Port No No
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity Yes Yes
HDMI Yes Yes
USB USB 2.0 USB 2.0
Physical
Environmental Sealing No No
Water Proof No No
Dust Proof No No
Shock Proof No No
Crush Proof No No
Freeze Proof No No
Weight 271 g 271 g
Physical Dimensions 109 x 63 x 42 mm 109 x 63 x 42 mm
Battery Life 380 shots 380 shots
Battery Type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery Model LI-92B LI-92B
Other Features
Self Timer Yes Yes
Timelapse Recording Yes Yes
GPS
Storage Type SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory
Storage Slots 1 1

Most popular cameras

Canon EOS 70D 20.0 MP CMOS
APS-C
Pentax K-5 IIs 16.0 MP CMOS
APS-C
Sony SLT-A68 24.0 MP CMOS
APS-C
Panasonic Lumix DC-GH5S 10.0 MP CMOS
Four Thirds
Pentax K-5 II 16.0 MP CMOS
APS-C