Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!
In this review, we are going to provide a detailed evaluation and comparison of two different camera models that fall into the same category - Entry-Level Mirrorless. Although these cameras are from the same category, they were introduced by different brands - Olympus and Canon. Although Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Canon EOS M50 are both equipped with the same CMOS sensor, they boast of different resolution. Thus, Olympus OM-D E-M10 II has a sensor with a resolution of 16.0 MP, while Canon EOS M50 has a different resolution of 24.0 MP.
To get started, let’s take a look at some of the key features of Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Canon EOS M50 and, after this, we can go on to our detailed comparison of these models.
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Key Features:
Canon EOS M50 Key Features:
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II was substituted by Olympus E-M10 MIII.
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II substituted Olympus E-M10.
Image Stabilization | Yes vs No | All lenses are stabilized |
Flash Range | 5.8 vs 5 | 0.8 better flash range |
Max Shutter Speed | 1/16000 vs 1/4000 | Faster shutter speed |
Battery Life | 320 shots vs 235 shots | 85 more frames with a single charge |
Viewfinder Magnification | 0.62 vs No | 0.62 better magnification |
Bluetooth | Yes vs No | Connect your camera to other devices via Bluetooth |
Sensor Resolution | 24.0 MP vs 16.0 MP | 33.3% more pixels |
Sensor Area | 332.27 mm2 vs 224.9 mm2 | 32.3% larger pixel area |
Continuous Shooting | 10 fps vs 8 fps | 2 fps faster |
Number Of Focus Points | 143 vs 81 | 62 more focus points |
Screen Type | Fully Articulated vs Tilting | Flexible shooting positions |
Max Video Resolution | 3840 x 2160 vs 1920 x 1080 | Higher Resolution Video |
Microphone Port | Yes vs No | High quality audio recording option |
Touch Screen | Yes | Yes | Easy control of camera functions |
Screen Size | 3″ | 3″ | Large display |
Screen Resolution | 1,040k dots | 1,040k dots | High resolution screen |
Screen Type | Tilting | Fully Articulated | Help viewing and changing settings easily |
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic | Better framing and control |
Raw Support | Yes | Yes | Better image quality |
AutoFocus Face Detection | Yes | Yes | Very handy for portraits |
Timelapse Recording | Yes | Yes | Creative shooting |
Bracketing | Yes | Yes | Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR |
Continuous Shooting | 8.0 fps | 10.0 fps | Nice continuous shooting |
Built-In Flash | Yes | Yes | External flash available |
Flash Sync Port | Yes | Yes | Port for Flash Sync |
Headphone Port | No | No | No headphone port |
Environmental Sealing | No | No | No environmental sealing |
Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Canon EOS M50 from the front view.
Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.
After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.
Speaking of weight, Canon EOS M50 is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 0g less than the Olympus OM-D E-M10 II. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.
Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.
Are Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Canon EOS M50 any different in terms of sensor type?
In fact, that's exactly what makes these two models really different. Thus, it is a good point to consider if your are choosing between these two cameras. Olympus OM-D E-M10 II features a 16.0 MP Four Thirds sized CMOS sensor and boasts of a TruePic VII processor . Canon EOS M50, in its turn, comes with a 24.0 MP APS-C sized CMOS sensor , which makes it significantly different from the first model.
Take a look below to find the comparison of Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Canon EOS M50 by the size of their sensors.
One more distinctive feature of compared models is the sensor size. Canon EOS M50 is equipped with a sensor that is 0.7x larger than the one featured in Olympus OM-D E-M10 II. Compared to the cameras with smaller sensor area, the ones with larger sensors ensure more control on the blurry background and depth of field if you shoot in the same aperture and focal length. Thus, the first model has a significant advantage here.
If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.
This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Canon EOS M50 in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.
Photography Type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Canon EOS M50 |
---|---|---|
Portrait Photography |
|
|
Street Photography |
|
|
Sports Photography |
|
|
Daily Photography |
|
|
Landscape Photography |
|
|
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Olympus OM-D E-M10 II or Canon EOS M50, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.
What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Canon EOS M50 here is what we can say in conclusion:
According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Olympus OM-D E-M10 II deserves a higher Total Score than the Canon EOS M50. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.
For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Canon EOS M50 | |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Brand | Olympus | Canon |
Model | OM-D E-M10 II | EOS M50 |
Announced | Aug 25, 2015 | Feb 26, 2018 |
Body Type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor | ||
Sensor Type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor Size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor Dimensions | 17.3 x 13 mm | 22.3 x 14.9 mm |
Sensor Area | 224.90 mm2 | 332.27 mm2 |
Sensor Resolution | 16.0 MP | 24.0 MP |
Max Image Resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max Native ISO | 25,600 | 25,600 |
Max Boosted ISO | n/a | 51,200 |
Min Native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW Support | ||
Lens | ||
Manual Focus | ||
Lens Mount | Micro Four Thirds | Canon EF-M |
Number of Lenses | 94 | 16 |
Focal Length Multiplier | 2x | 1.6x |
Macro Focus Range | ||
AutoFocus | ||
AF Touch | ||
AF Continuous | ||
AF Single | ||
AF Tracking | ||
AF Selective | ||
AF Center | ||
AF Multi Area | ||
AF Live View | ||
AF Face Detection | ||
AF Contrast Detection | ||
AF Phase Detection | ||
Number of Focus Points | 81 | 143 |
Number of Cross Focus Points | n/a | n/a |
Screen | ||
Screen Type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen Size | 3″ | 3″ |
Screen Resolution | 1,040k dots | 1,040k dots |
Live View | ||
Touch Screen | ||
ViewFinder | ||
ViewFinder | Electronic | Electronic |
ViewFinder Resolution | 2,360k dots | 2,360k dots |
ViewFinder Coverage | 100% | 100% |
ViewFinder Magnification | 0.62 | |
Photography Features | ||
Min Shutter Speed | 60 s | 30 s |
Max Shutter Speed | 1/16000 s | 1/4000 s |
Continuous Shooting | 8.0 fps | 10.0 fps |
Shutter Priority | ||
Aperture Priority | ||
Manual Exposure Mode | ||
Exposure Compensation | ||
Custom White Balance | ||
Image Stabilization | ||
Built-in Flash | ||
Flash Range | 5.8 | 5 |
Flash Modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | |
External Flash | ||
AE Bracketing | ||
WB Bracketing | ||
Exposure Modes | ||
Multi-Segment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF-Area | ||
Center Weighted | ||
Video Features | ||
Video Resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC |
Max Video Resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 3840 x 2160 |
Video Formats | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone Port | ||
Headphone Port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless Connectivity | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 | USB |
Physical | ||
Environmental Sealing | ||
Water Proof | ||
Dust Proof | ||
Shock Proof | ||
Crush Proof | ||
Freeze Proof | ||
Weight | 390 g | 390 g |
Physical Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47 mm | 116 x 88 x 59 mm |
Battery Life | 320 shots | 235 shots |
Battery Type | Battery Pack | Built-in |
Battery Model | BLS-50 | n/a |
Other Features | ||
Self Timer | ||
Timelapse Recording | ||
GPS | ||
Storage Type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC slot (UHS-I compatible) |
Storage Slots | 1 | 1 |
Most popular cameras