Olympus E-450 vs Olympus E-300
- Four Thirds
- 10 megapixels
- Four Thirds
-
39
Overall -
9
Imaging -
17
Features -
76
Size -
100
Price
- Four Thirds
- 8 megapixels
- Four Thirds
-
34
Overall -
4
Imaging -
13
Features -
74
Size -
100
Price
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus E-300: a Complete Review and Comparison
Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!
In this overview, we are going to take a look at two different camera models that fall into different categories: the first model we are about to review, Olympus E-450 is a camera from Entry-Level DSLR category. It features CMOS sensor with a resolution of 10.0 MP. The second model we are looking at, Olympus E-300, falls into a Semi-Pro DSLR category and it is equipped with CCD sensor that has a resolution of 8.0 MP.
Now, before we can move on to our comparison, let's take a moment to look at the key characteristics of Olympus E-450 and Olympus E-300.
Olympus E-450 Key Features:
- 10.0 MP Four Thirds CMOS sensor
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Image Stabilization: No
- 2.7″ Fixed Type Screen
- ViewFinder: Yes
- 4.0 fps Continuous Shooting
- Built-in Wireless: No
- Dimensions: 130 x 91 x 53 mm
- Weight: 426 g
- Environmental Sealing: No
- Built-in GPS: No
- Replaced Olympus E-330. Compare
Olympus E-300 Key Features:
- 8.0 MP Four Thirds CCD sensor
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expands to 1600)
- Image Stabilization: No
- ViewFinder: Yes
- 3.0 fps Continuous Shooting
- Built-in Wireless: No
- Dimensions: 147 x 85 x 64 mm
- Weight: 624 g
- Environmental Sealing: No
- Built-in GPS: No
- Replaced by Olympus E-330. Compare
- Also known as Olympus EVOLT E-300
Being a newer model, Olympus E-450 substituted
Olympus E-330.
Be sure to check out some of our other comparisons that may also interest you:
Olympus E-450 vs. E-330
Olympus E-330 vs. Olympus E-300
Why is Olympus E-450 a better choice than Olympus E-300
| Sensor Resolution | 10.0 MP vs 8.0 MP | 20% more pixels |
| Continuous Shooting | 4 fps vs 3 fps | 1 fps faster |
| Flash Range | 12 vs No | 12 better flash range |
| Screen Size | 2.7″ vs 1.8″ | 0.9" larger screen |
| Screen Resolution | 230k dots vs 134k dots | 41.7% higher resolution screen |
| Weight | 426 g vs 624 g | 198 g lighter |
| Viewfinder Magnification | 0.46 vs No | 0.46 better magnification |
Key PROs of Olympus E-450 and Olympus E-300
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) | Better framing and control |
| Raw Support | Yes | Yes | Better image quality |
| Built-In Flash | Yes | Yes | External flash available |
| Flash Sync Port | Yes | Yes | Port for Flash Sync |
Key CONs of Olympus E-450 and Olympus E-300
| Touch Screen | No | No | No touch screen |
| Screen Size | 2.7″ | 1.8″ | Not suitable for flash photography |
| Screen Resolution | 230k dots | 134k dots | Small screen resolution |
| Screen Type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type | No flexible viewing angles |
| Sensor Resolution | 10.0 MP | 8.0 MP | Small sensor resolution |
| AutoFocus Face Detection | No | No | No Face Detection |
| Timelapse Recording | No | No | No timelapse recording |
| Bracketing | No | No | No AE bracketing |
| Continuous Shooting | 4.0 fps | 3.0 fps | Low continuous shooting |
| Image Stabilization | No | No | No image stabilization |
| Environmental Sealing | No | No | No environmental sealing |
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus E-300: Comparing Two Models By Physical Characteristics
Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Olympus E-450 and Olympus E-300 from the front view.
Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.
After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.
Speaking of weight, Olympus E-450 is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 198g less than the Olympus E-300. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.
Comparing Olympus E-450 and Olympus E-300 by the type of Sensor and Resolution
Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.
Are Olympus E-450 and Olympus E-300 any different in terms of sensor type?
In fact, that's exactly what makes these two models really different. Thus, it is a good point to consider if your are choosing between these two cameras. Olympus E-450 features a 10.0 MP Four Thirds sized CMOS sensor and boasts of a TruePic III processor . Olympus E-300, in its turn, comes with a 8.0 MP Four Thirds sized CCD sensor , which makes it significantly different from the first model.
Take a look below to find the comparison of Olympus E-450 and Olympus E-300 by the size of their sensors.
Olympus E-450 and Olympus E-300 are identical by this indicator, as each feature a sensor of the same size. Thus, both cameras will provide the same level of control in terms of the depth of field if you use them with the same focal length and aperture.
For Which Fields Of Photography Are Olympus E-450 and Olympus E-300 Suitable?
If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.
This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Olympus E-450 and Olympus E-300 in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.
| Photography Type | Olympus E-450 | Olympus E-300 |
|---|---|---|
| Portrait Photography |
|
|
| Street Photography |
|
|
| Sports Photography |
|
|
| Daily Photography |
|
|
| Landscape Photography |
|
|
Olympus E-450 for Portrait Photography
Advantages:
No Significant Advantages
Disadvantages:
- Small Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm) sensor
- No Image Stabilization
Olympus E-300 for Portrait Photography
Advantages:
No Significant Advantages
Disadvantages:
- Small Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm) sensor
- No Image Stabilization
Olympus E-450 for Street Photography
Advantages:
- Built-in View Finder
- Live View
- Large Four Thirds(17.3 x 13 mm) sensor
Disadvantages:
- Big size (130 x 91 x 53 mm)
- No Image Stabilization
- Small Number of autofocus Points (3)
Olympus E-300 for Street Photography
Advantages:
- Built-in View Finder
- Large Four Thirds(17.3 x 13 mm) sensor
Disadvantages:
- Big size (147 x 85 x 64 mm)
- No Image Stabilization
- Small Number of autofocus Points (3)
Olympus E-450 for Sports Photography
Advantages:
No Significant Advantages
Disadvantages:
- Slow Continuous Shooting (4.0 fps)
- No Environmental Sealing
- Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
- Smal Number of autofocus Points (3)
- Bad Low Light ISO (512)
- Small battery life (500 shots)
Olympus E-300 for Sports Photography
Advantages:
No Significant Advantages
Disadvantages:
- Slow Continuous Shooting (3.0 fps)
- No Environmental Sealing
- Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
- Smal Number of autofocus Points (3)
- Bad Max Native ISO (400)
Olympus E-450 for Daily Photography
Advantages:
- Built-in Flash
- Built-in View Finder
- Live View
Disadvantages:
- Small Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm) sensor
- Big weight (426 g)
- Big size (130 x 91 x 53 mm)
- Video is not available
Olympus E-300 for Daily Photography
Advantages:
- Built-in Flash
- Built-in View Finder
Disadvantages:
- Small Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm) sensor
- Big weight (624 g)
- Big size (147 x 85 x 64 mm)
- Video is not available
Olympus E-450 for Landscape Photography
Advantages:
- Live View
- RAW Support
Disadvantages:
- Small Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm) sensor
- Low resolution sensor (10 MP)
- Bad Dynamic Range (10.5)
- No Environmental Sealing
- Bad Low Light ISO (512)
Olympus E-300 for Landscape Photography
Advantages:
- RAW Support
Disadvantages:
- Small Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm) sensor
- Low resolution sensor (8 MP)
- No Environmental Sealing
- Bad Max Native ISO (400)
Comparison of Olympus E-450 vs Olympus E-300: Final Verdict
Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Olympus E-450 or Olympus E-300, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.
What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Olympus E-450 and Olympus E-300 here is what we can say in conclusion:
According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Olympus E-450 deserves a higher Total Score than the Olympus E-300. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus E-300 Table Of Technical Specs
For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:
| Olympus E-450 | Olympus E-300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | E-450 | E-300 |
| Announced | Mar 31, 2009 | Jan 10, 2005 |
| Body Type | Compact SLR | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor | ||
| Sensor Type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor Size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor Dimensions | 17.3 x 13 mm | 17.3 x 13 mm |
| Sensor Area | 224.90 mm2 | 224.90 mm2 |
| Sensor Resolution | 10.0 MP | 8.0 MP |
| Max Image Resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3264 x 2448 |
| Max Native ISO | 1,600 | 400 |
| Max Boosted ISO | n/a | 1,600 |
| Min Native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW Support |  |
|
| Lens | ||
| Manual Focus | |
|
| Lens Mount | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Number of Lenses | 45 | 45 |
| Focal Length Multiplier | 2x | 2x |
| Macro Focus Range | ||
| AutoFocus | ||
| AF Touch |  |
|
| AF Continuous | |
|
| AF Single | |
|
| AF Tracking | |
|
| AF Selective | |
|
| AF Center | |
|
| AF Multi Area | |
|
| AF Live View | |
|
| AF Face Detection | |
|
| AF Contrast Detection | |
|
| AF Phase Detection | |
|
| Number of Focus Points | 3 | 3 |
| Number of Cross Focus Points | n/a | n/a |
| Screen | ||
| Screen Type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen Size | 2.7″ | 1.8″ |
| Screen Resolution | 230k dots | 134k dots |
| Live View | |
|
| Touch Screen | |
|
| ViewFinder | ||
| ViewFinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| ViewFinder Resolution | 0k dots | 0k dots |
| ViewFinder Coverage | 95% | % |
| ViewFinder Magnification | 0.46 | |
| Photography Features | ||
| Min Shutter Speed | 60 s | 60 s |
| Max Shutter Speed | 1/4000 s | 1/4000 s |
| Continuous Shooting | 4.0 fps | 3.0 fps |
| Shutter Priority | |
|
| Aperture Priority | |
|
| Manual Exposure Mode | |
|
| Exposure Compensation | |
|
| Custom White Balance | |
|
| Image Stabilization | |
|
| Built-in Flash | |
|
| Flash Range | 12 | |
| Flash Modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
| External Flash | |
|
| AE Bracketing | |
|
| WB Bracketing | |
|
| Exposure Modes | ||
| Multi-Segment | |
|
| Average | |
|
| Spot | |
|
| Partial | |
|
| AF-Area | |
|
| Center Weighted | |
|
| Video Features | ||
| Video Resolutions | n/a | n/a |
| Max Video Resolution | ||
| Video Formats | n/a | n/a |
| Microphone Port | |
|
| Headphone Port | |
|
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless Connectivity | |
|
| HDMI | |
|
| USB | USB 2.0 | USB 1.0 |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental Sealing | |
|
| Water Proof | |
|
| Dust Proof | |
|
| Shock Proof | |
|
| Crush Proof | |
|
| Freeze Proof | |
|
| Weight | 426 g | 624 g |
| Physical Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53 mm | 147 x 85 x 64 mm |
| Battery Life | 500 shots | n/a |
| Battery Type | Battery Pack | n/a |
| Battery Model | n/a | n/a |
| Other Features | ||
| Self Timer | |
|
| Timelapse Recording | |
|
| GPS | ||
| Storage Type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Compact Flash (Type I or II) |
| Storage Slots | 1 | 1 |
Most popular cameras
Four Thirds
Full frame
APS-C
APS-C
Full frame
