Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!
In this review, we are going to make a detailed comparison of two cameras that fall into different categories. While the first model we are looking at, Nikon D7500 belongs to a Semi-Pro DSLR category, the other model, Nikon D7500 is a Semi-Pro Mirrorless camera. Nikon D7500 is equipped with a 21.0 MP CMOS sensor, while Sony Alpha a6300 comes with a 24.0 MP CMOS sensor.
Both cameras we are going to look at in our overview fall into two different categories - DSLR and MirrorLess. Keeping in mind all the distinctive features of each category, it will be hard to make a detailed comparison of these two models. However, we will do our best to make this review as unbiased and detailed as possible.
To get started, let’s take a look at some of the key features of Nikon D7500 and Sony Alpha a6300 and, after this, we can go on to our detailed comparison of these models.
Nikon D7500 Key Features:
Sony Alpha a6300 Key Features:
Nikon D7500 substituted Nikon D7200.
Be sure to check out some of our other overviews that may also interest you:
Nikon D7500 vs. D7200
Nikon D7200 vs. Sony Alpha a6300
Bluetooth | Yes vs No | Connect your camera to other devices via Bluetooth |
Sensor Area | 368.95 mm2 vs 366.6 mm2 | 0.6% larger pixel area |
Flash Range | 12 vs 6 | 6 better flash range |
Max Shutter Speed | 1/8000 vs 1/4000 | Faster shutter speed |
Screen Size | 3.2″ vs 3″ | 0.2" larger screen |
Touch Screen | Yes vs No | Easy control of camera functions |
Battery Life | 950 shots vs 400 shots | 550 more frames with a single charge |
Headphone Port | Yes vs No | Has headphone port |
Dxo Dynamic Range | 14 vs 13.7 | Better dynamic range |
Dxo Low Light Iso | 1483 vs 1437 | Better High ISO performance |
NFC | Yes vs No | Easy wireless connectivity with compatible devices |
Sensor Resolution | 24.0 MP vs 21.0 MP | 12.5% more pixels |
Continuous Shooting | 11 fps vs 8 fps | 3 fps faster |
Number Of Focus Points | 425 vs 51 | 374 more focus points |
Weight | 404 g vs 640 g | 236 g lighter |
Dxo Color Depth | 24.4 vs 24.3 | Better color depth |
Viewfinder Magnification | 0.7 vs 0.63 | 0.07 better magnification |
Screen Size | 3.2″ | 3″ | Large display |
Screen Type | Tilting | Tilting | Help viewing and changing settings easily |
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic | Better framing and control |
Raw Support | Yes | Yes | Better image quality |
AutoFocus Face Detection | Yes | Yes | Very handy for portraits |
Microphone Port | Yes | Yes | High quality audio recording option |
Bracketing | Yes | Yes | Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR |
Continuous Shooting | 8.0 fps | 11.0 fps | Nice continuous shooting |
Built-In Flash | Yes | Yes | External flash available |
Flash Sync Port | Yes | Yes | Port for Flash Sync |
Environmental Sealing | Yes | Yes | Shoot at tough conditions |
Screen Resolution | 922k dots | 922k dots | Small screen resolution |
Image Stabilization | No | No | No image stabilization |
Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Nikon D7500 and Sony Alpha a6300 from the front view.
Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.
After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.
Speaking of weight, Sony Alpha a6300 is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 236g less than the Nikon D7500. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.
Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.
Are Nikon D7500 and Sony Alpha a6300 any different in terms of sensor type?
In fact, that's exactly what makes these two models really different. Thus, it is a good point to consider if your are choosing between these two cameras. Nikon D7500 features a 21.0 MP APS-C sized CMOS sensor . Sony Alpha a6300, in its turn, comes with a 24.0 MP APS-C sized CMOS sensor and BIONZ X processor , which makes it significantly different from the first model.
Take a look below to find the comparison of Nikon D7500 and Sony Alpha a6300 by the size of their sensors.
Nikon D7500 and Sony Alpha a6300 are identical by this indicator, as each feature a sensor of the same size. Thus, both cameras will provide the same level of control in terms of the depth of field if you use them with the same focal length and aperture.
If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.
This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Nikon D7500 and Sony Alpha a6300 in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.
Photography Type | Nikon D7500 | Sony Alpha a6300 |
---|---|---|
Portrait Photography |
|
|
Street Photography |
|
|
Sports Photography |
|
|
Daily Photography |
|
|
Landscape Photography |
|
|
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
No Significant DisadvantagesHopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Nikon D7500 or Sony Alpha a6300, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.
What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Nikon D7500 and Sony Alpha a6300 here is what we can say in conclusion:
According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Sony Alpha a6300 deserves a higher Total Score than the Nikon D7500. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.
For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:
Nikon D7500 | Sony Alpha a6300 | |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Brand | Nikon | Sony |
Model | D7500 | Alpha a6300 |
Announced | Apr 12, 2017 | Feb 03, 2016 |
Body Type | Mid-size SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor | ||
Sensor Type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor Size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor Dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7 mm | 23.5 x 15.6 mm |
Sensor Area | 368.95 mm2 | 366.60 mm2 |
Sensor Resolution | 21.0 MP | 24.0 MP |
Max Image Resolution | 5568 x 3712 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max Native ISO | 51,200 | 25,600 |
Max Boosted ISO | 1,640,000 | 51,200 |
Min Native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW Support | ||
Lens | ||
Manual Focus | ||
Lens Mount | Nikon F | Sony E (NEX) |
Number of Lenses | 287 | 83 |
Focal Length Multiplier | 1.5x | 1.5x |
Macro Focus Range | ||
AutoFocus | ||
AF Touch | ||
AF Continuous | ||
AF Single | ||
AF Tracking | ||
AF Selective | ||
AF Center | ||
AF Multi Area | ||
AF Live View | ||
AF Face Detection | ||
AF Contrast Detection | ||
AF Phase Detection | ||
Number of Focus Points | 51 | 425 |
Number of Cross Focus Points | 15 | n/a |
Screen | ||
Screen Type | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen Size | 3.2″ | 3″ |
Screen Resolution | 922k dots | 922k dots |
Live View | ||
Touch Screen | ||
ViewFinder | ||
ViewFinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
ViewFinder Resolution | 0k dots | 2,359k dots |
ViewFinder Coverage | 100% | 100% |
ViewFinder Magnification | 0.63 | 0.7 |
Photography Features | ||
Min Shutter Speed | 30 s | 30 s |
Max Shutter Speed | 1/8000 s | 1/4000 s |
Continuous Shooting | 8.0 fps | 11.0 fps |
Shutter Priority | ||
Aperture Priority | ||
Manual Exposure Mode | ||
Exposure Compensation | ||
Custom White Balance | ||
Image Stabilization | ||
Built-in Flash | ||
Flash Range | 12 | 6 |
Flash Modes | Auto, Red-eye, Slow sync, Rear curtain | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless |
External Flash | ||
AE Bracketing | ||
WB Bracketing | ||
Exposure Modes | ||
Multi-Segment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF-Area | ||
Center Weighted | ||
DxO Sensor Scores | ||
DxO Sensor Score | 86 | 85 |
DxO Color Depth | 24.3 | 24.4 |
DxO Dynamic Range | 14.0 | 13.7 |
DxO Low Light ISO | 1483 | 1437 |
Video Features | ||
Video Resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 144 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p) |
Max Video Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 |
Video Formats | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
Microphone Port | ||
Headphone Port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless Connectivity | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
Physical | ||
Environmental Sealing | ||
Water Proof | ||
Dust Proof | ||
Shock Proof | ||
Crush Proof | ||
Freeze Proof | ||
Weight | 640 g | 404 g |
Physical Dimensions | 136 x 104 x 73 mm | 120 x 67 x 49 mm |
Battery Life | 950 shots | 400 shots |
Battery Type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery Model | EN-EL15a | NP-FW50 |
Other Features | ||
Self Timer | ||
Timelapse Recording | ||
GPS | Optional | |
Storage Type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage Slots | 1 | 1 |
Most popular cameras