Nikon D40X vs Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III
- Four Thirds
- 16 megapixels
- Micro Four Thirds
-
46
Overall -
18
Imaging -
62
Features -
77
Size -
0
Price
Nikon D40X vs Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III: a Complete Review and Comparison
Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!
In this review, we are going to make a detailed comparison of two cameras that fall into different categories. While the first model we are looking at, Nikon D40X belongs to a Entry-Level DSLR category, the other model, Nikon D40X is a Entry-Level Mirrorless camera. Both models feature different types of sensors. Thus, Nikon D40X comes with CCD sensor that has a resolution of 10.0 MP resolution, while our second compared model Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III features a 16.0 MP CMOS sensor.
Both cameras we are going to look at in our overview fall into two different categories - DSLR and MirrorLess. Keeping in mind all the distinctive features of each category, it will be hard to make a detailed comparison of these two models. However, we will do our best to make this review as unbiased and detailed as possible.
To get started, let’s take a look at some of the key features of Nikon D40X and Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and, after this, we can go on to our detailed comparison of these models.
Nikon D40X Key Features:
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Key Features:
- 16.0 MP Four Thirds CMOS sensor
- ISO 200 - 25600 (Expands to 100)
- Image Stabilization: Yes
- 3″ Tilting Screen
- ViewFinder: Yes
- 8.6 fps Continuous Shooting
- Video: 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
- Built-in Wireless: Yes
- Dimensions: 122 x 84 x 50 mm
- Weight: 410 g
- Environmental Sealing: No
- Built-in GPS: No
- Replaced Olympus E-M10 II.
Nikon D40X was substituted by Nikon D60.
Be sure to check out some of our other overviews that may also interest you:
Nikon D40X vs. D60
Nikon D60 vs. Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III
Nikon D40X substituted Nikon D50.
Be sure to check out some of our other overviews that may also interest you:
Nikon D40X vs. D50
Nikon D50 vs. Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III
Why is Nikon D40X a better choice than Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III
| Sensor Area | 369.72 mm2 vs 226.2 mm2 | 38.8% larger pixel area |
| Flash Range | 17 vs 5.8 | 11.2 better flash range |
What are the key reasons to pick Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III over Nikon D40X
| Wireless Connectivity | Built-In vs No | Better connectivity |
| Timelapse Recording | Yes vs No | Creative shooting |
| Sensor Resolution | 16.0 MP vs 10.0 MP | 37.5% more pixels |
| Image Stabilization | Yes vs No | All lenses are stabilized |
| Continuous Shooting | 8.6 fps vs 3 fps | 5.6 fps faster |
| AutoFocus Face Detection | Yes vs No | Very handy for portraits |
| Screen Size | 3″ vs 2.5″ | 0.5" larger screen |
| Screen Resolution | 1,040k dots vs 230k dots | 77.9% higher resolution screen |
| Touch Screen | Yes vs No | Easy control of camera functions |
| Weight | 410 g vs 522 g | 112 g lighter |
| Viewfinder Magnification | 0.62 vs 0.53 | 0.09 better magnification |
Key PROs of Nikon D40X and Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic | Better framing and control |
| Raw Support | Yes | Yes | Better image quality |
| Built-In Flash | Yes | Yes | External flash available |
| Flash Sync Port | Yes | Yes | Port for Flash Sync |
Key CONs of Nikon D40X and Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III
| Sensor Resolution | 10.0 MP | 16.0 MP | Small sensor resolution |
| Environmental Sealing | No | No | No environmental sealing |
Nikon D40X vs Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III: Comparing Two Models By Physical Characteristics
Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Nikon D40X and Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III from the front view.
Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.
After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.
Speaking of weight, Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 112g less than the Nikon D40X. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.
Comparing Nikon D40X and Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III by the type of Sensor and Resolution
Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.
Are Nikon D40X and Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III any different in terms of sensor type?
In fact, that's exactly what makes these two models really different. Thus, it is a good point to consider if your are choosing between these two cameras. Nikon D40X features a 10.0 MP APS-C sized CCD sensor and boasts of a Expeed processor . Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III, in its turn, comes with a 16.0 MP Four Thirds sized CMOS sensor and TruePic VIII processor , which makes it significantly different from the first model.
Take a look below to find the comparison of Nikon D40X and Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III by the size of their sensors.
One more distinctive feature of compared models is the sensor size. Nikon D40X has a sensor area 0.6x bigger compared to Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III. What does it mean? This basically means that if you these cameras them with the same aperture and focal length, the first model will give you more control in terms of the blurry background and depth of field.
For Which Fields Of Photography Are Nikon D40X and Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Suitable?
If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.
This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Nikon D40X and Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.
| Photography Type | Nikon D40X | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III |
|---|---|---|
| Portrait Photography |
|
|
| Street Photography |
|
|
| Sports Photography |
|
|
| Daily Photography |
|
|
| Landscape Photography |
|
|
Nikon D40X for Portrait Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.7 x 15.6 mm) sensor
Disadvantages:
- You might not like Nikon skintone
- No Image Stabilization
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III for Portrait Photography
Advantages:
- Image Stabilization
- Face Detection Focusing
Disadvantages:
- Small Four Thirds (17.4 x 13 mm) sensor
Nikon D40X for Street Photography
Advantages:
- Built-in View Finder
- Large APS-C(23.7 x 15.6 mm) sensor
Disadvantages:
- Big size (124 x 94 x 64 mm)
- No Image Stabilization
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III for Street Photography
Advantages:
- Built-in View Finder
- Live View
- Image Stabilization
- Large Four Thirds(17.4 x 13 mm) sensor
Disadvantages:
- Big size (122 x 84 x 50 mm)
Nikon D40X for Sports Photography
Advantages:
No Significant Advantages
Disadvantages:
- Slow Continuous Shooting (3.0 fps)
- No Environmental Sealing
- Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
- Bad Low Light ISO (516)
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III for Sports Photography
Advantages:
- Big Number of autofocus Points (121)
Disadvantages:
- Slow Continuous Shooting (8.6 fps)
- No Environmental Sealing
- Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
- Small battery life (330 shots)
Nikon D40X for Daily Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.7 x 15.6 mm) sensor
- Built-in Flash
- Built-in View Finder
Disadvantages:
- Big weight (522 g)
- Big size (124 x 94 x 64 mm)
- Video is not available
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III for Daily Photography
Advantages:
- Built-in Flash
- Built-in View Finder
- Live View
- Wireless Connectivity
- Video is available
Disadvantages:
- Small Four Thirds (17.4 x 13 mm) sensor
- Big weight (410 g)
- Big size (122 x 84 x 50 mm)
Nikon D40X for Landscape Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.7 x 15.6 mm) sensor
- Good Dynamic Range (11.4)
- RAW Support
Disadvantages:
- Low resolution sensor (10 MP)
- No Environmental Sealing
- Bad Low Light ISO (516)
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III for Landscape Photography
Advantages:
- Live View
- RAW Support
Disadvantages:
- Small Four Thirds (17.4 x 13 mm) sensor
- Low resolution sensor (16 MP)
- No Environmental Sealing
Comparison of Nikon D40X vs Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III: Final Verdict
Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Nikon D40X or Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.
What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Nikon D40X and Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III here is what we can say in conclusion:
According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III deserves a higher Total Score than the Nikon D40X. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.
Nikon D40X vs Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Table Of Technical Specs
For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:
| Nikon D40X | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | D40X | OM-D E-M10 Mark III |
| Announced | May 27, 2007 | Aug 31, 2017 |
| Body Type | Compact SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor | ||
| Sensor Type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor Size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor Dimensions | 23.7 x 15.6 mm | 17.4 x 13 mm |
| Sensor Area | 369.72 mm2 | 226.20 mm2 |
| Sensor Resolution | 10.0 MP | 16.0 MP |
| Max Image Resolution | 3872 x 2592 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max Native ISO | 1,600 | 25,600 |
| Max Boosted ISO | 3,200 | n/a |
| Min Native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW Support |  |
|
| Lens | ||
| Manual Focus | |
|
| Lens Mount | Nikon F | Micro Four Thirds |
| Number of Lenses | 287 | 94 |
| Focal Length Multiplier | 1.5x | 2x |
| Macro Focus Range | ||
| AutoFocus | ||
| AF Touch |  |
|
| AF Continuous | |
|
| AF Single | |
|
| AF Tracking | |
|
| AF Selective | |
|
| AF Center | |
|
| AF Multi Area | |
|
| AF Live View | |
|
| AF Face Detection | |
|
| AF Contrast Detection | |
|
| AF Phase Detection | |
|
| Number of Focus Points | n/a | 121 |
| Number of Cross Focus Points | n/a | n/a |
| Screen | ||
| Screen Type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen Size | 2.5″ | 3″ |
| Screen Resolution | 230k dots | 1,040k dots |
| Live View | |
|
| Touch Screen | |
|
| ViewFinder | ||
| ViewFinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
| ViewFinder Resolution | 0k dots | 2,360k dots |
| ViewFinder Coverage | 95% | 100% |
| ViewFinder Magnification | 0.53 | 0.62 |
| Photography Features | ||
| Min Shutter Speed | 30 s | 60 s |
| Max Shutter Speed | 1/4000 s | 1/4000 s |
| Continuous Shooting | 3.0 fps | 8.6 fps |
| Shutter Priority | |
|
| Aperture Priority | |
|
| Manual Exposure Mode | |
|
| Exposure Compensation | |
|
| Custom White Balance | |
|
| Image Stabilization | |
|
| Built-in Flash | |
|
| Flash Range | 17 | 5.8 |
| Flash Modes | Front curtain, Rear curtain, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual |
| External Flash | |
|
| AE Bracketing | |
|
| WB Bracketing | |
|
| Exposure Modes | ||
| Multi-Segment | |
|
| Average | |
|
| Spot | |
|
| Partial | |
|
| AF-Area | |
|
| Center Weighted | |
|
| Video Features | ||
| Video Resolutions | n/a | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max Video Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | |
| Video Formats | n/a | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone Port | |
|
| Headphone Port | |
|
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless Connectivity | |
|
| HDMI | |
|
| USB | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental Sealing | |
|
| Water Proof | |
|
| Dust Proof | |
|
| Shock Proof | |
|
| Crush Proof | |
|
| Freeze Proof | |
|
| Weight | 522 g | 410 g |
| Physical Dimensions | 124 x 94 x 64 mm | 122 x 84 x 50 mm |
| Battery Life | n/a | 330 shots |
| Battery Type | n/a | Battery Pack |
| Battery Model | EN-EL9 | BLS-50 |
| Other Features | ||
| Self Timer | |
|
| Timelapse Recording | |
|
| GPS | ||
| Storage Type | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) |
| Storage Slots | 1 | 1 |
Most popular cameras
Full frame
Four Thirds
Four Thirds
APS-C
Four Thirds
