Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!
The goal of this overview is to provide a detailed comparison of two popular camera models introduced by the same brand - Nikon. Although both products are offered by the same brand, they come from different categories. Thus, Nikon, is a camera from Entry-Level DSLR category, while D7000 is a Semi-Pro DSLR camera. Both products that we are going to review are equipped with the same type of sensor - CMOS. However, they have different resolution. The first compared model, Nikon D3300, features has a resolution of 24.0 MP. Another model that we are reviewing, Nikon D7000, features a sensor with a resolution of 16.0 MP.
Now, before we can move on to our comparison, let's take a moment to look at the key characteristics of Nikon D3300 and Nikon D7000.
Nikon D3300 Key Features:
Nikon D7000 Key Features:
Since Nikon D3300 has been around for some time, it was substituted by
Nikon D3400.
Be sure to check out some of our other comparisons that may also interest you:
Nikon D3300 vs. D3400
Nikon D3400 vs. Nikon D7000
Being a newer model, Nikon D3300 substituted
Nikon D3200.
Be sure to check out some of our other comparisons that may also interest you:
Nikon D3300 vs. D3200
Nikon D3200 vs. Nikon D7000
Sensor Resolution | 24.0 MP vs 16.0 MP | 33.3% more pixels |
Weight | 430 g vs 780 g | 350 g lighter |
Dxo Color Depth | 24.3 vs 23.5 | Better color depth |
Dxo Low Light Iso | 1385 vs 1167 | Better High ISO performance |
Timelapse Recording | Yes vs No | Creative shooting |
Storage Slots | 2 vs 1 | Extra storage slot |
Sensor Area | 370.52 mm2 vs 366.6 mm2 | 1.1% larger pixel area |
Continuous Shooting | 6 fps vs 5 fps | 1 fps faster |
Max Shutter Speed | 1/8000 vs 1/4000 | Faster shutter speed |
Number Of Focus Points | 39 vs 11 | 28 more focus points |
Number Of Cross Focus Points | 9 vs 1 | 8 more cross focus points |
Battery Life | 1050 shots vs 700 shots | 350 more frames with a single charge |
Environmental Sealing | Yes vs No | Shoot at tough conditions |
Dxo Dynamic Range | 13.9 vs 12.8 | Better dynamic range |
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) vs Optical (pentamirror) | Better framing and control |
Viewfinder Magnification | 0.64 vs 0.57 | 0.07 better magnification |
Screen Size | 3″ | 3″ | Large display |
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentaprism) | Better framing and control |
Raw Support | Yes | Yes | Better image quality |
AutoFocus Face Detection | Yes | Yes | Very handy for portraits |
Microphone Port | Yes | Yes | High quality audio recording option |
Built-In Flash | Yes | Yes | External flash available |
Flash Sync Port | Yes | Yes | Port for Flash Sync |
Battery Life | 700 shots | 1050 shots | Big number of frames with a single charge |
Touch Screen | No | No | No touch screen |
Screen Resolution | 921k dots | 921k dots | Small screen resolution |
Screen Type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type | No flexible viewing angles |
Headphone Port | No | No | No headphone port |
Continuous Shooting | 5.0 fps | 6.0 fps | Low continuous shooting |
Image Stabilization | No | No | No image stabilization |
Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Nikon D3300 and Nikon D7000 from the front view.
Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.
After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.
Speaking of weight, Nikon D3300 is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 350g less than the Nikon D7000. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.
Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.
Are Nikon D3300 and Nikon D7000 any different in terms of sensor type?
In fact, that's exactly what makes these two models really different. Thus, it is a good point to consider if your are choosing between these two cameras. Nikon D3300 features a 24.0 MP APS-C sized CMOS sensor . Nikon D7000, in its turn, comes with a 16.0 MP APS-C sized CMOS sensor , which makes it significantly different from the first model.
Take a look below to find the comparison of Nikon D3300 and Nikon D7000 by the size of their sensors.
Nikon D3300 and Nikon D7000 are identical by this indicator, as each feature a sensor of the same size. Thus, both cameras will provide the same level of control in terms of the depth of field if you use them with the same focal length and aperture.
If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.
This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Nikon D3300 and Nikon D7000 in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.
Photography Type | Nikon D3300 | Nikon D7000 |
---|---|---|
Portrait Photography |
|
|
Street Photography |
|
|
Sports Photography |
|
|
Daily Photography |
|
|
Landscape Photography |
|
|
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Nikon D3300 or Nikon D7000, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.
What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Nikon D3300 and Nikon D7000 here is what we can say in conclusion:
According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Nikon D3300 deserves a higher Total Score than the Nikon D7000. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.
For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:
Nikon D3300 | Nikon D7000 | |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Brand | Nikon | Nikon |
Model | D3300 | D7000 |
Announced | Apr 21, 2014 | Nov 30, 2010 |
Body Type | Compact SLR | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor | ||
Sensor Type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor Size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor Dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6 mm | 23.6 x 15.7 mm |
Sensor Area | 366.60 mm2 | 370.52 mm2 |
Sensor Resolution | 24.0 MP | 16.0 MP |
Max Image Resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4928 x 3264 |
Max Native ISO | 12,800 | 6,400 |
Max Boosted ISO | 25,600 | 25,600 |
Min Native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW Support | ||
Lens | ||
Manual Focus | ||
Lens Mount | Nikon F | Nikon F |
Number of Lenses | 287 | 287 |
Focal Length Multiplier | 1.5x | 1.5x |
Macro Focus Range | ||
AutoFocus | ||
AF Touch | ||
AF Continuous | ||
AF Single | ||
AF Tracking | ||
AF Selective | ||
AF Center | ||
AF Multi Area | ||
AF Live View | ||
AF Face Detection | ||
AF Contrast Detection | ||
AF Phase Detection | ||
Number of Focus Points | 11 | 39 |
Number of Cross Focus Points | 1 | 9 |
Screen | ||
Screen Type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen Size | 3″ | 3″ |
Screen Resolution | 921k dots | 921k dots |
Live View | ||
Touch Screen | ||
ViewFinder | ||
ViewFinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentaprism) |
ViewFinder Resolution | 0k dots | 0k dots |
ViewFinder Coverage | 95% | 100% |
ViewFinder Magnification | 0.57 | 0.64 |
Photography Features | ||
Min Shutter Speed | 30 s | 30 s |
Max Shutter Speed | 1/4000 s | 1/8000 s |
Continuous Shooting | 5.0 fps | 6.0 fps |
Shutter Priority | ||
Aperture Priority | ||
Manual Exposure Mode | ||
Exposure Compensation | ||
Custom White Balance | ||
Image Stabilization | ||
Built-in Flash | ||
Flash Range | 12 | 12 |
Flash Modes | Auto, Auto slow sync, Auto slow sync with red-eye reduction, Auto with red-eye reduction, Fill-flash, Rear-curtain sync, Rear-curtain with slow sync, Red-eye reduction, Red-eye reduction with slow sync, Slow sync | Auto, Red-eye, Slow sync, Rear curtain |
External Flash | ||
AE Bracketing | ||
WB Bracketing | ||
Exposure Modes | ||
Multi-Segment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF-Area | ||
Center Weighted | ||
DxO Sensor Scores | ||
DxO Sensor Score | 82 | 80 |
DxO Color Depth | 24.3 | 23.5 |
DxO Dynamic Range | 12.8 | 13.9 |
DxO Low Light ISO | 1385 | 1167 |
Video Features | ||
Video Resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p fps), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p fps), 640 x 424 (30, 25 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (24, 25, 30 fps), 640 x 424 (24 fps) |
Max Video Resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 |
Video Formats | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone Port | ||
Headphone Port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless Connectivity | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
Physical | ||
Environmental Sealing | ||
Water Proof | ||
Dust Proof | ||
Shock Proof | ||
Crush Proof | ||
Freeze Proof | ||
Weight | 430 g | 780 g |
Physical Dimensions | 124 x 98 x 76 mm | 132 x 105 x 77 mm |
Battery Life | 700 shots | 1050 shots |
Battery Type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery Model | EN-EL14a | EN-EL15 |
Other Features | ||
Self Timer | ||
Timelapse Recording | ||
GPS | Optional | Optional |
Storage Type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage Slots | 1 | 2 |
Most popular cameras