Nikon D3200 vs Olympus OM-D E-M10 II

  • APS-C
  • 24 megapixels
  • Nikon F
  • 45
    Overall
  • 19
    Imaging
  • 30
    Features
  • 73
    Size
  • 0
    Price
  • Four Thirds
  • 16 megapixels
  • Micro Four Thirds
  • 49
    Overall
  • 21
    Imaging
  • 71
    Features
  • 78
    Size
  • 0
    Price

Nikon D3200 vs Olympus OM-D E-M10 II: a Complete Review and Comparison

Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!

In this review, we are going to make a detailed comparison of two cameras that fall into different categories. While the first model we are looking at, Nikon D3200 belongs to a Entry-Level DSLR category, the other model, Nikon D3200 is a Entry-Level Mirrorless camera. Nikon D3200 is equipped with a 24.0 MP CMOS sensor, while Olympus OM-D E-M10 II comes with a 16.0 MP CMOS sensor.

Both cameras we are going to look at in our overview fall into two different categories - DSLR and MirrorLess. Keeping in mind all the distinctive features of each category, it will be hard to make a detailed comparison of these two models. However, we will do our best to make this review as unbiased and detailed as possible.

To get started, let’s take a look at some of the key features of Nikon D3200 and Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and, after this, we can go on to our detailed comparison of these models.

Nikon D3200 Key Features:

  • 24.0 MP APS-C CMOS sensor
  • ISO 100 - 6400 (Expands to 12800)
  • Image Stabilization: No
  • 3″ Fixed Type Screen
  • ViewFinder: Yes
  • 4.0 fps Continuous Shooting
  • Video: 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps), 640 x 424 (30, 25 fps)
  • Built-in Wireless: Yes
  • Dimensions: 125 x 96 x 77 mm
  • Weight: 505 g
  • Environmental Sealing: No
  • Built-in GPS: Yes
  • Replaced Nikon D3100. Compare
  • Replaced by Nikon D3300. Compare

Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Key Features:

  • 16.0 MP Four Thirds CMOS sensor
  • ISO 200 - 25600 (Expands to 100)
  • Image Stabilization: Yes
  • 3″ Tilting Screen
  • ViewFinder: Yes
  • 8.0 fps Continuous Shooting
  • Video: 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
  • Built-in Wireless: Yes
  • Dimensions: 120 x 83 x 47 mm
  • Weight: 390 g
  • Environmental Sealing: No
  • Built-in GPS: No
  • Replaced Olympus E-M10.
  • Replaced by Olympus E-M10 MIII.

Nikon D3200 was substituted by Nikon D3300. Be sure to check out some of our other overviews that may also interest you:
Nikon D3200 vs. D3300
Nikon D3300 vs. Olympus OM-D E-M10 II

Nikon D3200 substituted Nikon D3100. Be sure to check out some of our other overviews that may also interest you:
Nikon D3200 vs. D3100
Nikon D3100 vs. Olympus OM-D E-M10 II

Why is Nikon D3200 a better choice than Olympus OM-D E-M10 II

Sensor Resolution 24.0 MP vs 16.0 MP 33.3% more pixels
Sensor Area 357.28 mm2 vs 224.9 mm2 37.1% larger pixel area
Flash Range 12 vs 5.8 6.2 better flash range
Battery Life 540 shots vs 320 shots 220 more frames with a single charge
Microphone Port Yes vs No High quality audio recording option
Dxo Color Depth 24.1 vs 23.1 Better color depth
Dxo Dynamic Range 13.2 vs 12.5 Better dynamic range
Dxo Low Light Iso 1131 vs 842 Better High ISO performance

What are the key reasons to pick Olympus OM-D E-M10 II over Nikon D3200

Timelapse Recording Yes vs No Creative shooting
Image Stabilization Yes vs No All lenses are stabilized
Continuous Shooting 8 fps vs 4 fps 4 fps faster
Max Shutter Speed 1/16000 vs 1/4000 Faster shutter speed
Number Of Focus Points 81 vs 11 70 more focus points
Screen Resolution 1,040k dots vs 921k dots 11.4% higher resolution screen
Touch Screen Yes vs No Easy control of camera functions
Weight 390 g vs 505 g 115 g lighter
Viewfinder Magnification 0.62 vs 0.53 0.09 better magnification

Key PROs of Nikon D3200 and Olympus OM-D E-M10 II

Screen Size 3″ | 3″ Large display
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic Better framing and control
Raw Support Yes | Yes Better image quality
AutoFocus Face Detection Yes | Yes Very handy for portraits
Bracketing Yes | Yes Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR
Built-In Flash Yes | Yes External flash available
Flash Sync Port Yes | Yes Port for Flash Sync

Key CONs of Nikon D3200 and Olympus OM-D E-M10 II

Headphone Port No | No No headphone port
Environmental Sealing No | No No environmental sealing

Nikon D3200 vs Olympus OM-D E-M10 II: Comparing Two Models By Physical Characteristics

Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Nikon D3200 and Olympus OM-D E-M10 II from the front view.

Nikon D3200
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II
HTML
BB

Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.

Nikon D3200
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II
HTML
BB

After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.

Speaking of weight, Olympus OM-D E-M10 II is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 115g less than the Nikon D3200. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.

Comparing Nikon D3200 and Olympus OM-D E-M10 II by the type of Sensor and Resolution

Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.

Are Nikon D3200 and Olympus OM-D E-M10 II any different in terms of sensor type?

In fact, that's exactly what makes these two models really different. Thus, it is a good point to consider if your are choosing between these two cameras. Nikon D3200 features a 24.0 MP APS-C sized CMOS sensor . Olympus OM-D E-M10 II, in its turn, comes with a 16.0 MP Four Thirds sized CMOS sensor and TruePic VII processor , which makes it significantly different from the first model.

Take a look below to find the comparison of Nikon D3200 and Olympus OM-D E-M10 II by the size of their sensors.

Nikon D3200
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II
HTML
BB

One more distinctive feature of compared models is the sensor size. Nikon D3200 has a sensor area 0.6x bigger compared to Olympus OM-D E-M10 II. What does it mean? This basically means that if you these cameras them with the same aperture and focal length, the first model will give you more control in terms of the blurry background and depth of field.

For Which Fields Of Photography Are Nikon D3200 and Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Suitable?

If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.

This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Nikon D3200 and Olympus OM-D E-M10 II in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.

Photography Type Nikon D3200 Olympus OM-D E-M10 II
Portrait Photography
83%
73%
Street Photography
62%
95%
Sports Photography
64%
89%
Daily Photography
52%
61%
Landscape Photography
92%
79%

Nikon D3200 for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.2 x 15.4 mm) sensor
  • High resolution sensor (24 MP)
  • Face Detection Focusing

Disadvantages:

  • You might not like Nikon skintone
  • No Image Stabilization

Olympus OM-D E-M10 II for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

  • Fast Max Shutter Speed (1/16000s)
  • Image Stabilization
  • Face Detection Focusing

Disadvantages:

  • Small Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm) sensor

Nikon D3200 for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Large APS-C(23.2 x 15.4 mm) sensor

Disadvantages:

  • Big size (125 x 96 x 77 mm)
  • No Image Stabilization
  • Small Number of autofocus Points (11)

Olympus OM-D E-M10 II for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Image Stabilization
  • Large Four Thirds(17.3 x 13 mm) sensor

Disadvantages:

  • Big size (120 x 83 x 47 mm)

Nikon D3200 for Sports Photography

Advantages:

  • Big size (125 x 96 x 77 mm)

Disadvantages:

  • Slow Continuous Shooting (4.0 fps)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
  • Smal Number of autofocus Points (11)
  • Small Number of CrossFocus Points (1)
  • Bad Low Light ISO (1131)
  • Small battery life (540 shots)

Olympus OM-D E-M10 II for Sports Photography

Advantages:

  • Fast Max Shutter Speed (1/16000s)
  • Big Number of autofocus Points (81)

Disadvantages:

  • Slow Continuous Shooting (8.0 fps)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Bad Low Light ISO (842)
  • Small battery life (320 shots)

Nikon D3200 for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.2 x 15.4 mm) sensor
  • Built-in Flash
  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Wireless Connectivity
  • Video is available

Disadvantages:

  • Big weight (505 g)
  • Big size (125 x 96 x 77 mm)

Olympus OM-D E-M10 II for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Built-in Flash
  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Wireless Connectivity
  • Video is available

Disadvantages:

  • Small Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm) sensor
  • Big size (120 x 83 x 47 mm)

Nikon D3200 for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.2 x 15.4 mm) sensor
  • High resolution sensor (24 MP)
  • Good Dynamic Range (13.2)
  • Live View
  • RAW Support

Disadvantages:

  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Bad Low Light ISO (1131)

Olympus OM-D E-M10 II for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Good Dynamic Range (12.5)
  • Live View
  • RAW Support

Disadvantages:

  • Small Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm) sensor
  • Low resolution sensor (16 MP)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Bad Low Light ISO (842)

Comparison of Nikon D3200 vs Olympus OM-D E-M10 II: Final Verdict

Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Nikon D3200 or Olympus OM-D E-M10 II, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.

What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Nikon D3200 and Olympus OM-D E-M10 II here is what we can say in conclusion:

According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Olympus OM-D E-M10 II deserves a higher Total Score than the Nikon D3200. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.

Nikon D3200 vs Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Table Of Technical Specs

For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:

Nikon D3200 Olympus OM-D E-M10 II
General
Brand Nikon Olympus
Model D3200 OM-D E-M10 II
Announced Jul 25, 2012 Aug 25, 2015
Body Type Compact SLR SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor
Sensor Type CMOS CMOS
Sensor Size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor Dimensions 23.2 x 15.4 mm 17.3 x 13 mm
Sensor Area 357.28 mm2 224.90 mm2
Sensor Resolution 24.0 MP 16.0 MP
Max Image Resolution 6016 x 4000 4608 x 3456
Max Native ISO 6,400 25,600
Max Boosted ISO 12,800 n/a
Min Native ISO 100 200
RAW Support Yes Yes
Lens
Manual Focus Yes Yes
Lens Mount Nikon F Micro Four Thirds
Number of Lenses 287 94
Focal Length Multiplier 1.5x 2x
Macro Focus Range
AutoFocus
AF Touch No Yes
AF Continuous Yes Yes
AF Single Yes Yes
AF Tracking Yes Yes
AF Selective Yes Yes
AF Center No Yes
AF Multi Area Yes Yes
AF Live View Yes Yes
AF Face Detection Yes Yes
AF Contrast Detection Yes Yes
AF Phase Detection Yes No
Number of Focus Points 11 81
Number of Cross Focus Points 1 n/a
Screen
Screen Type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen Size 3″ 3″
Screen Resolution 921k dots 1,040k dots
Live View Yes Yes
Touch Screen No Yes
ViewFinder
ViewFinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
ViewFinder Resolution 0k dots 2,360k dots
ViewFinder Coverage 95% 100%
ViewFinder Magnification 0.53 0.62
Photography Features
Min Shutter Speed 30 s 60 s
Max Shutter Speed 1/4000 s 1/16000 s
Continuous Shooting 4.0 fps 8.0 fps
Shutter Priority Yes Yes
Aperture Priority Yes Yes
Manual Exposure Mode Yes Yes
Exposure Compensation Yes Yes
Custom White Balance Yes Yes
Image Stabilization No Yes
Built-in Flash Yes Yes
Flash Range 12 5.8
Flash Modes Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual
External Flash Yes Yes
AE Bracketing Yes Yes
WB Bracketing No Yes
Exposure Modes
Multi-Segment Yes Yes
Average No No
Spot Yes Yes
Partial No No
AF-Area Yes No
Center Weighted Yes No
DxO Sensor Scores
DxO Sensor Score 81 73
DxO Color Depth 24.1 23.1
DxO Dynamic Range 13.2 12.5
DxO Low Light ISO 1131 842
Video Features
Video Resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps), 640 x 424 (30, 25 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max Video Resolution 1920 x 1080 1920 x 1080
Video Formats MPEG-4, H.264 H.264, Motion JPEG
Microphone Port Yes No
Headphone Port No No
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity Yes Yes
HDMI Yes Yes
USB USB 2.0 USB 2.0
Physical
Environmental Sealing No No
Water Proof No No
Dust Proof No No
Shock Proof No No
Crush Proof No No
Freeze Proof No No
Weight 505 g 390 g
Physical Dimensions 125 x 96 x 77 mm 120 x 83 x 47 mm
Battery Life 540 shots 320 shots
Battery Type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery Model EN-EL14 BLS-50
Other Features
Self Timer Yes Yes
Timelapse Recording No Yes
GPS Optional
Storage Type SD/SDHC/SDXC UHS-I compliant SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage Slots 1 1

Most popular cameras

Pentax K-5 II 16.0 MP CMOS
APS-C
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH3 16.0 MP CMOS
Four Thirds
Olympus OM-D E-M10 16.0 MP CMOS
Four Thirds
Pentax K-5 IIs 16.0 MP CMOS
APS-C
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 16.0 MP CMOS
Four Thirds