Nikon D3200 vs Nikon D3400

  • APS-C
  • 24 megapixels
  • Nikon F
  • 45
    Overall
  • 19
    Imaging
  • 30
    Features
  • 73
    Size
  • 0
    Price
  • APS-C
  • 24 megapixels
  • Nikon F
  • 48
    Overall
  • 24
    Imaging
  • 33
    Features
  • 73
    Size
  • 0
    Price

Nikon D3200 vs Nikon D3400: a Complete Review and Comparison

Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!

The goal of this overview is to provide a detailed comparison of two popular camera models from Entry-Level DSLR category, introduced by Nikon. We are going to take a closer look at the technical and physical characteristics, features, and performance. The models we are going to assess and compare in this review are D3200 and D3400. The first common feature of Nikon D3200 and Nikon D3400 that is worth mentioning is sensor. Both cameras feature CMOS sensors with a resolution of 24.0 MP.

Now, before we can move on to our comparison, let's take a moment to look at the key characteristics of Nikon D3200 and Nikon D3400.

Nikon D3200 Key Features:

  • 24.0 MP APS-C CMOS sensor
  • ISO 100 - 6400 (Expands to 12800)
  • Image Stabilization: No
  • 3″ Fixed Type Screen
  • ViewFinder: Yes
  • 4.0 fps Continuous Shooting
  • Video: 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps), 640 x 424 (30, 25 fps)
  • Built-in Wireless: Yes
  • Dimensions: 125 x 96 x 77 mm
  • Weight: 505 g
  • Environmental Sealing: No
  • Built-in GPS: Yes
  • Replaced Nikon D3100. Compare
  • Replaced by Nikon D3300. Compare

Nikon D3400 Key Features:

  • 24.0 MP APS-C CMOS sensor
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Image Stabilization: No
  • 3″ Fixed Type Screen
  • ViewFinder: Yes
  • 5.0 fps Continuous Shooting
  • Video: 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps), 640 x 424 (30, 25 fps)
  • Built-in Wireless: No
  • Dimensions: 124 x 98 x 76 mm
  • Weight: 395 g
  • Environmental Sealing: No
  • Built-in GPS: Yes
  • Replaced Nikon D3300. Compare
  • Replaced by Nikon D3500. Compare

Since Nikon D3200 has been around for some time, it was substituted by Nikon D3300. Be sure to check out some of our other comparisons that may also interest you:
Nikon D3200 vs. D3300
Nikon D3300 vs. Nikon D3400

Being a newer model, Nikon D3200 substituted Nikon D3100. Be sure to check out some of our other comparisons that may also interest you:
Nikon D3200 vs. D3100
Nikon D3100 vs. Nikon D3400

Why is Nikon D3200 a better choice than Nikon D3400

Wireless Connectivity Optional vs No Better connectivity
Microphone Port Yes vs No High quality audio recording option

What are the key reasons to pick Nikon D3400 over Nikon D3200

Bluetooth Yes vs No Connect your camera to other devices via Bluetooth
Sensor Area 366.6 mm2 vs 357.28 mm2 2.5% larger pixel area
Continuous Shooting 5 fps vs 4 fps 1 fps faster
Battery Life 1200 shots vs 540 shots 660 more frames with a single charge
Weight 395 g vs 505 g 110 g lighter
Dxo Color Depth 24.8 vs 24.1 Better color depth
Dxo Dynamic Range 13.9 vs 13.2 Better dynamic range
Dxo Low Light Iso 1192 vs 1131 Better High ISO performance
Viewfinder Magnification 0.56 vs 0.53 0.03 better magnification

Key PROs of Nikon D3200 and Nikon D3400

Screen Size 3″ | 3″ Large display
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) Better framing and control
Raw Support Yes | Yes Better image quality
Sensor Resolution 24.0 MP | 24.0 MP Bigger prints and more details
AutoFocus Face Detection Yes | Yes Very handy for portraits
Built-In Flash Yes | Yes External flash available
Flash Sync Port Yes | Yes Port for Flash Sync
Battery Life 540 shots | 1200 shots Big number of frames with a single charge

Key CONs of Nikon D3200 and Nikon D3400

Touch Screen No | No No touch screen
Screen Resolution 921k dots | 921k dots Small screen resolution
Screen Type Fixed Type | Fixed Type No flexible viewing angles
Headphone Port No | No No headphone port
Timelapse Recording No | No No timelapse recording
Continuous Shooting 4.0 fps | 5.0 fps Low continuous shooting
Image Stabilization No | No No image stabilization
Environmental Sealing No | No No environmental sealing

Nikon D3200 vs Nikon D3400: Comparing Two Models By Physical Characteristics

Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Nikon D3200 and Nikon D3400 from the front view.

Nikon D3200
Nikon D3400
HTML
BB

Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.

Nikon D3200
Nikon D3400
HTML
BB

After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.

Speaking of weight, Nikon D3400 is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 110g less than the Nikon D3200. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.

Battery values for Entry-Level DSLR cameras:
Nikon D3200 — 540 shots
Nikon D3400 — 1200 shots
Min: 230 shots
Average: 588 shots
Max: 1900 shots
Thickness values for Entry-Level DSLR cameras:
Nikon D3200 — 77 mm
Nikon D3400 — 76 mm
Min: 53 mm
Average: 73 mm
Max: 86 mm
Weight values for Entry-Level DSLR cameras:
Nikon D3200 — 505 g
Nikon D3400 — 395 g
Min: 365 g
Average: 539 g
Max: 690 g

Comparing Nikon D3200 and Nikon D3400 by the type of Sensor and Resolution

Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.

Are Nikon D3200 and Nikon D3400 any different in terms of sensor type?

In terms of sensor type and resolution, these models are identical. Both Nikon D3200 and Nikon D3400 come equipped with the same CMOS that has a resolution of 24.0 MP. Thus, if you are wondering, which option to choose, this is not a factor you should be looking at.

Take a look below to find the comparison of Nikon D3200 and Nikon D3400 by the size of their sensors.

Nikon D3200
Nikon D3400
HTML
BB

Nikon D3200 and Nikon D3400 are identical by this indicator, as each feature a sensor of the same size. Thus, both cameras will provide the same level of control in terms of the depth of field if you use them with the same focal length and aperture.

For Which Fields Of Photography Are Nikon D3200 and Nikon D3400 Suitable?

If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.

This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Nikon D3200 and Nikon D3400 in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.

Photography Type Nikon D3200 Nikon D3400
Portrait Photography
83%
83%
Street Photography
62%
73%
Sports Photography
64%
61%
Daily Photography
52%
56%
Landscape Photography
92%
94%

Nikon D3200 for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.2 x 15.4 mm) sensor
  • High resolution sensor (24 MP)
  • Face Detection Focusing

Disadvantages:

  • You might not like Nikon skintone
  • No Image Stabilization

Nikon D3400 for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
  • High resolution sensor (24 MP)
  • Face Detection Focusing

Disadvantages:

  • You might not like Nikon skintone
  • No Image Stabilization

Nikon D3200 for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Large APS-C(23.2 x 15.4 mm) sensor

Disadvantages:

  • Big size (125 x 96 x 77 mm)
  • No Image Stabilization
  • Small Number of autofocus Points (11)

Nikon D3400 for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Large APS-C(23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
  • Big battery life (1200 shots)

Disadvantages:

  • Big size (124 x 98 x 76 mm)
  • No Image Stabilization
  • Small Number of autofocus Points (11)

Nikon D3200 for Sports Photography

Advantages:

  • Big size (125 x 96 x 77 mm)

Disadvantages:

  • Slow Continuous Shooting (4.0 fps)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
  • Smal Number of autofocus Points (11)
  • Small Number of CrossFocus Points (1)
  • Bad Low Light ISO (1131)
  • Small battery life (540 shots)

Nikon D3400 for Sports Photography

Advantages:

  • Big size (124 x 98 x 76 mm)

Disadvantages:

  • Slow Continuous Shooting (5.0 fps)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
  • Smal Number of autofocus Points (11)
  • Bad Low Light ISO (1192)

Nikon D3200 for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.2 x 15.4 mm) sensor
  • Built-in Flash
  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Wireless Connectivity
  • Video is available

Disadvantages:

  • Big weight (505 g)
  • Big size (125 x 96 x 77 mm)

Nikon D3400 for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
  • Built-in Flash
  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Video is available

Disadvantages:

  • Big size (124 x 98 x 76 mm)

Nikon D3200 for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.2 x 15.4 mm) sensor
  • High resolution sensor (24 MP)
  • Good Dynamic Range (13.2)
  • Live View
  • RAW Support

Disadvantages:

  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Bad Low Light ISO (1131)

Nikon D3400 for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
  • High resolution sensor (24 MP)
  • Good Dynamic Range (13.9)
  • Live View
  • RAW Support

Disadvantages:

  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Bad Low Light ISO (1192)

Comparison of Nikon D3200 vs Nikon D3400: Final Verdict

Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Nikon D3200 or Nikon D3400, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.

What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Nikon D3200 and Nikon D3400 here is what we can say in conclusion:

According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Nikon D3400 deserves a higher Total Score than the Nikon D3200. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.

Nikon D3200 vs Nikon D3400 Table Of Technical Specs

For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:

Nikon D3200 Nikon D3400
General
Brand Nikon Nikon
Model D3200 D3400
Announced Jul 25, 2012 Aug 17, 2016
Body Type Compact SLR Compact SLR
Sensor
Sensor Type CMOS CMOS
Sensor Size APS-C APS-C
Sensor Dimensions 23.2 x 15.4 mm 23.5 x 15.6 mm
Sensor Area 357.28 mm2 366.60 mm2
Sensor Resolution 24.0 MP 24.0 MP
Max Image Resolution 6016 x 4000 6000 x 4000
Max Native ISO 6,400 25,600
Max Boosted ISO 12,800 n/a
Min Native ISO 100 100
RAW Support Yes Yes
Lens
Manual Focus Yes Yes
Lens Mount Nikon F Nikon F
Number of Lenses 287 287
Focal Length Multiplier 1.5x 1.5x
Macro Focus Range
AutoFocus
AF Touch No No
AF Continuous Yes Yes
AF Single Yes Yes
AF Tracking Yes Yes
AF Selective Yes Yes
AF Center No Yes
AF Multi Area Yes Yes
AF Live View Yes Yes
AF Face Detection Yes Yes
AF Contrast Detection Yes Yes
AF Phase Detection Yes Yes
Number of Focus Points 11 11
Number of Cross Focus Points 1 n/a
Screen
Screen Type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen Size 3″ 3″
Screen Resolution 921k dots 921k dots
Live View Yes Yes
Touch Screen No No
ViewFinder
ViewFinder Optical (pentamirror) Optical (pentamirror)
ViewFinder Resolution 0k dots 0k dots
ViewFinder Coverage 95% 95%
ViewFinder Magnification 0.53 0.56
Photography Features
Min Shutter Speed 30 s 30 s
Max Shutter Speed 1/4000 s 1/4000 s
Continuous Shooting 4.0 fps 5.0 fps
Shutter Priority Yes Yes
Aperture Priority Yes Yes
Manual Exposure Mode Yes Yes
Exposure Compensation Yes Yes
Custom White Balance Yes Yes
Image Stabilization No No
Built-in Flash Yes Yes
Flash Range 12 12
Flash Modes Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain Auto, Auto slow sync, Auto slow sync with red-eye reduction, Auto with red-eye reduction, Fill-flash, Rear-curtain sync, Rear-curtain with slow sync, Red-eye reduction, Red-eye reduction with slow sync, Slow sync
External Flash Yes Yes
AE Bracketing Yes No
WB Bracketing No Yes
Exposure Modes
Multi-Segment Yes Yes
Average No No
Spot Yes Yes
Partial No No
AF-Area Yes Yes
Center Weighted Yes Yes
DxO Sensor Scores
DxO Sensor Score 81 86
DxO Color Depth 24.1 24.8
DxO Dynamic Range 13.2 13.9
DxO Low Light ISO 1131 1192
Video Features
Video Resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps), 640 x 424 (30, 25 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps), 640 x 424 (30, 25 fps)
Max Video Resolution 1920 x 1080 1920 x 1080
Video Formats MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone Port Yes No
Headphone Port No No
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity Yes No
HDMI Yes Yes
USB USB 2.0 USB 2.0
Physical
Environmental Sealing No No
Water Proof No No
Dust Proof No No
Shock Proof No No
Crush Proof No No
Freeze Proof No No
Weight 505 g 395 g
Physical Dimensions 125 x 96 x 77 mm 124 x 98 x 76 mm
Battery Life 540 shots 1200 shots
Battery Type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery Model EN-EL14 EN-EL14a
Other Features
Self Timer Yes Yes
Timelapse Recording No No
GPS Optional Optional
Storage Type SD/SDHC/SDXC UHS-I compliant SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage Slots 1 1

Most popular cameras

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II 20.0 MP CMOS
Four Thirds
Pentax K-1 Mark II 36.0 MP CMOS
Full frame
Sony Alpha A7 II 24.0 MP CMOS
Full frame
Sony Alpha A7S II 12.0 MP CMOS
Full frame
Sony Alpha A7R III 42.0 MP BSI-CMOS
Full frame