Leica Q vs Ricoh GR III

  • Full frame
  • 24 megapixels
  • Fixed lens
  • 54
    Overall
  • 32
    Imaging
  • 63
    Features
  • 72
    Size
  • 0
    Price
  • APS-C
  • 24 megapixels
  • Fixed lens
  • 47
    Overall
  • 14
    Imaging
  • 48
    Features
  • 85
    Size
  • 0
    Price

Leica Q vs Ricoh GR III: a Complete Review and Comparison

Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!

In this review, we are going to provide a detailed evaluation and comparison of two different camera models that fall into the same category - Large Sensor Compact. Although these cameras are from the same category, they were introduced by different brands - Leica and Ricoh. Although Leica Q and Ricoh GR III cameras that we are going to review here have significant distinctive features, they also have something in common. Thus, the first common trait of both models is sensor. These cameras feature identical 24.0 MP CMOS sensors.

To get started, let’s take a look at some of the key features of Leica Q and Ricoh GR III and, after this, we can go on to our detailed comparison of these models.

Leica Q Key Features:

  • 24.0 MP Full frame CMOS sensor
  • ISO 100 - 50000
  • Image Stabilization: Yes
  • 3″ Fixed Type Screen
  • ViewFinder: Yes
  • 10.0 fps Continuous Shooting
  • Video: 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p)
  • Built-in Wireless: Yes
  • Dimensions: 130 x 80 x 93 mm
  • Weight: 640 g
  • Environmental Sealing: No
  • Built-in GPS: No
  • Also known as Leica Typ 116

Ricoh GR III Key Features:

  • 24.0 MP APS-C CMOS sensor
  • Image Stabilization: Yes
  • 3″ Fixed Type Screen
  • ViewFinder: Yes
  • fps Continuous Shooting
  • Video: 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
  • Built-in Wireless: Yes
  • Dimensions: 109 x 62 x 33 mm
  • Weight: 257 g
  • Environmental Sealing: No
  • Built-in GPS: No

Why is Leica Q a better choice than Ricoh GR III

Timelapse Recording Yes vs No Creative shooting
Sensor Area 864 mm2 vs 366.6 mm2 57.6% larger pixel area
Continuous Shooting 10 fps vs No fps 10 fps faster
Max Shutter Speed 1/16000 vs 1/4000 Faster shutter speed
Screen Resolution 1,040k dots vs 1,037k dots 0.3% higher resolution screen

What are the key reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over Leica Q

Weight 257 g vs 640 g 383 g lighter

Key PROs of Leica Q and Ricoh GR III

Touch Screen Yes | Yes Easy control of camera functions
Screen Size 3″ | 3″ Large display
Screen Resolution 1,040k dots | 1,037k dots High resolution screen
Viewfinder Electronic | Optical (optional) Better framing and control
Raw Support Yes | Yes Better image quality
Sensor Resolution 24.0 MP | 24.0 MP Bigger prints and more details
AutoFocus Face Detection Yes | Yes Very handy for portraits
Bracketing Yes | Yes Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR
Image Stabilization Yes | Yes Built-in stabilization

Key CONs of Leica Q and Ricoh GR III

Screen Type Fixed Type | Fixed Type No flexible viewing angles
Microphone Port No | No No microphone port
Headphone Port No | No No headphone port
Built-In Flash No | No No built-in flash
Environmental Sealing No | No No environmental sealing

Leica Q vs Ricoh GR III: Comparing Two Models By Physical Characteristics

Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Leica Q and Ricoh GR III from the front view.

Leica Q
Ricoh GR III
HTML
BB

Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.

Leica Q
Ricoh GR III
HTML
BB

After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.

Speaking of weight, Ricoh GR III is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 383g less than the Leica Q. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.

Thickness values for Large Sensor Compact cameras:
Leica Q — 93 mm
Ricoh GR III — 33 mm
Min: 31 mm
Average: 54 mm
Max: 122 mm
Weight values for Large Sensor Compact cameras:
Leica Q — 640 g
Ricoh GR III — 257 g
Min: 206 g
Average: 393 g
Max: 1040 g

Comparing Leica Q and Ricoh GR III by the type of Sensor and Resolution

Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.

Are Leica Q and Ricoh GR III any different in terms of sensor type?

In terms of sensor type and resolution, these models are identical. Both Leica Q and Ricoh GR III come equipped with the same CMOS that has a resolution of 24.0 MP. Thus, if you are wondering, which option to choose, this is not a factor you should be looking at.

Take a look below to find the comparison of Leica Q and Ricoh GR III by the size of their sensors.

Leica Q
Ricoh GR III
HTML
BB

One more distinctive feature of compared models is the sensor size. Leica Q has a sensor area 0.4x bigger compared to Ricoh GR III. What does it mean? This basically means that if you these cameras them with the same aperture and focal length, the first model will give you more control in terms of the blurry background and depth of field.

For Which Fields Of Photography Are Leica Q and Ricoh GR III Suitable?

If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.

This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Leica Q and Ricoh GR III in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.

Photography Type Leica Q Ricoh GR III
Portrait Photography
99%
93%
Street Photography
95%
98%
Sports Photography
92%
48%
Daily Photography
70%
2%
Landscape Photography
96%
81%

Leica Q for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

  • Large Full frame (36 x 24 mm) sensor
  • High resolution sensor (24 MP)
  • Fast Max Shutter Speed (1/16000s)
  • Image Stabilization
  • Face Detection Focusing

Disadvantages:

No Significant Disadvantages

Ricoh GR III for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
  • High resolution sensor (24 MP)
  • Image Stabilization
  • Face Detection Focusing

Disadvantages:

No Significant Disadvantages

Leica Q for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Image Stabilization
  • Large Full frame(36 x 24 mm) sensor

Disadvantages:

  • Big size (130 x 80 x 93 mm)

Ricoh GR III for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Small size (109 x 62 x 33 mm)
  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Image Stabilization
  • Large APS-C(23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor

Disadvantages:

No Significant Disadvantages

Leica Q for Sports Photography

Advantages:

  • Fast Max Shutter Speed (1/16000s)
  • Nice Low Light ISO (2221)
  • Big size (130 x 80 x 93 mm)

Disadvantages:

  • Slow Continuous Shooting (10.0 fps)
  • No Environmental Sealing

Ricoh GR III for Sports Photography

Advantages:

No Significant Advantages

Disadvantages:

  • Slow Continuous Shooting ( fps)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
  • Bad Max Native ISO (0)
  • Small size (109 x 62 x 33 mm)

Leica Q for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Large Full frame (36 x 24 mm) sensor
  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Wireless Connectivity
  • Video is available

Disadvantages:

  • Big weight (640 g)
  • Big size (130 x 80 x 93 mm)
  • No Built-in Flash

Ricoh GR III for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
  • Small weight (257 g)
  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Wireless Connectivity
  • Video is available

Disadvantages:

  • No Built-in Flash

Leica Q for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Large Full frame (36 x 24 mm) sensor
  • High resolution sensor (24 MP)
  • Good Dynamic Range (12.7)
  • Live View
  • RAW Support
  • Nice Low Light ISO (2221)

Disadvantages:

  • No Environmental Sealing

Ricoh GR III for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
  • High resolution sensor (24 MP)
  • Live View
  • RAW Support

Disadvantages:

  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Bad Max Native ISO (0)

Comparison of Leica Q vs Ricoh GR III: Final Verdict

Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Leica Q or Ricoh GR III, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.

What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Leica Q and Ricoh GR III here is what we can say in conclusion:

According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Leica Q deserves a higher Total Score than the Ricoh GR III. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.

Leica Q vs Ricoh GR III Table Of Technical Specs

For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:

Leica Q Ricoh GR III
General
Brand Leica Ricoh
Model Q GR III
Announced Jun 10, 2015 Sep 25, 2018
Body Type Large sensor compact Large sensor compact
Sensor
Sensor Type CMOS CMOS
Sensor Size Full frame APS-C
Sensor Dimensions 36 x 24 mm 23.5 x 15.6 mm
Sensor Area 864.00 mm2 366.60 mm2
Sensor Resolution 24.0 MP 24.0 MP
Max Image Resolution 6000 x 4000 6000 x 4000
Max Native ISO 50,000 0
Max Boosted ISO n/a n/a
Min Native ISO 100 0
RAW Support Yes Yes
Lens
Manual Focus Yes Yes
Lens Mount Fixed lens Fixed lens
Number of Lenses n/a n/a
Focal Length Multiplier n/a n/a
Macro Focus Range 17 6
AutoFocus
AF Touch Yes Yes
AF Continuous Yes Yes
AF Single Yes Yes
AF Tracking No Yes
AF Selective Yes Yes
AF Center Yes Yes
AF Multi Area Yes Yes
AF Live View Yes Yes
AF Face Detection Yes Yes
AF Contrast Detection Yes Yes
AF Phase Detection No Yes
Number of Focus Points n/a n/a
Number of Cross Focus Points n/a n/a
Screen
Screen Type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen Size 3″ 3″
Screen Resolution 1,040k dots 1,037k dots
Live View Yes Yes
Touch Screen Yes Yes
ViewFinder
ViewFinder Electronic Optical (optional)
ViewFinder Resolution 3,680k dots 0k dots
ViewFinder Coverage 100% %
ViewFinder Magnification
Photography Features
Min Shutter Speed 30 s 30 s
Max Shutter Speed 1/16000 s 1/4000 s
Continuous Shooting 10.0 fps fps
Shutter Priority Yes Yes
Aperture Priority Yes Yes
Manual Exposure Mode Yes Yes
Exposure Compensation Yes Yes
Custom White Balance Yes Yes
Image Stabilization Yes Yes
Built-in Flash No No
Flash Range 0 0
Flash Modes no built-in flash Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye
External Flash Yes Yes
AE Bracketing Yes Yes
WB Bracketing No No
Exposure Modes
Multi-Segment Yes Yes
Average No Yes
Spot Yes Yes
Partial No No
AF-Area No No
Center Weighted No No
Video Features
Video Resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Max Video Resolution 1920 x 1080 1920 x 1080
Video Formats MPEG-4 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone Port No No
Headphone Port No No
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity Yes Yes
HDMI Yes No
USB USB 2.0 USB 1
Physical
Environmental Sealing No No
Water Proof No No
Dust Proof No No
Shock Proof No No
Crush Proof No No
Freeze Proof No No
Weight 640 g 257 g
Physical Dimensions 130 x 80 x 93 mm 109 x 62 x 33 mm
Battery Life n/a n/a
Battery Type n/a n/a
Battery Model BP-DC12 n/a
Other Features
Self Timer Yes Yes
Timelapse Recording Yes No
GPS
Storage Type SD/SDHC/SDXC Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported)
Storage Slots 1 1

Most popular cameras

Fujifilm X-T3 26.0 MP BSI-CMOS
APS-C
Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 20.0 MP CMOS
Four Thirds
Nikon D610 24.0 MP CMOS
Full frame
Sony Alpha A7S 12.0 MP CMOS
Full frame
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV 30.0 MP CMOS
Full frame