Leica M Typ 240 vs Leica M8

  • Full frame
  • 24 megapixels
  • Leica M
  • 52
    Overall
  • 26
    Imaging
  • 23
    Features
  • 78
    Size
  • 0
    Price
  • APS-H
  • 10 megapixels
  • Leica M
  • 42
    Overall
  • 11
    Imaging
  • 17
    Features
  • 79
    Size
  • 0
    Price

Leica M Typ 240 vs Leica M8: a Complete Review and Comparison

Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!

The goal of this overview is to provide a detailed comparison of two popular camera models from Pro Mirrorless category, introduced by Leica. We are going to take a closer look at the technical and physical characteristics, features, and performance. The models we are going to assess and compare in this review are M Typ 240 and M8. The models we are going to compare in our review have different sensors. Leica M Typ 240 features a CMOS sensor that has a resolution of 24.0 MP. Leica M8, on the contrary, has a different CCD sensor with 24.0 MP resolution.

Now, before we can move on to our comparison, let's take a moment to look at the key characteristics of Leica M Typ 240 and Leica M8.

Leica M Typ 240 Key Features:

  • 24.0 MP Full frame CMOS sensor
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Image Stabilization: No
  • 3″ Fixed Type Screen
  • ViewFinder: Yes
  • 3.0 fps Continuous Shooting
  • Video: 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps)
  • Built-in Wireless: No
  • Dimensions: 139 x 80 x 42 mm
  • Weight: 680 g
  • Environmental Sealing: Yes
  • Built-in GPS: Yes

Leica M8 Key Features:

  • 10.0 MP APS-H CCD sensor
  • ISO 160 - 2500
  • Image Stabilization: No
  • ViewFinder: Yes
  • fps Continuous Shooting
  • Built-in Wireless: No
  • Dimensions: 139 x 80 x 37 mm
  • Weight: 591 g
  • Environmental Sealing: No
  • Built-in GPS: No
  • Replaced by Leica M8.2.

Why is Leica M Typ 240 a better choice than Leica M8

Sensor Resolution 24.0 MP vs 10.0 MP 58.3% more pixels
Sensor Area 864 mm2 vs 486 mm2 43.8% larger pixel area
Continuous Shooting 3 fps vs No fps 3 fps faster
Screen Size 3″ vs 2.5″ 0.5" larger screen
Screen Resolution 920k dots vs 230k dots 75% higher resolution screen
Environmental Sealing Yes vs No Shoot at tough conditions
Dxo Color Depth 24 vs 21.1 Better color depth
Dxo Dynamic Range 13.3 vs 11.3 Better dynamic range
Dxo Low Light Iso 1860 vs 663 Better High ISO performance
Viewfinder Magnification 0.68 vs No 0.68 better magnification

What are the key reasons to pick Leica M8 over Leica M Typ 240

Max Shutter Speed 1/8000 vs 1/4000 Faster shutter speed
Battery Life 550 shots vs 500 shots 50 more frames with a single charge
Weight 591 g vs 680 g 89 g lighter

Key PROs of Leica M Typ 240 and Leica M8

Viewfinder Optical (rangefinder) | Optical (rangefinder) Better framing and control
Raw Support Yes | Yes Better image quality
Flash Sync Port Yes | Yes Port for Flash Sync
Battery Life 500 shots | 550 shots Big number of frames with a single charge

Key CONs of Leica M Typ 240 and Leica M8

Touch Screen No | No No touch screen
Screen Resolution 920k dots | 230k dots Small screen resolution
Screen Type Fixed Type | Fixed Type No flexible viewing angles
AutoFocus Face Detection No | No No Face Detection
Timelapse Recording No | No No timelapse recording
Bracketing No | No No AE bracketing
Continuous Shooting 3.0 fps | fps Low continuous shooting
Built-In Flash No | No No built-in flash
Image Stabilization No | No No image stabilization

Leica M Typ 240 vs Leica M8: Comparing Two Models By Physical Characteristics

Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Leica M Typ 240 and Leica M8 from the front view.

Leica M Typ 240
Leica M8
HTML
BB

Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.

Leica M Typ 240
Leica M8
HTML
BB

After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.

Speaking of weight, Leica M8 is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 89g less than the Leica M Typ 240. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.

Battery values for Pro Mirrorless cameras:
Leica M Typ 240 — 500 shots
Leica M8 — 550 shots
Min: 210 shots
Average: 432 shots
Max: 870 shots
Thickness values for Pro Mirrorless cameras:
Leica M Typ 240 — 42 mm
Leica M8 — 37 mm
Min: 37 mm
Average: 63 mm
Max: 97 mm
Weight values for Pro Mirrorless cameras:
Leica M Typ 240 — 680 g
Leica M8 — 591 g
Min: 465 g
Average: 672 g
Max: 1320 g

Comparing Leica M Typ 240 and Leica M8 by the type of Sensor and Resolution

Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.

Are Leica M Typ 240 and Leica M8 any different in terms of sensor type?

In fact, that's exactly what makes these two models really different. Thus, it is a good point to consider if your are choosing between these two cameras. Leica M Typ 240 features a 24.0 MP Full frame sized CMOS sensor . Leica M8, in its turn, comes with a 10.0 MP APS-H sized CCD sensor , which makes it significantly different from the first model.

Take a look below to find the comparison of Leica M Typ 240 and Leica M8 by the size of their sensors.

Leica M Typ 240
Leica M8
HTML
BB

One more distinctive feature of compared models is the sensor size. Leica M Typ 240 has a sensor area 0.6x bigger compared to Leica M8. What does it mean? This basically means that if you these cameras them with the same aperture and focal length, the first model will give you more control in terms of the blurry background and depth of field.

For Which Fields Of Photography Are Leica M Typ 240 and Leica M8 Suitable?

If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.

This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Leica M Typ 240 and Leica M8 in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.

Photography Type Leica M Typ 240 Leica M8
Portrait Photography
85%
85%
Street Photography
84%
72%
Sports Photography
91%
83%
Daily Photography
90%
99%
Landscape Photography
96%
72%

Leica M Typ 240 for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

  • Large Full frame (36 x 24 mm) sensor
  • High resolution sensor (24 MP)

Disadvantages:

  • No Image Stabilization

Leica M8 for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-H (27 x 18 mm) sensor
  • Fast Max Shutter Speed (1/8000s)

Disadvantages:

  • No Image Stabilization

Leica M Typ 240 for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Large Full frame(36 x 24 mm) sensor

Disadvantages:

  • Big size (139 x 80 x 42 mm)
  • No Image Stabilization

Leica M8 for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Built-in View Finder
  • Large APS-H(27 x 18 mm) sensor

Disadvantages:

  • Big size (139 x 80 x 37 mm)
  • No Image Stabilization

Leica M Typ 240 for Sports Photography

Advantages:

  • Environmental Sealing
  • Nice Low Light ISO (1860)

Disadvantages:

  • Slow Continuous Shooting (3.0 fps)
  • Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
  • Bad Max Native ISO (6400)
  • Small battery life (500 shots)

Leica M8 for Sports Photography

Advantages:

  • Fast Max Shutter Speed (1/8000s)

Disadvantages:

  • Slow Continuous Shooting ( fps)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Bad Low Light ISO (663)
  • Small battery life (550 shots)

Leica M Typ 240 for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Large Full frame (36 x 24 mm) sensor
  • Built-in View Finder
  • Video is available

Disadvantages:

  • Big weight (680 g)
  • Big size (139 x 80 x 42 mm)
  • No Built-in Flash

Leica M8 for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-H (27 x 18 mm) sensor
  • Built-in View Finder

Disadvantages:

  • Big weight (591 g)
  • Big size (139 x 80 x 37 mm)
  • No Built-in Flash
  • Video is not available

Leica M Typ 240 for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Large Full frame (36 x 24 mm) sensor
  • High resolution sensor (24 MP)
  • Good Dynamic Range (13.3)
  • Environmental Sealing
  • RAW Support
  • Nice Low Light ISO (1860)

Disadvantages:

  • Bad Max Native ISO (6400)

Leica M8 for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-H (27 x 18 mm) sensor
  • Good Dynamic Range (11.3)
  • RAW Support

Disadvantages:

  • Low resolution sensor (10 MP)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Bad Low Light ISO (663)

Comparison of Leica M Typ 240 vs Leica M8: Final Verdict

Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Leica M Typ 240 or Leica M8, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.

What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Leica M Typ 240 and Leica M8 here is what we can say in conclusion:

According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Leica M Typ 240 deserves a higher Total Score than the Leica M8. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.

Leica M Typ 240 vs Leica M8 Table Of Technical Specs

For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:

Leica M Typ 240 Leica M8
General
Brand Leica Leica
Model M Typ 240 M8
Announced Sep 17, 2012 Jul 31, 2007
Body Type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor
Sensor Type CMOS CCD
Sensor Size Full frame APS-H
Sensor Dimensions 36 x 24 mm 27 x 18 mm
Sensor Area 864.00 mm2 486.00 mm2
Sensor Resolution 24.0 MP 10.0 MP
Max Image Resolution 5952 x 3976 3936 x 2630
Max Native ISO 6,400 2,500
Max Boosted ISO n/a n/a
Min Native ISO 100 160
RAW Support Yes Yes
Lens
Manual Focus Yes Yes
Lens Mount Leica M Leica M
Number of Lenses 59 59
Focal Length Multiplier 1x 1.3x
Macro Focus Range
AutoFocus
AF Touch No No
AF Continuous No No
AF Single No No
AF Tracking No No
AF Selective No No
AF Center No No
AF Multi Area No No
AF Live View No No
AF Face Detection No No
AF Contrast Detection No No
AF Phase Detection No No
Number of Focus Points n/a n/a
Number of Cross Focus Points n/a n/a
Screen
Screen Type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen Size 3″ 2.5″
Screen Resolution 920k dots 230k dots
Live View Yes No
Touch Screen No No
ViewFinder
ViewFinder Optical (rangefinder) Optical (rangefinder)
ViewFinder Resolution 0k dots 0k dots
ViewFinder Coverage 1% %
ViewFinder Magnification 0.68
Photography Features
Min Shutter Speed 60 s 8 s
Max Shutter Speed 1/4000 s 1/8000 s
Continuous Shooting 3.0 fps fps
Shutter Priority No No
Aperture Priority Yes Yes
Manual Exposure Mode Yes Yes
Exposure Compensation Yes Yes
Custom White Balance Yes Yes
Image Stabilization No No
Built-in Flash No No
Flash Range 0 0
Flash Modes Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync
External Flash Yes Yes
AE Bracketing No No
WB Bracketing Yes No
Exposure Modes
Multi-Segment No No
Average No No
Spot No No
Partial No No
AF-Area No No
Center Weighted Yes No
DxO Sensor Scores
DxO Sensor Score 84 59
DxO Color Depth 24.0 21.1
DxO Dynamic Range 13.3 11.3
DxO Low Light ISO 1860 663
Video Features
Video Resolutions 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) n/a
Max Video Resolution 1920 x 1080
Video Formats Motion JPEG n/a
Microphone Port No No
Headphone Port No No
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity No No
HDMI No No
USB USB 2.0 USB 2.0
Physical
Environmental Sealing Yes No
Water Proof No No
Dust Proof No No
Shock Proof No No
Crush Proof No No
Freeze Proof No No
Weight 680 g 591 g
Physical Dimensions 139 x 80 x 42 mm 139 x 80 x 37 mm
Battery Life 500 shots 550 shots
Battery Type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery Model n/a n/a
Other Features
Self Timer Yes Yes
Timelapse Recording No No
GPS Optional
Storage Type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC card
Storage Slots 1 1

Most popular cameras

Pentax K-5 II 16.0 MP CMOS
APS-C
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH3 16.0 MP CMOS
Four Thirds
Olympus OM-D E-M10 16.0 MP CMOS
Four Thirds
Pentax K-5 IIs 16.0 MP CMOS
APS-C
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 16.0 MP CMOS
Four Thirds