Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica M Typ 262

  • Full frame
  • 18 megapixels
  • Leica M
  • 47
    Overall
  • 18
    Imaging
  • 13
    Features
  • 79
    Size
  • 0
    Price
  • Full frame
  • 24 megapixels
  • Leica M
  • 49
    Overall
  • 23
    Imaging
  • 15
    Features
  • 78
    Size
  • 0
    Price

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica M Typ 262: a Complete Review and Comparison

Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!

The goal of this overview is to provide a detailed comparison of two popular camera models from Pro Mirrorless category, introduced by Leica. We are going to take a closer look at the technical and physical characteristics, features, and performance. The models we are going to assess and compare in this review are M-E Typ 220 and M Typ 262. The models we are going to compare in our review have different sensors. Leica M-E Typ 220 features a CCD sensor that has a resolution of 18.0 MP. Leica M Typ 262, on the contrary, has a different CMOS sensor with 18.0 MP resolution.

Now, before we can move on to our comparison, let's take a moment to look at the key characteristics of Leica M-E Typ 220 and Leica M Typ 262.

Leica M-E Typ 220 Key Features:

  • 18.0 MP Full frame CCD sensor
  • ISO 80 - 2500
  • Image Stabilization: No
  • ViewFinder: Yes
  • 2.0 fps Continuous Shooting
  • Built-in Wireless: No
  • Dimensions: 139 x 80 x 37 mm
  • Weight: 585 g
  • Environmental Sealing: No
  • Built-in GPS: No

Leica M Typ 262 Key Features:

  • 24.0 MP Full frame CMOS sensor
  • ISO 200 - 6400 (Expands to 100)
  • Image Stabilization: No
  • 3″ Fixed Type Screen
  • ViewFinder: Yes
  • 3.0 fps Continuous Shooting
  • Built-in Wireless: No
  • Dimensions: 139 x 80 x 42 mm
  • Weight: 600 g
  • Environmental Sealing: No
  • Built-in GPS: Yes
  • Also known as Leica Typ 262

Why is Leica M-E Typ 220 a better choice than Leica M Typ 262

Sensor Area 864 mm2 vs 855.62 mm2 1% larger pixel area
Weight 585 g vs 600 g 15 g lighter

What are the key reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over Leica M-E Typ 220

Sensor Resolution 24.0 MP vs 18.0 MP 25% more pixels
Continuous Shooting 3 fps vs 2 fps 1 fps faster
Screen Size 3″ vs 2.5″ 0.5" larger screen
Screen Resolution 921k dots vs 230k dots 75% higher resolution screen

Key PROs of Leica M-E Typ 220 and Leica M Typ 262

Viewfinder Optical (rangefinder) | Optical (rangefinder) Better framing and control
Raw Support Yes | Yes Better image quality
Flash Sync Port Yes | Yes Port for Flash Sync

Key CONs of Leica M-E Typ 220 and Leica M Typ 262

Touch Screen No | No No touch screen
Screen Resolution 230k dots | 921k dots Small screen resolution
Screen Type Fixed Type | Fixed Type No flexible viewing angles
AutoFocus Face Detection No | No No Face Detection
Timelapse Recording No | No No timelapse recording
Continuous Shooting 2.0 fps | 3.0 fps Low continuous shooting
Built-In Flash No | No No built-in flash
Image Stabilization No | No No image stabilization
Environmental Sealing No | No No environmental sealing

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica M Typ 262: Comparing Two Models By Physical Characteristics

Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Leica M-E Typ 220 and Leica M Typ 262 from the front view.

Leica M-E Typ 220
Leica M Typ 262
HTML
BB

Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.

Leica M-E Typ 220
Leica M Typ 262
HTML
BB

After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.

Speaking of weight, Leica M-E Typ 220 is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 15g less than the Leica M Typ 262. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.

Thickness values for Pro Mirrorless cameras:
Leica M-E Typ 220 — 37 mm
Leica M Typ 262 — 42 mm
Min: 37 mm
Average: 63 mm
Max: 97 mm
Weight values for Pro Mirrorless cameras:
Leica M-E Typ 220 — 585 g
Leica M Typ 262 — 600 g
Min: 465 g
Average: 672 g
Max: 1320 g

Comparing Leica M-E Typ 220 and Leica M Typ 262 by the type of Sensor and Resolution

Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.

Are Leica M-E Typ 220 and Leica M Typ 262 any different in terms of sensor type?

In fact, that's exactly what makes these two models really different. Thus, it is a good point to consider if your are choosing between these two cameras. Leica M-E Typ 220 features a 18.0 MP Full frame sized CCD sensor . Leica M Typ 262, in its turn, comes with a 24.0 MP Full frame sized CMOS sensor and Maestro processor , which makes it significantly different from the first model.

Take a look below to find the comparison of Leica M-E Typ 220 and Leica M Typ 262 by the size of their sensors.

Leica M-E Typ 220
Leica M Typ 262
HTML
BB

Leica M-E Typ 220 and Leica M Typ 262 are identical by this indicator, as each feature a sensor of the same size. Thus, both cameras will provide the same level of control in terms of the depth of field if you use them with the same focal length and aperture.

For Which Fields Of Photography Are Leica M-E Typ 220 and Leica M Typ 262 Suitable?

If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.

This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Leica M-E Typ 220 and Leica M Typ 262 in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.

Photography Type Leica M-E Typ 220 Leica M Typ 262
Portrait Photography
68%
87%
Street Photography
73%
76%
Sports Photography
56%
56%
Daily Photography
96%
97%
Landscape Photography
82%
79%

Leica M-E Typ 220 for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

  • Large Full frame (36 x 24 mm) sensor

Disadvantages:

  • No Image Stabilization

Leica M Typ 262 for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

  • Large Full frame (35.8 x 23.9 mm) sensor
  • High resolution sensor (24 MP)

Disadvantages:

  • No Image Stabilization

Leica M-E Typ 220 for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Built-in View Finder
  • Large Full frame(36 x 24 mm) sensor

Disadvantages:

  • Big size (139 x 80 x 37 mm)
  • No Image Stabilization

Leica M Typ 262 for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Built-in View Finder
  • Large Full frame(35.8 x 23.9 mm) sensor

Disadvantages:

  • Big size (139 x 80 x 42 mm)
  • No Image Stabilization

Leica M-E Typ 220 for Sports Photography

Advantages:

No Significant Advantages

Disadvantages:

  • Slow Continuous Shooting (2.0 fps)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
  • Bad Low Light ISO (787)

Leica M Typ 262 for Sports Photography

Advantages:

No Significant Advantages

Disadvantages:

  • Slow Continuous Shooting (3.0 fps)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
  • Bad Max Native ISO (6400)

Leica M-E Typ 220 for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Large Full frame (36 x 24 mm) sensor
  • Built-in View Finder

Disadvantages:

  • Big weight (585 g)
  • Big size (139 x 80 x 37 mm)
  • No Built-in Flash
  • Video is not available

Leica M Typ 262 for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Large Full frame (35.8 x 23.9 mm) sensor
  • Built-in View Finder

Disadvantages:

  • Big weight (600 g)
  • Big size (139 x 80 x 42 mm)
  • No Built-in Flash
  • Video is not available

Leica M-E Typ 220 for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Large Full frame (36 x 24 mm) sensor
  • Good Dynamic Range (11.7)
  • RAW Support

Disadvantages:

  • Low resolution sensor (18 MP)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Bad Low Light ISO (787)

Leica M Typ 262 for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Large Full frame (35.8 x 23.9 mm) sensor
  • High resolution sensor (24 MP)
  • RAW Support

Disadvantages:

  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Bad Max Native ISO (6400)

Comparison of Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica M Typ 262: Final Verdict

Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Leica M-E Typ 220 or Leica M Typ 262, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.

What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Leica M-E Typ 220 and Leica M Typ 262 here is what we can say in conclusion:

According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Leica M Typ 262 deserves a higher Total Score than the Leica M-E Typ 220. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica M Typ 262 Table Of Technical Specs

For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:

Leica M-E Typ 220 Leica M Typ 262
General
Brand Leica Leica
Model M-E Typ 220 M Typ 262
Announced Sep 17, 2012 Nov 19, 2015
Body Type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor
Sensor Type CCD CMOS
Sensor Size Full frame Full frame
Sensor Dimensions 36 x 24 mm 35.8 x 23.9 mm
Sensor Area 864.00 mm2 855.62 mm2
Sensor Resolution 18.0 MP 24.0 MP
Max Image Resolution 5212 x 3472 5952 x 3976
Max Native ISO 2,500 6,400
Max Boosted ISO n/a n/a
Min Native ISO 80 200
RAW Support Yes Yes
Lens
Manual Focus Yes Yes
Lens Mount Leica M Leica M
Number of Lenses 59 59
Focal Length Multiplier 1x 1x
Macro Focus Range
AutoFocus
AF Touch No No
AF Continuous No No
AF Single No No
AF Tracking No No
AF Selective No No
AF Center No No
AF Multi Area No No
AF Live View No No
AF Face Detection No No
AF Contrast Detection No No
AF Phase Detection No No
Number of Focus Points n/a n/a
Number of Cross Focus Points n/a n/a
Screen
Screen Type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen Size 2.5″ 3″
Screen Resolution 230k dots 921k dots
Live View No No
Touch Screen No No
ViewFinder
ViewFinder Optical (rangefinder) Optical (rangefinder)
ViewFinder Resolution 0k dots 0k dots
ViewFinder Coverage n/a %
ViewFinder Magnification 0.68 0.68
Photography Features
Min Shutter Speed 4 s 60 s
Max Shutter Speed 1/4000 s 1/4000 s
Continuous Shooting 2.0 fps 3.0 fps
Shutter Priority No No
Aperture Priority Yes Yes
Manual Exposure Mode Yes Yes
Exposure Compensation Yes Yes
Custom White Balance Yes Yes
Image Stabilization No No
Built-in Flash No No
Flash Range 0 0
Flash Modes Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync no built-in flash
External Flash Yes Yes
AE Bracketing No Yes
WB Bracketing Yes No
Exposure Modes
Multi-Segment No No
Average No No
Spot No No
Partial No No
AF-Area No No
Center Weighted Yes No
Video Features
Video Resolutions n/a n/a
Max Video Resolution
Video Formats n/a n/a
Microphone Port No No
Headphone Port No No
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity No No
HDMI No No
USB USB none USB 2.0
Physical
Environmental Sealing No No
Water Proof No No
Dust Proof No No
Shock Proof No No
Crush Proof No No
Freeze Proof No No
Weight 585 g 600 g
Physical Dimensions 139 x 80 x 37 mm 139 x 80 x 42 mm
Battery Life n/a n/a
Battery Type n/a n/a
Battery Model n/a BP-SCL2
Other Features
Self Timer Yes Yes
Timelapse Recording No No
GPS Optional
Storage Type SD/SDHC card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage Slots 1 1

Most popular cameras

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7 16.0 MP CMOS
Four Thirds
Canon EOS 5D Mark III 22.0 MP CMOS
Full frame
Pentax K-5 II 16.0 MP CMOS
APS-C
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH3 16.0 MP CMOS
Four Thirds
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 16.0 MP CMOS
Four Thirds