Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica M Typ 262
- Full frame
- 18 megapixels
- Leica M
-
47
Overall -
18
Imaging -
13
Features -
79
Size -
0
Price
- Full frame
- 24 megapixels
- Leica M
-
49
Overall -
23
Imaging -
15
Features -
78
Size -
0
Price
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica M Typ 262: a Complete Review and Comparison
Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!
The goal of this overview is to provide a detailed comparison of two popular camera models from Pro Mirrorless category, introduced by Leica. We are going to take a closer look at the technical and physical characteristics, features, and performance. The models we are going to assess and compare in this review are M-E Typ 220 and M Typ 262. The models we are going to compare in our review have different sensors. Leica M-E Typ 220 features a CCD sensor that has a resolution of 18.0 MP. Leica M Typ 262, on the contrary, has a different CMOS sensor with 18.0 MP resolution.
Now, before we can move on to our comparison, let's take a moment to look at the key characteristics of Leica M-E Typ 220 and Leica M Typ 262.
Leica M-E Typ 220 Key Features:
- 18.0 MP Full frame CCD sensor
- ISO 80 - 2500
- Image Stabilization: No
- ViewFinder: Yes
- 2.0 fps Continuous Shooting
- Built-in Wireless: No
- Dimensions: 139 x 80 x 37 mm
- Weight: 585 g
- Environmental Sealing: No
- Built-in GPS: No
Leica M Typ 262 Key Features:
- 24.0 MP Full frame CMOS sensor
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Expands to 100)
- Image Stabilization: No
- 3″ Fixed Type Screen
- ViewFinder: Yes
- 3.0 fps Continuous Shooting
- Built-in Wireless: No
- Dimensions: 139 x 80 x 42 mm
- Weight: 600 g
- Environmental Sealing: No
- Built-in GPS: Yes
- Also known as Leica Typ 262
Why is Leica M-E Typ 220 a better choice than Leica M Typ 262
| Sensor Area | 864 mm2 vs 855.62 mm2 | 1% larger pixel area |
| Weight | 585 g vs 600 g | 15 g lighter |
What are the key reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over Leica M-E Typ 220
| Sensor Resolution | 24.0 MP vs 18.0 MP | 25% more pixels |
| Continuous Shooting | 3 fps vs 2 fps | 1 fps faster |
| Screen Size | 3″ vs 2.5″ | 0.5" larger screen |
| Screen Resolution | 921k dots vs 230k dots | 75% higher resolution screen |
Key PROs of Leica M-E Typ 220 and Leica M Typ 262
| Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Optical (rangefinder) | Better framing and control |
| Raw Support | Yes | Yes | Better image quality |
| Flash Sync Port | Yes | Yes | Port for Flash Sync |
Key CONs of Leica M-E Typ 220 and Leica M Typ 262
| Touch Screen | No | No | No touch screen |
| Screen Resolution | 230k dots | 921k dots | Small screen resolution |
| Screen Type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type | No flexible viewing angles |
| AutoFocus Face Detection | No | No | No Face Detection |
| Timelapse Recording | No | No | No timelapse recording |
| Continuous Shooting | 2.0 fps | 3.0 fps | Low continuous shooting |
| Built-In Flash | No | No | No built-in flash |
| Image Stabilization | No | No | No image stabilization |
| Environmental Sealing | No | No | No environmental sealing |
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica M Typ 262: Comparing Two Models By Physical Characteristics
Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Leica M-E Typ 220 and Leica M Typ 262 from the front view.
Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.
After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.
Speaking of weight, Leica M-E Typ 220 is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 15g less than the Leica M Typ 262. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.
Comparing Leica M-E Typ 220 and Leica M Typ 262 by the type of Sensor and Resolution
Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.
Are Leica M-E Typ 220 and Leica M Typ 262 any different in terms of sensor type?
In fact, that's exactly what makes these two models really different. Thus, it is a good point to consider if your are choosing between these two cameras. Leica M-E Typ 220 features a 18.0 MP Full frame sized CCD sensor . Leica M Typ 262, in its turn, comes with a 24.0 MP Full frame sized CMOS sensor and Maestro processor , which makes it significantly different from the first model.
Take a look below to find the comparison of Leica M-E Typ 220 and Leica M Typ 262 by the size of their sensors.
Leica M-E Typ 220 and Leica M Typ 262 are identical by this indicator, as each feature a sensor of the same size. Thus, both cameras will provide the same level of control in terms of the depth of field if you use them with the same focal length and aperture.
For Which Fields Of Photography Are Leica M-E Typ 220 and Leica M Typ 262 Suitable?
If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.
This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Leica M-E Typ 220 and Leica M Typ 262 in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.
| Photography Type | Leica M-E Typ 220 | Leica M Typ 262 |
|---|---|---|
| Portrait Photography |
|
|
| Street Photography |
|
|
| Sports Photography |
|
|
| Daily Photography |
|
|
| Landscape Photography |
|
|
Leica M-E Typ 220 for Portrait Photography
Advantages:
- Large Full frame (36 x 24 mm) sensor
Disadvantages:
- No Image Stabilization
Leica M Typ 262 for Portrait Photography
Advantages:
- Large Full frame (35.8 x 23.9 mm) sensor
- High resolution sensor (24 MP)
Disadvantages:
- No Image Stabilization
Leica M-E Typ 220 for Street Photography
Advantages:
- Built-in View Finder
- Large Full frame(36 x 24 mm) sensor
Disadvantages:
- Big size (139 x 80 x 37 mm)
- No Image Stabilization
Leica M Typ 262 for Street Photography
Advantages:
- Built-in View Finder
- Large Full frame(35.8 x 23.9 mm) sensor
Disadvantages:
- Big size (139 x 80 x 42 mm)
- No Image Stabilization
Leica M-E Typ 220 for Sports Photography
Advantages:
No Significant Advantages
Disadvantages:
- Slow Continuous Shooting (2.0 fps)
- No Environmental Sealing
- Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
- Bad Low Light ISO (787)
Leica M Typ 262 for Sports Photography
Advantages:
No Significant Advantages
Disadvantages:
- Slow Continuous Shooting (3.0 fps)
- No Environmental Sealing
- Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
- Bad Max Native ISO (6400)
Leica M-E Typ 220 for Daily Photography
Advantages:
- Large Full frame (36 x 24 mm) sensor
- Built-in View Finder
Disadvantages:
- Big weight (585 g)
- Big size (139 x 80 x 37 mm)
- No Built-in Flash
- Video is not available
Leica M Typ 262 for Daily Photography
Advantages:
- Large Full frame (35.8 x 23.9 mm) sensor
- Built-in View Finder
Disadvantages:
- Big weight (600 g)
- Big size (139 x 80 x 42 mm)
- No Built-in Flash
- Video is not available
Leica M-E Typ 220 for Landscape Photography
Advantages:
- Large Full frame (36 x 24 mm) sensor
- Good Dynamic Range (11.7)
- RAW Support
Disadvantages:
- Low resolution sensor (18 MP)
- No Environmental Sealing
- Bad Low Light ISO (787)
Leica M Typ 262 for Landscape Photography
Advantages:
- Large Full frame (35.8 x 23.9 mm) sensor
- High resolution sensor (24 MP)
- RAW Support
Disadvantages:
- No Environmental Sealing
- Bad Max Native ISO (6400)
Comparison of Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica M Typ 262: Final Verdict
Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Leica M-E Typ 220 or Leica M Typ 262, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.
What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Leica M-E Typ 220 and Leica M Typ 262 here is what we can say in conclusion:
According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Leica M Typ 262 deserves a higher Total Score than the Leica M-E Typ 220. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Leica M Typ 262 Table Of Technical Specs
For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:
| Leica M-E Typ 220 | Leica M Typ 262 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Brand | Leica | Leica |
| Model | M-E Typ 220 | M Typ 262 |
| Announced | Sep 17, 2012 | Nov 19, 2015 |
| Body Type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor | ||
| Sensor Type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor Size | Full frame | Full frame |
| Sensor Dimensions | 36 x 24 mm | 35.8 x 23.9 mm |
| Sensor Area | 864.00 mm2 | 855.62 mm2 |
| Sensor Resolution | 18.0 MP | 24.0 MP |
| Max Image Resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 5952 x 3976 |
| Max Native ISO | 2,500 | 6,400 |
| Max Boosted ISO | n/a | n/a |
| Min Native ISO | 80 | 200 |
| RAW Support |  |
|
| Lens | ||
| Manual Focus | |
|
| Lens Mount | Leica M | Leica M |
| Number of Lenses | 59 | 59 |
| Focal Length Multiplier | 1x | 1x |
| Macro Focus Range | ||
| AutoFocus | ||
| AF Touch |  |
|
| AF Continuous | |
|
| AF Single | |
|
| AF Tracking | |
|
| AF Selective | |
|
| AF Center | |
|
| AF Multi Area | |
|
| AF Live View | |
|
| AF Face Detection | |
|
| AF Contrast Detection | |
|
| AF Phase Detection | |
|
| Number of Focus Points | n/a | n/a |
| Number of Cross Focus Points | n/a | n/a |
| Screen | ||
| Screen Type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen Size | 2.5″ | 3″ |
| Screen Resolution | 230k dots | 921k dots |
| Live View | |
|
| Touch Screen | |
|
| ViewFinder | ||
| ViewFinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Optical (rangefinder) |
| ViewFinder Resolution | 0k dots | 0k dots |
| ViewFinder Coverage | n/a | % |
| ViewFinder Magnification | 0.68 | 0.68 |
| Photography Features | ||
| Min Shutter Speed | 4 s | 60 s |
| Max Shutter Speed | 1/4000 s | 1/4000 s |
| Continuous Shooting | 2.0 fps | 3.0 fps |
| Shutter Priority | |
|
| Aperture Priority | |
|
| Manual Exposure Mode | |
|
| Exposure Compensation | |
|
| Custom White Balance | |
|
| Image Stabilization | |
|
| Built-in Flash | |
|
| Flash Range | 0 | 0 |
| Flash Modes | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | no built-in flash |
| External Flash | |
|
| AE Bracketing | |
|
| WB Bracketing | |
|
| Exposure Modes | ||
| Multi-Segment | |
|
| Average | |
|
| Spot | |
|
| Partial | |
|
| AF-Area | |
|
| Center Weighted | |
|
| Video Features | ||
| Video Resolutions | n/a | n/a |
| Max Video Resolution | ||
| Video Formats | n/a | n/a |
| Microphone Port | |
|
| Headphone Port | |
|
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless Connectivity | |
|
| HDMI | |
|
| USB | USB none | USB 2.0 |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental Sealing | |
|
| Water Proof | |
|
| Dust Proof | |
|
| Shock Proof | |
|
| Crush Proof | |
|
| Freeze Proof | |
|
| Weight | 585 g | 600 g |
| Physical Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37 mm | 139 x 80 x 42 mm |
| Battery Life | n/a | n/a |
| Battery Type | n/a | n/a |
| Battery Model | n/a | BP-SCL2 |
| Other Features | ||
| Self Timer | |
|
| Timelapse Recording | |
|
| GPS | Optional | |
| Storage Type | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage Slots | 1 | 1 |
Most popular cameras
Four Thirds
Full frame
APS-C
Four Thirds
Four Thirds
