Leica D-Lux 7 vs Leica Q2
- Four Thirds
- 17 megapixels
- Fixed lens
-
48
Overall -
20
Imaging -
59
Features -
78
Size -
0
Price
- Full frame
- 47 megapixels
- Fixed lens
-
64
Overall -
45
Imaging -
65
Features -
72
Size -
100
Price
Leica D-Lux 7 vs Leica Q2: a Complete Review and Comparison
Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!
The goal of this overview is to provide a detailed comparison of two popular camera models from Large Sensor Compact category, introduced by Leica. We are going to take a closer look at the technical and physical characteristics, features, and performance. The models we are going to assess and compare in this review are D-Lux 7 and Q2. Both products that we are going to review are equipped with the same type of sensor - CMOS. However, they have different resolution. Thus, Leica D-Lux 7 comes with a 17.0 MP CMOS sensor, while the Leica Q2 features a 47.0 MP CMOS sensor.
Now, before we can move on to our comparison, let's take a moment to look at the key characteristics of Leica D-Lux 7 and Leica Q2.
Leica D-Lux 7 Key Features:
- 17.0 MP Four Thirds CMOS sensor
- ISO 200 - 25600 (Expands to 100)
- Image Stabilization: Yes
- 3″ Fixed Type Screen
- ViewFinder: Yes
- 11.0 fps Continuous Shooting
- Video: 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC
- Built-in Wireless: Yes
- Dimensions: 118 x 66 x 64 mm
- Weight: 403 g
- Environmental Sealing: No
- Built-in GPS: No
- Replaced Leica .
Leica Q2 Key Features:
- 47.0 MP Full frame CMOS sensor
- ISO 50 - 50000
- Image Stabilization: Yes
- 3″ Fixed Type Screen
- ViewFinder: Yes
- 20.0 fps Continuous Shooting
- Video: 4K/30/24p, 1080/120/60/30/24p
- Built-in Wireless: Yes
- Dimensions: 130 x 80 x 92 mm
- Weight: 718 g
- Environmental Sealing: Yes
- Built-in GPS: No
- Replaced Leica Q. Compare
- Also known as Leica Type No. 4889
Why is Leica D-Lux 7 a better choice than Leica Q2
| Max Shutter Speed | 1/4000 vs 1/2000 | Faster shutter speed |
| AutoFocus Face Detection | Yes vs No | Very handy for portraits |
| Screen Resolution | 1,240k dots vs 1,040k dots | 16.1% higher resolution screen |
| Weight | 403 g vs 718 g | 315 g lighter |
What are the key reasons to pick Leica Q2 over Leica D-Lux 7
| Timelapse Recording | Yes vs No | Creative shooting |
| Sensor Resolution | 47.0 MP vs 17.0 MP | 63.8% more pixels |
| Sensor Area | 864 mm2 vs 224.9 mm2 | 74% larger pixel area |
| Continuous Shooting | 20 fps vs 11 fps | 9 fps faster |
| Battery Life | 370 shots vs 340 shots | 30 more frames with a single charge |
| Environmental Sealing | Yes vs No | Shoot at tough conditions |
| Viewfinder Magnification | 0.76 vs 0.7 | 0.06 better magnification |
Key PROs of Leica D-Lux 7 and Leica Q2
| Touch Screen | Yes | Yes | Easy control of camera functions |
| Screen Size | 3″ | 3″ | Large display |
| Screen Resolution | 1,240k dots | 1,040k dots | High resolution screen |
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic | Better framing and control |
| Raw Support | Yes | Yes | Better image quality |
| Bracketing | Yes | Yes | Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR |
| Continuous Shooting | 11.0 fps | 20.0 fps | Nice continuous shooting |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | Yes | Built-in stabilization |
Key CONs of Leica D-Lux 7 and Leica Q2
| Screen Type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type | No flexible viewing angles |
| Microphone Port | No | No | No microphone port |
| Headphone Port | No | No | No headphone port |
| Built-In Flash | No | No | No built-in flash |
Leica D-Lux 7 vs Leica Q2: Comparing Two Models By Physical Characteristics
Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Leica D-Lux 7 and Leica Q2 from the front view.
Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.
After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.
Speaking of weight, Leica D-Lux 7 is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 315g less than the Leica Q2. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.
Comparing Leica D-Lux 7 and Leica Q2 by the type of Sensor and Resolution
Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.
Are Leica D-Lux 7 and Leica Q2 any different in terms of sensor type?
In fact, that's exactly what makes these two models really different. Thus, it is a good point to consider if your are choosing between these two cameras. Leica D-Lux 7 features a 17.0 MP Four Thirds sized CMOS sensor . Leica Q2, in its turn, comes with a 47.0 MP Full frame sized CMOS sensor , which makes it significantly different from the first model.
Take a look below to find the comparison of Leica D-Lux 7 and Leica Q2 by the size of their sensors.
One more distinctive feature of compared models is the sensor size. Leica Q2 is equipped with a sensor that is 0.3x larger than the one featured in Leica D-Lux 7. Compared to the cameras with smaller sensor area, the ones with larger sensors ensure more control on the blurry background and depth of field if you shoot in the same aperture and focal length. Thus, the first model has a significant advantage here.
For Which Fields Of Photography Are Leica D-Lux 7 and Leica Q2 Suitable?
If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.
This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Leica D-Lux 7 and Leica Q2 in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.
| Photography Type | Leica D-Lux 7 | Leica Q2 |
|---|---|---|
| Portrait Photography |
|
|
| Street Photography |
|
|
| Sports Photography |
|
|
| Daily Photography |
|
|
| Landscape Photography |
|
|
Leica D-Lux 7 for Portrait Photography
Advantages:
- Image Stabilization
- Face Detection Focusing
Disadvantages:
- Small Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm) sensor
Leica Q2 for Portrait Photography
Advantages:
- Large Full frame (36 x 24 mm) sensor
- High resolution sensor (47 MP)
- Image Stabilization
Disadvantages:
No Significant DisadvantagesLeica D-Lux 7 for Street Photography
Advantages:
- Built-in View Finder
- Live View
- Image Stabilization
- Large Four Thirds(17.3 x 13 mm) sensor
Disadvantages:
- Big size (118 x 66 x 64 mm)
Leica Q2 for Street Photography
Advantages:
- Built-in View Finder
- Live View
- Image Stabilization
- Large Full frame(36 x 24 mm) sensor
Disadvantages:
- Big size (130 x 80 x 92 mm)
Leica D-Lux 7 for Sports Photography
Advantages:
- Fast Continuous Shooting (11.0 fps)
Disadvantages:
- No Environmental Sealing
- Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
- Smal Number of autofocus Points (49)
- Small battery life (340 shots)
Leica Q2 for Sports Photography
Advantages:
- Fast Continuous Shooting (20.0 fps)
- Environmental Sealing
- Big size (130 x 80 x 92 mm)
Disadvantages:
- Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/2000s)
- Smal Number of autofocus Points (49)
- Small battery life (370 shots)
Leica D-Lux 7 for Daily Photography
Advantages:
- Built-in View Finder
- Live View
- Wireless Connectivity
- Video is available
Disadvantages:
- Small Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm) sensor
- Big weight (403 g)
- Big size (118 x 66 x 64 mm)
- No Built-in Flash
Leica Q2 for Daily Photography
Advantages:
- Large Full frame (36 x 24 mm) sensor
- Built-in View Finder
- Live View
- Wireless Connectivity
- Video is available
Disadvantages:
- Big weight (718 g)
- Big size (130 x 80 x 92 mm)
- No Built-in Flash
Leica D-Lux 7 for Landscape Photography
Advantages:
- Live View
- RAW Support
Disadvantages:
- Small Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm) sensor
- Low resolution sensor (17 MP)
- No Environmental Sealing
Leica Q2 for Landscape Photography
Advantages:
- Large Full frame (36 x 24 mm) sensor
- High resolution sensor (47 MP)
- Environmental Sealing
- Live View
- RAW Support
Disadvantages:
No Significant DisadvantagesComparison of Leica D-Lux 7 vs Leica Q2: Final Verdict
Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Leica D-Lux 7 or Leica Q2, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.
What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Leica D-Lux 7 and Leica Q2 here is what we can say in conclusion:
According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Leica Q2 deserves a higher Total Score than the Leica D-Lux 7. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.
Leica D-Lux 7 vs Leica Q2 Table Of Technical Specs
For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:
| Leica D-Lux 7 | Leica Q2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Brand | Leica | Leica |
| Model | D-Lux 7 | Q2 |
| Announced | Nov 20, 2018 | Mar 07, 2019 |
| Body Type | Large sensor compact | Large sensor compact |
| Sensor | ||
| Sensor Type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor Size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
| Sensor Dimensions | 17.3 x 13 mm | 36 x 24 mm |
| Sensor Area | 224.90 mm2 | 864.00 mm2 |
| Sensor Resolution | 17.0 MP | 47.0 MP |
| Max Image Resolution | 4736 x 3552 | 8368 x 5584 |
| Max Native ISO | 25,600 | 50,000 |
| Max Boosted ISO | n/a | n/a |
| Min Native ISO | 200 | 50 |
| RAW Support |  |
|
| Lens | ||
| Manual Focus | |
|
| Lens Mount | Fixed lens | Fixed lens |
| Number of Lenses | n/a | n/a |
| Focal Length Multiplier | n/a | n/a |
| Macro Focus Range | 3 | 17 |
| AutoFocus | ||
| AF Touch | |
|
| AF Continuous | |
|
| AF Single | |
|
| AF Tracking | |
 |
| AF Selective | |
|
| AF Center | |
|
| AF Multi Area | |
|
| AF Live View | |
|
| AF Face Detection | |
|
| AF Contrast Detection | |
|
| AF Phase Detection | |
|
| Number of Focus Points | 49 | 49 |
| Number of Cross Focus Points | n/a | n/a |
| Screen | ||
| Screen Type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen Size | 3″ | 3″ |
| Screen Resolution | 1,240k dots | 1,040k dots |
| Live View | |
|
| Touch Screen | |
|
| ViewFinder | ||
| ViewFinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| ViewFinder Resolution | 2,760k dots | 0k dots |
| ViewFinder Coverage | 100% | 100% |
| ViewFinder Magnification | 0.7 | 0.76 |
| Photography Features | ||
| Min Shutter Speed | 1800 s | 60 s |
| Max Shutter Speed | 1/4000 s | 1/2000 s |
| Continuous Shooting | 11.0 fps | 20.0 fps |
| Shutter Priority | |
|
| Aperture Priority | |
|
| Manual Exposure Mode | |
|
| Exposure Compensation | |
|
| Custom White Balance | |
|
| Image Stabilization | |
|
| Built-in Flash | |
|
| Flash Range | 0 | 0 |
| Flash Modes | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| External Flash | |
|
| AE Bracketing | |
|
| WB Bracketing | |
|
| Exposure Modes | ||
| Multi-Segment | |
|
| Average | |
|
| Spot | |
|
| Partial | |
|
| AF-Area | |
|
| Center Weighted | |
|
| DxO Sensor Scores | ||
| DxO Sensor Score | n/a | n/a |
| DxO Color Depth | n/a | n/a |
| DxO Dynamic Range | n/a | n/a |
| DxO Low Light ISO | n/a | n/a |
| Video Features | ||
| Video Resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 4K/30/24p, 1080/120/60/30/24p |
| Max Video Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 |
| Video Formats | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone Port | |
|
| Headphone Port | |
|
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless Connectivity | |
|
| HDMI | |
|
| USB | USB DP-DC15 lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental Sealing | |
|
| Water Proof | |
|
| Dust Proof | |
|
| Shock Proof | |
|
| Crush Proof | |
|
| Freeze Proof | |
|
| Weight | 403 g | 718 g |
| Physical Dimensions | 118 x 66 x 64 mm | 130 x 80 x 92 mm |
| Battery Life | 340 shots | 370 shots |
| Battery Type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery Model | n/a | BP-SCL4 |
| Other Features | ||
| Self Timer | |
|
| Timelapse Recording | |
|
| GPS | ||
| Storage Type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage Slots | 1 | 1 |
Most popular cameras
APS-C
Four Thirds
Full frame
Full frame
Full frame
