Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR III
Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR III: a Complete Review and Comparison
Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!
In this review, we are going to provide a detailed evaluation and comparison of two different camera models that fall into the same category - Large Sensor Compact. Although these cameras are from the same category, they were introduced by different brands - Fujifilm and Ricoh. Although Fujifilm XF10 and Ricoh GR III cameras that we are going to review here have significant distinctive features, they also have something in common. Thus, the first common trait of both models is sensor. These cameras feature identical 24.0 MP CMOS sensors.
To get started, let’s take a look at some of the key features of Fujifilm XF10 and Ricoh GR III and, after this, we can go on to our detailed comparison of these models.
Fujifilm XF10 Key Features:
- 24.0 MP APS-C CMOS sensor
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Expands to 100 - 51200)
- Image Stabilization: No
- 3″ Fixed Type Screen
- ViewFinder: No
- 6.0 fps Continuous Shooting
- Video: 3840 x 2160 @ 15p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
- Built-in Wireless: Yes
- Dimensions: 113 x 64 x 41 mm
- Weight: 279 g
- Environmental Sealing: No
- Built-in GPS: No
Ricoh GR III Key Features:
- 24.0 MP APS-C CMOS sensor
- Image Stabilization: Yes
- 3″ Fixed Type Screen
- ViewFinder: Yes
- fps Continuous Shooting
- Video: 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
- Built-in Wireless: Yes
- Dimensions: 109 x 62 x 33 mm
- Weight: 257 g
- Environmental Sealing: No
- Built-in GPS: No
Why is Fujifilm XF10 a better choice than Ricoh GR III
| Bluetooth | Yes vs No | Connect your camera to other devices via Bluetooth |
| Timelapse Recording | Yes vs No | Creative shooting |
| Sensor Area | 368.95 mm2 vs 366.6 mm2 | 0.6% larger pixel area |
| Continuous Shooting | 6 fps vs No fps | 6 fps faster |
| Built-In Flash | Yes vs No | All the lenses are stabilized |
| Flash Range | 5.3 vs No | 5.3 better flash range |
| Screen Resolution | 1,040k dots vs 1,037k dots | 0.3% higher resolution screen |
| Max Video Resolution | 3840 x 2160 vs 1920 x 1080 | Higher Resolution Video |
| Microphone Port | Yes vs No | High quality audio recording option |
What are the key reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over Fujifilm XF10
| Image Stabilization | Yes vs No | All lenses are stabilized |
| External Flash | Yes vs No | Connect off-camera flash |
| Weight | 257 g vs 279 g | 22 g lighter |
Key PROs of Fujifilm XF10 and Ricoh GR III
| Touch Screen | Yes | Yes | Easy control of camera functions |
| Screen Size | 3″ | 3″ | Large display |
| Screen Resolution | 1,040k dots | 1,037k dots | High resolution screen |
| Raw Support | Yes | Yes | Better image quality |
| Sensor Resolution | 24.0 MP | 24.0 MP | Bigger prints and more details |
| AutoFocus Face Detection | Yes | Yes | Very handy for portraits |
| Bracketing | Yes | Yes | Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR |
Key CONs of Fujifilm XF10 and Ricoh GR III
| Screen Type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type | No flexible viewing angles |
| Headphone Port | No | No | No headphone port |
| Continuous Shooting | 6.0 fps | fps | Low continuous shooting |
| Environmental Sealing | No | No | No environmental sealing |
Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR III: Comparing Two Models By Physical Characteristics
Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Fujifilm XF10 and Ricoh GR III from the front view.
Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.
After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.
Speaking of weight, Ricoh GR III is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 22g less than the Fujifilm XF10. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.
Comparing Fujifilm XF10 and Ricoh GR III by the type of Sensor and Resolution
Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.
Are Fujifilm XF10 and Ricoh GR III any different in terms of sensor type?
In terms of sensor type and resolution, these models are identical. Both Fujifilm XF10 and Ricoh GR III come equipped with the same CMOS that has a resolution of 24.0 MP. Thus, if you are wondering, which option to choose, this is not a factor you should be looking at.
Take a look below to find the comparison of Fujifilm XF10 and Ricoh GR III by the size of their sensors.
Fujifilm XF10 and Ricoh GR III are identical by this indicator, as each feature a sensor of the same size. Thus, both cameras will provide the same level of control in terms of the depth of field if you use them with the same focal length and aperture.
For Which Fields Of Photography Are Fujifilm XF10 and Ricoh GR III Suitable?
If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.
This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Fujifilm XF10 and Ricoh GR III in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.
| Photography Type | Fujifilm XF10 | Ricoh GR III |
|---|---|---|
| Portrait Photography |
|
|
| Street Photography |
|
|
| Sports Photography |
|
|
| Daily Photography |
|
|
| Landscape Photography |
|
|
Fujifilm XF10 for Portrait Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm) sensor
- High resolution sensor (24 MP)
- Face Detection Focusing
Disadvantages:
- No Image Stabilization
Ricoh GR III for Portrait Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
- High resolution sensor (24 MP)
- Image Stabilization
- Face Detection Focusing
Disadvantages:
No Significant DisadvantagesFujifilm XF10 for Street Photography
Advantages:
- Live View
- Large APS-C(23.5 x 15.7 mm) sensor
Disadvantages:
- Big size (113 x 64 x 41 mm)
- No Built-in View Finder
- No Image Stabilization
Ricoh GR III for Street Photography
Advantages:
- Small size (109 x 62 x 33 mm)
- Built-in View Finder
- Live View
- Image Stabilization
- Large APS-C(23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
Disadvantages:
No Significant DisadvantagesFujifilm XF10 for Sports Photography
Advantages:
- Big Number of autofocus Points (91)
- No View Finder
Disadvantages:
- Slow Continuous Shooting (6.0 fps)
- No Environmental Sealing
- Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
- Bad Max Native ISO (12800)
- Small battery life (330 shots)
Ricoh GR III for Sports Photography
Advantages:
No Significant Advantages
Disadvantages:
- Slow Continuous Shooting ( fps)
- No Environmental Sealing
- Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
- Bad Max Native ISO (0)
- Small size (109 x 62 x 33 mm)
Fujifilm XF10 for Daily Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm) sensor
- Small weight (279 g)
- Built-in Flash
- Live View
- Wireless Connectivity
- Video is available
Disadvantages:
- No Built-in View Finder
Ricoh GR III for Daily Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
- Small weight (257 g)
- Built-in View Finder
- Live View
- Wireless Connectivity
- Video is available
Disadvantages:
- No Built-in Flash
Fujifilm XF10 for Landscape Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm) sensor
- High resolution sensor (24 MP)
- Live View
- RAW Support
Disadvantages:
- No Environmental Sealing
- Bad Max Native ISO (12800)
Ricoh GR III for Landscape Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
- High resolution sensor (24 MP)
- Live View
- RAW Support
Disadvantages:
- No Environmental Sealing
- Bad Max Native ISO (0)
Comparison of Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR III: Final Verdict
Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Fujifilm XF10 or Ricoh GR III, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.
What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Fujifilm XF10 and Ricoh GR III here is what we can say in conclusion:
According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Fujifilm XF10 deserves a higher Total Score than the Ricoh GR III. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.
Fujifilm XF10 vs Ricoh GR III Table Of Technical Specs
For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:
| Fujifilm XF10 | Ricoh GR III | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Brand | Fujifilm | Ricoh |
| Model | XF10 | GR III |
| Announced | Jul 19, 2018 | Sep 25, 2018 |
| Body Type | Large sensor compact | Large sensor compact |
| Sensor | ||
| Sensor Type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor Size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor Dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7 mm | 23.5 x 15.6 mm |
| Sensor Area | 368.95 mm2 | 366.60 mm2 |
| Sensor Resolution | 24.0 MP | 24.0 MP |
| Max Image Resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Max Native ISO | 12,800 | 0 |
| Max Boosted ISO | 51,200 | n/a |
| Min Native ISO | 200 | 0 |
| RAW Support |  |
|
| Lens | ||
| Manual Focus | |
|
| Lens Mount | Fixed lens | Fixed lens |
| Number of Lenses | n/a | n/a |
| Focal Length Multiplier | n/a | n/a |
| Macro Focus Range | 10 | 6 |
| AutoFocus | ||
| AF Touch | |
|
| AF Continuous | |
|
| AF Single | |
|
| AF Tracking | |
|
| AF Selective | |
|
| AF Center | |
|
| AF Multi Area | |
|
| AF Live View | |
|
| AF Face Detection | |
|
| AF Contrast Detection | |
|
| AF Phase Detection | |
|
| Number of Focus Points | 91 | n/a |
| Number of Cross Focus Points | n/a | n/a |
| Screen | ||
| Screen Type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen Size | 3″ | 3″ |
| Screen Resolution | 1,040k dots | 1,037k dots |
| Live View | |
|
| Touch Screen | |
|
| ViewFinder | ||
| ViewFinder | Optical (optional) | |
| ViewFinder Resolution | 0k dots | 0k dots |
| ViewFinder Coverage | % | % |
| ViewFinder Magnification | ||
| Photography Features | ||
| Min Shutter Speed | 30 s | 30 s |
| Max Shutter Speed | 1/4000 s | 1/4000 s |
| Continuous Shooting | 6.0 fps | fps |
| Shutter Priority | |
|
| Aperture Priority | |
|
| Manual Exposure Mode | |
|
| Exposure Compensation | |
|
| Custom White Balance | |
|
| Image Stabilization |  |
|
| Built-in Flash | |
|
| Flash Range | 5.3 | 0 |
| Flash Modes | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro, Rear-curtain Synchro, Commander | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye |
| External Flash | |
|
| AE Bracketing | |
|
| WB Bracketing | |
|
| Exposure Modes | ||
| Multi-Segment | |
|
| Average | |
|
| Spot | |
|
| Partial | |
|
| AF-Area | |
|
| Center Weighted | |
|
| Video Features | ||
| Video Resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 15p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max Video Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 1920 x 1080 |
| Video Formats | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone Port | |
|
| Headphone Port | |
|
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless Connectivity | |
|
| HDMI | |
|
| USB | USB 1 | USB 1 |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental Sealing | |
|
| Water Proof | |
|
| Dust Proof | |
|
| Shock Proof | |
|
| Crush Proof | |
|
| Freeze Proof | |
|
| Weight | 279 g | 257 g |
| Physical Dimensions | 113 x 64 x 41 mm | 109 x 62 x 33 mm |
| Battery Life | 330 shots | n/a |
| Battery Type | Battery Pack | n/a |
| Battery Model | n/a | n/a |
| Other Features | ||
| Self Timer | |
|
| Timelapse Recording | |
|
| GPS | ||
| Storage Type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
| Storage Slots | 1 | 1 |
Most popular cameras
Full frame
Full frame
Four Thirds
Full frame
Full frame
