Fujifilm X100S vs Ricoh GR III
Fujifilm X100S vs Ricoh GR III: a Complete Review and Comparison
Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!
In this review, we are going to provide a detailed evaluation and comparison of two different camera models that fall into the same category - Large Sensor Compact. Although these cameras are from the same category, they were introduced by different brands - Fujifilm and Ricoh. Models we are reviewing in this article have different types of sensors, Thus, Fujifilm X100S is equipped with a 16.0 MP CMOS X-TRANS II sensor. Ricoh GR III, on the contrary, features CMOS sensor with a resolution of 24.0 MP.
To get started, let’s take a look at some of the key features of Fujifilm X100S and Ricoh GR III and, after this, we can go on to our detailed comparison of these models.
Fujifilm X100S Key Features:
- 16.0 MP APS-C CMOS X-TRANS II sensor
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Expands to 25600)
- Image Stabilization: No
- 2.8″ Fixed Type Screen
- ViewFinder: Yes
- 6.0 fps Continuous Shooting
- Video: 1920 x 1080 (60, 30fps)
- Built-in Wireless: Yes
- Dimensions: 127 x 74 x 54 mm
- Weight: 445 g
- Environmental Sealing: No
- Built-in GPS: No
- Replaced Fujifilm X100.
- Replaced by Fujifilm X100T. Compare
Ricoh GR III Key Features:
- 24.0 MP APS-C CMOS sensor
- Image Stabilization: Yes
- 3″ Fixed Type Screen
- ViewFinder: Yes
- fps Continuous Shooting
- Video: 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
- Built-in Wireless: Yes
- Dimensions: 109 x 62 x 33 mm
- Weight: 257 g
- Environmental Sealing: No
- Built-in GPS: No
Fujifilm X100S was substituted by Fujifilm X100T.
Be sure to check out some of our other overviews that may also interest you:
Fujifilm X100S vs. X100T
Fujifilm X100T vs. Ricoh GR III
Fujifilm X100S substituted Fujifilm X100.
Why is Fujifilm X100S a better choice than Ricoh GR III
| Sensor Area | 372.88 mm2 vs 366.6 mm2 | 1.7% larger pixel area |
| Continuous Shooting | 6 fps vs No fps | 6 fps faster |
| Built-In Flash | Yes vs No | All the lenses are stabilized |
| Flash Range | 9 vs No | 9 better flash range |
| Viewfinder Magnification | 0.5 vs No | 0.5 better magnification |
What are the key reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over Fujifilm X100S
| Sensor Resolution | 24.0 MP vs 16.0 MP | 33.3% more pixels |
| Image Stabilization | Yes vs No | All lenses are stabilized |
| AutoFocus Face Detection | Yes vs No | Very handy for portraits |
| Screen Size | 3″ vs 2.8″ | 0.2" larger screen |
| Screen Resolution | 1,037k dots vs 460k dots | 55.6% higher resolution screen |
| Touch Screen | Yes vs No | Easy control of camera functions |
| Weight | 257 g vs 445 g | 188 g lighter |
Key PROs of Fujifilm X100S and Ricoh GR III
| Viewfinder | Electronic and Optical (tunnel) | Optical (optional) | Better framing and control |
| Raw Support | Yes | Yes | Better image quality |
| Bracketing | Yes | Yes | Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR |
Key CONs of Fujifilm X100S and Ricoh GR III
| Screen Type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type | No flexible viewing angles |
| Microphone Port | No | No | No microphone port |
| Headphone Port | No | No | No headphone port |
| Timelapse Recording | No | No | No timelapse recording |
| Continuous Shooting | 6.0 fps | fps | Low continuous shooting |
| Environmental Sealing | No | No | No environmental sealing |
Fujifilm X100S vs Ricoh GR III: Comparing Two Models By Physical Characteristics
Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Fujifilm X100S and Ricoh GR III from the front view.
Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.
After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.
Speaking of weight, Ricoh GR III is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 188g less than the Fujifilm X100S. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.
Comparing Fujifilm X100S and Ricoh GR III by the type of Sensor and Resolution
Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.
Are Fujifilm X100S and Ricoh GR III any different in terms of sensor type?
In fact, that's exactly what makes these two models really different. Thus, it is a good point to consider if your are choosing between these two cameras. Fujifilm X100S features a 16.0 MP APS-C sized CMOS X-TRANS II sensor and boasts of a EXR II processor . Ricoh GR III, in its turn, comes with a 24.0 MP APS-C sized CMOS sensor , which makes it significantly different from the first model.
Take a look below to find the comparison of Fujifilm X100S and Ricoh GR III by the size of their sensors.
Fujifilm X100S and Ricoh GR III are identical by this indicator, as each feature a sensor of the same size. Thus, both cameras will provide the same level of control in terms of the depth of field if you use them with the same focal length and aperture.
For Which Fields Of Photography Are Fujifilm X100S and Ricoh GR III Suitable?
If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.
This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Fujifilm X100S and Ricoh GR III in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.
| Photography Type | Fujifilm X100S | Ricoh GR III |
|---|---|---|
| Portrait Photography |
|
|
| Street Photography |
|
|
| Sports Photography |
|
|
| Daily Photography |
|
|
| Landscape Photography |
|
|
Fujifilm X100S for Portrait Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.6 x 15.8 mm) sensor
Disadvantages:
- No Image Stabilization
Ricoh GR III for Portrait Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
- High resolution sensor (24 MP)
- Image Stabilization
- Face Detection Focusing
Disadvantages:
No Significant DisadvantagesFujifilm X100S for Street Photography
Advantages:
- Built-in View Finder
- Live View
- Large APS-C(23.6 x 15.8 mm) sensor
Disadvantages:
- Big size (127 x 74 x 54 mm)
- No Image Stabilization
Ricoh GR III for Street Photography
Advantages:
- Small size (109 x 62 x 33 mm)
- Built-in View Finder
- Live View
- Image Stabilization
- Large APS-C(23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
Disadvantages:
No Significant DisadvantagesFujifilm X100S for Sports Photography
Advantages:
No Significant Advantages
Disadvantages:
- Slow Continuous Shooting (6.0 fps)
- No Environmental Sealing
- Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
- Smal Number of autofocus Points (49)
- Bad Max Native ISO (12800)
- Small battery life (330 shots)
Ricoh GR III for Sports Photography
Advantages:
No Significant Advantages
Disadvantages:
- Slow Continuous Shooting ( fps)
- No Environmental Sealing
- Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
- Bad Max Native ISO (0)
- Small size (109 x 62 x 33 mm)
Fujifilm X100S for Daily Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.6 x 15.8 mm) sensor
- Built-in Flash
- Built-in View Finder
- Live View
- Wireless Connectivity
- Video is available
Disadvantages:
- Big weight (445 g)
- Big size (127 x 74 x 54 mm)
Ricoh GR III for Daily Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
- Small weight (257 g)
- Built-in View Finder
- Live View
- Wireless Connectivity
- Video is available
Disadvantages:
- No Built-in Flash
Fujifilm X100S for Landscape Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.6 x 15.8 mm) sensor
- Live View
- RAW Support
Disadvantages:
- Low resolution sensor (16 MP)
- No Environmental Sealing
- Bad Max Native ISO (12800)
Ricoh GR III for Landscape Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
- High resolution sensor (24 MP)
- Live View
- RAW Support
Disadvantages:
- No Environmental Sealing
- Bad Max Native ISO (0)
Comparison of Fujifilm X100S vs Ricoh GR III: Final Verdict
Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Fujifilm X100S or Ricoh GR III, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.
What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Fujifilm X100S and Ricoh GR III here is what we can say in conclusion:
According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Ricoh GR III deserves a higher Total Score than the Fujifilm X100S. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.
Fujifilm X100S vs Ricoh GR III Table Of Technical Specs
For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:
| Fujifilm X100S | Ricoh GR III | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Brand | Fujifilm | Ricoh |
| Model | X100S | GR III |
| Announced | Jul 29, 2013 | Sep 25, 2018 |
| Body Type | Large sensor compact | Large sensor compact |
| Sensor | ||
| Sensor Type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CMOS |
| Sensor Size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor Dimensions | 23.6 x 15.8 mm | 23.5 x 15.6 mm |
| Sensor Area | 372.88 mm2 | 366.60 mm2 |
| Sensor Resolution | 16.0 MP | 24.0 MP |
| Max Image Resolution | 4896 x 3264 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Max Native ISO | 12,800 | 0 |
| Max Boosted ISO | 25,600 | n/a |
| Min Native ISO | 100 | 0 |
| RAW Support |  |
|
| Lens | ||
| Manual Focus | |
|
| Lens Mount | Fixed lens | Fixed lens |
| Number of Lenses | n/a | n/a |
| Focal Length Multiplier | n/a | n/a |
| Macro Focus Range | 10 | 6 |
| AutoFocus | ||
| AF Touch |  |
|
| AF Continuous | |
|
| AF Single | |
|
| AF Tracking | |
|
| AF Selective | |
|
| AF Center | |
|
| AF Multi Area | |
|
| AF Live View | |
|
| AF Face Detection | |
|
| AF Contrast Detection | |
|
| AF Phase Detection | |
|
| Number of Focus Points | 49 | n/a |
| Number of Cross Focus Points | n/a | n/a |
| Screen | ||
| Screen Type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen Size | 2.8″ | 3″ |
| Screen Resolution | 460k dots | 1,037k dots |
| Live View | |
|
| Touch Screen | |
|
| ViewFinder | ||
| ViewFinder | Electronic and Optical (tunnel) | Optical (optional) |
| ViewFinder Resolution | 2,350k dots | 0k dots |
| ViewFinder Coverage | 90% | % |
| ViewFinder Magnification | 0.5 | |
| Photography Features | ||
| Min Shutter Speed | 30 s | 30 s |
| Max Shutter Speed | 1/4000 s | 1/4000 s |
| Continuous Shooting | 6.0 fps | fps |
| Shutter Priority | |
|
| Aperture Priority | |
|
| Manual Exposure Mode | |
|
| Exposure Compensation | |
|
| Custom White Balance | |
|
| Image Stabilization | |
|
| Built-in Flash | |
|
| Flash Range | 9 | 0 |
| Flash Modes | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye |
| External Flash | |
|
| AE Bracketing | |
|
| WB Bracketing | |
|
| Exposure Modes | ||
| Multi-Segment | |
|
| Average | |
|
| Spot | |
|
| Partial | |
|
| AF-Area | |
|
| Center Weighted | |
|
| Video Features | ||
| Video Resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max Video Resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 |
| Video Formats | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone Port | |
|
| Headphone Port | |
|
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless Connectivity | |
|
| HDMI | |
|
| USB | USB 2.0 | USB 1 |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental Sealing | |
|
| Water Proof | |
|
| Dust Proof | |
|
| Shock Proof | |
|
| Crush Proof | |
|
| Freeze Proof | |
|
| Weight | 445 g | 257 g |
| Physical Dimensions | 127 x 74 x 54 mm | 109 x 62 x 33 mm |
| Battery Life | 330 shots | n/a |
| Battery Type | Battery Pack | n/a |
| Battery Model | NP-95 | n/a |
| Other Features | ||
| Self Timer | |
|
| Timelapse Recording | |
|
| GPS | ||
| Storage Type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
| Storage Slots | 1 | 1 |
Most popular cameras
Full frame
Full frame
Four Thirds
Full frame
Full frame
