Fujifilm X100F vs Ricoh GR III

  • APS-C
  • 24 megapixels
  • Fixed lens
  • 46
    Overall
  • 18
    Imaging
  • 37
    Features
  • 78
    Size
  • 0
    Price
  • APS-C
  • 24 megapixels
  • Fixed lens
  • 47
    Overall
  • 14
    Imaging
  • 48
    Features
  • 85
    Size
  • 0
    Price

Fujifilm X100F vs Ricoh GR III: a Complete Review and Comparison

Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!

In this review, we are going to provide a detailed evaluation and comparison of two different camera models that fall into the same category - Large Sensor Compact. Although these cameras are from the same category, they were introduced by different brands - Fujifilm and Ricoh. Models we are reviewing in this article have different types of sensors, Thus, Fujifilm X100F is equipped with a 24.0 MP CMOS X-TRANS III sensor. Ricoh GR III, on the contrary, features CMOS sensor with a resolution of 24.0 MP.

To get started, let’s take a look at some of the key features of Fujifilm X100F and Ricoh GR III and, after this, we can go on to our detailed comparison of these models.

Fujifilm X100F Key Features:

  • 24.0 MP APS-C CMOS X-TRANS III sensor
  • ISO 200 - 12800 (Expands to 100 - 51200)
  • Image Stabilization: No
  • 3″ Fixed Type Screen
  • ViewFinder: Yes
  • 8.0 fps Continuous Shooting
  • Video: 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p)
  • Built-in Wireless: Yes
  • Dimensions: 127 x 75 x 52 mm
  • Weight: 469 g
  • Environmental Sealing: No
  • Built-in GPS: No
  • Replaced Fujifilm X100T. Compare

Ricoh GR III Key Features:

  • 24.0 MP APS-C CMOS sensor
  • Image Stabilization: Yes
  • 3″ Fixed Type Screen
  • ViewFinder: Yes
  • fps Continuous Shooting
  • Video: 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
  • Built-in Wireless: Yes
  • Dimensions: 109 x 62 x 33 mm
  • Weight: 257 g
  • Environmental Sealing: No
  • Built-in GPS: No

Fujifilm X100F substituted Fujifilm X100T. Be sure to check out some of our other overviews that may also interest you:
Fujifilm X100F vs. X100T
Fujifilm X100T vs. Ricoh GR III

Why is Fujifilm X100F a better choice than Ricoh GR III

Timelapse Recording Yes vs No Creative shooting
Sensor Area 368.16 mm2 vs 366.6 mm2 0.4% larger pixel area
Continuous Shooting 8 fps vs No fps 8 fps faster
Built-In Flash Yes vs No All the lenses are stabilized
Flash Range 4.6 vs No 4.6 better flash range
Screen Resolution 1,040k dots vs 1,037k dots 0.3% higher resolution screen
Microphone Port Yes vs No High quality audio recording option
Viewfinder Magnification 0.5 vs No 0.5 better magnification

What are the key reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over Fujifilm X100F

Image Stabilization Yes vs No All lenses are stabilized
Touch Screen Yes vs No Easy control of camera functions
Weight 257 g vs 469 g 212 g lighter

Key PROs of Fujifilm X100F and Ricoh GR III

Screen Size 3″ | 3″ Large display
Screen Resolution 1,040k dots | 1,037k dots High resolution screen
Viewfinder Electronic and Optical (tunnel) | Optical (optional) Better framing and control
Raw Support Yes | Yes Better image quality
Sensor Resolution 24.0 MP | 24.0 MP Bigger prints and more details
AutoFocus Face Detection Yes | Yes Very handy for portraits
Bracketing Yes | Yes Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR

Key CONs of Fujifilm X100F and Ricoh GR III

Screen Type Fixed Type | Fixed Type No flexible viewing angles
Headphone Port No | No No headphone port
Environmental Sealing No | No No environmental sealing

Fujifilm X100F vs Ricoh GR III: Comparing Two Models By Physical Characteristics

Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Fujifilm X100F and Ricoh GR III from the front view.

Fujifilm X100F
Ricoh GR III
HTML
BB

Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.

Fujifilm X100F
Ricoh GR III
HTML
BB

After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.

Speaking of weight, Ricoh GR III is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 212g less than the Fujifilm X100F. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.

Thickness values for Large Sensor Compact cameras:
Fujifilm X100F — 52 mm
Ricoh GR III — 33 mm
Min: 31 mm
Average: 54 mm
Max: 122 mm
Weight values for Large Sensor Compact cameras:
Fujifilm X100F — 469 g
Ricoh GR III — 257 g
Min: 206 g
Average: 393 g
Max: 1040 g

Comparing Fujifilm X100F and Ricoh GR III by the type of Sensor and Resolution

Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.

Are Fujifilm X100F and Ricoh GR III any different in terms of sensor type?

Take a look below to find the comparison of Fujifilm X100F and Ricoh GR III by the size of their sensors.

Fujifilm X100F
Ricoh GR III
HTML
BB

Fujifilm X100F and Ricoh GR III are identical by this indicator, as each feature a sensor of the same size. Thus, both cameras will provide the same level of control in terms of the depth of field if you use them with the same focal length and aperture.

For Which Fields Of Photography Are Fujifilm X100F and Ricoh GR III Suitable?

If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.

This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Fujifilm X100F and Ricoh GR III in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.

Photography Type Fujifilm X100F Ricoh GR III
Portrait Photography
88%
93%
Street Photography
80%
98%
Sports Photography
93%
48%
Daily Photography
52%
2%
Landscape Photography
81%
81%

Fujifilm X100F for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.6 x 15.6 mm) sensor
  • High resolution sensor (24 MP)
  • Face Detection Focusing

Disadvantages:

  • No Image Stabilization

Ricoh GR III for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
  • High resolution sensor (24 MP)
  • Image Stabilization
  • Face Detection Focusing

Disadvantages:

No Significant Disadvantages

Fujifilm X100F for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Large APS-C(23.6 x 15.6 mm) sensor

Disadvantages:

  • Big size (127 x 75 x 52 mm)
  • No Image Stabilization

Ricoh GR III for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Small size (109 x 62 x 33 mm)
  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Image Stabilization
  • Large APS-C(23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor

Disadvantages:

No Significant Disadvantages

Fujifilm X100F for Sports Photography

Advantages:

  • Big Number of autofocus Points (325)

Disadvantages:

  • Slow Continuous Shooting (8.0 fps)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
  • Bad Max Native ISO (12800)
  • Small battery life (390 shots)

Ricoh GR III for Sports Photography

Advantages:

No Significant Advantages

Disadvantages:

  • Slow Continuous Shooting ( fps)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
  • Bad Max Native ISO (0)
  • Small size (109 x 62 x 33 mm)

Fujifilm X100F for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.6 x 15.6 mm) sensor
  • Built-in Flash
  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Wireless Connectivity
  • Video is available

Disadvantages:

  • Big weight (469 g)
  • Big size (127 x 75 x 52 mm)

Ricoh GR III for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
  • Small weight (257 g)
  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Wireless Connectivity
  • Video is available

Disadvantages:

  • No Built-in Flash

Fujifilm X100F for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.6 x 15.6 mm) sensor
  • High resolution sensor (24 MP)
  • Live View
  • RAW Support

Disadvantages:

  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Bad Max Native ISO (12800)

Ricoh GR III for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
  • High resolution sensor (24 MP)
  • Live View
  • RAW Support

Disadvantages:

  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Bad Max Native ISO (0)

Comparison of Fujifilm X100F vs Ricoh GR III: Final Verdict

Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Fujifilm X100F or Ricoh GR III, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.

What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Fujifilm X100F and Ricoh GR III here is what we can say in conclusion:

According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Ricoh GR III deserves a higher Total Score than the Fujifilm X100F. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.

Fujifilm X100F vs Ricoh GR III Table Of Technical Specs

For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:

Fujifilm X100F Ricoh GR III
General
Brand Fujifilm Ricoh
Model X100F GR III
Announced Jan 18, 2017 Sep 25, 2018
Body Type Large sensor compact Large sensor compact
Sensor
Sensor Type CMOS X-TRANS III CMOS
Sensor Size APS-C APS-C
Sensor Dimensions 23.6 x 15.6 mm 23.5 x 15.6 mm
Sensor Area 368.16 mm2 366.60 mm2
Sensor Resolution 24.0 MP 24.0 MP
Max Image Resolution 6000 x 4000 6000 x 4000
Max Native ISO 12,800 0
Max Boosted ISO 51,200 n/a
Min Native ISO 200 0
RAW Support Yes Yes
Lens
Manual Focus Yes Yes
Lens Mount Fixed lens Fixed lens
Number of Lenses n/a n/a
Focal Length Multiplier n/a n/a
Macro Focus Range 6
AutoFocus
AF Touch No Yes
AF Continuous Yes Yes
AF Single Yes Yes
AF Tracking No Yes
AF Selective No Yes
AF Center Yes Yes
AF Multi Area Yes Yes
AF Live View Yes Yes
AF Face Detection Yes Yes
AF Contrast Detection Yes Yes
AF Phase Detection Yes Yes
Number of Focus Points 325 n/a
Number of Cross Focus Points n/a n/a
Screen
Screen Type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen Size 3″ 3″
Screen Resolution 1,040k dots 1,037k dots
Live View Yes Yes
Touch Screen No Yes
ViewFinder
ViewFinder Electronic and Optical (tunnel) Optical (optional)
ViewFinder Resolution 2,360k dots 0k dots
ViewFinder Coverage 92% %
ViewFinder Magnification 0.5
Photography Features
Min Shutter Speed 4 s 30 s
Max Shutter Speed 1/4000 s 1/4000 s
Continuous Shooting 8.0 fps fps
Shutter Priority Yes Yes
Aperture Priority Yes Yes
Manual Exposure Mode Yes Yes
Exposure Compensation Yes Yes
Custom White Balance Yes Yes
Image Stabilization No Yes
Built-in Flash Yes No
Flash Range 4.6 0
Flash Modes Auto, forced, suppressed, slow synchro, commander Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye
External Flash Yes Yes
AE Bracketing Yes Yes
WB Bracketing Yes No
Exposure Modes
Multi-Segment Yes Yes
Average Yes Yes
Spot Yes Yes
Partial No No
AF-Area No No
Center Weighted No No
Video Features
Video Resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Max Video Resolution 1920 x 1080 1920 x 1080
Video Formats H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone Port Yes No
Headphone Port No No
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity Yes Yes
HDMI Yes No
USB USB 2.0 USB 1
Physical
Environmental Sealing No No
Water Proof No No
Dust Proof No No
Shock Proof No No
Crush Proof No No
Freeze Proof No No
Weight 469 g 257 g
Physical Dimensions 127 x 75 x 52 mm 109 x 62 x 33 mm
Battery Life 390 shots n/a
Battery Type Battery Pack n/a
Battery Model n/a n/a
Other Features
Self Timer Yes Yes
Timelapse Recording Yes No
GPS
Storage Type SD/SDHC/SDXC Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported)
Storage Slots 1 1

Most popular cameras

Canon EOS 5D Mark IV 30.0 MP CMOS
Full frame
Sony Alpha A7 II 24.0 MP CMOS
Full frame
Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 20.0 MP CMOS
Four Thirds
Canon EOS-1D X Mark II 20.0 MP CMOS
Full frame
Sony Alpha A7S II 12.0 MP CMOS
Full frame