Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!
In this review, we are going to provide a detailed evaluation and comparison of two different camera models that fall into the same category - Large Sensor Compact. Although these cameras are from the same category, they were introduced by different brands - Fujifilm and Ricoh. Models we are reviewing in this article have different types of sensors, Thus, Fujifilm X100F is equipped with a 24.0 MP CMOS X-TRANS III sensor. Ricoh GR III, on the contrary, features CMOS sensor with a resolution of 24.0 MP.
To get started, let’s take a look at some of the key features of Fujifilm X100F and Ricoh GR III and, after this, we can go on to our detailed comparison of these models.
Fujifilm X100F Key Features:
Ricoh GR III Key Features:
|Timelapse Recording||Yes vs No||Creative shooting|
|Sensor Area||368.16 mm2 vs 366.6 mm2||0.4% larger pixel area|
|Continuous Shooting||8 fps vs No fps||8 fps faster|
|Built-In Flash||Yes vs No||All the lenses are stabilized|
|Flash Range||4.6 vs No||4.6 better flash range|
|Screen Resolution||1,040k dots vs 1,037k dots||0.3% higher resolution screen|
|Microphone Port||Yes vs No||High quality audio recording option|
|Viewfinder Magnification||0.5 vs No||0.5 better magnification|
|Image Stabilization||Yes vs No||All lenses are stabilized|
|Touch Screen||Yes vs No||Easy control of camera functions|
|Weight||257 g vs 469 g||212 g lighter|
|Screen Size||3″ | 3″||Large display|
|Screen Resolution||1,040k dots | 1,037k dots||High resolution screen|
|Viewfinder||Electronic and Optical (tunnel) | Optical (optional)||Better framing and control|
|Raw Support||Yes | Yes||Better image quality|
|Sensor Resolution||24.0 MP | 24.0 MP||Bigger prints and more details|
|AutoFocus Face Detection||Yes | Yes||Very handy for portraits|
|Bracketing||Yes | Yes||Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR|
|Screen Type||Fixed Type | Fixed Type||No flexible viewing angles|
|Headphone Port||No | No||No headphone port|
|Environmental Sealing||No | No||No environmental sealing|
Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Fujifilm X100F and Ricoh GR III from the front view.
Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.
After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.
Speaking of weight, Ricoh GR III is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 212g less than the Fujifilm X100F. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.
Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.
Are Fujifilm X100F and Ricoh GR III any different in terms of sensor type?
Take a look below to find the comparison of Fujifilm X100F and Ricoh GR III by the size of their sensors.
Fujifilm X100F and Ricoh GR III are identical by this indicator, as each feature a sensor of the same size. Thus, both cameras will provide the same level of control in terms of the depth of field if you use them with the same focal length and aperture.
If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.
This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Fujifilm X100F and Ricoh GR III in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.
|Photography Type||Fujifilm X100F||Ricoh GR III|
Disadvantages:No Significant Disadvantages
Disadvantages:No Significant Disadvantages
No Significant Advantages
Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Fujifilm X100F or Ricoh GR III, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.
What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Fujifilm X100F and Ricoh GR III here is what we can say in conclusion:
According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Ricoh GR III deserves a higher Total Score than the Fujifilm X100F. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.
For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:
|Fujifilm X100F||Ricoh GR III|
|Announced||Jan 18, 2017||Sep 25, 2018|
|Body Type||Large sensor compact||Large sensor compact|
|Sensor Type||CMOS X-TRANS III||CMOS|
|Sensor Dimensions||23.6 x 15.6 mm||23.5 x 15.6 mm|
|Sensor Area||368.16 mm2||366.60 mm2|
|Sensor Resolution||24.0 MP||24.0 MP|
|Max Image Resolution||6000 x 4000||6000 x 4000|
|Max Native ISO||12,800||0|
|Max Boosted ISO||51,200||n/a|
|Min Native ISO||200||0|
|Lens Mount||Fixed lens||Fixed lens|
|Number of Lenses||n/a||n/a|
|Focal Length Multiplier||n/a||n/a|
|Macro Focus Range||6|
|AF Multi Area|
|AF Live View|
|AF Face Detection|
|AF Contrast Detection|
|AF Phase Detection|
|Number of Focus Points||325||n/a|
|Number of Cross Focus Points||n/a||n/a|
|Screen Type||Fixed Type||Fixed Type|
|Screen Resolution||1,040k dots||1,037k dots|
|ViewFinder||Electronic and Optical (tunnel)||Optical (optional)|
|ViewFinder Resolution||2,360k dots||0k dots|
|Min Shutter Speed||4 s||30 s|
|Max Shutter Speed||1/4000 s||1/4000 s|
|Continuous Shooting||8.0 fps||fps|
|Manual Exposure Mode|
|Custom White Balance|
|Flash Modes||Auto, forced, suppressed, slow synchro, commander||Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye|
|Video Resolutions||1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p)||1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM|
|Max Video Resolution||1920 x 1080||1920 x 1080|
|Video Formats||H.264||MPEG-4, H.264|
|USB||USB 2.0||USB 1|
|Weight||469 g||257 g|
|Physical Dimensions||127 x 75 x 52 mm||109 x 62 x 33 mm|
|Battery Life||390 shots||n/a|
|Battery Type||Battery Pack||n/a|
|Storage Type||SD/SDHC/SDXC||Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported)|