Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!
In this review, we are going to make a detailed comparison of two cameras that fall into different categories. While the first model we are looking at, Fujifilm X10 belongs to a Small Sensor Compact category, the other model, Fujifilm X10 is a Semi-Pro Mirrorless camera. Both models feature different types of sensors. Thus, Fujifilm X10 comes with CMOS X-TRANS I sensor that has a resolution of 12.0 MP resolution, while our second compared model Sony Alpha a6300 features a 24.0 MP CMOS sensor.
Both cameras we are going to look at in our overview fall into two different categories - Compact and MirrorLess. Keeping in mind all the distinctive features of each category, it will be hard to make a detailed comparison of these two models. However, we will do our best to make this review as unbiased and detailed as possible.
To get started, let’s take a look at some of the key features of Fujifilm X10 and Sony Alpha a6300 and, after this, we can go on to our detailed comparison of these models.
Fujifilm X10 Key Features:
Sony Alpha a6300 Key Features:
|Image Stabilization||Yes vs No||All lenses are stabilized|
|Flash Range||9 vs 6||3 better flash range|
|Weight||350 g vs 404 g||54 g lighter|
|Wireless Connectivity||Built-In vs No||Better connectivity|
|NFC||Yes vs No||Easy wireless connectivity with compatible devices|
|Timelapse Recording||No vs No||Creative shooting|
|Sensor Resolution||24.0 MP vs 12.0 MP||50% more pixels|
|Sensor Area||366.6 mm2 vs 58.08 mm2||84.2% larger pixel area|
|Continuous Shooting||11 fps vs 10 fps||1 fps faster|
|Number Of Focus Points||425 vs 49||376 more focus points|
|Screen Size||3″ vs 2.8″||0.2" larger screen|
|Screen Resolution||922k dots vs 460k dots||50.1% higher resolution screen|
|Battery Life||400 shots vs 270 shots||130 more frames with a single charge|
|Environmental Sealing||Yes vs No||Shoot at tough conditions|
|Max Video Resolution||3840 x 2160 vs 1920 x 1080||Higher Resolution Video|
|Microphone Port||Yes vs No||High quality audio recording option|
|Dxo Color Depth||24.4 vs 20.5||Better color depth|
|Dxo Dynamic Range||13.7 vs 11.3||Better dynamic range|
|Dxo Low Light Iso||1437 vs 245||Better High ISO performance|
|Viewfinder Magnification||0.7 vs No||0.7 better magnification|
|Viewfinder||Optical (tunnel) | Electronic||Better framing and control|
|Raw Support||Yes | Yes||Better image quality|
|AutoFocus Face Detection||Yes | Yes||Very handy for portraits|
|Bracketing||Yes | Yes||Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR|
|Continuous Shooting||10.0 fps | 11.0 fps||Nice continuous shooting|
|Built-In Flash||Yes | Yes||External flash available|
|Touch Screen||No | No||No touch screen|
|Screen Resolution||460k dots | 922k dots||Small screen resolution|
|Headphone Port||No | No||No headphone port|
|Timelapse Recording||No | Yes||No timelapse recording|
Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Fujifilm X10 and Sony Alpha a6300 from the front view.
Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.
After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.
Speaking of weight, Fujifilm X10 is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 54g less than the Sony Alpha a6300. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.
Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.
Are Fujifilm X10 and Sony Alpha a6300 any different in terms of sensor type?
In fact, that's exactly what makes these two models really different. Thus, it is a good point to consider if your are choosing between these two cameras. Fujifilm X10 features a 12.0 MP 2/3" sized CMOS X-TRANS I sensor and boasts of a EXR processor . Sony Alpha a6300, in its turn, comes with a 24.0 MP APS-C sized CMOS sensor and BIONZ X processor , which makes it significantly different from the first model.
Take a look below to find the comparison of Fujifilm X10 and Sony Alpha a6300 by the size of their sensors.
One more distinctive feature of compared models is the sensor size. Sony Alpha a6300 is equipped with a sensor that is 0.2x larger than the one featured in Fujifilm X10. Compared to the cameras with smaller sensor area, the ones with larger sensors ensure more control on the blurry background and depth of field if you shoot in the same aperture and focal length. Thus, the first model has a significant advantage here.
If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.
This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Fujifilm X10 and Sony Alpha a6300 in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.
|Photography Type||Fujifilm X10||Sony Alpha a6300|
No Significant Advantages
Disadvantages:No Significant Disadvantages
Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Fujifilm X10 or Sony Alpha a6300, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.
What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Fujifilm X10 and Sony Alpha a6300 here is what we can say in conclusion:
According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Sony Alpha a6300 deserves a higher Total Score than the Fujifilm X10. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.
For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:
|Fujifilm X10||Sony Alpha a6300|
|Announced||Jul 11, 2012||Feb 03, 2016|
|Body Type||Compact||Rangefinder-style mirrorless|
|Sensor Type||CMOS X-TRANS I||CMOS|
|Sensor Dimensions||8.8 x 6.6 mm||23.5 x 15.6 mm|
|Sensor Area||58.08 mm2||366.60 mm2|
|Sensor Resolution||12.0 MP||24.0 MP|
|Max Image Resolution||4000 x 3000||6000 x 4000|
|Max Native ISO||3,200||25,600|
|Max Boosted ISO||12,800||51,200|
|Min Native ISO||100||100|
|Lens Mount||Fixed lens||Sony E (NEX)|
|Number of Lenses||n/a||83|
|Focal Length Multiplier||n/a||1.5x|
|Macro Focus Range||1|
|AF Multi Area|
|AF Live View|
|AF Face Detection|
|AF Contrast Detection|
|AF Phase Detection|
|Number of Focus Points||49||425|
|Number of Cross Focus Points||n/a||n/a|
|Screen Type||Fixed Type||Tilting|
|Screen Resolution||460k dots||922k dots|
|ViewFinder Resolution||0k dots||2,359k dots|
|Min Shutter Speed||30 s||30 s|
|Max Shutter Speed||1/4000 s||1/4000 s|
|Continuous Shooting||10.0 fps||11.0 fps|
|Manual Exposure Mode|
|Custom White Balance|
|Flash Modes||Auto, Red-Eye, Slow Sync||Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless|
|DxO Sensor Scores|
|DxO Sensor Score||50||85|
|DxO Color Depth||20.5||24.4|
|DxO Dynamic Range||11.3||13.7|
|DxO Low Light ISO||245||1437|
|Video Resolutions||1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (70, 30 fps), 320 x 240 (120 fps), 320 x 112 (200 fps)||4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p)|
|Max Video Resolution||1920 x 1080||3840 x 2160|
|Video Formats||H.264||MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264|
|USB||USB 2.0||USB 2.0|
|Weight||350 g||404 g|
|Physical Dimensions||117 x 70 x 57 mm||120 x 67 x 49 mm|
|Battery Life||270 shots||400 shots|
|Battery Type||Battery Pack||Battery Pack|