Fujifilm X-E3 vs Ricoh GR II
Fujifilm X-E3 vs Ricoh GR II: a Complete Review and Comparison
Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!
In this review, we are going to make a detailed comparison of two cameras that fall into different categories. While the first model we are looking at, Fujifilm X-E3 belongs to a Entry-Level Mirrorless category, the other model, Fujifilm X-E3 is a Large Sensor Compact camera. Both models feature different types of sensors. Thus, Fujifilm X-E3 comes with CMOS X-TRANS III sensor that has a resolution of 24.0 MP resolution, while our second compared model Ricoh GR II features a 16.0 MP CMOS sensor.
Both cameras we are going to look at in our overview fall into two different categories - MirrorLess and Compact. Keeping in mind all the distinctive features of each category, it will be hard to make a detailed comparison of these two models. However, we will do our best to make this review as unbiased and detailed as possible.
To get started, let’s take a look at some of the key features of Fujifilm X-E3 and Ricoh GR II and, after this, we can go on to our detailed comparison of these models.
Fujifilm X-E3 Key Features:
- 24.0 MP APS-C CMOS X-TRANS III sensor
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Expands to 100 - 51200)
- Image Stabilization: No
- 3″ Fixed Type Screen
- ViewFinder: Yes
- 14.0 fps Continuous Shooting
- Video: 3840 x 2160 (20p, 25p, 24p)
- Built-in Wireless: Yes
- Dimensions: 121 x 74 x 43 mm
- Weight: 337 g
- Environmental Sealing: No
- Built-in GPS: No
- Replaced Fujifilm X-E2S. Compare
Ricoh GR II Key Features:
- 16.0 MP APS-C CMOS sensor
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Image Stabilization: No
- 3″ Fixed Type Screen
- ViewFinder: Yes
- 4.0 fps Continuous Shooting
- Video: 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p)
- Built-in Wireless: Yes
- Dimensions: 117 x 63 x 35 mm
- Weight: 251 g
- Environmental Sealing: No
- Built-in GPS: No
- Replaced Ricoh GR. Compare
- Replaced by Ricoh GR III. Compare
Fujifilm X-E3 substituted Fujifilm X-E2S.
Be sure to check out some of our other overviews that may also interest you:
Fujifilm X-E3 vs. X-E2S
Fujifilm X-E2S vs. Ricoh GR II
Why is Fujifilm X-E3 a better choice than Ricoh GR II
| Bluetooth | Yes vs No | Connect your camera to other devices via Bluetooth |
| Timelapse Recording | Yes vs No | Creative shooting |
| Sensor Resolution | 24.0 MP vs 16.0 MP | 33.3% more pixels |
| Continuous Shooting | 14 fps vs 4 fps | 10 fps faster |
| Number Of Focus Points | 325 vs 9 | 316 more focus points |
| Touch Screen | Yes vs No | Easy control of camera functions |
| Battery Life | 350 shots vs 320 shots | 30 more frames with a single charge |
| Max Video Resolution | 3840 x 2160 vs 1920 x 1080 | Higher Resolution Video |
| Microphone Port | Yes vs No | High quality audio recording option |
| Viewfinder Magnification | 0.62 vs No | 0.62 better magnification |
What are the key reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over Fujifilm X-E3
| NFC | Yes vs No | Easy wireless connectivity with compatible devices |
| Sensor Area | 372.09 mm2 vs 368.16 mm2 | 1.1% larger pixel area |
| Built-In Flash | Yes vs No | All the lenses are stabilized |
| Flash Range | 3 vs No | 3 better flash range |
| Screen Resolution | 1,230k dots vs 1,040k dots | 15.4% higher resolution screen |
| Weight | 251 g vs 337 g | 86 g lighter |
Key PROs of Fujifilm X-E3 and Ricoh GR II
| Screen Size | 3″ | 3″ | Large display |
| Screen Resolution | 1,040k dots | 1,230k dots | High resolution screen |
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (optional) | Better framing and control |
| Raw Support | Yes | Yes | Better image quality |
| AutoFocus Face Detection | Yes | Yes | Very handy for portraits |
| Bracketing | Yes | Yes | Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR |
Key CONs of Fujifilm X-E3 and Ricoh GR II
| Screen Type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type | No flexible viewing angles |
| Headphone Port | No | No | No headphone port |
| Image Stabilization | No | No | No image stabilization |
| Environmental Sealing | No | No | No environmental sealing |
Fujifilm X-E3 vs Ricoh GR II: Comparing Two Models By Physical Characteristics
Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Fujifilm X-E3 and Ricoh GR II from the front view.
Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.
After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.
Speaking of weight, Ricoh GR II is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 86g less than the Fujifilm X-E3. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.
Comparing Fujifilm X-E3 and Ricoh GR II by the type of Sensor and Resolution
Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.
Are Fujifilm X-E3 and Ricoh GR II any different in terms of sensor type?
In fact, that's exactly what makes these two models really different. Thus, it is a good point to consider if your are choosing between these two cameras. Fujifilm X-E3 features a 24.0 MP APS-C sized CMOS X-TRANS III sensor and boasts of a EXR Processor III processor . Ricoh GR II, in its turn, comes with a 16.0 MP APS-C sized CMOS sensor and GR Engine V processor , which makes it significantly different from the first model.
Take a look below to find the comparison of Fujifilm X-E3 and Ricoh GR II by the size of their sensors.
Fujifilm X-E3 and Ricoh GR II are identical by this indicator, as each feature a sensor of the same size. Thus, both cameras will provide the same level of control in terms of the depth of field if you use them with the same focal length and aperture.
For Which Fields Of Photography Are Fujifilm X-E3 and Ricoh GR II Suitable?
If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.
This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Fujifilm X-E3 and Ricoh GR II in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.
| Photography Type | Fujifilm X-E3 | Ricoh GR II |
|---|---|---|
| Portrait Photography |
|
|
| Street Photography |
|
|
| Sports Photography |
|
|
| Daily Photography |
|
|
| Landscape Photography |
|
|
Fujifilm X-E3 for Portrait Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.6 x 15.6 mm) sensor
- High resolution sensor (24 MP)
- Face Detection Focusing
Disadvantages:
- No Image Stabilization
Ricoh GR II for Portrait Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.7 x 15.7 mm) sensor
- Face Detection Focusing
Disadvantages:
- No Image Stabilization
Fujifilm X-E3 for Street Photography
Advantages:
- Built-in View Finder
- Live View
- Large APS-C(23.6 x 15.6 mm) sensor
Disadvantages:
- Big size (121 x 74 x 43 mm)
- No Image Stabilization
Ricoh GR II for Street Photography
Advantages:
- Built-in View Finder
- Live View
- Large APS-C(23.7 x 15.7 mm) sensor
Disadvantages:
- Big size (117 x 63 x 35 mm)
- No Image Stabilization
- Small Number of autofocus Points (9)
Fujifilm X-E3 for Sports Photography
Advantages:
- Fast Continuous Shooting (14.0 fps)
- Big Number of autofocus Points (325)
Disadvantages:
- No Environmental Sealing
- Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
- Bad Max Native ISO (12800)
- Small battery life (350 shots)
Ricoh GR II for Sports Photography
Advantages:
No Significant Advantages
Disadvantages:
- Slow Continuous Shooting (4.0 fps)
- No Environmental Sealing
- Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
- Smal Number of autofocus Points (9)
- Bad Low Light ISO (1078)
- Small battery life (320 shots)
Fujifilm X-E3 for Daily Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.6 x 15.6 mm) sensor
- Built-in View Finder
- Live View
- Wireless Connectivity
- Video is available
Disadvantages:
- Big size (121 x 74 x 43 mm)
- No Built-in Flash
Ricoh GR II for Daily Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.7 x 15.7 mm) sensor
- Small weight (251 g)
- Built-in Flash
- Built-in View Finder
- Live View
- Wireless Connectivity
- Video is available
Disadvantages:
No Significant DisadvantagesFujifilm X-E3 for Landscape Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.6 x 15.6 mm) sensor
- High resolution sensor (24 MP)
- Live View
- RAW Support
Disadvantages:
- No Environmental Sealing
- Bad Max Native ISO (12800)
Ricoh GR II for Landscape Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.7 x 15.7 mm) sensor
- Good Dynamic Range (13.7)
- Live View
- RAW Support
Disadvantages:
- Low resolution sensor (16 MP)
- No Environmental Sealing
- Bad Low Light ISO (1078)
Comparison of Fujifilm X-E3 vs Ricoh GR II: Final Verdict
Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Fujifilm X-E3 or Ricoh GR II, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.
What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Fujifilm X-E3 and Ricoh GR II here is what we can say in conclusion:
According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Ricoh GR II deserves a higher Total Score than the Fujifilm X-E3. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.
Fujifilm X-E3 vs Ricoh GR II Table Of Technical Specs
For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:
| Fujifilm X-E3 | Ricoh GR II | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Brand | Fujifilm | Ricoh |
| Model | X-E3 | GR II |
| Announced | Sep 07, 2017 | Jun 17, 2015 |
| Body Type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Large sensor compact |
| Sensor | ||
| Sensor Type | CMOS X-TRANS III | CMOS |
| Sensor Size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor Dimensions | 23.6 x 15.6 mm | 23.7 x 15.7 mm |
| Sensor Area | 368.16 mm2 | 372.09 mm2 |
| Sensor Resolution | 24.0 MP | 16.0 MP |
| Max Image Resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Max Native ISO | 12,800 | 25,600 |
| Max Boosted ISO | 51,200 | n/a |
| Min Native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW Support |  |
|
| Lens | ||
| Manual Focus | |
|
| Lens Mount | Fujifilm X | Fixed lens |
| Number of Lenses | 43 | n/a |
| Focal Length Multiplier | 1.5x | n/a |
| Macro Focus Range | 10 | |
| AutoFocus | ||
| AF Touch | |
 |
| AF Continuous | |
|
| AF Single | |
|
| AF Tracking | |
|
| AF Selective | |
|
| AF Center | |
|
| AF Multi Area | |
|
| AF Live View | |
|
| AF Face Detection | |
|
| AF Contrast Detection | |
|
| AF Phase Detection | |
|
| Number of Focus Points | 325 | 9 |
| Number of Cross Focus Points | n/a | n/a |
| Screen | ||
| Screen Type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen Size | 3″ | 3″ |
| Screen Resolution | 1,040k dots | 1,230k dots |
| Live View | |
|
| Touch Screen | |
|
| ViewFinder | ||
| ViewFinder | Electronic | Optical (optional) |
| ViewFinder Resolution | 2,360k dots | 0k dots |
| ViewFinder Coverage | 100% | % |
| ViewFinder Magnification | 0.62 | |
| Photography Features | ||
| Min Shutter Speed | 30 s | 300 s |
| Max Shutter Speed | 1/4000 s | 1/4000 s |
| Continuous Shooting | 14.0 fps | 4.0 fps |
| Shutter Priority | |
|
| Aperture Priority | |
|
| Manual Exposure Mode | |
|
| Exposure Compensation | |
|
| Custom White Balance | |
|
| Image Stabilization | |
|
| Built-in Flash | |
|
| Flash Range | 0 | 3 |
| Flash Modes | no built-in flash | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless |
| External Flash | |
|
| AE Bracketing | |
|
| WB Bracketing | |
|
| Exposure Modes | ||
| Multi-Segment | |
|
| Average | |
|
| Spot | |
|
| Partial | |
|
| AF-Area | |
|
| Center Weighted | |
|
| Video Features | ||
| Video Resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (20p, 25p, 24p) | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) |
| Max Video Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 1920 x 1080 |
| Video Formats | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone Port | |
|
| Headphone Port | |
|
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless Connectivity | |
|
| HDMI | |
|
| USB | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental Sealing | |
|
| Water Proof | |
|
| Dust Proof | |
|
| Shock Proof | |
|
| Crush Proof | |
|
| Freeze Proof | |
|
| Weight | 337 g | 251 g |
| Physical Dimensions | 121 x 74 x 43 mm | 117 x 63 x 35 mm |
| Battery Life | 350 shots | 320 shots |
| Battery Type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery Model | NP-W126S | DB-65 |
| Other Features | ||
| Self Timer | |
|
| Timelapse Recording | |
|
| GPS | ||
| Storage Type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage Slots | 1 | 1 |
Most popular cameras
Full frame
Four Thirds
Four Thirds
Four Thirds
Four Thirds
