Fujifilm S9900w vs Ricoh GR III

  • 1/2.3"
  • 16 megapixels
  • Fixed lens
  • 38
    Overall
  • 11
    Imaging
  • 42
    Features
  • 70
    Size
  • 0
    Price
  • APS-C
  • 24 megapixels
  • Fixed lens
  • 47
    Overall
  • 14
    Imaging
  • 48
    Features
  • 85
    Size
  • 0
    Price

Fujifilm S9900w vs Ricoh GR III: a Complete Review and Comparison

Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!

In this review, we are going to make a detailed comparison of two cameras that fall into different categories. While the first model we are looking at, Fujifilm S9900w belongs to a Small Sensor Superzoom category, the other model, Fujifilm S9900w is a Large Sensor Compact camera. Fujifilm S9900w is equipped with a 16.0 MP CMOS sensor, while Ricoh GR III comes with a 24.0 MP CMOS sensor.

Both cameras we are going to look at in our overview fall into two different categories - SuperZoom and Compact. Keeping in mind all the distinctive features of each category, it will be hard to make a detailed comparison of these two models. However, we will do our best to make this review as unbiased and detailed as possible.

To get started, let’s take a look at some of the key features of Fujifilm S9900w and Ricoh GR III and, after this, we can go on to our detailed comparison of these models.

Fujifilm S9900w Key Features:

  • 16.0 MP 1/2.3" CMOS sensor
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Image Stabilization: Yes
  • 3″ Fixed Screen
  • ViewFinder: Yes
  • 10.0 fps Continuous Shooting
  • Video: 1920 x 1080 (6oi), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p)
  • Built-in Wireless: Yes
  • Dimensions: 123 x 87 x 116 mm
  • Weight: 670 g
  • Environmental Sealing: No
  • Built-in GPS: No

Ricoh GR III Key Features:

  • 24.0 MP APS-C CMOS sensor
  • Image Stabilization: Yes
  • 3″ Fixed Type Screen
  • ViewFinder: Yes
  • fps Continuous Shooting
  • Video: 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
  • Built-in Wireless: Yes
  • Dimensions: 109 x 62 x 33 mm
  • Weight: 257 g
  • Environmental Sealing: No
  • Built-in GPS: No

Why is Fujifilm S9900w a better choice than Ricoh GR III

Timelapse Recording Yes vs No Creative shooting
Continuous Shooting 10 fps vs No fps 10 fps faster
Built-In Flash Yes vs No All the lenses are stabilized
Flash Range 7 vs No 7 better flash range

What are the key reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over Fujifilm S9900w

Sensor Resolution 24.0 MP vs 16.0 MP 33.3% more pixels
Sensor Area 366.6 mm2 vs 28.07 mm2 92.3% larger pixel area
Raw Support Yes vs No Better image quality
External Flash Yes vs No Connect off-camera flash
Max Shutter Speed 1/4000 vs 1/1700 Faster shutter speed
Screen Resolution 1,037k dots vs 460k dots 55.6% higher resolution screen
Touch Screen Yes vs No Easy control of camera functions
Weight 257 g vs 670 g 413 g lighter

Key PROs of Fujifilm S9900w and Ricoh GR III

Screen Size 3″ | 3″ Large display
Viewfinder Electronic | Optical (optional) Better framing and control
AutoFocus Face Detection Yes | Yes Very handy for portraits
Bracketing Yes | Yes Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR
Image Stabilization Yes | Yes Built-in stabilization

Key CONs of Fujifilm S9900w and Ricoh GR III

Screen Type Fixed | Fixed Type No flexible viewing angles
Microphone Port No | No No microphone port
Headphone Port No | No No headphone port
Environmental Sealing No | No No environmental sealing

Fujifilm S9900w vs Ricoh GR III: Comparing Two Models By Physical Characteristics

Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Fujifilm S9900w and Ricoh GR III from the front view.

Fujifilm S9900w
Ricoh GR III
HTML
BB

Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.

Fujifilm S9900w
Ricoh GR III
HTML
BB

After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.

Speaking of weight, Ricoh GR III is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 413g less than the Fujifilm S9900w. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.

Comparing Fujifilm S9900w and Ricoh GR III by the type of Sensor and Resolution

Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.

Are Fujifilm S9900w and Ricoh GR III any different in terms of sensor type?

In fact, that's exactly what makes these two models really different. Thus, it is a good point to consider if your are choosing between these two cameras. Fujifilm S9900w features a 16.0 MP 1/2.3" sized CMOS sensor . Ricoh GR III, in its turn, comes with a 24.0 MP APS-C sized CMOS sensor , which makes it significantly different from the first model.

Take a look below to find the comparison of Fujifilm S9900w and Ricoh GR III by the size of their sensors.

Fujifilm S9900w
Ricoh GR III
HTML
BB

One more distinctive feature of compared models is the sensor size. Ricoh GR III is equipped with a sensor that is 0.1x larger than the one featured in Fujifilm S9900w. Compared to the cameras with smaller sensor area, the ones with larger sensors ensure more control on the blurry background and depth of field if you shoot in the same aperture and focal length. Thus, the first model has a significant advantage here.

In terms of sensor size, both Fujifilm S9900w and Ricoh GR III feature similar sensors. Thus, none of these models can boast of a significant advantage over the other. Both cameras should deliver about the same control over the depth of field if they are used with the same aperture and focal length.

For Which Fields Of Photography Are Fujifilm S9900w and Ricoh GR III Suitable?

If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.

This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Fujifilm S9900w and Ricoh GR III in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.

Photography Type Fujifilm S9900w Ricoh GR III
Portrait Photography
51%
93%
Street Photography
69%
98%
Sports Photography
85%
48%
Daily Photography
76%
2%
Landscape Photography
40%
81%

Fujifilm S9900w for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

  • Image Stabilization
  • Face Detection Focusing

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor

Ricoh GR III for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
  • High resolution sensor (24 MP)
  • Image Stabilization
  • Face Detection Focusing

Disadvantages:

No Significant Disadvantages

Fujifilm S9900w for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Image Stabilization

Disadvantages:

  • Big size (123 x 87 x 116 mm)
  • Small 1/2.3"(6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor

Ricoh GR III for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Small size (109 x 62 x 33 mm)
  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Image Stabilization
  • Large APS-C(23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor

Disadvantages:

No Significant Disadvantages

Fujifilm S9900w for Sports Photography

Advantages:

  • Big size (123 x 87 x 116 mm)

Disadvantages:

  • Slow Continuous Shooting (10.0 fps)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/1700s)
  • Bad Max Native ISO (12800)
  • Small battery life (300 shots)

Ricoh GR III for Sports Photography

Advantages:

No Significant Advantages

Disadvantages:

  • Slow Continuous Shooting ( fps)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
  • Bad Max Native ISO (0)
  • Small size (109 x 62 x 33 mm)

Fujifilm S9900w for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Built-in Flash
  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Wireless Connectivity
  • Video is available

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
  • Big weight (670 g)
  • Big size (123 x 87 x 116 mm)

Ricoh GR III for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
  • Small weight (257 g)
  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Wireless Connectivity
  • Video is available

Disadvantages:

  • No Built-in Flash

Fujifilm S9900w for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Live View

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
  • Low resolution sensor (16 MP)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • No RAW Support
  • Bad Max Native ISO (12800)

Ricoh GR III for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
  • High resolution sensor (24 MP)
  • Live View
  • RAW Support

Disadvantages:

  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Bad Max Native ISO (0)

Comparison of Fujifilm S9900w vs Ricoh GR III: Final Verdict

Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Fujifilm S9900w or Ricoh GR III, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.

What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Fujifilm S9900w and Ricoh GR III here is what we can say in conclusion:

According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Ricoh GR III deserves a higher Total Score than the Fujifilm S9900w. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.

Fujifilm S9900w vs Ricoh GR III Table Of Technical Specs

For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:

Fujifilm S9900w Ricoh GR III
General
Brand Fujifilm Ricoh
Model S9900w GR III
Announced Jan 14, 2015 Sep 25, 2018
Body Type SLR-like (bridge) Large sensor compact
Sensor
Sensor Type CMOS CMOS
Sensor Size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor Dimensions 6.17 x 4.55 mm 23.5 x 15.6 mm
Sensor Area 28.07 mm2 366.60 mm2
Sensor Resolution 16.0 MP 24.0 MP
Max Image Resolution 4608 x 3456 6000 x 4000
Max Native ISO 12,800 0
Max Boosted ISO n/a n/a
Min Native ISO 100 0
RAW Support No Yes
Lens
Manual Focus Yes Yes
Lens Mount Fixed lens Fixed lens
Number of Lenses n/a n/a
Focal Length Multiplier n/a n/a
Macro Focus Range 7 6
AutoFocus
AF Touch No Yes
AF Continuous Yes Yes
AF Single Yes Yes
AF Tracking Yes Yes
AF Selective Yes Yes
AF Center Yes Yes
AF Multi Area Yes Yes
AF Live View Yes Yes
AF Face Detection Yes Yes
AF Contrast Detection Yes Yes
AF Phase Detection No Yes
Number of Focus Points n/a n/a
Number of Cross Focus Points n/a n/a
Screen
Screen Type Fixed Fixed Type
Screen Size 3″ 3″
Screen Resolution 460k dots 1,037k dots
Live View Yes Yes
Touch Screen No Yes
ViewFinder
ViewFinder Electronic Optical (optional)
ViewFinder Resolution 920k dots 0k dots
ViewFinder Coverage 97% %
ViewFinder Magnification
Photography Features
Min Shutter Speed 8 s 30 s
Max Shutter Speed 1/1700 s 1/4000 s
Continuous Shooting 10.0 fps fps
Shutter Priority Yes Yes
Aperture Priority Yes Yes
Manual Exposure Mode Yes Yes
Exposure Compensation Yes Yes
Custom White Balance Yes Yes
Image Stabilization Yes Yes
Built-in Flash Yes No
Flash Range 7 0
Flash Modes Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye
External Flash No Yes
AE Bracketing Yes Yes
WB Bracketing Yes No
Exposure Modes
Multi-Segment Yes Yes
Average Yes Yes
Spot Yes Yes
Partial No No
AF-Area No No
Center Weighted No No
Video Features
Video Resolutions 1920 x 1080 (6oi), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Max Video Resolution 1920 x 1080 1920 x 1080
Video Formats H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone Port No No
Headphone Port No No
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity Yes Yes
HDMI Yes No
USB USB 2.0 USB 1
Physical
Environmental Sealing No No
Water Proof No No
Dust Proof No No
Shock Proof No No
Crush Proof No No
Freeze Proof No No
Weight 670 g 257 g
Physical Dimensions 123 x 87 x 116 mm 109 x 62 x 33 mm
Battery Life 300 shots n/a
Battery Type Battery Pack n/a
Battery Model 4 x AA n/a
Other Features
Self Timer Yes Yes
Timelapse Recording Yes No
GPS
Storage Type SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported)
Storage Slots 1 1

Most popular cameras

Pentax K-5 II 16.0 MP CMOS
APS-C
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH3 16.0 MP CMOS
Four Thirds
Olympus OM-D E-M10 16.0 MP CMOS
Four Thirds
Pentax K-5 IIs 16.0 MP CMOS
APS-C
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 16.0 MP CMOS
Four Thirds