Fujifilm S9900w vs Ricoh GR III
- 1/2.3"
- 16 megapixels
- Fixed lens
-
38
Overall -
11
Imaging -
42
Features -
70
Size -
0
Price
Fujifilm S9900w vs Ricoh GR III: a Complete Review and Comparison
Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!
In this review, we are going to make a detailed comparison of two cameras that fall into different categories. While the first model we are looking at, Fujifilm S9900w belongs to a Small Sensor Superzoom category, the other model, Fujifilm S9900w is a Large Sensor Compact camera. Fujifilm S9900w is equipped with a 16.0 MP CMOS sensor, while Ricoh GR III comes with a 24.0 MP CMOS sensor.
Both cameras we are going to look at in our overview fall into two different categories - SuperZoom and Compact. Keeping in mind all the distinctive features of each category, it will be hard to make a detailed comparison of these two models. However, we will do our best to make this review as unbiased and detailed as possible.
To get started, let’s take a look at some of the key features of Fujifilm S9900w and Ricoh GR III and, after this, we can go on to our detailed comparison of these models.
Fujifilm S9900w Key Features:
- 16.0 MP 1/2.3" CMOS sensor
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Image Stabilization: Yes
- 3″ Fixed Screen
- ViewFinder: Yes
- 10.0 fps Continuous Shooting
- Video: 1920 x 1080 (6oi), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p)
- Built-in Wireless: Yes
- Dimensions: 123 x 87 x 116 mm
- Weight: 670 g
- Environmental Sealing: No
- Built-in GPS: No
Ricoh GR III Key Features:
- 24.0 MP APS-C CMOS sensor
- Image Stabilization: Yes
- 3″ Fixed Type Screen
- ViewFinder: Yes
- fps Continuous Shooting
- Video: 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
- Built-in Wireless: Yes
- Dimensions: 109 x 62 x 33 mm
- Weight: 257 g
- Environmental Sealing: No
- Built-in GPS: No
Why is Fujifilm S9900w a better choice than Ricoh GR III
| Timelapse Recording | Yes vs No | Creative shooting |
| Continuous Shooting | 10 fps vs No fps | 10 fps faster |
| Built-In Flash | Yes vs No | All the lenses are stabilized |
| Flash Range | 7 vs No | 7 better flash range |
What are the key reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over Fujifilm S9900w
| Sensor Resolution | 24.0 MP vs 16.0 MP | 33.3% more pixels |
| Sensor Area | 366.6 mm2 vs 28.07 mm2 | 92.3% larger pixel area |
| Raw Support | Yes vs No | Better image quality |
| External Flash | Yes vs No | Connect off-camera flash |
| Max Shutter Speed | 1/4000 vs 1/1700 | Faster shutter speed |
| Screen Resolution | 1,037k dots vs 460k dots | 55.6% higher resolution screen |
| Touch Screen | Yes vs No | Easy control of camera functions |
| Weight | 257 g vs 670 g | 413 g lighter |
Key PROs of Fujifilm S9900w and Ricoh GR III
| Screen Size | 3″ | 3″ | Large display |
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (optional) | Better framing and control |
| AutoFocus Face Detection | Yes | Yes | Very handy for portraits |
| Bracketing | Yes | Yes | Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | Yes | Built-in stabilization |
Key CONs of Fujifilm S9900w and Ricoh GR III
| Screen Type | Fixed | Fixed Type | No flexible viewing angles |
| Microphone Port | No | No | No microphone port |
| Headphone Port | No | No | No headphone port |
| Environmental Sealing | No | No | No environmental sealing |
Fujifilm S9900w vs Ricoh GR III: Comparing Two Models By Physical Characteristics
Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Fujifilm S9900w and Ricoh GR III from the front view.
Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.
After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.
Speaking of weight, Ricoh GR III is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 413g less than the Fujifilm S9900w. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.
Comparing Fujifilm S9900w and Ricoh GR III by the type of Sensor and Resolution
Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.
Are Fujifilm S9900w and Ricoh GR III any different in terms of sensor type?
In fact, that's exactly what makes these two models really different. Thus, it is a good point to consider if your are choosing between these two cameras. Fujifilm S9900w features a 16.0 MP 1/2.3" sized CMOS sensor . Ricoh GR III, in its turn, comes with a 24.0 MP APS-C sized CMOS sensor , which makes it significantly different from the first model.
Take a look below to find the comparison of Fujifilm S9900w and Ricoh GR III by the size of their sensors.
One more distinctive feature of compared models is the sensor size. Ricoh GR III is equipped with a sensor that is 0.1x larger than the one featured in Fujifilm S9900w. Compared to the cameras with smaller sensor area, the ones with larger sensors ensure more control on the blurry background and depth of field if you shoot in the same aperture and focal length. Thus, the first model has a significant advantage here.
In terms of sensor size, both Fujifilm S9900w and Ricoh GR III feature similar sensors. Thus, none of these models can boast of a significant advantage over the other. Both cameras should deliver about the same control over the depth of field if they are used with the same aperture and focal length.
For Which Fields Of Photography Are Fujifilm S9900w and Ricoh GR III Suitable?
If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.
This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Fujifilm S9900w and Ricoh GR III in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.
| Photography Type | Fujifilm S9900w | Ricoh GR III |
|---|---|---|
| Portrait Photography |
|
|
| Street Photography |
|
|
| Sports Photography |
|
|
| Daily Photography |
|
|
| Landscape Photography |
|
|
Fujifilm S9900w for Portrait Photography
Advantages:
- Image Stabilization
- Face Detection Focusing
Disadvantages:
- Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
Ricoh GR III for Portrait Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
- High resolution sensor (24 MP)
- Image Stabilization
- Face Detection Focusing
Disadvantages:
No Significant DisadvantagesFujifilm S9900w for Street Photography
Advantages:
- Built-in View Finder
- Live View
- Image Stabilization
Disadvantages:
- Big size (123 x 87 x 116 mm)
- Small 1/2.3"(6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
Ricoh GR III for Street Photography
Advantages:
- Small size (109 x 62 x 33 mm)
- Built-in View Finder
- Live View
- Image Stabilization
- Large APS-C(23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
Disadvantages:
No Significant DisadvantagesFujifilm S9900w for Sports Photography
Advantages:
- Big size (123 x 87 x 116 mm)
Disadvantages:
- Slow Continuous Shooting (10.0 fps)
- No Environmental Sealing
- Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/1700s)
- Bad Max Native ISO (12800)
- Small battery life (300 shots)
Ricoh GR III for Sports Photography
Advantages:
No Significant Advantages
Disadvantages:
- Slow Continuous Shooting ( fps)
- No Environmental Sealing
- Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
- Bad Max Native ISO (0)
- Small size (109 x 62 x 33 mm)
Fujifilm S9900w for Daily Photography
Advantages:
- Built-in Flash
- Built-in View Finder
- Live View
- Wireless Connectivity
- Video is available
Disadvantages:
- Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
- Big weight (670 g)
- Big size (123 x 87 x 116 mm)
Ricoh GR III for Daily Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
- Small weight (257 g)
- Built-in View Finder
- Live View
- Wireless Connectivity
- Video is available
Disadvantages:
- No Built-in Flash
Fujifilm S9900w for Landscape Photography
Advantages:
- Live View
Disadvantages:
- Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
- Low resolution sensor (16 MP)
- No Environmental Sealing
- No RAW Support
- Bad Max Native ISO (12800)
Ricoh GR III for Landscape Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
- High resolution sensor (24 MP)
- Live View
- RAW Support
Disadvantages:
- No Environmental Sealing
- Bad Max Native ISO (0)
Comparison of Fujifilm S9900w vs Ricoh GR III: Final Verdict
Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Fujifilm S9900w or Ricoh GR III, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.
What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Fujifilm S9900w and Ricoh GR III here is what we can say in conclusion:
According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Ricoh GR III deserves a higher Total Score than the Fujifilm S9900w. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.
Fujifilm S9900w vs Ricoh GR III Table Of Technical Specs
For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:
| Fujifilm S9900w | Ricoh GR III | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Brand | Fujifilm | Ricoh |
| Model | S9900w | GR III |
| Announced | Jan 14, 2015 | Sep 25, 2018 |
| Body Type | SLR-like (bridge) | Large sensor compact |
| Sensor | ||
| Sensor Type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor Dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55 mm | 23.5 x 15.6 mm |
| Sensor Area | 28.07 mm2 | 366.60 mm2 |
| Sensor Resolution | 16.0 MP | 24.0 MP |
| Max Image Resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Max Native ISO | 12,800 | 0 |
| Max Boosted ISO | n/a | n/a |
| Min Native ISO | 100 | 0 |
| RAW Support |  |
 |
| Lens | ||
| Manual Focus | |
|
| Lens Mount | Fixed lens | Fixed lens |
| Number of Lenses | n/a | n/a |
| Focal Length Multiplier | n/a | n/a |
| Macro Focus Range | 7 | 6 |
| AutoFocus | ||
| AF Touch | |
|
| AF Continuous | |
|
| AF Single | |
|
| AF Tracking | |
|
| AF Selective | |
|
| AF Center | |
|
| AF Multi Area | |
|
| AF Live View | |
|
| AF Face Detection | |
|
| AF Contrast Detection | |
|
| AF Phase Detection | |
|
| Number of Focus Points | n/a | n/a |
| Number of Cross Focus Points | n/a | n/a |
| Screen | ||
| Screen Type | Fixed | Fixed Type |
| Screen Size | 3″ | 3″ |
| Screen Resolution | 460k dots | 1,037k dots |
| Live View | |
|
| Touch Screen | |
|
| ViewFinder | ||
| ViewFinder | Electronic | Optical (optional) |
| ViewFinder Resolution | 920k dots | 0k dots |
| ViewFinder Coverage | 97% | % |
| ViewFinder Magnification | ||
| Photography Features | ||
| Min Shutter Speed | 8 s | 30 s |
| Max Shutter Speed | 1/1700 s | 1/4000 s |
| Continuous Shooting | 10.0 fps | fps |
| Shutter Priority | |
|
| Aperture Priority | |
|
| Manual Exposure Mode | |
|
| Exposure Compensation | |
|
| Custom White Balance | |
|
| Image Stabilization | |
|
| Built-in Flash | |
|
| Flash Range | 7 | 0 |
| Flash Modes | Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye |
| External Flash | |
|
| AE Bracketing | |
|
| WB Bracketing | |
|
| Exposure Modes | ||
| Multi-Segment | |
|
| Average | |
|
| Spot | |
|
| Partial | |
|
| AF-Area | |
|
| Center Weighted | |
|
| Video Features | ||
| Video Resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (6oi), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max Video Resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 |
| Video Formats | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone Port | |
|
| Headphone Port | |
|
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless Connectivity | |
|
| HDMI | |
|
| USB | USB 2.0 | USB 1 |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental Sealing | |
|
| Water Proof | |
|
| Dust Proof | |
|
| Shock Proof | |
|
| Crush Proof | |
|
| Freeze Proof | |
|
| Weight | 670 g | 257 g |
| Physical Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116 mm | 109 x 62 x 33 mm |
| Battery Life | 300 shots | n/a |
| Battery Type | Battery Pack | n/a |
| Battery Model | 4 x AA | n/a |
| Other Features | ||
| Self Timer | |
|
| Timelapse Recording | |
|
| GPS | ||
| Storage Type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
| Storage Slots | 1 | 1 |
Most popular cameras
APS-C
Four Thirds
Four Thirds
APS-C
Four Thirds
