Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66
- 1/2.3"
- 18 megapixels
- Fixed lens
-
51
Overall -
13
Imaging -
39
Features -
97
Size -
1
Price
Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66: a Complete Review and Comparison
Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!
In this review, we are going to provide a detailed evaluation and comparison of two different camera models that fall into the same category - Ultracompact. Although these cameras are from the same category, they were introduced by different brands - Fujifilm and Sony. Models we are reviewing in this article have different types of sensors, Thus, Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR is equipped with a 16.0 MP EXRCMOS sensor. Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66, on the contrary, features BSI-CMOS sensor with a resolution of 18.0 MP.
To get started, let’s take a look at some of the key features of Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 and, after this, we can go on to our detailed comparison of these models.
Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR Key Features:
- 16.0 MP 1/2" EXRCMOS sensor
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expands to 6400)
- Image Stabilization: Yes
- 3.5″ Fixed Type Screen
- ViewFinder: No
- 3.0 fps Continuous Shooting
- Video: 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
- Built-in Wireless: No
- Dimensions: 101 x 59 x 18 mm
- Weight: 151 g
- Environmental Sealing: No
- Built-in GPS: No
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 Key Features:
- 18.0 MP 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS sensor
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Image Stabilization: Yes
- 3.3″ Fixed Type Screen
- ViewFinder: No
- 10.0 fps Continuous Shooting
- Video: 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
- Built-in Wireless: No
- Dimensions: 93 x 54 x 13 mm
- Weight: 109 g
- Environmental Sealing: No
- Built-in GPS: No
Why is Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR a better choice than Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66
| Sensor Area | 30.72 mm2 vs 28.07 mm2 | 8.6% larger pixel area |
| Manual Exposure Mode | Yes vs No | Has Manual Exposure Mode |
| Screen Size | 3.5″ vs 3.3″ | 0.2" larger screen |
What are the key reasons to pick Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 over Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR
| Sensor Resolution | 18.0 MP vs 16.0 MP | 11.1% more pixels |
| Continuous Shooting | 10 fps vs 3 fps | 7 fps faster |
| Flash Range | 3.1 vs 3 | 0.1 better flash range |
| Max Shutter Speed | 1/4000 vs 1/2000 | Faster shutter speed |
| Screen Resolution | 1,230k dots vs 460k dots | 62.6% higher resolution screen |
| Battery Life | 250 shots vs 220 shots | 30 more frames with a single charge |
| Weight | 109 g vs 151 g | 42 g lighter |
Key PROs of Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66
| Touch Screen | Yes | Yes | Easy control of camera functions |
| Screen Size | 3.5″ | 3.3″ | Large display |
| AutoFocus Face Detection | Yes | Yes | Very handy for portraits |
| Built-In Flash | Yes | Yes | External flash available |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | Yes | Built-in stabilization |
Key CONs of Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66
| Screen Type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type | No flexible viewing angles |
| Viewfinder | No | No | No ViewFinder |
| Raw Support | No | No | Doesn's support RAW format |
| Sensor Resolution | 16.0 MP | 18.0 MP | Small sensor resolution |
| Microphone Port | No | No | No microphone port |
| Headphone Port | No | No | No headphone port |
| Timelapse Recording | No | No | No timelapse recording |
| External Flash Shoe | No | No | No Flash Shoe |
| Bracketing | No | No | No AE bracketing |
| Environmental Sealing | No | No | No environmental sealing |
| Battery Life | 220 shots | 250 shots | Low battery life |
Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66: Comparing Two Models By Physical Characteristics
Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 from the front view.
Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.
After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.
Speaking of weight, Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 42g less than the Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.
Comparing Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 by the type of Sensor and Resolution
Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.
Are Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 any different in terms of sensor type?
In fact, that's exactly what makes these two models really different. Thus, it is a good point to consider if your are choosing between these two cameras. Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR features a 16.0 MP 1/2" sized EXRCMOS sensor and boasts of a EXR processor . Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66, in its turn, comes with a 18.0 MP 1/2.3" sized BSI-CMOS sensor and BIONZ processor , which makes it significantly different from the first model.
Take a look below to find the comparison of Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 by the size of their sensors.
One more distinctive feature of compared models is the sensor size. Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR has a sensor area 0.9x bigger compared to Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66. What does it mean? This basically means that if you these cameras them with the same aperture and focal length, the first model will give you more control in terms of the blurry background and depth of field.
For Which Fields Of Photography Are Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 Suitable?
If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.
This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.
| Photography Type | Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 |
|---|---|---|
| Portrait Photography |
|
|
| Street Photography |
|
|
| Sports Photography |
|
|
| Daily Photography |
|
|
| Landscape Photography |
|
|
Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR for Portrait Photography
Advantages:
- Image Stabilization
- Face Detection Focusing
Disadvantages:
- Small 1/2" (6.4 x 4.8 mm) sensor
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 for Portrait Photography
Advantages:
- Image Stabilization
- Face Detection Focusing
Disadvantages:
- Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR for Street Photography
Advantages:
- Small size (101 x 59 x 18 mm)
- Live View
- Image Stabilization
Disadvantages:
- No Built-in View Finder
- Small 1/2"(6.4 x 4.8 mm) sensor
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 for Street Photography
Advantages:
- Small size (93 x 54 x 13 mm)
- Live View
- Image Stabilization
Disadvantages:
- No Built-in View Finder
- Small 1/2.3"(6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR for Sports Photography
Advantages:
- No View Finder
Disadvantages:
- Slow Continuous Shooting (3.0 fps)
- No Environmental Sealing
- Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/2000s)
- Small Number of CrossFocus Points (0)
- Bad Max Native ISO (3200)
- Small battery life (220 shots)
- Small size (101 x 59 x 18 mm)
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 for Sports Photography
Advantages:
- No View Finder
Disadvantages:
- Slow Continuous Shooting (10.0 fps)
- No Environmental Sealing
- Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
- Small Number of CrossFocus Points (0)
- Bad Max Native ISO (12800)
- Small battery life (250 shots)
- Small size (93 x 54 x 13 mm)
Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR for Daily Photography
Advantages:
- Small weight (151 g)
- Small size (101 x 59 x 18 mm)
- Built-in Flash
- Live View
- Video is available
Disadvantages:
- Small 1/2" (6.4 x 4.8 mm) sensor
- No Built-in View Finder
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 for Daily Photography
Advantages:
- Small weight (109 g)
- Small size (93 x 54 x 13 mm)
- Built-in Flash
- Video is available
Disadvantages:
- Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
- No Built-in View Finder
Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR for Landscape Photography
Advantages:
- Live View
Disadvantages:
- Small 1/2" (6.4 x 4.8 mm) sensor
- Low resolution sensor (16 MP)
- No Environmental Sealing
- No RAW Support
- Bad Max Native ISO (3200)
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 for Landscape Photography
Advantages:
No Significant Advantages
Disadvantages:
- Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
- Low resolution sensor (18 MP)
- No Environmental Sealing
- No RAW Support
- Bad Max Native ISO (12800)
Comparison of Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66: Final Verdict
Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR or Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.
What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 here is what we can say in conclusion:
According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 deserves a higher Total Score than the Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.
Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 Table Of Technical Specs
For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:
| Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Brand | Fujifilm | Sony |
| Model | FinePix Z900EXR | Cyber-shot DSC-TX66 |
| Announced | Apr 05, 2011 | Feb 28, 2012 |
| Body Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor | ||
| Sensor Type | EXRCMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor Size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor Dimensions | 6.4 x 4.8 mm | 6.17 x 4.55 mm |
| Sensor Area | 30.72 mm2 | 28.07 mm2 |
| Sensor Resolution | 16.0 MP | 18.0 MP |
| Max Image Resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Max Native ISO | 3,200 | 12,800 |
| Max Boosted ISO | 6,400 | n/a |
| Min Native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW Support |  |
|
| Lens | ||
| Manual Focus |  |
|
| Lens Mount | Fixed lens | Fixed lens |
| Number of Lenses | n/a | n/a |
| Focal Length Multiplier | n/a | n/a |
| Macro Focus Range | 1 | |
| AutoFocus | ||
| AF Touch | |
|
| AF Continuous | |
|
| AF Single | |
|
| AF Tracking | |
|
| AF Selective | |
|
| AF Center | |
|
| AF Multi Area | |
|
| AF Live View | |
|
| AF Face Detection | |
|
| AF Contrast Detection | |
|
| AF Phase Detection | |
|
| Number of Focus Points | n/a | n/a |
| Number of Cross Focus Points | 0 | 0 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen Type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen Size | 3.5″ | 3.3″ |
| Screen Resolution | 460k dots | 1,230k dots |
| Live View | |
|
| Touch Screen | |
|
| ViewFinder | ||
| ViewFinder | ||
| ViewFinder Resolution | 0k dots | 0k dots |
| ViewFinder Coverage | % | % |
| ViewFinder Magnification | ||
| Photography Features | ||
| Min Shutter Speed | 4 s | 30 s |
| Max Shutter Speed | 1/2000 s | 1/4000 s |
| Continuous Shooting | 3.0 fps | 10.0 fps |
| Shutter Priority | |
|
| Aperture Priority | |
|
| Manual Exposure Mode | |
|
| Exposure Compensation | |
|
| Custom White Balance | |
|
| Image Stabilization | |
|
| Built-in Flash | |
|
| Flash Range | 3 | 3.1 |
| Flash Modes | Auto, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
| External Flash | |
|
| AE Bracketing | |
|
| WB Bracketing | |
|
| Exposure Modes | ||
| Multi-Segment | |
|
| Average | |
|
| Spot | |
|
| Partial | |
|
| AF-Area | |
|
| Center Weighted | |
|
| Video Features | ||
| Video Resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max Video Resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 |
| Video Formats | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone Port | |
|
| Headphone Port | |
|
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless Connectivity | |
|
| HDMI | |
|
| USB | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental Sealing | |
|
| Water Proof | |
|
| Dust Proof | |
|
| Shock Proof | |
|
| Crush Proof | |
|
| Freeze Proof | |
|
| Weight | 151 g | 109 g |
| Physical Dimensions | 101 x 59 x 18 mm | 93 x 54 x 13 mm |
| Battery Life | 220 shots | 250 shots |
| Battery Type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery Model | NP-45A | NP-BN |
| Other Features | ||
| Self Timer | |
|
| Timelapse Recording | |
|
| GPS | ||
| Storage Type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo, microSD/microSDHC |
| Storage Slots | 1 | 1 |
Most popular cameras
APS-C
Four Thirds
Four Thirds
APS-C
Four Thirds
