Canon PowerShot SX50 HS vs Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II

  • 1/2.3"
  • 12 megapixels
  • Fixed lens
  • 42
    Overall
  • 15
    Imaging
  • 42
    Features
  • 71
    Size
  • 1
    Price
  • Four Thirds
  • 20 megapixels
  • Micro Four Thirds
  • 48
    Overall
  • 22
    Imaging
  • 85
    Features
  • 74
    Size
  • 0
    Price

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS vs Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II: a Complete Review and Comparison

Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!

In this review, we are going to make a detailed comparison of two cameras that fall into different categories. While the first model we are looking at, Canon PowerShot SX50 HS belongs to a Small Sensor Superzoom category, the other model, Canon PowerShot SX50 HS is a Pro Mirrorless camera. Both models feature different types of sensors. Thus, Canon PowerShot SX50 HS comes with BSI-CMOS sensor that has a resolution of 12.0 MP resolution, while our second compared model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II features a 20.0 MP CMOS sensor.

Both cameras we are going to look at in our overview fall into two different categories - SuperZoom and MirrorLess. Keeping in mind all the distinctive features of each category, it will be hard to make a detailed comparison of these two models. However, we will do our best to make this review as unbiased and detailed as possible.

To get started, let’s take a look at some of the key features of Canon PowerShot SX50 HS and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and, after this, we can go on to our detailed comparison of these models.

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Key Features:

  • 12.0 MP 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS sensor
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Image Stabilization: Yes
  • 2.8″ Fully Articulated Screen
  • ViewFinder: Yes
  • 2.0 fps Continuous Shooting
  • Video: 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
  • Built-in Wireless: No
  • Dimensions: 123 x 87 x 106 mm
  • Weight: 595 g
  • Environmental Sealing: No
  • Built-in GPS: No
  • Replaced Canon SX40 HS.
  • Replaced by Canon SX60 HS.

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Key Features:

  • 20.0 MP Four Thirds CMOS sensor
  • ISO 200 - 25600 (Expands to 64)
  • Image Stabilization: Yes
  • 3″ Fully Articulated Screen
  • ViewFinder: Yes
  • 15.0 fps Continuous Shooting
  • Video: 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
  • Built-in Wireless: Yes
  • Dimensions: 134 x 91 x 67 mm
  • Weight: 574 g
  • Environmental Sealing: Yes
  • Built-in GPS: No
  • Replaced Olympus E-M1.

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS was substituted by Canon SX60 HS.

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS substituted Canon SX40 HS.

Why is Canon PowerShot SX50 HS a better choice than Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II

Built-In Flash Yes vs No All the lenses are stabilized

What are the key reasons to pick Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II over Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Wireless Connectivity Built-In vs No Better connectivity
Timelapse Recording Yes vs No Creative shooting
Storage Slots 2 vs 1 Extra storage slot
Sensor Resolution 20.0 MP vs 12.0 MP 40% more pixels
Sensor Area 226.2 mm2 vs 28.07 mm2 87.6% larger pixel area
Continuous Shooting 15 fps vs 2 fps 13 fps faster
Flash Range 9.1 vs 5.5 3.6 better flash range
Max Shutter Speed 1/8000 vs 1/2000 Faster shutter speed
Number Of Focus Points 121 vs 9 112 more focus points
Screen Size 3″ vs 2.8″ 0.2" larger screen
Screen Resolution 1,037k dots vs 461k dots 55.5% higher resolution screen
Touch Screen Yes vs No Easy control of camera functions
Battery Life 350 shots vs 315 shots 35 more frames with a single charge
Weight 574 g vs 595 g 21 g lighter
Environmental Sealing Yes vs No Shoot at tough conditions
Max Video Resolution 4096 x 2160 vs 1920 x 1080 Higher Resolution Video
Microphone Port Yes vs No High quality audio recording option
Headphone Port Yes vs No Has headphone port
Dxo Color Depth 23.7 vs 20.3 Better color depth
Dxo Dynamic Range 12.8 vs 11.2 Better dynamic range
Dxo Low Light Iso 1312 vs 179 Better High ISO performance
Viewfinder Resolution 2,360k dots vs 202k dots 91.4% higher resolution

Key PROs of Canon PowerShot SX50 HS and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II

Screen Type Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated Help viewing and changing settings easily
Viewfinder Electronic | Electronic Better framing and control
Raw Support Yes | Yes Better image quality
AutoFocus Face Detection Yes | Yes Very handy for portraits
Bracketing Yes | Yes Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR
Image Stabilization Yes | Yes Built-in stabilization

Key CONs of Canon PowerShot SX50 HS and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II

Sensor Resolution 12.0 MP | 20.0 MP Small sensor resolution

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS vs Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II: Comparing Two Models By Physical Characteristics

Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Canon PowerShot SX50 HS and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II from the front view.

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
HTML
BB

Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
HTML
BB

After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.

Speaking of weight, Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 21g less than the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.

Comparing Canon PowerShot SX50 HS and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II by the type of Sensor and Resolution

Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.

Are Canon PowerShot SX50 HS and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II any different in terms of sensor type?

In fact, that's exactly what makes these two models really different. Thus, it is a good point to consider if your are choosing between these two cameras. Canon PowerShot SX50 HS features a 12.0 MP 1/2.3" sized BSI-CMOS sensor . Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II, in its turn, comes with a 20.0 MP Four Thirds sized CMOS sensor and TruePic VIII processor , which makes it significantly different from the first model.

Take a look below to find the comparison of Canon PowerShot SX50 HS and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II by the size of their sensors.

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
HTML
BB

One more distinctive feature of compared models is the sensor size. Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II is equipped with a sensor that is 0.1x larger than the one featured in Canon PowerShot SX50 HS. Compared to the cameras with smaller sensor area, the ones with larger sensors ensure more control on the blurry background and depth of field if you shoot in the same aperture and focal length. Thus, the first model has a significant advantage here.

For Which Fields Of Photography Are Canon PowerShot SX50 HS and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Suitable?

If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.

This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Canon PowerShot SX50 HS and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.

Photography Type Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
Portrait Photography
80%
71%
Street Photography
70%
99%
Sports Photography
77%
96%
Daily Photography
85%
93%
Landscape Photography
63%
92%

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

  • Canon is famous with its skintones
  • Image Stabilization
  • Face Detection Focusing

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

  • Fast Max Shutter Speed (1/8000s)
  • Image Stabilization
  • Face Detection Focusing

Disadvantages:

  • Small Four Thirds (17.4 x 13 mm) sensor

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Fully Articulated Screen
  • Image Stabilization

Disadvantages:

  • Big size (123 x 87 x 106 mm)
  • Small 1/2.3"(6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
  • Small Number of autofocus Points (9)

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Fully Articulated Screen
  • Image Stabilization
  • Large Four Thirds(17.4 x 13 mm) sensor

Disadvantages:

  • Big size (134 x 91 x 67 mm)

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS for Sports Photography

Advantages:

  • Big size (123 x 87 x 106 mm)

Disadvantages:

  • Slow Continuous Shooting (2.0 fps)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/2000s)
  • Smal Number of autofocus Points (9)
  • Bad Low Light ISO (179)
  • Small battery life (315 shots)

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II for Sports Photography

Advantages:

  • Fast Continuous Shooting (15.0 fps)
  • Environmental Sealing
  • Fast Max Shutter Speed (1/8000s)
  • Big Number of autofocus Points (121)

Disadvantages:

  • Small battery life (350 shots)

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Built-in Flash
  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Video is available

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
  • Big weight (595 g)
  • Big size (123 x 87 x 106 mm)

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Wireless Connectivity
  • Video is available

Disadvantages:

  • Small Four Thirds (17.4 x 13 mm) sensor
  • Big weight (574 g)
  • Big size (134 x 91 x 67 mm)
  • No Built-in Flash

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Good Dynamic Range (11.2)
  • Live View
  • RAW Support

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
  • Low resolution sensor (12 MP)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Bad Low Light ISO (179)

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Good Dynamic Range (12.8)
  • Environmental Sealing
  • Live View
  • RAW Support

Disadvantages:

  • Small Four Thirds (17.4 x 13 mm) sensor
  • Low resolution sensor (20 MP)

Comparison of Canon PowerShot SX50 HS vs Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II: Final Verdict

Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Canon PowerShot SX50 HS or Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.

What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Canon PowerShot SX50 HS and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II here is what we can say in conclusion:

According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II deserves a higher Total Score than the Canon PowerShot SX50 HS. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS vs Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Table Of Technical Specs

For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
General
Brand Canon Olympus
Model PowerShot SX50 HS OM-D E-M1 Mark II
Announced Jan 15, 2013 Sep 19, 2016
Body Type SLR-like (bridge) SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor
Sensor Type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor Size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor Dimensions 6.17 x 4.55 mm 17.4 x 13 mm
Sensor Area 28.07 mm2 226.20 mm2
Sensor Resolution 12.0 MP 20.0 MP
Max Image Resolution 4000 x 3000 5184 x 3888
Max Native ISO 6,400 25,600
Max Boosted ISO n/a n/a
Min Native ISO 80 200
RAW Support Yes Yes
Lens
Manual Focus Yes Yes
Lens Mount Fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Number of Lenses n/a 94
Focal Length Multiplier n/a 2x
Macro Focus Range 0
AutoFocus
AF Touch No Yes
AF Continuous Yes Yes
AF Single Yes Yes
AF Tracking Yes Yes
AF Selective Yes Yes
AF Center No Yes
AF Multi Area Yes Yes
AF Live View Yes Yes
AF Face Detection Yes Yes
AF Contrast Detection Yes Yes
AF Phase Detection No Yes
Number of Focus Points 9 121
Number of Cross Focus Points n/a n/a
Screen
Screen Type Fully Articulated Fully Articulated
Screen Size 2.8″ 3″
Screen Resolution 461k dots 1,037k dots
Live View Yes Yes
Touch Screen No Yes
ViewFinder
ViewFinder Electronic Electronic
ViewFinder Resolution 202k dots 2,360k dots
ViewFinder Coverage 100% 100%
ViewFinder Magnification
Photography Features
Min Shutter Speed 15 s 60 s
Max Shutter Speed 1/2000 s 1/8000 s
Continuous Shooting 2.0 fps 15.0 fps
Shutter Priority Yes Yes
Aperture Priority Yes Yes
Manual Exposure Mode Yes Yes
Exposure Compensation Yes Yes
Custom White Balance Yes Yes
Image Stabilization Yes Yes
Built-in Flash Yes No
Flash Range 5.5 9.1
Flash Modes Auto, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Second Curtain Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual
External Flash Yes Yes
AE Bracketing Yes Yes
WB Bracketing No Yes
Exposure Modes
Multi-Segment Yes Yes
Average No No
Spot Yes Yes
Partial No No
AF-Area No No
Center Weighted Yes No
DxO Sensor Scores
DxO Sensor Score 47 80
DxO Color Depth 20.3 23.7
DxO Dynamic Range 11.2 12.8
DxO Low Light ISO 179 1312
Video Features
Video Resolutions 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Max Video Resolution 1920 x 1080 4096 x 2160
Video Formats H.264 MOV, H.264
Microphone Port No Yes
Headphone Port No Yes
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity No Yes
HDMI Yes Yes
USB USB 2.0 USB 3.0
Physical
Environmental Sealing No Yes
Water Proof No No
Dust Proof No No
Shock Proof No No
Crush Proof No No
Freeze Proof No No
Weight 595 g 574 g
Physical Dimensions 123 x 87 x 106 mm 134 x 91 x 67 mm
Battery Life 315 shots 350 shots
Battery Type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery Model NB-10L n/a
Other Features
Self Timer Yes Yes
Timelapse Recording No Yes
GPS
Storage Type SD/SDHC/SDXC Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots
Storage Slots 1 2

Most popular cameras

Canon EOS 5D Mark III 22.0 MP CMOS
Full frame
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 16.0 MP CMOS
Four Thirds
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7 16.0 MP CMOS
Four Thirds
Canon EOS M5 24.0 MP CMOS
APS-C
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX7 16.0 MP CMOS
Four Thirds