Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II vs Ricoh GR III
Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II vs Ricoh GR III: a Complete Review and Comparison
Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!
In this review, we are going to provide a detailed evaluation and comparison of two different camera models that fall into the same category - Large Sensor Compact. Although these cameras are from the same category, they were introduced by different brands - Canon and Ricoh. Models we are reviewing in this article have different types of sensors, Thus, Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II is equipped with a 20.0 MP BSI-CMOS sensor. Ricoh GR III, on the contrary, features CMOS sensor with a resolution of 24.0 MP.
To get started, let’s take a look at some of the key features of Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II and Ricoh GR III and, after this, we can go on to our detailed comparison of these models.
Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II Key Features:
- 20.0 MP 1" BSI-CMOS sensor
- ISO 125 - 12800
- Image Stabilization: Yes
- 3″ Fixed Type Screen
- ViewFinder: No
- 8.2 fps Continuous Shooting
- Video: 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC
- Built-in Wireless: Yes
- Dimensions: 98 x 58 x 31 mm
- Weight: 206 g
- Environmental Sealing: No
- Built-in GPS: No
- Replaced Canon G9 X.
Ricoh GR III Key Features:
- 24.0 MP APS-C CMOS sensor
- Image Stabilization: Yes
- 3″ Fixed Type Screen
- ViewFinder: Yes
- fps Continuous Shooting
- Video: 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
- Built-in Wireless: Yes
- Dimensions: 109 x 62 x 33 mm
- Weight: 257 g
- Environmental Sealing: No
- Built-in GPS: No
Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II substituted Canon G9 X.
Why is Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II a better choice than Ricoh GR III
| NFC | Yes vs No | Easy wireless connectivity with compatible devices |
| Bluetooth | Yes vs No | Connect your camera to other devices via Bluetooth |
| Timelapse Recording | Yes vs No | Creative shooting |
| Continuous Shooting | 8.2 fps vs No fps | 8.2 fps faster |
| Built-In Flash | Yes vs No | All the lenses are stabilized |
| Flash Range | 6 vs No | 6 better flash range |
| Screen Resolution | 1,040k dots vs 1,037k dots | 0.3% higher resolution screen |
| Weight | 206 g vs 257 g | 51 g lighter |
What are the key reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II
| Sensor Resolution | 24.0 MP vs 20.0 MP | 16.7% more pixels |
| Sensor Area | 366.6 mm2 vs 116.16 mm2 | 68.3% larger pixel area |
| External Flash | Yes vs No | Connect off-camera flash |
| Max Shutter Speed | 1/4000 vs 1/2000 | Faster shutter speed |
Key PROs of Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II and Ricoh GR III
| Touch Screen | Yes | Yes | Easy control of camera functions |
| Screen Size | 3″ | 3″ | Large display |
| Screen Resolution | 1,040k dots | 1,037k dots | High resolution screen |
| Raw Support | Yes | Yes | Better image quality |
| AutoFocus Face Detection | Yes | Yes | Very handy for portraits |
| Image Stabilization | Yes | Yes | Built-in stabilization |
Key CONs of Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II and Ricoh GR III
| Screen Type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type | No flexible viewing angles |
| Microphone Port | No | No | No microphone port |
| Headphone Port | No | No | No headphone port |
| Environmental Sealing | No | No | No environmental sealing |
Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II vs Ricoh GR III: Comparing Two Models By Physical Characteristics
Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II and Ricoh GR III from the front view.
Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.
After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.
Speaking of weight, Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 51g less than the Ricoh GR III. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.
Comparing Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II and Ricoh GR III by the type of Sensor and Resolution
Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.
Are Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II and Ricoh GR III any different in terms of sensor type?
In fact, that's exactly what makes these two models really different. Thus, it is a good point to consider if your are choosing between these two cameras. Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II features a 20.0 MP 1" sized BSI-CMOS sensor . Ricoh GR III, in its turn, comes with a 24.0 MP APS-C sized CMOS sensor , which makes it significantly different from the first model.
Take a look below to find the comparison of Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II and Ricoh GR III by the size of their sensors.
One more distinctive feature of compared models is the sensor size. Ricoh GR III is equipped with a sensor that is 0.3x larger than the one featured in Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II. Compared to the cameras with smaller sensor area, the ones with larger sensors ensure more control on the blurry background and depth of field if you shoot in the same aperture and focal length. Thus, the first model has a significant advantage here.
For Which Fields Of Photography Are Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II and Ricoh GR III Suitable?
If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.
This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II and Ricoh GR III in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.
| Photography Type | Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Ricoh GR III |
|---|---|---|
| Portrait Photography |
|
|
| Street Photography |
|
|
| Sports Photography |
|
|
| Daily Photography |
|
|
| Landscape Photography |
|
|
Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II for Portrait Photography
Advantages:
- Canon is famous with its skintones
- Image Stabilization
- Face Detection Focusing
Disadvantages:
- Small 1" (13.2 x 8.8 mm) sensor
Ricoh GR III for Portrait Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
- High resolution sensor (24 MP)
- Image Stabilization
- Face Detection Focusing
Disadvantages:
No Significant DisadvantagesCanon PowerShot G9 X Mark II for Street Photography
Advantages:
- Small size (98 x 58 x 31 mm)
- Live View
- Image Stabilization
Disadvantages:
- No Built-in View Finder
- Small 1"(13.2 x 8.8 mm) sensor
Ricoh GR III for Street Photography
Advantages:
- Small size (109 x 62 x 33 mm)
- Built-in View Finder
- Live View
- Image Stabilization
- Large APS-C(23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
Disadvantages:
No Significant DisadvantagesCanon PowerShot G9 X Mark II for Sports Photography
Advantages:
- No View Finder
Disadvantages:
- Slow Continuous Shooting (8.2 fps)
- No Environmental Sealing
- Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/2000s)
- Bad Low Light ISO (522)
- Small battery life (235 shots)
- Small size (98 x 58 x 31 mm)
Ricoh GR III for Sports Photography
Advantages:
No Significant Advantages
Disadvantages:
- Slow Continuous Shooting ( fps)
- No Environmental Sealing
- Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
- Bad Max Native ISO (0)
- Small size (109 x 62 x 33 mm)
Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II for Daily Photography
Advantages:
- Small weight (206 g)
- Small size (98 x 58 x 31 mm)
- Built-in Flash
- Live View
- Wireless Connectivity
- Video is available
Disadvantages:
- Small 1" (13.2 x 8.8 mm) sensor
- No Built-in View Finder
Ricoh GR III for Daily Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
- Small weight (257 g)
- Built-in View Finder
- Live View
- Wireless Connectivity
- Video is available
Disadvantages:
- No Built-in Flash
Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II for Landscape Photography
Advantages:
- Good Dynamic Range (12.5)
- Live View
- RAW Support
Disadvantages:
- Small 1" (13.2 x 8.8 mm) sensor
- Low resolution sensor (20 MP)
- No Environmental Sealing
- Bad Low Light ISO (522)
Ricoh GR III for Landscape Photography
Advantages:
- Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
- High resolution sensor (24 MP)
- Live View
- RAW Support
Disadvantages:
- No Environmental Sealing
- Bad Max Native ISO (0)
Comparison of Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II vs Ricoh GR III: Final Verdict
Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II or Ricoh GR III, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.
What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II and Ricoh GR III here is what we can say in conclusion:
According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II deserves a higher Total Score than the Ricoh GR III. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.
Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II vs Ricoh GR III Table Of Technical Specs
For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:
| Canon PowerShot G9 X Mark II | Ricoh GR III | |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Brand | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model | PowerShot G9 X Mark II | GR III |
| Announced | Jan 04, 2017 | Sep 25, 2018 |
| Body Type | Compact | Large sensor compact |
| Sensor | ||
| Sensor Type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor Size | 1" | APS-C |
| Sensor Dimensions | 13.2 x 8.8 mm | 23.5 x 15.6 mm |
| Sensor Area | 116.16 mm2 | 366.60 mm2 |
| Sensor Resolution | 20.0 MP | 24.0 MP |
| Max Image Resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Max Native ISO | 12,800 | 0 |
| Max Boosted ISO | n/a | n/a |
| Min Native ISO | 125 | 0 |
| RAW Support |  |
|
| Lens | ||
| Manual Focus | |
|
| Lens Mount | Fixed lens | Fixed lens |
| Number of Lenses | n/a | n/a |
| Focal Length Multiplier | n/a | n/a |
| Macro Focus Range | 5 | 6 |
| AutoFocus | ||
| AF Touch | |
|
| AF Continuous | |
|
| AF Single | |
|
| AF Tracking | |
|
| AF Selective | |
|
| AF Center | |
|
| AF Multi Area | |
|
| AF Live View | |
|
| AF Face Detection | |
|
| AF Contrast Detection | |
|
| AF Phase Detection |  |
|
| Number of Focus Points | n/a | n/a |
| Number of Cross Focus Points | n/a | n/a |
| Screen | ||
| Screen Type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen Size | 3″ | 3″ |
| Screen Resolution | 1,040k dots | 1,037k dots |
| Live View | |
|
| Touch Screen | |
|
| ViewFinder | ||
| ViewFinder | Optical (optional) | |
| ViewFinder Resolution | 0k dots | 0k dots |
| ViewFinder Coverage | % | % |
| ViewFinder Magnification | ||
| Photography Features | ||
| Min Shutter Speed | 30 s | 30 s |
| Max Shutter Speed | 1/2000 s | 1/4000 s |
| Continuous Shooting | 8.2 fps | fps |
| Shutter Priority | |
|
| Aperture Priority | |
|
| Manual Exposure Mode | |
|
| Exposure Compensation | |
|
| Custom White Balance | |
|
| Image Stabilization | |
|
| Built-in Flash | |
|
| Flash Range | 6 | 0 |
| Flash Modes | Auto, slow synchro | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye |
| External Flash | |
|
| AE Bracketing | |
|
| WB Bracketing | |
|
| Exposure Modes | ||
| Multi-Segment | |
|
| Average | |
|
| Spot | |
|
| Partial | |
|
| AF-Area | |
|
| Center Weighted | |
|
| Video Features | ||
| Video Resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max Video Resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 |
| Video Formats | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone Port | |
|
| Headphone Port | |
|
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless Connectivity | |
|
| HDMI | |
|
| USB | USB 2.0 | USB 1 |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental Sealing | |
|
| Water Proof | |
|
| Dust Proof | |
|
| Shock Proof | |
|
| Crush Proof | |
|
| Freeze Proof | |
|
| Weight | 206 g | 257 g |
| Physical Dimensions | 98 x 58 x 31 mm | 109 x 62 x 33 mm |
| Battery Life | 235 shots | n/a |
| Battery Type | Battery Pack | n/a |
| Battery Model | n/a | n/a |
| Other Features | ||
| Self Timer | |
|
| Timelapse Recording | |
|
| GPS | ||
| Storage Type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
| Storage Slots | 1 | 1 |
Most popular cameras
Four Thirds
Full frame
APS-C
Four Thirds
Four Thirds
