Canon IXUS 165 vs Nikon Coolpix P330

  • 1/2.3"
  • 20 megapixels
  • Fixed lens
  • 43
    Overall
  • 5
    Imaging
  • 24
    Features
  • 92
    Size
  • 100
    Price
  • 1/1.7"
  • 12 megapixels
  • Fixed lens
  • 50
    Overall
  • 18
    Imaging
  • 37
    Features
  • 86
    Size
  • 1
    Price

Canon IXUS 165 vs Nikon Coolpix P330: a Complete Review and Comparison

Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!

In this review, we are going to make a detailed comparison of two cameras that fall into different categories. While the first model we are looking at, Canon IXUS 165 belongs to a Ultracompact category, the other model, Canon IXUS 165 is a Small Sensor Compact camera. Both models feature different types of sensors. Thus, Canon IXUS 165 comes with CCD sensor that has a resolution of 20.0 MP resolution, while our second compared model Nikon Coolpix P330 features a 12.0 MP BSI-CMOS sensor.

To get started, let’s take a look at some of the key features of Canon IXUS 165 and Nikon Coolpix P330 and, after this, we can go on to our detailed comparison of these models.

Canon IXUS 165 Key Features:

  • 20.0 MP 1/2.3" CCD sensor
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Image Stabilization: Yes
  • 2.7″ Fixed Type Screen
  • ViewFinder: No
  • 0.8 fps Continuous Shooting
  • Video: 1280 x 720 (25p), 640 x 480 (30p)
  • Built-in Wireless: No
  • Dimensions: 95 x 54 x 22 mm
  • Weight: 128 g
  • Environmental Sealing: No
  • Built-in GPS: No

Nikon Coolpix P330 Key Features:

  • 12.0 MP 1/1.7" BSI-CMOS sensor
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Image Stabilization: Yes
  • 3″ Fixed Type Screen
  • ViewFinder: No
  • 10.0 fps Continuous Shooting
  • Video: 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720p (30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25fps)
  • Built-in Wireless: Yes
  • Dimensions: 103 x 58 x 32 mm
  • Weight: 200 g
  • Environmental Sealing: No
  • Built-in GPS: Yes
  • Replaced Nikon P310.
  • Replaced by Nikon .

Why is Canon IXUS 165 a better choice than Nikon Coolpix P330

Sensor Resolution 20.0 MP vs 12.0 MP 40% more pixels
Battery Life 220 shots vs 200 shots 20 more frames with a single charge
Weight 128 g vs 200 g 72 g lighter

What are the key reasons to pick Nikon Coolpix P330 over Canon IXUS 165

Wireless Connectivity Optional vs No Better connectivity
Gps Built-in vs No Has GPS
Sensor Area 41.52 mm2 vs 28.07 mm2 32.4% larger pixel area
Raw Support Yes vs No Better image quality
Manual Exposure Mode Yes vs No Has Manual Exposure Mode
Continuous Shooting 10 fps vs 0.8 fps 9.2 fps faster
Flash Range 6.5 vs 3 3.5 better flash range
Max Shutter Speed 1/4000 vs 1/2000 Faster shutter speed
Screen Size 3″ vs 2.7″ 0.3" larger screen
Screen Resolution 921k dots vs 230k dots 75% higher resolution screen
Max Video Resolution 1920 x 1080 vs 1280 x 720 Higher Resolution Video

Key PROs of Canon IXUS 165 and Nikon Coolpix P330

AutoFocus Face Detection Yes | Yes Very handy for portraits
Built-In Flash Yes | Yes External flash available
Image Stabilization Yes | Yes Built-in stabilization

Key CONs of Canon IXUS 165 and Nikon Coolpix P330

Touch Screen No | No No touch screen
Screen Resolution 230k dots | 921k dots Small screen resolution
Screen Type Fixed Type | Fixed Type No flexible viewing angles
Viewfinder No | No No ViewFinder
Sensor Resolution 20.0 MP | 12.0 MP Small sensor resolution
Microphone Port No | No No microphone port
Headphone Port No | No No headphone port
Timelapse Recording No | No No timelapse recording
External Flash Shoe No | No No Flash Shoe
Environmental Sealing No | No No environmental sealing
Battery Life 220 shots | 200 shots Low battery life

Canon IXUS 165 vs Nikon Coolpix P330: Comparing Two Models By Physical Characteristics

Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Canon IXUS 165 and Nikon Coolpix P330 from the front view.

Canon IXUS 165
Nikon Coolpix P330
HTML
BB

Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.

Canon IXUS 165
Nikon Coolpix P330
HTML
BB

After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.

Speaking of weight, Canon IXUS 165 is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 72g less than the Nikon Coolpix P330. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.

Comparing Canon IXUS 165 and Nikon Coolpix P330 by the type of Sensor and Resolution

Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.

Are Canon IXUS 165 and Nikon Coolpix P330 any different in terms of sensor type?

In fact, that's exactly what makes these two models really different. Thus, it is a good point to consider if your are choosing between these two cameras. Canon IXUS 165 features a 20.0 MP 1/2.3" sized CCD sensor . Nikon Coolpix P330, in its turn, comes with a 12.0 MP 1/1.7" sized BSI-CMOS sensor , which makes it significantly different from the first model.

Take a look below to find the comparison of Canon IXUS 165 and Nikon Coolpix P330 by the size of their sensors.

Canon IXUS 165
Nikon Coolpix P330
HTML
BB

One more distinctive feature of compared models is the sensor size. Nikon Coolpix P330 is equipped with a sensor that is 0.7x larger than the one featured in Canon IXUS 165. Compared to the cameras with smaller sensor area, the ones with larger sensors ensure more control on the blurry background and depth of field if you shoot in the same aperture and focal length. Thus, the first model has a significant advantage here.

For Which Fields Of Photography Are Canon IXUS 165 and Nikon Coolpix P330 Suitable?

If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.

This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Canon IXUS 165 and Nikon Coolpix P330 in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.

Photography Type Canon IXUS 165 Nikon Coolpix P330
Portrait Photography
78%
21%
Street Photography
24%
46%
Sports Photography
28%
33%
Daily Photography
24%
32%
Landscape Photography
46%
65%

Canon IXUS 165 for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

  • Canon is famous with its skintones
  • Image Stabilization
  • Face Detection Focusing

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor

Nikon Coolpix P330 for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

  • Image Stabilization
  • Face Detection Focusing

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm) sensor
  • You might not like Nikon skintone

Canon IXUS 165 for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Small size (95 x 54 x 22 mm)
  • Live View
  • Image Stabilization

Disadvantages:

  • No Built-in View Finder
  • Small 1/2.3"(6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
  • Small Number of autofocus Points (9)

Nikon Coolpix P330 for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Small size (103 x 58 x 32 mm)
  • Live View
  • Image Stabilization

Disadvantages:

  • No Built-in View Finder
  • Small 1/1.7"(7.44 x 5.58 mm) sensor

Canon IXUS 165 for Sports Photography

Advantages:

  • No View Finder

Disadvantages:

  • Slow Continuous Shooting (0.8 fps)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/2000s)
  • Smal Number of autofocus Points (9)
  • Bad Max Native ISO (1600)
  • Small battery life (220 shots)
  • Small size (95 x 54 x 22 mm)

Nikon Coolpix P330 for Sports Photography

Advantages:

  • No View Finder

Disadvantages:

  • Slow Continuous Shooting (10.0 fps)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
  • Small Number of CrossFocus Points (0)
  • Bad Low Light ISO (213)
  • Small battery life (200 shots)
  • Small size (103 x 58 x 32 mm)

Canon IXUS 165 for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Small weight (128 g)
  • Small size (95 x 54 x 22 mm)
  • Built-in Flash
  • Live View
  • Video is available

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
  • No Built-in View Finder

Nikon Coolpix P330 for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Small weight (200 g)
  • Small size (103 x 58 x 32 mm)
  • Built-in Flash
  • Wireless Connectivity
  • Video is available

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm) sensor
  • No Built-in View Finder

Canon IXUS 165 for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Live View

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
  • Low resolution sensor (20 MP)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • No RAW Support
  • Bad Max Native ISO (1600)

Nikon Coolpix P330 for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Good Dynamic Range (11.7)
  • RAW Support

Disadvantages:

  • Small 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm) sensor
  • Low resolution sensor (12 MP)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Bad Low Light ISO (213)

Comparison of Canon IXUS 165 vs Nikon Coolpix P330: Final Verdict

Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Canon IXUS 165 or Nikon Coolpix P330, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.

What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Canon IXUS 165 and Nikon Coolpix P330 here is what we can say in conclusion:

According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Nikon Coolpix P330 deserves a higher Total Score than the Canon IXUS 165. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.

Canon IXUS 165 vs Nikon Coolpix P330 Table Of Technical Specs

For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:

Canon IXUS 165 Nikon Coolpix P330
General
Brand Canon Nikon
Model IXUS 165 Coolpix P330
Announced Jan 06, 2015 Mar 04, 2013
Body Type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor
Sensor Type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor Size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor Dimensions 6.17 x 4.55 mm 7.44 x 5.58 mm
Sensor Area 28.07 mm2 41.52 mm2
Sensor Resolution 20.0 MP 12.0 MP
Max Image Resolution 5152 x 3864 4000 x 3000
Max Native ISO 1,600 12,800
Max Boosted ISO n/a n/a
Min Native ISO 100 100
RAW Support No Yes
Lens
Manual Focus No Yes
Lens Mount Fixed lens Fixed lens
Number of Lenses n/a n/a
Focal Length Multiplier n/a n/a
Macro Focus Range 1 3
AutoFocus
AF Touch No No
AF Continuous Yes No
AF Single Yes No
AF Tracking Yes Yes
AF Selective No No
AF Center Yes Yes
AF Multi Area No Yes
AF Live View Yes No
AF Face Detection Yes Yes
AF Contrast Detection Yes Yes
AF Phase Detection No No
Number of Focus Points 9 n/a
Number of Cross Focus Points n/a 0
Screen
Screen Type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen Size 2.7″ 3″
Screen Resolution 230k dots 921k dots
Live View Yes Yes
Touch Screen No No
ViewFinder
ViewFinder
ViewFinder Resolution 0k dots 0k dots
ViewFinder Coverage % %
ViewFinder Magnification
Photography Features
Min Shutter Speed 15 s 60 s
Max Shutter Speed 1/2000 s 1/4000 s
Continuous Shooting 0.8 fps 10.0 fps
Shutter Priority No Yes
Aperture Priority No Yes
Manual Exposure Mode No Yes
Exposure Compensation No Yes
Custom White Balance Yes Yes
Image Stabilization Yes Yes
Built-in Flash Yes Yes
Flash Range 3 6.5
Flash Modes Auto, slow synchro
External Flash No No
AE Bracketing No Yes
WB Bracketing No Yes
Exposure Modes
Multi-Segment Yes Yes
Average No No
Spot Yes Yes
Partial No No
AF-Area No Yes
Center Weighted Yes Yes
Video Features
Video Resolutions 1280 x 720 (25p), 640 x 480 (30p) 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720p (30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25fps)
Max Video Resolution 1280 x 720 1920 x 1080
Video Formats MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone Port No No
Headphone Port No No
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity No Yes
HDMI No No
USB USB 2.0 USB 2.0
Physical
Environmental Sealing No No
Water Proof No No
Dust Proof No No
Shock Proof No No
Crush Proof No No
Freeze Proof No No
Weight 128 g 200 g
Physical Dimensions 95 x 54 x 22 mm 103 x 58 x 32 mm
Battery Life 220 shots 200 shots
Battery Type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery Model NB-11L/LH EN-EL12
Other Features
Self Timer Yes Yes
Timelapse Recording No No
GPS Built-in
Storage Type SD/SDHC/SDXC card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage Slots 1 1

Most popular cameras

Fujifilm X-T3 26.0 MP BSI-CMOS
APS-C
Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 20.0 MP CMOS
Four Thirds
Nikon D610 24.0 MP CMOS
Full frame
Sony Alpha A7S 12.0 MP CMOS
Full frame
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV 30.0 MP CMOS
Full frame