Canon EOS M50 vs Sony Alpha a6400

  • APS-C
  • 24 megapixels
  • Canon EF-M
  • 48
    Overall
  • 20
    Imaging
  • 61
    Features
  • 76
    Size
  • 0
    Price
  • APS-C
  • 24 megapixels
  • Sony E
  • 52
    Overall
  • 25
    Imaging
  • 76
    Features
  • 78
    Size
  • 0
    Price

Canon EOS M50 vs Sony Alpha a6400: a Complete Review and Comparison

Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!

In this review, we are going to make a detailed comparison of two cameras that fall into different categories. While the first model we are looking at, Canon EOS M50 belongs to a Entry-Level Mirrorless category, the other model, Canon EOS M50 is a Semi-Pro Mirrorless camera. One of the key common traits of both cameras we are looking at is sensor. Both Canon EOS M50 and Sony Alpha a6400, are equipped with the same 24.0 MP CMOS sensors.

To get started, let’s take a look at some of the key features of Canon EOS M50 and Sony Alpha a6400 and, after this, we can go on to our detailed comparison of these models.

Canon EOS M50 Key Features:

  • 24.0 MP APS-C CMOS sensor
  • ISO 100 - 25600 (Expands to 51200)
  • Image Stabilization: No
  • 3″ Fully Articulated Screen
  • ViewFinder: Yes
  • 10.0 fps Continuous Shooting
  • Video: 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC
  • Built-in Wireless: Yes
  • Dimensions: 116 x 88 x 59 mm
  • Weight: 390 g
  • Environmental Sealing: No
  • Built-in GPS: No

Sony Alpha a6400 Key Features:

  • 24.0 MP APS-C CMOS sensor
  • ISO 100 - 32000 (Expands to 102800)
  • Image Stabilization: No
  • 3″ Tilting Screen
  • ViewFinder: Yes
  • 11.0 fps Continuous Shooting
  • Video: 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM
  • Built-in Wireless: Yes
  • Dimensions: 120 x 67 x 60 mm
  • Weight: 403 g
  • Environmental Sealing: Yes
  • Built-in GPS: No

Why is Canon EOS M50 a better choice than Sony Alpha a6400

Screen Type Fully Articulated vs Tilting Flexible shooting positions
Screen Resolution 1,040k dots vs 922k dots 11.3% higher resolution screen
Weight 390 g vs 403 g 13 g lighter
Viewfinder Resolution 2,360k dots vs 2,359k dots 0% higher resolution

What are the key reasons to pick Sony Alpha a6400 over Canon EOS M50

NFC Yes vs No Easy wireless connectivity with compatible devices
Sensor Area 366.6 mm2 vs 332.27 mm2 9.4% larger pixel area
Continuous Shooting 11 fps vs 10 fps 1 fps faster
Flash Range 6 vs 5 1 better flash range
Number Of Focus Points 425 vs 143 282 more focus points
Battery Life 410 shots vs 235 shots 175 more frames with a single charge
Environmental Sealing Yes vs No Shoot at tough conditions
Viewfinder Magnification 0.7 vs No 0.7 better magnification

Key PROs of Canon EOS M50 and Sony Alpha a6400

Touch Screen Yes | Yes Easy control of camera functions
Screen Size 3″ | 3″ Large display
Screen Type Fully Articulated | Tilting Help viewing and changing settings easily
Viewfinder Electronic | Electronic Better framing and control
Raw Support Yes | Yes Better image quality
Sensor Resolution 24.0 MP | 24.0 MP Bigger prints and more details
AutoFocus Face Detection Yes | Yes Very handy for portraits
Microphone Port Yes | Yes High quality audio recording option
Timelapse Recording Yes | Yes Creative shooting
Bracketing Yes | Yes Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR
Continuous Shooting 10.0 fps | 11.0 fps Nice continuous shooting
Built-In Flash Yes | Yes External flash available
Flash Sync Port Yes | Yes Port for Flash Sync

Key CONs of Canon EOS M50 and Sony Alpha a6400

Headphone Port No | No No headphone port
Image Stabilization No | No No image stabilization

Canon EOS M50 vs Sony Alpha a6400: Comparing Two Models By Physical Characteristics

Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Canon EOS M50 and Sony Alpha a6400 from the front view.

Canon EOS M50
Sony Alpha a6400
HTML
BB

Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.

Canon EOS M50
Sony Alpha a6400
HTML
BB

After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.

Speaking of weight, Canon EOS M50 is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 13g less than the Sony Alpha a6400. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.

Comparing Canon EOS M50 and Sony Alpha a6400 by the type of Sensor and Resolution

Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.

Are Canon EOS M50 and Sony Alpha a6400 any different in terms of sensor type?

In terms of sensor type and resolution, these models are identical. Both Canon EOS M50 and Sony Alpha a6400 come equipped with the same CMOS that has a resolution of 24.0 MP. Thus, if you are wondering, which option to choose, this is not a factor you should be looking at.

Take a look below to find the comparison of Canon EOS M50 and Sony Alpha a6400 by the size of their sensors.

Canon EOS M50
Sony Alpha a6400
HTML
BB

Canon EOS M50 and Sony Alpha a6400 are identical by this indicator, as each feature a sensor of the same size. Thus, both cameras will provide the same level of control in terms of the depth of field if you use them with the same focal length and aperture.

For Which Fields Of Photography Are Canon EOS M50 and Sony Alpha a6400 Suitable?

If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.

This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Canon EOS M50 and Sony Alpha a6400 in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.

Photography Type Canon EOS M50 Sony Alpha a6400
Portrait Photography
95%
88%
Street Photography
94%
82%
Sports Photography
91%
98%
Daily Photography
12%
54%
Landscape Photography
86%
97%

Canon EOS M50 for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (22.3 x 14.9 mm) sensor
  • High resolution sensor (24 MP)
  • Canon is famous with its skintones
  • Face Detection Focusing

Disadvantages:

  • No Image Stabilization

Sony Alpha a6400 for Portrait Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
  • High resolution sensor (24 MP)
  • Face Detection Focusing

Disadvantages:

  • No Image Stabilization

Canon EOS M50 for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Fully Articulated Screen
  • Large APS-C(22.3 x 14.9 mm) sensor

Disadvantages:

  • Big size (116 x 88 x 59 mm)
  • No Image Stabilization

Sony Alpha a6400 for Street Photography

Advantages:

  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Large APS-C(23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor

Disadvantages:

  • Big size (120 x 67 x 60 mm)
  • No Image Stabilization

Canon EOS M50 for Sports Photography

Advantages:

  • Big Number of autofocus Points (143)

Disadvantages:

  • Slow Continuous Shooting (10.0 fps)
  • No Environmental Sealing
  • Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
  • Small battery life (235 shots)

Sony Alpha a6400 for Sports Photography

Advantages:

  • Fast Continuous Shooting (11.0 fps)
  • Environmental Sealing
  • Big Number of autofocus Points (425)

Disadvantages:

  • Slow Max Shutter Speed (1/4000s)
  • Small battery life (410 shots)

Canon EOS M50 for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (22.3 x 14.9 mm) sensor
  • Built-in Flash
  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Wireless Connectivity
  • Video is available

Disadvantages:

  • Big size (116 x 88 x 59 mm)

Sony Alpha a6400 for Daily Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
  • Built-in Flash
  • Built-in View Finder
  • Live View
  • Wireless Connectivity
  • Video is available

Disadvantages:

  • Big weight (403 g)
  • Big size (120 x 67 x 60 mm)

Canon EOS M50 for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (22.3 x 14.9 mm) sensor
  • High resolution sensor (24 MP)
  • Live View
  • RAW Support

Disadvantages:

  • No Environmental Sealing

Sony Alpha a6400 for Landscape Photography

Advantages:

  • Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
  • High resolution sensor (24 MP)
  • Good Dynamic Range (13.6)
  • Environmental Sealing
  • Live View
  • RAW Support

Disadvantages:

No Significant Disadvantages

Comparison of Canon EOS M50 vs Sony Alpha a6400: Final Verdict

Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Canon EOS M50 or Sony Alpha a6400, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.

What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Canon EOS M50 and Sony Alpha a6400 here is what we can say in conclusion:

According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Sony Alpha a6400 deserves a higher Total Score than the Canon EOS M50. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.

Canon EOS M50 vs Sony Alpha a6400 Table Of Technical Specs

For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:

Canon EOS M50 Sony Alpha a6400
General
Brand Canon Sony
Model EOS M50 Alpha a6400
Announced Feb 26, 2018 Jan 15, 2019
Body Type SLR-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor
Sensor Type CMOS CMOS
Sensor Size APS-C APS-C
Sensor Dimensions 22.3 x 14.9 mm 23.5 x 15.6 mm
Sensor Area 332.27 mm2 366.60 mm2
Sensor Resolution 24.0 MP 24.0 MP
Max Image Resolution 6000 x 4000 6000 x 4000
Max Native ISO 25,600 32,000
Max Boosted ISO 51,200 102,800
Min Native ISO 100 100
RAW Support Yes Yes
Lens
Manual Focus Yes Yes
Lens Mount Canon EF-M Sony E
Number of Lenses 16 102
Focal Length Multiplier 1.6x 1.5x
Macro Focus Range
AutoFocus
AF Touch Yes Yes
AF Continuous Yes Yes
AF Single Yes Yes
AF Tracking Yes Yes
AF Selective Yes Yes
AF Center Yes Yes
AF Multi Area Yes Yes
AF Live View Yes Yes
AF Face Detection Yes Yes
AF Contrast Detection Yes Yes
AF Phase Detection Yes Yes
Number of Focus Points 143 425
Number of Cross Focus Points n/a n/a
Screen
Screen Type Fully Articulated Tilting
Screen Size 3″ 3″
Screen Resolution 1,040k dots 922k dots
Live View Yes Yes
Touch Screen Yes Yes
ViewFinder
ViewFinder Electronic Electronic
ViewFinder Resolution 2,360k dots 2,359k dots
ViewFinder Coverage 100% 100%
ViewFinder Magnification 0.7
Photography Features
Min Shutter Speed 30 s 30 s
Max Shutter Speed 1/4000 s 1/4000 s
Continuous Shooting 10.0 fps 11.0 fps
Shutter Priority Yes Yes
Aperture Priority Yes Yes
Manual Exposure Mode Yes Yes
Exposure Compensation Yes Yes
Custom White Balance Yes Yes
Image Stabilization No No
Built-in Flash Yes Yes
Flash Range 5 6
Flash Modes auto, slow sync, rear sync, redeye reduction, wireless, hi-speed sync
External Flash Yes Yes
AE Bracketing Yes Yes
WB Bracketing No Yes
Exposure Modes
Multi-Segment Yes Yes
Average No Yes
Spot Yes Yes
Partial No No
AF-Area No No
Center Weighted No No
Video Features
Video Resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM
Max Video Resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
Video Formats MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone Port Yes Yes
Headphone Port No No
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity Yes Yes
HDMI Yes Yes
USB USB USB 2.0
Physical
Environmental Sealing No Yes
Water Proof No No
Dust Proof No No
Shock Proof No No
Crush Proof No No
Freeze Proof No No
Weight 390 g 403 g
Physical Dimensions 116 x 88 x 59 mm 120 x 67 x 60 mm
Battery Life 235 shots 410 shots
Battery Type Built-in Battery Pack
Battery Model n/a NP-FW50
Other Features
Self Timer Yes Yes
Timelapse Recording Yes Yes
GPS
Storage Type SD/SDHC/SDXC slot (UHS-I compatible) SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick DUO (UHS-I compliant)
Storage Slots 1 1

Most popular cameras

Pentax K-5 II 16.0 MP CMOS
APS-C
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH3 16.0 MP CMOS
Four Thirds
Olympus OM-D E-M10 16.0 MP CMOS
Four Thirds
Pentax K-5 IIs 16.0 MP CMOS
APS-C
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 16.0 MP CMOS
Four Thirds