Are you looking for the best camera to suit your needs? Due to a wide range of options, making a wise and weighted decision can be rather challenging. Which specs to keep in mind? What are the key pros and cons of each model? This comparison should give some helpful hints!
The goal of this overview is to provide a detailed comparison of two popular camera models introduced by the same brand - Canon. Although both products are offered by the same brand, they come from different categories. Thus, Canon, is a camera from Entry-Level DSLR category, while EOS 6D Mark II is a Semi-Pro DSLR camera. Both products that we are going to review are equipped with the same type of sensor - CMOS. However, they have different resolution. The first compared model, Canon EOS 4000D, features has a resolution of 18.0 MP. Another model that we are reviewing, Canon EOS 6D Mark II, features a sensor with a resolution of 26.0 MP.
Now, before we can move on to our comparison, let's take a moment to look at the key characteristics of Canon EOS 4000D and Canon EOS 6D Mark II.
Canon EOS 4000D Key Features:
Canon EOS 6D Mark II Key Features:
|Built-In Flash||Yes vs No||All the lenses are stabilized|
|Flash Range||9.2 vs No||9.2 better flash range|
|Weight||436 g vs 765 g||329 g lighter|
|NFC||Yes vs No||Easy wireless connectivity with compatible devices|
|Bluetooth||Yes vs No||Connect your camera to other devices via Bluetooth|
|Gps||Built-in vs No||Has GPS|
|Timelapse Recording||Yes vs No||Creative shooting|
|Sensor Resolution||26.0 MP vs 18.0 MP||30.8% more pixels|
|Sensor Area||861.6 mm2 vs 332.27 mm2||61.4% larger pixel area|
|Image Stabilization||Yes vs No||All lenses are stabilized|
|Continuous Shooting||6.5 fps vs 3 fps||3.5 fps faster|
|Number Of Focus Points||45 vs 9||36 more focus points|
|Screen Size||3″ vs 2.7″||0.3" larger screen|
|Screen Type||Fully Articulated vs Fixed Type||Flexible shooting positions|
|Screen Resolution||1,040k dots vs 230k dots||77.9% higher resolution screen|
|Touch Screen||Yes vs No||Easy control of camera functions|
|Battery Life||1200 shots vs 500 shots||700 more frames with a single charge|
|Environmental Sealing||Yes vs No||Shoot at tough conditions|
|Viewfinder||Optical (pentaprism) vs Optical (pentamirror)||Better framing and control|
|Viewfinder Magnification||0.71 vs No||0.71 better magnification|
|Viewfinder||Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentaprism)||Better framing and control|
|Raw Support||Yes | Yes||Better image quality|
|AutoFocus Face Detection||Yes | Yes||Very handy for portraits|
|Bracketing||Yes | Yes||Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR|
|Flash Sync Port||Yes | Yes||Port for Flash Sync|
|Battery Life||500 shots | 1200 shots||Big number of frames with a single charge|
|Continuous Shooting||3.0 fps | 6.5 fps||Low continuous shooting|
Before heading straight to the technical characteristics of each model, let’s start with comparing their physical specs. Let’s start with looking at the physical difference of the two products. Below are images that clearly show the sizes of Canon EOS 4000D and Canon EOS 6D Mark II from the front view.
Now, let’s go on and see how the reviewed models are different or similar by the top view.
After looking at these images, you should get a clear idea of each model’s dimensions and how they are different from each other. However, we are not going to stop there. The next characteristic worth looking at is the weight. Of course, not every photographer is concerned about the weight, for example, it wouldn't be a decisive point for those who shoot in a studio. However, it is still an important factor because if you happen to go on a long photo session or just love having the camera with you wherever you go, you want to be sure that the chosen model isn't too heavy.
Speaking of weight, Canon EOS 4000D is a lighter option of these two, as it weights 329g less than the Canon EOS 6D Mark II. This difference, in fact, can become a significant disadvantage for the photographers, who prefer to have their cameras with them wherever they go.
Sensor is, without a doubt, the most significant element of every digital camera. Its type, size, and resolution are the factors that define the quality of future shots. Thus, it is barely possible to pick a suitable camera without looking at these specs.
Are Canon EOS 4000D and Canon EOS 6D Mark II any different in terms of sensor type?
In fact, that's exactly what makes these two models really different. Thus, it is a good point to consider if your are choosing between these two cameras. Canon EOS 4000D features a 18.0 MP APS-C sized CMOS sensor . Canon EOS 6D Mark II, in its turn, comes with a 26.0 MP Full frame sized CMOS sensor , which makes it significantly different from the first model.
Take a look below to find the comparison of Canon EOS 4000D and Canon EOS 6D Mark II by the size of their sensors.
One more distinctive feature of compared models is the sensor size. Canon EOS 6D Mark II is equipped with a sensor that is 0.4x larger than the one featured in Canon EOS 4000D. Compared to the cameras with smaller sensor area, the ones with larger sensors ensure more control on the blurry background and depth of field if you shoot in the same aperture and focal length. Thus, the first model has a significant advantage here.
If you are interested in photography or has made a career in this field, you should know that different types of shooting actually require different camera characteristics. While one model can produce outstanding portraits, at the same time, it can be terrible for shooting landscapes, and so on. Thus, before you purchase a specific camera, it is vital to decide, which type of shooting you do most often and consider an option that suits it the most.
This section of our comparison is devoted to the performance of Canon EOS 4000D and Canon EOS 6D Mark II in different fields of photography. Here we are going to look at the five main areas and evaluate how well each of the reviewed models performs in them. This will help you choose an option that suits your needs the most depending on your interest in one or several of these fields.
|Photography Type||Canon EOS 4000D||Canon EOS 6D Mark II|
Disadvantages:No Significant Disadvantages
Disadvantages:No Significant Disadvantages
Hopefully, our detailed overview of these models has helped you consider all the main specs, pros and cons of each cameras. Maybe, after reading this comparison, some of you have already decided which option to opt for depending on your needs and preferences. However, if you are still wondering which option is a better choice, Canon EOS 4000D or Canon EOS 6D Mark II, below you can see what scores each of them received in five different aspects. To wrap up, we have used our unique Decision Algorithm that assesses different camera models upon 63 different factors including their price, and, if possible, DxO Mark scores. This algorithm allows us to make our verdict more consistent and objective.
What is our final verdict? Based on our comparison and the final scores of Canon EOS 4000D and Canon EOS 6D Mark II here is what we can say in conclusion:
According all the factors that we considered in the process of comparing these two cameras, Canon EOS 6D Mark II deserves a higher Total Score than the Canon EOS 4000D. Thus, if you are choosing between these options, we would recommend you to choose the first model over the other one.
For better understanding of each model’s technical characteristics, find the detailed comparison below:
|Canon EOS 4000D||Canon EOS 6D Mark II|
|Model||EOS 4000D||EOS 6D Mark II|
|Announced||Feb 26, 2018||Jun 29, 2017|
|Body Type||Compact SLR||Mid-size SLR|
|Sensor Size||APS-C||Full frame|
|Sensor Dimensions||22.3 x 14.9 mm||35.9 x 24 mm|
|Sensor Area||332.27 mm2||861.60 mm2|
|Sensor Resolution||18.0 MP||26.0 MP|
|Max Image Resolution||5184 x 3456||6240 x 4160|
|Max Native ISO||6,400||40,000|
|Max Boosted ISO||12,800||102,400|
|Min Native ISO||100||100|
|Lens Mount||Canon EF/EF-S||Canon EF|
|Number of Lenses||304||256|
|Focal Length Multiplier||1.6x||1x|
|Macro Focus Range|
|AF Multi Area|
|AF Live View|
|AF Face Detection|
|AF Contrast Detection|
|AF Phase Detection|
|Number of Focus Points||9||45|
|Number of Cross Focus Points||n/a||45|
|Screen Type||Fixed Type||Fully Articulated|
|Screen Resolution||230k dots||1,040k dots|
|ViewFinder||Optical (pentamirror)||Optical (pentaprism)|
|ViewFinder Resolution||0k dots||0k dots|
|Min Shutter Speed||30 s||30 s|
|Max Shutter Speed||1/4000 s||1/4000 s|
|Continuous Shooting||3.0 fps||6.5 fps|
|Manual Exposure Mode|
|Custom White Balance|
|Flash Modes||Auto, Red-eye||no built-in flash|
|Video Resolutions||n/a||1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC|
|Max Video Resolution||1920 x 1080|
|Video Formats||n/a||MPEG-4, H.264|
|USB||USB 2.0||USB 2.0|
|Weight||436 g||765 g|
|Physical Dimensions||129 x 102 x 77 mm||144 x 111 x 75 mm|
|Battery Life||500 shots||1200 shots|
|Battery Type||Battery Pack||Battery Pack|
|Storage Type||SD/SDHC/SDXC card||SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I compatible)|